Mobile

Take a look at http://www.codeproject.com/useritems/CeMultiBarMenu.asp. Daniel ;) --------------------------- Never change a running system!

registry keys.

Aroogala wrote: 1. Would I need to go as far as socket programming to achieve this? If you are using Access databases on the desktop, there are only two ways to synchronize data: through ActiveSync, and the ADOCE filter. The first one is out of the question, and the second (described in this article[^]) is started from the desktop. If you want to start the synchronization process from the device, you will have to either implement it yourself or upgrade to SQL Server CE. Aroogala wrote: 2. Can ADOCE 3.1 object communicate directly with the desktop version of access? Unfortunately, no. Aroogala wrote: 3. Can I manipulate the filesystem of my desktop pc from a pocketPC app? I believe your only option for this is through a LAN connection. :~

ahh, thanks much! I was going nuts looking for this stuff.

Dear Friends, I got that i can not fix the starting address of the shared memory. Actually my problem is below. I am creating shared memory using CreateFileMapping(). By using the MapViewOfFile() i am creating a view for the shared memory i want. I want to create this view at my specified address always(ie how many times i call the MapViewOfFile() i want it to be created always at specified address). I can do that using lpBaseAddress parameter of MapViewOfFileEx(). But this function is not supported in Windows CE .NET. Can anybody suggest any alternative for this. Thanks and Best Regards, subramjobmail, 2003/07/02 (15:16 JST).

embeddedVersuS wrote: I have to create a .dll file that will encapsulate all the C++ functions necessary for my controls? Short answer: Yes.

Is it possible to handle these input messages from the stylus with PreTranslateMessage(MSG* pMsg) ? I have figured out, that if i use that function, i can handle the WM_LBUTTONDOWN message even if i click on the ListCtrl-window, and not only on the dialog box window. But now the problem is, that i have to know, which window in the dialog box is active and should be handled! Because the other Windows should be handled normal. And is it normal, that the selected item in a listbox is only changing, if you are clicking on it? With normal windows applications, you only have to tap on it and it's quite changing. Greetings, Frank

Ok, that works fine with AfxBeginThread and WaitForSingleObject (I just replaced these functions). Don't know why it didn't work with my method! Thanks a lot for your help ;)

Take a look at the following article Using Worker Threads. void CMyView::OnClose() { // ... determine if we want to shut down // ... for example, is the document modified? // ... if we don't want to shut down the view, // ... just return // If we get here, are are closing the view myWorkerThread->m\_bAutoDelete = FALSE; running = FALSE; WaitForSingleObject(myWorkerThread->m\_hThread, INFINITE); delete myWorkerThread; CView::OnClose(); // or whatever the superclass is } Daniel ;) --------------------------- Never change a running system!

Check my reply on PPCDN. Also, check the target CPU.

Thanks Jonas, After doing a little research I discovered that its not that the pointers are getting permanently "scrambled" as I first thought, but that it takes the WinCE operating system a few seconds after a resume to reinitialize the card (handles and pointers to the files that were open on the card). It probably depends on the make and model of the card, but my Kingston CF card took right around 5 seconds after a resume to kick in. If I waited those five seconds before entering data then all was well. So, here's what I did in the data entry loop: CWaitCursor wait; m_cFile.GetStatus(m_sFileName, m_rStatus); wait.~CWaitCursor(); Execution stops for 5+/- seconds on the GetStatus line until the card is initialized, then the waitcursor goes away and the user can continue. Once the card is initialized there is no perceptible delay in execution and the user doesn't see the waitcursor. Seems a little kludgy but it works. Anyone see a danger in doing this? majoob