The Wonder of Shari'a
-
Adnan Siddiqi wrote:
This is not truly a shariyah
Ok, one more time, this is not sharia, fine. Now lets move on.... Now, again. Do you...support....sharia....law? My mom told me once that "while we all don't speak the same language, everyone in the world undestands an asskicking"
kgaddy wrote:
Ok, one more time, this is not sharia, fine. Now lets move on.... Now, again. Do you...support....sharia....law?
now you are learning something,you have learnt after several replies of mine that you were doing a mistake to link up an incident which is shiarya which was not good at all, its similar link invastion of iraq/afghan wars with bible or crusaded and now you main Question, Yes I accept Shariyah law.Shariyah is nothing but following rules of Quran for different fields of like like law,politics ,science etc etc..
http://weblogs.com.pk/kadnan | kadnan.blogspot.com | AJAX based Contact Form for Blogger or any other website
-- modified at 7:10 Friday 13th January, 2006
-
kgaddy wrote:
um...look at the previous 10 posts. Thats exactly what I asked him.
So are you going to try to paint sharia in a good light???? I would love to see this. That's your original question. It is clear that you're not interested in his opinions about sharia laws. You've already made up your mind about that. What is clear though, is that you're seeking to attack him as a person, by making him look like some kind of monster for supporting sharia laws. I think he understood this, and refused to answer your question. I think it was also fairly clear that he did not try to paint sharia laws in good light. At least not your version of sharia laws. I practice martial arts, and I really enjoy that. Meanwhile, idiots beat other people up on the streets, using techniques from martial arts. Suppose this rape case was an assault case instead, in which the perpretrator had used martial arts techniques. If you had hinted that martial arts was the source of evil in the assault, because it allowed the perpetrator to severely injure the other guy, to which Anna had replied "That is truly sick", I would also have agreed that it is truly sick, and I would also have pointed out that this has nothing to do with martial arts (for reasons I will not go in to here, because it's beside the point). Had you replied to me, asking if I'm trying to paint martial arts in a good light, I would've reacted somewhat like Adnan, as any other person would have, when given such a disingenuous question.
well,thts what i was trying to tel him,but as you mentioned,he had clearly made up his mind,this guy always takes time to understand.
http://weblogs.com.pk/kadnan | kadnan.blogspot.com | AJAX based Contact Form for Blogger or any other website
-
He's astounded that this moron can't answer a simple question, I would say. Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
and ur such a fucki ng retard tht you have NO idea what he has been trying to do,READ the whole damn post,i know its hard for your brain cells to figure out the whole thing
http://weblogs.com.pk/kadnan | kadnan.blogspot.com | AJAX based Contact Form for Blogger or any other website
-
Why do you bother with this idiot ? I knew before I read the responses that he would not answer you. Next time he talk to you, he will tell you that he answered you and you refused to respond. Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
-
Why do you bother with this idiot ? I knew before I read the responses that he would not answer you. Next time he talk to you, he will tell you that he answered you and you refused to respond. Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
When this[^] have understood what i am trying to say,why are you having difficulty to get it? obviously,you are a dumbass or i say some orthodox christian who believes that Christianity is the only true religion on earth(day dreaming)
http://weblogs.com.pk/kadnan | kadnan.blogspot.com | AJAX based Contact Form for Blogger or any other website
-
kgaddy wrote:
um...look at the previous 10 posts. Thats exactly what I asked him.
So are you going to try to paint sharia in a good light???? I would love to see this. That's your original question. It is clear that you're not interested in his opinions about sharia laws. You've already made up your mind about that. What is clear though, is that you're seeking to attack him as a person, by making him look like some kind of monster for supporting sharia laws. I think he understood this, and refused to answer your question. I think it was also fairly clear that he did not try to paint sharia laws in good light. At least not your version of sharia laws. I practice martial arts, and I really enjoy that. Meanwhile, idiots beat other people up on the streets, using techniques from martial arts. Suppose this rape case was an assault case instead, in which the perpretrator had used martial arts techniques. If you had hinted that martial arts was the source of evil in the assault, because it allowed the perpetrator to severely injure the other guy, to which Anna had replied "That is truly sick", I would also have agreed that it is truly sick, and I would also have pointed out that this has nothing to do with martial arts (for reasons I will not go in to here, because it's beside the point). Had you replied to me, asking if I'm trying to paint martial arts in a good light, I would've reacted somewhat like Adnan, as any other person would have, when given such a disingenuous question.
Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote:
That's your original question.
Yes, that was my origional question. But then I conceded that and asked him many times, "Do you support sharia?"
Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote:
It is clear that you're not interested in his opinions about sharia laws.
Oh yes I am!
Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote:
, by making him look like some kind of monster for supporting sharia laws.
No, If he does support sharia laws he is a monster and that is why he will not answer. If a German in the 1940s supported the "final solution" does that make him a monster? While sharia is not that extreme, it clearly condones human rights abuses. Ask any woman in Afganistan today. Martial arts are not laws you subject people too. It's a tool. My mom told me once that "while we all don't speak the same language, everyone in the world undestands an asskicking"
-
kgaddy wrote:
Ok, one more time, this is not sharia, fine. Now lets move on.... Now, again. Do you...support....sharia....law?
now you are learning something,you have learnt after several replies of mine that you were doing a mistake to link up an incident which is shiarya which was not good at all, its similar link invastion of iraq/afghan wars with bible or crusaded and now you main Question, Yes I accept Shariyah law.Shariyah is nothing but following rules of Quran for different fields of like like law,politics ,science etc etc..
http://weblogs.com.pk/kadnan | kadnan.blogspot.com | AJAX based Contact Form for Blogger or any other website
-- modified at 7:10 Friday 13th January, 2006
Adnan Siddiqi wrote:
now you are learning something,you have learnt after several replies of mine that you were doing a mistake to link up an incident which is shiarya which was not good at all,
You give yourself too much credit. So you believe that all people forced to live under such law be muslium? And if they do not are they to become dimmis? My mom told me once that "while we all don't speak the same language, everyone in the world undestands an asskicking"
-
Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote:
That's your original question.
Yes, that was my origional question. But then I conceded that and asked him many times, "Do you support sharia?"
Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote:
It is clear that you're not interested in his opinions about sharia laws.
Oh yes I am!
Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote:
, by making him look like some kind of monster for supporting sharia laws.
No, If he does support sharia laws he is a monster and that is why he will not answer. If a German in the 1940s supported the "final solution" does that make him a monster? While sharia is not that extreme, it clearly condones human rights abuses. Ask any woman in Afganistan today. Martial arts are not laws you subject people too. It's a tool. My mom told me once that "while we all don't speak the same language, everyone in the world undestands an asskicking"
kgaddy wrote:
No, If he does support sharia laws he is a monster and that is why he will not answer.
That's your point of view. I think he's determined not to answer you, because he knows you have already judged him. Would you care to confront anyone who has already passed judgment on you? I sure wouldn't. I would flip the finger, and walk away.
kgaddy wrote:
Yes, that was my origional question. But then I conceded that and asked him many times, "Do you support sharia?"
You could've made the concession a tad more obvious IMO. I think he would've responded more favorably then.
kgaddy wrote:
If a German in the 1940s supported the "final solution" does that make him a monster? While sharia is not that extreme, it clearly condones human rights abuses. Ask any woman in Afganistan today.
I'm not sure if I'm prepared to argue with you on that matter. The ideology of the Nazis were political, but appears almost as religious in some aspects. But then again, when taken to their extremes, there is little or no difference between political and religious zeal... Personally, I believe that sharia is a vile way of governing a society.
kgaddy wrote:
Martial arts are not laws you subject people too. It's a tool.
Exactly. I think Adnan sees sharia laws as a tool which was used badly in the alleged death sentence.
-
kgaddy wrote:
No, If he does support sharia laws he is a monster and that is why he will not answer.
That's your point of view. I think he's determined not to answer you, because he knows you have already judged him. Would you care to confront anyone who has already passed judgment on you? I sure wouldn't. I would flip the finger, and walk away.
kgaddy wrote:
Yes, that was my origional question. But then I conceded that and asked him many times, "Do you support sharia?"
You could've made the concession a tad more obvious IMO. I think he would've responded more favorably then.
kgaddy wrote:
If a German in the 1940s supported the "final solution" does that make him a monster? While sharia is not that extreme, it clearly condones human rights abuses. Ask any woman in Afganistan today.
I'm not sure if I'm prepared to argue with you on that matter. The ideology of the Nazis were political, but appears almost as religious in some aspects. But then again, when taken to their extremes, there is little or no difference between political and religious zeal... Personally, I believe that sharia is a vile way of governing a society.
kgaddy wrote:
Martial arts are not laws you subject people too. It's a tool.
Exactly. I think Adnan sees sharia laws as a tool which was used badly in the alleged death sentence.
Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote:
That's your point of view. I think he's determined not to answer you, because he knows you have already judged him. Would you care to confront anyone who has already passed judgment on you? I sure wouldn't. I would flip the finger, and walk away.
Well It looks like your opinion also:
Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote:
Personally, I believe that sharia is a vile way of governing a society.
Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote:
I think he would've responded more favorably then.
No he would not. I've asked questions like this before.
Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote:
Martial arts are not laws you subject people too. It's a tool. Exactly. I think Adnan sees sharia laws as a tool which was used badly in the alleged death sentence.
It's not the same. You cannot impose martial arts on me, but you could impose sharia law on me. Sharia is a law, martial arts is the gun to enfore a law. If that makes sense. In other words, in our western society, I can reject martial arts. It does not stop you from enjoying it. But I could not do the same to sharia (reject it). I would be killed. My mom told me once that "while we all don't speak the same language, everyone in the world undestands an asskicking" -- modified at 10:09 Friday 13th January, 2006
-
Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote:
That's your point of view. I think he's determined not to answer you, because he knows you have already judged him. Would you care to confront anyone who has already passed judgment on you? I sure wouldn't. I would flip the finger, and walk away.
Well It looks like your opinion also:
Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote:
Personally, I believe that sharia is a vile way of governing a society.
Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote:
I think he would've responded more favorably then.
No he would not. I've asked questions like this before.
Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote:
Martial arts are not laws you subject people too. It's a tool. Exactly. I think Adnan sees sharia laws as a tool which was used badly in the alleged death sentence.
It's not the same. You cannot impose martial arts on me, but you could impose sharia law on me. Sharia is a law, martial arts is the gun to enfore a law. If that makes sense. In other words, in our western society, I can reject martial arts. It does not stop you from enjoying it. But I could not do the same to sharia (reject it). I would be killed. My mom told me once that "while we all don't speak the same language, everyone in the world undestands an asskicking" -- modified at 10:09 Friday 13th January, 2006
kgaddy wrote:
Well It looks like your opinion also:
Yes, it is, and I never claimed it wasn't. I believe that the way sharia seems to be implemented, is a vile form of governing. On the other hand, I don't think I fully comprehend the sharia laws, so it could be that the idea is sound, but the implementation is just wrong. I'm fairly sure though that there's something wrong with the sharia laws that allows this crap to happen. Anyway, if I had wanted to know what Adnan thinks about sharia, I would not have advertised my judgement beforehand. Don't show your hand until you've been called! ;)
-
Adnan Siddiqi wrote:
now you are learning something,you have learnt after several replies of mine that you were doing a mistake to link up an incident which is shiarya which was not good at all,
You give yourself too much credit. So you believe that all people forced to live under such law be muslium? And if they do not are they to become dimmis? My mom told me once that "while we all don't speak the same language, everyone in the world undestands an asskicking"
*yawn* i am back to my question "go and read what i had written before"
http://weblogs.com.pk/kadnan | kadnan.blogspot.com | AJAX based Contact Form for Blogger or any other website
-
*yawn* i am back to my question "go and read what i had written before"
http://weblogs.com.pk/kadnan | kadnan.blogspot.com | AJAX based Contact Form for Blogger or any other website
Adnan Siddiqi wrote:
i am back to my question "go and read what i had written before"
um..that's not a question. And besides, you have never expresses your position on dhimmitude. My mom told me once that "while we all don't speak the same language, everyone in the world undestands an asskicking"
-
Adnan Siddiqi wrote:
i am back to my question "go and read what i had written before"
um..that's not a question. And besides, you have never expresses your position on dhimmitude. My mom told me once that "while we all don't speak the same language, everyone in the world undestands an asskicking"
kgaddy wrote:
that's not a question
I`m sorry for this mistake,that was my reply to you
kgaddy wrote:
you have never expresses your position on dhimmitude
Jorgen has clearly explained you the reason /Regds
http://weblogs.com.pk/kadnan | kadnan.blogspot.com | AJAX based Contact Form for Blogger or any other website
-
kgaddy wrote:
Well It looks like your opinion also:
Yes, it is, and I never claimed it wasn't. I believe that the way sharia seems to be implemented, is a vile form of governing. On the other hand, I don't think I fully comprehend the sharia laws, so it could be that the idea is sound, but the implementation is just wrong. I'm fairly sure though that there's something wrong with the sharia laws that allows this crap to happen. Anyway, if I had wanted to know what Adnan thinks about sharia, I would not have advertised my judgement beforehand. Don't show your hand until you've been called! ;)
that kgaddy will have difficulty to understand it,just for sake of knowledge,i try to elaborate it. the literall arabic meanings of Shariyah is "Road",often used as sea-shore as well,in Islam,it could be translated as "Road to guidance" in english. What Is shariyah[^],from the site: The law system inspired by the Koran, the Sunna, older Arabic law systems, parallel traditions, and work of Muslim scholars over the two first centuries of Islam. i would like to add my words,i can`t say I would ne 100% correct to explain it as i am not some authentic scholar,would try my best,else if one is sincre to know,he/she could seek alternative muslim source.... Shariyah is related with muslims only,non-muslims have notthing to do with it since its irrelevent for them. second shariyah is not something which is imposed to someone,as my statment is supported by this verse of quran: And now have We set thee (O Muhammad) on a clear road of (Our) commandment; so follow it, and follow not the whims of those who know not.(Quran:45:18) so this verse mentions that its good for muslims to follow it,if not,its their loss..its like that if a mother advises his son not to smoke,she can just advise him,if he lsitens,if not,bad for him,its not mom`s burden now that she didn`t aware the her kid. there are many things in Islam which are MUST, forinstance Prayers(Salat),FASt etc..Shariyah wasn`t asked to be must otherwise every muslim country had shariyah otherwise we were declared as non-muslims. The author further says,which does support my point of view mentioned in the link: Sharia is often referred to as Islamic law, but this is wrong, as only a small part is irrefutably based upon the core Islamic text, the Koran. A correct definition would either be "Islam-inspired", "Islam-derived" or "the law system of Muslims". there is clear difference between implementing the actual system or get inspiration of it.. let me take example of Interest,in arabic its called Ribah,in Islam,Interest is NOT allowed at all,there are banks in pakistan who take interests,while there are bank in Pakistan who are termed as ISLAMIC BANK since they are interest free,you may say those islamic banks followed the Shariyah. its also said that Shariyah or Islam dont support democracy,that is also wrong,the biggest example of democrac
-
kgaddy wrote:
that's not a question
I`m sorry for this mistake,that was my reply to you
kgaddy wrote:
you have never expresses your position on dhimmitude
Jorgen has clearly explained you the reason /Regds
http://weblogs.com.pk/kadnan | kadnan.blogspot.com | AJAX based Contact Form for Blogger or any other website
Adnan Siddiqi wrote:
Jorgen has clearly explained you the reason
No he did not. If you are so passionate about sharia, can you please justify dhimmitude. I personally am against it (for obvious reasons). But maybe you can shed some light on the subject. My mom told me once that "while we all don't speak the same language, everyone in the world undestands an asskicking"
-
Because Americans aren't greedy. It's selfish to keep all the killing to ourselves. You know in a single year in Vietnam, 7 times as many US soldiers were killed as the nearly three years we've been in Iraq? Plus we actually accomplished something rather substantial there as opposed to Vietnam. In fact America would have to be in Iraq with the same rate of casualties for another 64 years before the death toll matched that of Vietnam. At the end of the day, Iraq and Afghanistan are fresh Democracies, while Vietnam caved to the Soviets. Moral of the story: When you want a war...let conservatives handle it!
just for sake of better understanding and learning,you are trying to say that people kill in DC due to crimes are equal to death of us soliders in iraq?
http://weblogs.com.pk/kadnan | kadnan.blogspot.com | AJAX based Contact Form for Blogger or any other website
-
that kgaddy will have difficulty to understand it,just for sake of knowledge,i try to elaborate it. the literall arabic meanings of Shariyah is "Road",often used as sea-shore as well,in Islam,it could be translated as "Road to guidance" in english. What Is shariyah[^],from the site: The law system inspired by the Koran, the Sunna, older Arabic law systems, parallel traditions, and work of Muslim scholars over the two first centuries of Islam. i would like to add my words,i can`t say I would ne 100% correct to explain it as i am not some authentic scholar,would try my best,else if one is sincre to know,he/she could seek alternative muslim source.... Shariyah is related with muslims only,non-muslims have notthing to do with it since its irrelevent for them. second shariyah is not something which is imposed to someone,as my statment is supported by this verse of quran: And now have We set thee (O Muhammad) on a clear road of (Our) commandment; so follow it, and follow not the whims of those who know not.(Quran:45:18) so this verse mentions that its good for muslims to follow it,if not,its their loss..its like that if a mother advises his son not to smoke,she can just advise him,if he lsitens,if not,bad for him,its not mom`s burden now that she didn`t aware the her kid. there are many things in Islam which are MUST, forinstance Prayers(Salat),FASt etc..Shariyah wasn`t asked to be must otherwise every muslim country had shariyah otherwise we were declared as non-muslims. The author further says,which does support my point of view mentioned in the link: Sharia is often referred to as Islamic law, but this is wrong, as only a small part is irrefutably based upon the core Islamic text, the Koran. A correct definition would either be "Islam-inspired", "Islam-derived" or "the law system of Muslims". there is clear difference between implementing the actual system or get inspiration of it.. let me take example of Interest,in arabic its called Ribah,in Islam,Interest is NOT allowed at all,there are banks in pakistan who take interests,while there are bank in Pakistan who are termed as ISLAMIC BANK since they are interest free,you may say those islamic banks followed the Shariyah. its also said that Shariyah or Islam dont support democracy,that is also wrong,the biggest example of democrac
Adnan Siddiqi wrote:
Shariyah is related with muslims only,non-muslims have notthing to do with it since its irrelevent for them.
then explain this: Dhimmitude is the status that Islamic law, the Sharia, mandates for non-Muslims, primarily Jews and Christians. Dhimmis, “protected” or “guilty” people, are free to practice their religion in a Sharia regime, but are made subject to a number of humiliating regulations designed to enforce the Qur'an's command that they "feel themselves subdued" (Sura 9:29). This denial of equality of rights and dignity remains part of the Sharia, and, as such, are part of the legal superstructure that global jihadists are laboring through violence to restore everywhere in the Islamic world, and wish ultimately to impose on the entire human race. If dhimmis complained about their inferior status, institutionalized humiliation, or poverty, their masters voided their contract and regarded them as enemies of Islam, fair game as objects of violence. Consequently, dhimmis were generally cowed into silence and worse. It was almost unheard-of to find dhimmis speaking out against their oppressors; to do so would have been suicide. For centuries dhimmi communities in the Islamic world learned to live in peace with their Muslim overlords by acquiescing to their subservience. Some even actively identified with the dominant class, and became strenuous advocates for it. My mom told me once that "while we all don't speak the same language, everyone in the world undestands an asskicking"
-
Adnan Siddiqi wrote:
Shariyah is related with muslims only,non-muslims have notthing to do with it since its irrelevent for them.
then explain this: Dhimmitude is the status that Islamic law, the Sharia, mandates for non-Muslims, primarily Jews and Christians. Dhimmis, “protected” or “guilty” people, are free to practice their religion in a Sharia regime, but are made subject to a number of humiliating regulations designed to enforce the Qur'an's command that they "feel themselves subdued" (Sura 9:29). This denial of equality of rights and dignity remains part of the Sharia, and, as such, are part of the legal superstructure that global jihadists are laboring through violence to restore everywhere in the Islamic world, and wish ultimately to impose on the entire human race. If dhimmis complained about their inferior status, institutionalized humiliation, or poverty, their masters voided their contract and regarded them as enemies of Islam, fair game as objects of violence. Consequently, dhimmis were generally cowed into silence and worse. It was almost unheard-of to find dhimmis speaking out against their oppressors; to do so would have been suicide. For centuries dhimmi communities in the Islamic world learned to live in peace with their Muslim overlords by acquiescing to their subservience. Some even actively identified with the dominant class, and became strenuous advocates for it. My mom told me once that "while we all don't speak the same language, everyone in the world undestands an asskicking"
kgaddy wrote:
then explain this:
nope,first you are gonna admit that you linked up an incident delibrately with shariyah and tried to give impression that shariyah supports it.without having any knowledge about this matter?don`t try to be clever ass wid me while you can`t.. its late nite here,see u in 24 hrs
http://weblogs.com.pk/kadnan | kadnan.blogspot.com | AJAX based Contact Form for Blogger or any other website
-
kgaddy wrote:
then explain this:
nope,first you are gonna admit that you linked up an incident delibrately with shariyah and tried to give impression that shariyah supports it.without having any knowledge about this matter?don`t try to be clever ass wid me while you can`t.. its late nite here,see u in 24 hrs
http://weblogs.com.pk/kadnan | kadnan.blogspot.com | AJAX based Contact Form for Blogger or any other website
-
Adnan Siddiqi wrote:
Shariyah is related with muslims only,non-muslims have notthing to do with it since its irrelevent for them.
then explain this: Dhimmitude is the status that Islamic law, the Sharia, mandates for non-Muslims, primarily Jews and Christians. Dhimmis, “protected” or “guilty” people, are free to practice their religion in a Sharia regime, but are made subject to a number of humiliating regulations designed to enforce the Qur'an's command that they "feel themselves subdued" (Sura 9:29). This denial of equality of rights and dignity remains part of the Sharia, and, as such, are part of the legal superstructure that global jihadists are laboring through violence to restore everywhere in the Islamic world, and wish ultimately to impose on the entire human race. If dhimmis complained about their inferior status, institutionalized humiliation, or poverty, their masters voided their contract and regarded them as enemies of Islam, fair game as objects of violence. Consequently, dhimmis were generally cowed into silence and worse. It was almost unheard-of to find dhimmis speaking out against their oppressors; to do so would have been suicide. For centuries dhimmi communities in the Islamic world learned to live in peace with their Muslim overlords by acquiescing to their subservience. Some even actively identified with the dominant class, and became strenuous advocates for it. My mom told me once that "while we all don't speak the same language, everyone in the world undestands an asskicking"
Hysteria?? you didn`t answer me that are you admitting that you had NO idea about shariyah and yo linked up an event with it and now when i responded to someone else about it,you skipped the real post and threw another question? Stop being a troll,otherwise ausual you`ll be ign0red
http://weblogs.com.pk/kadnan | kadnan.blogspot.com | AJAX based Contact Form for Blogger or any other website