Mobile

Hi, it seems like you are getting an error because you are not using the correct namespace or scope for cout. cout is defined within the std namespace, so you need to either use std::cout or add a using namespace std; directive before your main function. For example: #include using namespace std; int main() { cout << "Hello world"; return 0; } or #include int main() { std::cout << "Hello world"; return 0; } You can read more about namespaces and cout here:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/15359589/cout-is-not-a-member-of-std-cout-was-not-declared-in-this-scope[^], 'cout' was not declared in this scope [FIXED][^] or https://stackoverflow.com/questions/15185801/cout-was-not-declared-in-this-scope[^] Best regards, Mia from CodeIT

Yes, it is realistic to make money from a small mobile/tablet app. While the app market is highly competitive, many app developers have found success in generating revenue from their apps through various monetization strategies. One of the most common ways to make money from an app is through in-app advertising. This involves displaying ads within the app and earning revenue from clicks or impressions. Another popular monetization method is in-app purchases, where users can purchase premium features or content within the app. Additionally, some apps generate revenue through subscription models, where users pay a recurring fee for access to premium content or services. Other apps may charge a one-time fee for the app itself or offer a freemium model, where basic features are free but users can pay for additional features or content. Ultimately, the success of an app in generating revenue will depend on a variety of factors, including the quality and functionality of the app, the target audience, the competition in the app market,[^]innovative features and the chosen monetization strategy. However, with the right approach and execution, it is certainly possible to make money from a small mobile/tablet app.

I have read your question carefully. You should need to increase your connectivity by using a spectrum router. Best Router for Spectrum - Ultimate Top Buying Guide 2022[^]The Geek Cart has provided a lot of knowledge about it.

Use this formula for the cost calculation: hourly rate х number of hours spent = app design cost. For instance, if you need UI/UX app design close to Uber's and your designer charges $50 per hour x 246h (max design time) = $12,300 (UI/UX design of iOS and Android apps). You can read this guide about the [cost of designing an app]([https://www.cleveroad.com/blog/how-much-does-it-cost-to-design-a-mobile-app/\](https://www.cleveroad.com/blog/how-much-does-it-cost-to-design-a-mobile-app/)). Much depends on the region and application design requirements.

Possibly. As Greg said, he's had a lot of other non-trolling posts. Maybe it just needs Sean to have a word about some of his latest posts? "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

Not everyone is a smartass. This might help: https://melroselabs.com/docs/tutorials/sms/send-sms-with-smpp-using-csharp/ https://stackoverflow.com/questions/23607116/smpp-server-and-client-applications-c-sharp https://ozeki-sms-gateway.com/p_107-how-to-send-sms-from-c-sharp-with-smpp.html https://sourceforge.net/projects/easysmpp/

NB: The as operator can and will return null if the object you're trying to cast cannot be converted to the target type. Type-testing operators and cast expression - C# reference | Microsoft Docs[^] You use as when you're not sure whether the object can be converted to the specified type; in which case, you should always check for null before using the variable. Using T y = x as T; without then checking for y == null is always a mistake. When you're certain that the object will be of the desired type, you use a cast expression instead: T y = (T)x; In this case, there is no need to check for null, since the runtime would throw an exception if the conversion cannot be performed. However, in this case, it would be far better to simply use the WebRequest.CreateHttp method, which has been available since .NET 4.5, and already returns the correct type: WebRequest.CreateHttp Method (System.Net) | Microsoft Docs[^] "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer