The Weird and The Wonderful

da-leak is d bigst horor! :-D

Leave my balls alone, would you... (You're all thinking it, I just had the balls to say it) I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.

Draw a red circle whit a slash through it (the classic 'No' symbol), and put TLA in the middle. Karl

Although I am not primarily a driver developer, I have written a few. The 1st rule is don't put any MessageBoxes in the driver not even while debugging. :sigh: Just because the code works, it doesn't mean that it is good code.

I guess Microsoft keep that bug as a signature of tradition :)

a Stored procedure is given a name and called from code, while ad query writes it's own query (select, update, insert, delete). Is there anything else we need to know about?

Charvak Karpe wrote: but in the real world probably 90% of the population can tell what you're doing if you do 24 * 60 * 60 You haven't worked with some of the developers I work with now. No, they couldn't tell you what that code was doing... seriously. A guide to posting questions on CodeProject[^] Dave Kreskowiak

The comment I added was much much tamer.

Perhaps a better way would have been to use the start command. Do they not know DOS? :)

I have seen people use ints with 1s and 0s because they learned programming with a language that did not have a boolean type. I say that is what you get when you have someone whose degree is not in programming write the software :sigh: What is really scary is when folk with a real programming degree do the same thing! :omg: Just because the code works, it doesn't mean that it is good code.

Is there any chance you could get him a job with Paypal? Please? Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.

I unfortunately must disagree.. no amount of language feature or design constraint can save you from a programmer lacking in programming skills. The only solution for THAT problem is good code review and a team willing to point out ways to improve (and enforce them) to the souls who are in this occupation but shouldn't be. And.. your original post is hilarious and sad at the same time. For the same reasons.

Yes, and the whole software even more. As I wrote in another part of this 'series' he managed to do really everything wrong which is possible - in fact he wrote the How-Not-To of programming. I don't know where to start, so much he did wrong. E.g. there is no checking and no escaping of parameters, GET and POST parameters are written directly in the query. Depending on the PHP configuration is is possible to delete whole tables via SQL-injection. And, pretty nice, every user has an account with virtual money. But this will be part 4..

LOL!!!!!

I **really** like the second one.

dont you mean... // s == "r you creazy ?" ;) Life goes very fast. Tomorrow, today is already yesterday.

I think I'll take CIDiv's advice next time....you're probably not missing something...

jamie550 wrote: unnecessarily complicated In OOP they call it "extendable". :rolleyes: Greetings - Jacek

LOL!!! Oh man.. you just made my week.

A new low in obfuscation. Why use just the comparison operators when you can involve the rest in the task!! I'm curious what this person was thinking in doing this? Of course, there is the attendant fear of discovering what they were thinking.. I retract my question.