Vikram Punathambekar wrote: If somebody does it, SO WHAT? Well said, yes, rape is not "encouraged" in India, but if somebody is doing it SO WHAT Vikram Punathambekar wrote: Now look here, you want an Indo-Pak flame war, this is not the place. Go to the Soapbox, crib against India, and mail me the link so I can join issue. This flame war is started by you and only by you. You are an Indian and you posted something against Pakistan here, and so it is better that you yourself take it away towards soapbox. Vikram Punathambekar wrote: The basic difference is that you're a theocratic state and religious fanatics; we're secular. Ahm..no we are not culturally similar. We daily slaughter cows, our national dresses are different than that of India. Alcohol is prohibitted e.t.c e.t.c Vikram Punathambekar wrote: We *don't* have girls going about in small dresses. We *don't* condone public mouth to mouth kissing. We *don't* promote hugging in public. Your media is portraying everything you said above. Have you ever seen a Bollywood film (which seems not in your case...aHem ||)

Steve Mayfield wrote: What's next. Next ?? humm,,, CIA chief reported that Syria and Iran are getting uranium from African countries so there should be regeime change ;P

JohnJ wrote: The action sounds like typical behaviour from a repressive regime, And what about the regime responsible for spreading the fake stories of Jessica ..... :mad:

First of all this is a personal decision of an educational institution and a 100% correct decision supported by majority of people. If your difinition of "modern society" is that boys and girls sit together in class room and and and learn such literature; then sorry we are not a "modern society" and are proud of that. I don't know why you people call a society a modern society in which men and women hugging and kissing each other in the public, reading sexual material together in class room and women wearing little dresses....:mad: No we don't want to be "modern". This could be "your" way to judge how much a society is a progressive society not ours. And yes have you ever been to Lahore. It is much safe and better than almost all your cities. See yourself what your own journalist saying in the last two lines of this document[^].

Firends i am having a problem and i like your advice in this regard. I would appreciate the non-MFC answer. I've a thread. The purpose of this thread is to read string from somewhere and then display it on the console. Lets call it thread A. So simple, so easy. I've two other threads. The purpose of these threads is to get some data from internet. Now, what i want is that the two threads getting data from internet should "send" the string to thread A, so that it can be displayed. But i don't want those two threads to block. And this is the problem. Of course two threads should write string somewhere and then thread A get those strings periodically. As such critical section is necessary which i like to prevent because as such there is a blocking. In order to overcome the problem i am using IO completion ports. But the problem is that IOCP is not available in Win9X family operating systems. So what you like to advice me.