Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. A sensible Bishop

A sensible Bishop

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
csharpquestion
10 Posts 5 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    John Carson
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Regarding a picture depicting Jesus surrounded by gay men. Politician. It's a foul picture, an absolute abomination. I regard it as sacrilegious, blasphemous, highly offensive and grossly indecent. And this is over the fence, this is beyond the pale and it should be removed. Bishop. I don't think that the law should protect us Christians from offensive material. I don't think the law should protect any religion from offensive material or any other ideology from offensive material. The law should only be used to stop people calling for violence, or inciting the kind of hatred, racial hatred, that will lead to violence and discrimination of a serious kind. But other than that, we need to have a free society, free from the interfering of the law in these kind of debates. And this applies in my view right across the board for all religions. http://www.abc.net.au/cgi-bin/common/printfriendly.pl?http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2006/s1565487.htm[^] John Carson "To argue with a man who has renounced the use and authority of reason is like administering medicine to the dead." Thomas Paine

    L 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • J John Carson

      Regarding a picture depicting Jesus surrounded by gay men. Politician. It's a foul picture, an absolute abomination. I regard it as sacrilegious, blasphemous, highly offensive and grossly indecent. And this is over the fence, this is beyond the pale and it should be removed. Bishop. I don't think that the law should protect us Christians from offensive material. I don't think the law should protect any religion from offensive material or any other ideology from offensive material. The law should only be used to stop people calling for violence, or inciting the kind of hatred, racial hatred, that will lead to violence and discrimination of a serious kind. But other than that, we need to have a free society, free from the interfering of the law in these kind of debates. And this applies in my view right across the board for all religions. http://www.abc.net.au/cgi-bin/common/printfriendly.pl?http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2006/s1565487.htm[^] John Carson "To argue with a man who has renounced the use and authority of reason is like administering medicine to the dead." Thomas Paine

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lost User
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      http://www.revisef65.org/3bilder/ecceveropet.jpg[^] for what its worth Nunc est bibendum

      L 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Lost User

        http://www.revisef65.org/3bilder/ecceveropet.jpg[^] for what its worth Nunc est bibendum

        L Offline
        L Offline
        legalAlien
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Is that the picture in question? Just like the cartoon, seems like a storm over nothing. People (meaning ANY crutchless-relgious fruitcake) need to get off their high-horses and address the real problems of the world: poverty, homelesness, child/female abuse and so on. If everyone spent as much time thinking about those as they do about their stoopid fucking religious mumbo-jumbo bullshit bollocks we'd all be far better off.

        turning the other cheek just gets you slapped twice

        L J E 3 Replies Last reply
        0
        • L legalAlien

          Is that the picture in question? Just like the cartoon, seems like a storm over nothing. People (meaning ANY crutchless-relgious fruitcake) need to get off their high-horses and address the real problems of the world: poverty, homelesness, child/female abuse and so on. If everyone spent as much time thinking about those as they do about their stoopid fucking religious mumbo-jumbo bullshit bollocks we'd all be far better off.

          turning the other cheek just gets you slapped twice

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Lost User
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Yep. Personally I think it is crap, and just dome to inflame and get herself noticed. Imagine if this had been done to Mohammed, man, what a mess that would make. Nunc est bibendum

          L 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L Lost User

            Yep. Personally I think it is crap, and just dome to inflame and get herself noticed. Imagine if this had been done to Mohammed, man, what a mess that would make. Nunc est bibendum

            L Offline
            L Offline
            legalAlien
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Oops, I thought that WAS Mohammed!

            turning the other cheek just gets you slapped twice

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L legalAlien

              Is that the picture in question? Just like the cartoon, seems like a storm over nothing. People (meaning ANY crutchless-relgious fruitcake) need to get off their high-horses and address the real problems of the world: poverty, homelesness, child/female abuse and so on. If everyone spent as much time thinking about those as they do about their stoopid fucking religious mumbo-jumbo bullshit bollocks we'd all be far better off.

              turning the other cheek just gets you slapped twice

              J Offline
              J Offline
              John Carson
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              legalAlien wrote:

              Is that the picture in question?

              I haven't seen the picture in question, but I don't think so. If you step back in the URL you get here http://www.revisef65.org/3bilder/[^] which shows that the picture dates from 2003. I think the picture causing the controversy is recent. Further the site is Norwegian and the controversy is in Australia (in Tasmania actually, where Christian Graus lives, so perhaps he has seen the picture :) ). <Edit> Seems to clearly be the wrong picture. From this story, we see that it is the artist's "latest piece", which rules out the 2003 image. http://www.themercury.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5936,18077670%255E3462,00.html[^] </Edit> John Carson "To argue with a man who has renounced the use and authority of reason is like administering medicine to the dead." Thomas Paine -- modified at 11:14 Wednesday 8th February, 2006

              L 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • J John Carson

                legalAlien wrote:

                Is that the picture in question?

                I haven't seen the picture in question, but I don't think so. If you step back in the URL you get here http://www.revisef65.org/3bilder/[^] which shows that the picture dates from 2003. I think the picture causing the controversy is recent. Further the site is Norwegian and the controversy is in Australia (in Tasmania actually, where Christian Graus lives, so perhaps he has seen the picture :) ). <Edit> Seems to clearly be the wrong picture. From this story, we see that it is the artist's "latest piece", which rules out the 2003 image. http://www.themercury.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5936,18077670%255E3462,00.html[^] </Edit> John Carson "To argue with a man who has renounced the use and authority of reason is like administering medicine to the dead." Thomas Paine -- modified at 11:14 Wednesday 8th February, 2006

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Lost User
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Are there that many pictures of Christ surrounded by gay men circulating the world? Nunc est bibendum

                J B 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • L Lost User

                  Are there that many pictures of Christ surrounded by gay men circulating the world? Nunc est bibendum

                  J Offline
                  J Offline
                  John Carson
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  fat_boy wrote:

                  Are there that many pictures of Christ surrounded by gay men circulating the world?

                  Quite a few I suspect. There has been at least one play that portrayed Jesus himself as gay. John Carson "To argue with a man who has renounced the use and authority of reason is like administering medicine to the dead." Thomas Paine

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L Lost User

                    Are there that many pictures of Christ surrounded by gay men circulating the world? Nunc est bibendum

                    B Offline
                    B Offline
                    Bassam Abdul Baki
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Don't know, but many of them seem to be at that site. "If only one person knows the truth, it is still the truth." - Mahatma Gandhi Web - Blog - RSS - Math

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L legalAlien

                      Is that the picture in question? Just like the cartoon, seems like a storm over nothing. People (meaning ANY crutchless-relgious fruitcake) need to get off their high-horses and address the real problems of the world: poverty, homelesness, child/female abuse and so on. If everyone spent as much time thinking about those as they do about their stoopid fucking religious mumbo-jumbo bullshit bollocks we'd all be far better off.

                      turning the other cheek just gets you slapped twice

                      E Offline
                      E Offline
                      Edbert P
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      Just want to say I agree with you. Lately* I've been of the opinion that many people use their religion as an excuse only to feel good and to feel superior than others, and they nitpicked over not-so-important things while keeping a blind eye on the real world. *I had BIG arguments with some Christian friends on their actions being incompatible with their speech (i.e. the case of who's the biggest hypocrite: the Christians who pretend to live holy or the not-so-holy-and-not-so-Christian who live as they are) Edbert Sydney, Australia "A day without sunshine is like, you know, night."

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups