Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. .NET XML comments ==> documentation

.NET XML comments ==> documentation

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
csharpc++htmlvisual-studiocom
12 Posts 10 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    peterchen
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Is there anythign that generates module documentation for C# Express? NDoc doesn't do .NET 2.0 and the XML file generated by the /doc command contains only the comments itself. Does Visual Studio 2005 generate docs (like ther 2003 version did)?


    We say "get a life" to each other, disappointed or jokingly. What we forget, though, is that this is possibly the most destructive advice you can give to a geek.
    boost your code || Fold With Us! || sighist

    C J L 3 Replies Last reply
    0
    • P peterchen

      Is there anythign that generates module documentation for C# Express? NDoc doesn't do .NET 2.0 and the XML file generated by the /doc command contains only the comments itself. Does Visual Studio 2005 generate docs (like ther 2003 version did)?


      We say "get a life" to each other, disappointed or jokingly. What we forget, though, is that this is possibly the most destructive advice you can give to a geek.
      boost your code || Fold With Us! || sighist

      C Offline
      C Offline
      Christian Graus
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      peterchen wrote:

      Does Visual Studio 2005 generate docs (like ther 2003 version did)?

      My guess would be that it does, but not for Express. Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • P peterchen

        Is there anythign that generates module documentation for C# Express? NDoc doesn't do .NET 2.0 and the XML file generated by the /doc command contains only the comments itself. Does Visual Studio 2005 generate docs (like ther 2003 version did)?


        We say "get a life" to each other, disappointed or jokingly. What we forget, though, is that this is possibly the most destructive advice you can give to a geek.
        boost your code || Fold With Us! || sighist

        J Offline
        J Offline
        James T Johnson
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        peterchen wrote:

        Does Visual Studio 2005 generate docs (like ther 2003 version did)?

        I remember reading one of the MS guy's blog posts saying that this feature was cut from 2005 because people weren't using it enough to justify updating it for the new 2.0 features. I can't find it after a few google searches though. James

        J 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • J James T Johnson

          peterchen wrote:

          Does Visual Studio 2005 generate docs (like ther 2003 version did)?

          I remember reading one of the MS guy's blog posts saying that this feature was cut from 2005 because people weren't using it enough to justify updating it for the new 2.0 features. I can't find it after a few google searches though. James

          J Offline
          J Offline
          JimmyRopes
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Probably didn’t generate enough error reports from the system testers (end users). A sure sign not a lot of people are using it! I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes

          C 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • P peterchen

            Is there anythign that generates module documentation for C# Express? NDoc doesn't do .NET 2.0 and the XML file generated by the /doc command contains only the comments itself. Does Visual Studio 2005 generate docs (like ther 2003 version did)?


            We say "get a life" to each other, disappointed or jokingly. What we forget, though, is that this is possibly the most destructive advice you can give to a geek.
            boost your code || Fold With Us! || sighist

            L Offline
            L Offline
            linderk
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            There doesn't appear to be any support for doc generation in any flavor of VS2005. I just downloaded the latest nightly build for ndoc and compiled it under VS2005, then ran it against a small project I have. It emits some strange stuff for generic types, but otherwise it seems to work fine. Marc

            RaviBeeR L P 3 Replies Last reply
            0
            • L linderk

              There doesn't appear to be any support for doc generation in any flavor of VS2005. I just downloaded the latest nightly build for ndoc and compiled it under VS2005, then ran it against a small project I have. It emits some strange stuff for generic types, but otherwise it seems to work fine. Marc

              RaviBeeR Offline
              RaviBeeR Offline
              RaviBee
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              linderk wrote:

              There doesn't appear to be any support for doc generation in any flavor of VS2005.

              Good grief - if that's true, that's just plain nuts. :omg: /ravi My new year's resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Music | Articles | Freeware | Trips ravib(at)ravib(dot)com

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • J JimmyRopes

                Probably didn’t generate enough error reports from the system testers (end users). A sure sign not a lot of people are using it! I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes

                C Offline
                C Offline
                code frog 0
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Now that's funny!!!:laugh:

                Some assembly required. Code-frog System Architects, Inc.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L linderk

                  There doesn't appear to be any support for doc generation in any flavor of VS2005. I just downloaded the latest nightly build for ndoc and compiled it under VS2005, then ran it against a small project I have. It emits some strange stuff for generic types, but otherwise it seems to work fine. Marc

                  L Offline
                  L Offline
                  leppie
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  linderk wrote:

                  latest nightly build for ndoc

                  I think NDoc has been stale for over a year now... :~ xacc.ide-0.1.1.4 - now with LSharp integration and scripting :)

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L linderk

                    There doesn't appear to be any support for doc generation in any flavor of VS2005. I just downloaded the latest nightly build for ndoc and compiled it under VS2005, then ran it against a small project I have. It emits some strange stuff for generic types, but otherwise it seems to work fine. Marc

                    P Offline
                    P Offline
                    peterchen
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Karen? Marc? Anyway, welcome to codeproject :)


                    We say "get a life" to each other, disappointed or jokingly. What we forget, though, is that this is possibly the most destructive advice you can give to a geek.
                    boost your code || Fold With Us! || sighist

                    J M 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • P peterchen

                      Karen? Marc? Anyway, welcome to codeproject :)


                      We say "get a life" to each other, disappointed or jokingly. What we forget, though, is that this is possibly the most destructive advice you can give to a geek.
                      boost your code || Fold With Us! || sighist

                      J Offline
                      J Offline
                      J Dunlap
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      peterchen wrote:

                      Karen? Marc?
                      Anyway, welcome to codeproject :)

                      My thoughts exactly. :-D

                      [If I understand correctly, it's Marc Clifton posting under Karen's account - Karen's last name is Linder. But I wasn't aware that Karen had an account on CP!]

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • P peterchen

                        Karen? Marc? Anyway, welcome to codeproject :)


                        We say "get a life" to each other, disappointed or jokingly. What we forget, though, is that this is possibly the most destructive advice you can give to a geek.
                        boost your code || Fold With Us! || sighist

                        M Offline
                        M Offline
                        Marc Clifton
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        peterchen wrote:

                        Karen? Marc?

                        :laugh: Oops! My girlfriend had signed onto CP on my computer, and I hadn't noticed! Marc Pensieve

                        P 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • M Marc Clifton

                          peterchen wrote:

                          Karen? Marc?

                          :laugh: Oops! My girlfriend had signed onto CP on my computer, and I hadn't noticed! Marc Pensieve

                          P Offline
                          P Offline
                          peterchen
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          My first thought was you pulling a (reverse) Anna. Consider my relief :)


                          We say "get a life" to each other, disappointed or jokingly. What we forget, though, is that this is possibly the most destructive advice you can give to a geek.
                          boost your code || Fold With Us! || sighist

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups