Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. General Programming
  3. C / C++ / MFC
  4. Power of 2

Power of 2

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved C / C++ / MFC
question
38 Posts 12 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R RichardS

    Hi All, Is there a fast way of checking to see if an int is a power of 2 (i.e. 2, 4, 8, 16, 1024)? I know the long way using a loop, but I was hoping for a simple way of doing this. regards, Rich "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far the Universe is winning." -- Rich Cook

    B Offline
    B Offline
    BadKarma
    wrote on last edited by
    #11

    Hi, you could use ::log to check if its a power of 2 math: y = 2^x -> x = log(y)/log(2) so you can use:

    int y = 1024;
    if(y == (int)(::pow(2.0, ::floor(::log((double)y)/::log(2.0)))))
    {
      //  true
    }
    else
    {
      // false
    }
    

    but his is heavy processing, so it mith be slower that the for loop codito ergo sum

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • D Divyang Mithaiwala

      Hello RichardS, Try this one.

      double val = 0.0;
      val = log10(y) / log10(2.0);
      
      //Check that 'val' is pure int (Here you use ur own code is u optimize)
      int val2 = int(val);
      
      if (val == val2) 
           // y is power of 2
      else
           // y is not power of 2
      

      here 'y' is value u want to check for power of 2. Best of luck


      Divyang Mithaiwala System Engineer & Software Developer

      D Offline
      D Offline
      Divyang Mithaiwala
      wrote on last edited by
      #12

      Here logic is simple y = value that want to check x = find a value that is in power of 2 so,

      2^x = y
      log 2^x = log y
      x log 2 = log y

      x = log y /log 2


      Divyang Mithaiwala System Engineer & Software Developer

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R RichardS

        Hi All, Is there a fast way of checking to see if an int is a power of 2 (i.e. 2, 4, 8, 16, 1024)? I know the long way using a loop, but I was hoping for a simple way of doing this. regards, Rich "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far the Universe is winning." -- Rich Cook

        T Offline
        T Offline
        Taka Muraoka
        wrote on last edited by
        #13

        Define "fast". If you're using 32-bit int's, there are only 32 possibilities so you can just check entries in a lookup table, making sure you do the most likely candidates first. BTW, all these suggestions to use sqrt() and log() are nuts - these functions are insanely slow!


        The two most common elements in the universe are Hydrogen and stupidity. - Harlan Ellison Awasu 2.2 [^]: A free RSS/Atom feed reader with support for Code Project.

        R 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • R RichardS

          Hi All, Is there a fast way of checking to see if an int is a power of 2 (i.e. 2, 4, 8, 16, 1024)? I know the long way using a loop, but I was hoping for a simple way of doing this. regards, Rich "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far the Universe is winning." -- Rich Cook

          R Offline
          R Offline
          Ryan Binns
          wrote on last edited by
          #14

          Crikey. I thought this was well known. Just do this:

          if (x & (x-1))
          {
            // x is <edit>not</edit>a power of two
          }
          else
          {
            // x is <edit>not</edit> a power of two
          }

          sorry, got the two cases round the wrong way... :-O

          Ryan

          "Punctuality is only a virtue for those who aren't smart enough to think of good excuses for being late" John Nichol "Point Of Impact"

          -- modified at 6:04 Monday 6th March, 2006

          S N R 3 Replies Last reply
          0
          • R RichardS

            Yip, this was my way to begin with. regards, Rich "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far the Universe is winning." -- Rich Cook

            R Offline
            R Offline
            Russell
            wrote on last edited by
            #15

            Read this function, it could be another start point! This function that I wrote last year find the bigger long, greater than the input value, that is a power of 2. And it is quite fast!:) unsigned long Next2Power(unsigned long x){ unsigned long y=1, x1=x; if(x==0) return 0; while(x1!=0){ x1>>=1; y<<=1; } y>>=1; if(y!=x) y<<=1; return y; }

            Have a nice code day ;)

            D 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • R Ryan Binns

              Crikey. I thought this was well known. Just do this:

              if (x & (x-1))
              {
                // x is <edit>not</edit>a power of two
              }
              else
              {
                // x is <edit>not</edit> a power of two
              }

              sorry, got the two cases round the wrong way... :-O

              Ryan

              "Punctuality is only a virtue for those who aren't smart enough to think of good excuses for being late" John Nichol "Point Of Impact"

              -- modified at 6:04 Monday 6th March, 2006

              S Offline
              S Offline
              Stephen Hewitt
              wrote on last edited by
              #16

              This is by far the best suggestion so far - I'd wager it's impossible to beat this technique. Steve

              R 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • T Taka Muraoka

                Define "fast". If you're using 32-bit int's, there are only 32 possibilities so you can just check entries in a lookup table, making sure you do the most likely candidates first. BTW, all these suggestions to use sqrt() and log() are nuts - these functions are insanely slow!


                The two most common elements in the universe are Hydrogen and stupidity. - Harlan Ellison Awasu 2.2 [^]: A free RSS/Atom feed reader with support for Code Project.

                R Offline
                R Offline
                Ryan Binns
                wrote on last edited by
                #17

                Taka Muraoka wrote:

                BTW, all these suggestions to use sqrt() and log() are nuts - these functions are insanely slow!

                Agreed!! It is quite simple. A single decrement and bitwise AND will do the job nicely

                Ryan

                "Punctuality is only a virtue for those who aren't smart enough to think of good excuses for being late" John Nichol "Point Of Impact"

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • R Ryan Binns

                  Crikey. I thought this was well known. Just do this:

                  if (x & (x-1))
                  {
                    // x is <edit>not</edit>a power of two
                  }
                  else
                  {
                    // x is <edit>not</edit> a power of two
                  }

                  sorry, got the two cases round the wrong way... :-O

                  Ryan

                  "Punctuality is only a virtue for those who aren't smart enough to think of good excuses for being late" John Nichol "Point Of Impact"

                  -- modified at 6:04 Monday 6th March, 2006

                  N Offline
                  N Offline
                  Nibu babu thomas
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #18

                  Great work! You've implemented Russel's idea!


                  Nibu thomas Software Developer

                  R 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S Stephen Hewitt

                    This is by far the best suggestion so far - I'd wager it's impossible to beat this technique. Steve

                    R Offline
                    R Offline
                    Ryan Binns
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #19

                    And yet it got the lowest votes of all of them. Funny, isn't it :)

                    Ryan

                    "Punctuality is only a virtue for those who aren't smart enough to think of good excuses for being late" John Nichol "Point Of Impact"

                    S 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • N Nibu babu thomas

                      Great work! You've implemented Russel's idea!


                      Nibu thomas Software Developer

                      R Offline
                      R Offline
                      Ryan Binns
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #20

                      Actually, I've been using this for years doing embedded programming. Every clock cycle is precious ;)

                      Ryan

                      "Punctuality is only a virtue for those who aren't smart enough to think of good excuses for being late" John Nichol "Point Of Impact"

                      N R 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • R Ryan Binns

                        And yet it got the lowest votes of all of them. Funny, isn't it :)

                        Ryan

                        "Punctuality is only a virtue for those who aren't smart enough to think of good excuses for being late" John Nichol "Point Of Impact"

                        S Offline
                        S Offline
                        Stephen Hewitt
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #21

                        I gave you a 5 - I would have left it at that but then I saw the low score and felt compelled to reply. Steve

                        R 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R Ryan Binns

                          Actually, I've been using this for years doing embedded programming. Every clock cycle is precious ;)

                          Ryan

                          "Punctuality is only a virtue for those who aren't smart enough to think of good excuses for being late" John Nichol "Point Of Impact"

                          N Offline
                          N Offline
                          Nibu babu thomas
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #22

                          Yeah, well said.


                          Nibu thomas Software Developer

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • S Stephen Hewitt

                            I gave you a 5 - I would have left it at that but then I saw the low score and felt compelled to reply. Steve

                            R Offline
                            R Offline
                            Ryan Binns
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #23

                            Thanks :) I don't really care. I assume it was because of my first sentence. I was just surprised that five people answered, but not one of them knew about this. I genuinely believed it was well known!

                            Ryan

                            "Punctuality is only a virtue for those who aren't smart enough to think of good excuses for being late" John Nichol "Point Of Impact"

                            S 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • R Ryan Binns

                              Thanks :) I don't really care. I assume it was because of my first sentence. I was just surprised that five people answered, but not one of them knew about this. I genuinely believed it was well known!

                              Ryan

                              "Punctuality is only a virtue for those who aren't smart enough to think of good excuses for being late" John Nichol "Point Of Impact"

                              S Offline
                              S Offline
                              Stephen Hewitt
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #24

                              Surely using the word "crikey" demands higher rather than lower scores! Steve

                              R 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • S Stephen Hewitt

                                Surely using the word "crikey" demands higher rather than lower scores! Steve

                                R Offline
                                R Offline
                                Ryan Binns
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #25

                                :laugh:!

                                Ryan

                                "Punctuality is only a virtue for those who aren't smart enough to think of good excuses for being late" John Nichol "Point Of Impact"

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • T toxcct

                                  we are on a standard C++ forum, not managed/CLI...

                                  D Offline
                                  D Offline
                                  Divyang Mithaiwala
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #26

                                  Hello v2.0, We are on visual C++ & my suggesion is not wrong for it.


                                  Divyang Mithaiwala System Engineer & Software Developer

                                  T 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • D Divyang Mithaiwala

                                    Hello v2.0, We are on visual C++ & my suggesion is not wrong for it.


                                    Divyang Mithaiwala System Engineer & Software Developer

                                    T Offline
                                    T Offline
                                    toxcct
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #27

                                    Divyang Mithaiwala wrote:

                                    my suggesion is not wrong for it.

                                    yes it is, it will not work on a MFC/Win32 project... it is only for managed C++ (which is not for this forum, but for the C++/CLI forum instead)

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • R Ryan Binns

                                      Actually, I've been using this for years doing embedded programming. Every clock cycle is precious ;)

                                      Ryan

                                      "Punctuality is only a virtue for those who aren't smart enough to think of good excuses for being late" John Nichol "Point Of Impact"

                                      R Offline
                                      R Offline
                                      RichardS
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #28

                                      Hi Ryan, Thanks for the help. The code is great and the application is for an embedded -> PC interface. cheers Rich "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far the Universe is winning." -- Rich Cook

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • R Ryan Binns

                                        Crikey. I thought this was well known. Just do this:

                                        if (x & (x-1))
                                        {
                                          // x is <edit>not</edit>a power of two
                                        }
                                        else
                                        {
                                          // x is <edit>not</edit> a power of two
                                        }

                                        sorry, got the two cases round the wrong way... :-O

                                        Ryan

                                        "Punctuality is only a virtue for those who aren't smart enough to think of good excuses for being late" John Nichol "Point Of Impact"

                                        -- modified at 6:04 Monday 6th March, 2006

                                        R Offline
                                        R Offline
                                        RichardS
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #29

                                        Hi Ryan, Is there is quick way for now making x a power of 2 after you have decided that it is not? regards, Rich "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far the Universe is winning." -- Rich Cook

                                        R C 2 Replies Last reply
                                        0
                                        • T toxcct

                                          :sigh:

                                          S Offline
                                          S Offline
                                          Stephen Hewitt
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #30

                                          Modified version is still wrong - It will treat any integer as a power of 2. Steve

                                          T 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups