Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. General Programming
  3. C / C++ / MFC
  4. can I dynamically convert a base class object into a derived class object?

can I dynamically convert a base class object into a derived class object?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved C / C++ / MFC
c++questionlearning
21 Posts 7 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • E ewighell

    your answer is similar with my guess. but is there any way to implement the dynamical conversion from the base class object to a derived one. if not ,I would have to delete the base class object and recreate a derived one with the new operator. in this case I can't see the benefit of the inheritance, can I? Thank you very much!!! ------------------- I am learning C++ and English

    C Offline
    C Offline
    Cedric Moonen
    wrote on last edited by
    #9

    Maybe we can help you if you describe clearly what you need to do

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • E ewighell

      e.g:

      class DerivedClass:BaseClass
      {
      void functionInDerivedClassOnly();
      }
      BaseClass pBaseClass = new BaseClass();
      //can the following line be excuted correctly?
      (DerivedClass*)pBaseClass->functionInDerivedClassOnly();
      delete pBaseClass;

      Thank you very much!!! ------------------- I am learning C++ and English

      P Offline
      P Offline
      Prakash Nadar
      wrote on last edited by
      #10

      just by casting the baseclass pointer to derived class pointer does not make the object that was created i.e. baseclass into a dereived class. Its just like calling Donkey a dog does not make donkey to bark ;). so you can do this. BaseClass* pBaseClass = new DerivedClass(); ((DerivedClass*)pBaseClass)->functionInDerivedClassOnly(); or use reinterpret_cast


      -Prakash

      T S 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • P Prakash Nadar

        just by casting the baseclass pointer to derived class pointer does not make the object that was created i.e. baseclass into a dereived class. Its just like calling Donkey a dog does not make donkey to bark ;). so you can do this. BaseClass* pBaseClass = new DerivedClass(); ((DerivedClass*)pBaseClass)->functionInDerivedClassOnly(); or use reinterpret_cast


        -Prakash

        T Offline
        T Offline
        toxcct
        wrote on last edited by
        #11

        hey, you posted the same thing as i did 1 hour later :sigh: where were you ? :|


        TOXCCT >>> GEII power
        [toxcct][VisualCalc 2.20][VCalc 3.0 soon...]

        O P T 3 Replies Last reply
        0
        • S Stephen Hewitt

          Score: 1.8 (2 votes).

          How are the scores calculated? Obviously not an average as 3.6 (2x1.8) can't be obtained by adding 2 scores. Steve

          E Offline
          E Offline
          ewighell
          wrote on last edited by
          #12

          I have no idea what happened, either. I remember I voted for to 4 or 5. could someone in charge of this explain the problem? Thank you very much!!! ------------------- I am learning C++ and English

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • T toxcct

            hey, you posted the same thing as i did 1 hour later :sigh: where were you ? :|


            TOXCCT >>> GEII power
            [toxcct][VisualCalc 2.20][VCalc 3.0 soon...]

            O Offline
            O Offline
            Owner drawn
            wrote on last edited by
            #13

            He reinterpreted it.;P

            Jesus Loves:rose:

            --Owner Drawn:rose: --Nothing special --Defeat is temporary but surrender is permanent --Never say quits --Jesus is Lord:rose:

            T 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • O Owner drawn

              He reinterpreted it.;P

              Jesus Loves:rose:

              --Owner Drawn:rose: --Nothing special --Defeat is temporary but surrender is permanent --Never say quits --Jesus is Lord:rose:

              T Offline
              T Offline
              toxcct
              wrote on last edited by
              #14

              Owner drawn wrote:

              He reinterpreted it

              without quoting or refering to me ?! ;P not that sure...


              TOXCCT >>> GEII power
              [toxcct][VisualCalc 2.20][VCalc 3.0 soon...]

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • P Prakash Nadar

                just by casting the baseclass pointer to derived class pointer does not make the object that was created i.e. baseclass into a dereived class. Its just like calling Donkey a dog does not make donkey to bark ;). so you can do this. BaseClass* pBaseClass = new DerivedClass(); ((DerivedClass*)pBaseClass)->functionInDerivedClassOnly(); or use reinterpret_cast


                -Prakash

                S Offline
                S Offline
                Stephen Hewitt
                wrote on last edited by
                #15

                In the example above you should use static_cast<DerivedClass*>(pBaseClass). It's safer (but still not 100% safe) as it will only compile if it's possible for BaseClasss to exist which are also DerivedClasss (there is an inheritance relationship between them). Steve

                P 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • T toxcct

                  hey, you posted the same thing as i did 1 hour later :sigh: where were you ? :|


                  TOXCCT >>> GEII power
                  [toxcct][VisualCalc 2.20][VCalc 3.0 soon...]

                  P Offline
                  P Offline
                  Prakash Nadar
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #16

                  toxcct wrote:

                  hey, you posted the same thing as i did 1 hour later

                  I did not read the other solutions ;)


                  -Prakash

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S Stephen Hewitt

                    In the example above you should use static_cast<DerivedClass*>(pBaseClass). It's safer (but still not 100% safe) as it will only compile if it's possible for BaseClasss to exist which are also DerivedClasss (there is an inheritance relationship between them). Steve

                    P Offline
                    P Offline
                    Prakash Nadar
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #17

                    Stephen Hewitt wrote:

                    In the example above you should use static_cast(pBaseClass)

                    yes, correct. Thanks.


                    -Prakash

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • T toxcct

                      hey, you posted the same thing as i did 1 hour later :sigh: where were you ? :|


                      TOXCCT >>> GEII power
                      [toxcct][VisualCalc 2.20][VCalc 3.0 soon...]

                      T Offline
                      T Offline
                      ThatsAlok
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #18

                      toxcct wrote:

                      where were you ?

                      Me, Sleeping :)

                      "Opinions are neither right nor wrong. I cannot change your opinion. I can, however, change what influences your opinion." - David Crow

                      cheers, Alok Gupta VC Forum Q&A :- I/ IV

                      T 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S Stephen Hewitt

                        Score: 1.8 (2 votes).

                        How are the scores calculated? Obviously not an average as 3.6 (2x1.8) can't be obtained by adding 2 scores. Steve

                        T Offline
                        T Offline
                        toxcct
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #19

                        the scores are ponderated with the level of the members... - a bronze member votes for 1 voice - a silver member votes for 2 voices - a gold member votes for 4 voices - a platinum member votes for 8 voices


                        TOXCCT >>> GEII power
                        [toxcct][VisualCalc 2.20][VCalc 3.0 soon...]

                        S 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • T ThatsAlok

                          toxcct wrote:

                          where were you ?

                          Me, Sleeping :)

                          "Opinions are neither right nor wrong. I cannot change your opinion. I can, however, change what influences your opinion." - David Crow

                          cheers, Alok Gupta VC Forum Q&A :- I/ IV

                          T Offline
                          T Offline
                          toxcct
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #20

                          :zzz::zzz: zzzZZZZZZZzzzzz SShhhhhhh :zzz::zzz:


                          TOXCCT >>> GEII power
                          [toxcct][VisualCalc 2.20][VCalc 3.0 soon...]

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • T toxcct

                            the scores are ponderated with the level of the members... - a bronze member votes for 1 voice - a silver member votes for 2 voices - a gold member votes for 4 voices - a platinum member votes for 8 voices


                            TOXCCT >>> GEII power
                            [toxcct][VisualCalc 2.20][VCalc 3.0 soon...]

                            S Offline
                            S Offline
                            Stephen Hewitt
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #21

                            Ahhh Steve

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • World
                            • Users
                            • Groups