vonb wrote:
but IT don't want to install .net framework on 600-800 clients for just one app...
It's probably already installed; if it ain't, IT should take note that their clients aren't updated using Windows Update - which means that they're prolly missing security-packages. Even Win2k (using the latest SP) has .NET 2.0.
Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] They hate us for our freedom![^]
Your question is not clear.
Lobster Thermidor aux crevettes with a Mornay sauce, served in a Provençale manner with shallots and aubergines, garnished with truffle pate, brandy and a fried egg on top and Spam - Monty Python Spam Sketch
Depends which versions of Windows Servers you're running? Forefront endpoint protection and System Center Endpoint Protection come with most licensing agreements with current Windows products. As was pointed out: TrendMicro is fairly good, which even MalwareBytes has a Enterprise version of their quality AV. Manageability is a huge factor though, which cost is not far behind. A lot depends on existing Infrastructure like if you have a Firewall, IDS/IPS systems like Dell Secureworks, or other security blocks in place.
Something worth reading, albeit it's invincible!
Is this user on your Domain or an external user? I'd assume that you're using Windows Authentication, so it should be easy to trace back through debug logging. Were there any changes performed prior to this slow period? There are a large number of variables that could lead to authentication errors, but haveyou reviewed Event viewer on the box hosting iis 6 or one of the DCs? -SC
Something worth reading, albeit it's invincible!
sumit7034 wrote:
But didn't found any log.
There were certainly logs. But perhaps you meant log entries specifically related to what you are looking for. I seriously doubt that the computer wouldn't log a login event for a remote user.
When you upload, the ASMX should be writing the uploaded file to some path. Did you check the permissions on that path?
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar Personal Homepage
Tech Gossips
The woods are lovely, dark and deep, But I have promises to keep, And miles to go before I sleep, And miles to go before I sleep!
I want to take all new smtp packets generated inside the network, and send them out on a different ip address, and not the gateway address, so the ipaddress reverses back to the correct ptr record, indicating it's a mail a server that belongs to my domain. Right now, the packets go out on the gateway, with a different reverse ptr record.
That would be something that youtube knows and we don't. Site configurations are unique to a given site and won't be public knowledge.
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
