Hello, sorry for my late answer. No, this code show only a single process. Try to open 2 or more SharpDevelop Instances and you'll see that you only get one of them. In the meantime I found a solution. First get the ThreadID with the Win32 API and then get the ProcessByID, this works.

Process is the framework class.

Is it possible to fill listview with an one or more dimensional array by using databinding method?

Both types, don't work with both ones.

Hi, Check the Win32 API for the "SetParent" command.

Process[] procList = Process.GetProcesses(); It seems VS 2005 (maybe 2003 too) is buggy related to this code. If I have opened windows already before I start my application , VS only show 1 of them. But if I activate a window, which isn't listet in the process array, VS finds it immediately. Anybody here with the same experience? Is "EnumWindows" from Win32 API the only solution?

Hello, I have a problem with this code. Signature error, but why? using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Text; using System.Runtime.InteropServices; using System.Windows.Forms; namespace EnumerateSingle { public struct EditStream { public long dwCookie; public long dwError; public Delegate pfnCallback; } class RichEditC { public const long WM_USER = 0x400; public const long EM_STREAMIN = (WM_USER + 73); public const long EM_STREAMOUT = (WM_USER + 74); public const long SF_TEXT = 0x1 ; public const long SF_RTF = 0x2; public const long SF_RTFNOOBJS = 0x3; public const long SF_TEXTIZED = 0x4; public const long SF_UNICODE = 0x10; public const long SF_USECODEPAGE = 0x20; public const long SF_NCRFORNONASCII = 0x40; public delegate long RTFCallback(long dwCookie, long pbBuff, long cb, long pcb); public string buffText; [DllImport("User32.dll")] public static extern long SendMessage(long hWnd, long wMsg, long wParam, ref EditStream lParam); [DllImport("User32.dll")] public static extern void CopyMemory(object Destination, object source, long length); public static long EditStreamCallback(long dwCookie, long pbBuff, long cb, long pcb) { StringBuilder buff = new StringBuilder((int)cb); switch(dwCookie) { case 999: { CopyMemory(buff, pbBuff, cb); pcb = cb; return 0; } default: { return -1; } } } } } And the Clientcode: private void button3_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { RichEditC.RTFCallback myRtfCallback = new RichEditC.RTFCallback(RichEditC.EditStreamCallback); EditStream es = new EditStream(); es.dwCookie = 999; es.pfnCallback = myRtfCallback; //Error------------------------------------------------------------------------> RichEditC.SendMessage(0x80524, RichEditC.EM_STREAMOUT, RichEditC.SF_TEXT, ref es); } public long FARPROC(long pfn) { return pfn;

Currently, I am trying to implement a COM into CF 2.0 I've already implemented and registered the DLL successfully. But I always get a "NotSupportedException": Type objType = Type.GetTypeFromProgID("MacroCOM.dll); object oAct = Activator.CreateInstance(oType); object[] parameter = new object[1]; parameter[0] = 5; //long objType.InvokeMember("MCOMConnector",BindingFlags.SetProperty, null, oAct, parameter); //this lines executes the error Any solutions there? TIA.

Hi peshkunta, After InvokeMember (new in .NET Framework 2.0) -> IsBusy = false IsOffline = false that's the problem (tested with your code above as check process) InvokeMember fire a method of the selected HTML element. I loaded a FORM tag and after submitting it, a new webpage is loaded again. But if I am in debugging mode and go to the line after InvokeMember I wait a moment and then it works, because the browser don't fire the flag immediately.

Hi Judah, thx for reply and this tip. But additionally this won't work with InvokeMember. After firing this code line the application doesn't recognize browser activity.

I am using this code for check webbrowser's activity while (wbr.ReadyState != WebBrowserReadyState.Complete) { Application.DoEvents(); } But when I am using heForm.InvokeMember("submit"); which submits a form on a webpage, ReadyState will not be activated or changed. Also the IsBusy flag doesn't change.

How can I check when Webbrosercontrol (VS 2005) has loaded the Page completely? IsBusy and the ControlState(Completed, Loading, Loaded ... the enum) - doesn't work

Currently, I am working on an OCR solution where a camera push video frames into the application. One task is template matching where I try to find a bitmap within a bitmap. 1)Is template matching worth the work related to performance (Resolution 1024x768 - 24 Bit)? 2)Are there any information or resources for this subject on the web? Google show only rare information about it. thx

Thanks, looks better. Additionally I works with permutation now.

Hi Leslie, Just so I understand, you're starting with a value of (00)01 and asking which keys have this value? The result in this case being $0002 and $0004? Yes. Christian suggestion leads into overhead within the recursion. It's impossible. Try to make a recursion with 800 items, and you need about 10 min to loop through. Yes, good idea ... but really time consuming (overhead) The problem: Give me all connectors and subconnectors for current item. Lets draw better example: $1 [0] $2 [1] $3 [1] $4 [2] Result: a) $1 - $2 - $3 and b) $1 - $3 for the first line a) search connectors for $1 - found $2 and $3 then loop through founded subconnectors $2 and $3 $2 has $4 as connector $3 has no further connectors next element in main loop is §2 $2 - $4 .... $4 has no more connectors

You are right. I never had problems with algorithms and data structures, but this problems sets boundaries.

OK, but I have still a problem with overhead. Look at this link and look at those trees. http://personal.vsnl.com/erwin/pruning.htm[^] Level 1 Level 2 and so on. My hashtable uses 4 levels and each node needs ALL nodes from the upper levels to check. Level 1 has 800 entries. Level 2 has 800x800 entries and so on, which makes me crazy.

Hi Chris, Thanks for reply. Values are not unique, so it's a little bit hard to realize that. The big problem is to check each key with all available keys (so keys^keys possibilities) to find connectors. Speed is really hard task.

I have a Hashtable with following values: [Key][Value] [$0001][1] [$0002][0] [$0003][1] [$0004][0] [$0005][0] [$0006][0] [$0007][1] [$0008][1] [$0009][1] [$0010][1] Now I need all Keys with value "1". It is possible to extract them without a for loop? My main problem is a recursion. This hashtable is used 4 times and I have to check each key. Hashtable contains ~800 entries, what means 800^4 possibilites. Big overhead. Simple example: [$0001][00] [$0002][01] [$0003][04] [$0004][01] [$0005][02] Recursion - check element and its connectors 1. 0001 - my for loop checks all connectors -> Result: 0002 and 0004 (because Key is 01). 2. now check the connectors for connectors (we have 0002 and 0004) 3. 0002 has 0005(key = 02) and so on ..... Is there a way for a fast progress in speed? Thanks for all tips.

Thx for reply, By using VS 2003, it seems that I have to use copy paste.