The couple at the door
-
Sorry. Not you. Vincent did.
Go back and read your original post: Yeah, why do you have Christians? Were you picked on by one when you were a kid? Vincent picked up on your misspelling of the word "hate" and ran with it. But you didn't get it, as usual.
... since we've descended to name calling, I'm thinking you're about twenty pounds of troll droppings in a ten pound bag. - Vincent Reynolds
-
Yeah, that would be me. I made fun of espeir's typo, and now he thinks I'm advocating Christian genocide.
I think it is evident that muslim and christian fanatics think the same. Say anything against their precious beliefs, and you're the vilest creature on earth. Luckily, countries in which christianity has rooted itself, secular governments have been established, thus preventing theocratic law enforcement. Living in fear can't be good.
-
Sorry. Not you. Vincent did.
Yes. You saw right through me. I'm advocating Christian genocide -- all religions, actually -- to further my goal of creating a new, pure, LEFTIST, Marxist, socialist, communist, atheist, evolutionist, scientist, secular humanist authoritarian utopia. Of course, that would include killing everyone who belongs to my religion, including myself, but you can't make an omelet without breaking eggs, right? I'm thinking about calling it Stanistan, just to piss Stan off. Besides, Espeiria sounds too much like a flower, or maybe a tropical disease.
-
Sticks and stones may break my bones but names will never hurt me. You dumbass.
Wow! That old chestnut Forced into a Haiku form... You're half-way to wit.
-
Go back and read your original post: Yeah, why do you have Christians? Were you picked on by one when you were a kid? Vincent picked up on your misspelling of the word "hate" and ran with it. But you didn't get it, as usual.
... since we've descended to name calling, I'm thinking you're about twenty pounds of troll droppings in a ten pound bag. - Vincent Reynolds
I got it the first time. But that's no reason to make a bigotted anti-Christian remark suggesting genocide.
-
Yeah, that would be me. I made fun of espeir's typo, and now he thinks I'm advocating Christian genocide.
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
Yeah, that would be me. I made fun of espeir's typo, and now he thinks I'm advocating Christian genocide.
Hey...You said it, not me.
-
I think it is evident that muslim and christian fanatics think the same. Say anything against their precious beliefs, and you're the vilest creature on earth. Luckily, countries in which christianity has rooted itself, secular governments have been established, thus preventing theocratic law enforcement. Living in fear can't be good.
Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote:
I think it is evident that muslim and christian fanatics think the same.
Yes, they do. And I guess Hindu fanatics would be the same too. Regards, Nish
Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
The Ultimate Grid - The #1 MFC grid out there! -
ahz wrote:
he's still juvenile.
I've found your reaction to this allegory I reposted from another site quite interesting. Alvaro
... since we've descended to name calling, I'm thinking you're about twenty pounds of troll droppings in a ten pound bag. - Vincent Reynolds
Alvaro Mendez wrote:
found your reaction ... interesting
why? i'm curious.
-
Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote:
I think it is evident that muslim and christian fanatics think the same.
Yes, they do. And I guess Hindu fanatics would be the same too. Regards, Nish
Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
The Ultimate Grid - The #1 MFC grid out there!It's funny how certain religions gets more exposure than others. Especially so when there must be almost as many hindus as there are muslims for instance. Are there half a billion hindus, would you say? The only fanaticism coming from hinduism that I know of, is the mistreatment of women in some instances where marriages have gone awry. Well, the pre-arranged weddings is a bit hard to understand from my point of view, but I suppose that could just as well be attributed to a totally different culture, instead of being attributed to fanaticism.
-
Alvaro Mendez wrote:
found your reaction ... interesting
why? i'm curious.
ahz wrote:
why? i'm curious.
Just the fact that you seemed to get upset over it, as if it had offended you. I'm curious, what religion (if any) do you follow? A religious person would probably not have resorted to name calling over some fictional story. Alvaro
... since we've descended to name calling, I'm thinking you're about twenty pounds of troll droppings in a ten pound bag. - Vincent Reynolds
-
It's funny how certain religions gets more exposure than others. Especially so when there must be almost as many hindus as there are muslims for instance. Are there half a billion hindus, would you say? The only fanaticism coming from hinduism that I know of, is the mistreatment of women in some instances where marriages have gone awry. Well, the pre-arranged weddings is a bit hard to understand from my point of view, but I suppose that could just as well be attributed to a totally different culture, instead of being attributed to fanaticism.
Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote:
Are there half a billion hindus, would you say?
I think there must be about 750 million Hindus in India, and possibly another 20 million outside India. Regards, Nish
Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
The Ultimate Grid - The #1 MFC grid out there! -
ahz wrote:
why? i'm curious.
Just the fact that you seemed to get upset over it, as if it had offended you. I'm curious, what religion (if any) do you follow? A religious person would probably not have resorted to name calling over some fictional story. Alvaro
... since we've descended to name calling, I'm thinking you're about twenty pounds of troll droppings in a ten pound bag. - Vincent Reynolds
Alvaro Mendez wrote:
you seemed to get upset over it
i wasn't upset at all, really. i was merely calling it as i saw it. i could see the humor in it, but i try not to take enjoyment with humor that is made at the expense of others.
Alvaro Mendez wrote:
I'm curious, what religion (if any) do you follow?
what specific religion i follow is irrelavant, but i am christian, or i try to be anyway.
Alvaro Mendez wrote:
name calling
actually i said the "story" was bigotted. i didn't say anything about you. and, like i said, i called it as i saw it. i'm pretty sure if i had posted something similar where the subject were people of the protected-class du jour, then it would have been called bigotted by others. So, I honestly don't understand why it's ok for others to say something is bigotted, but it's not ok for me. it's pretty clear that "Hank" represents a "god figure" while "Karl" is his "earthly representative" or "prophet" and the "letter" represents the religious writings of any number of religions (take your pick). Mary and John, then, represent that religion's missionaries. So, it's a pretty clear slam on religion, in general, and on the proselyting kind in particular. It makes one wonder why it's currently so fashionable to knock about people of a religious persuasion.
-
Let's leave not leave out atheists who place their faith in science while being ignorant of its details.
Strictly speaking an athiest doesn't necessarily place their faith in science. They just don't place their faith in theistic dogma. a-: Without; not -theist: one who believes in the existence of a god or gods := one who does not believe in the existance of a god or gods ColinMackay.net Scottish Developers are looking for speakers for user group sessions over the next few months. Do you want to know more?
-
Alvaro Mendez wrote:
Dude, I didn't brand it as a joke.
Yes you did.
Alvaro Mendez wrote:
Some are laughing at it. Some hate it. And some don't even get it.
It's not a matter of love, hate or getting it. It's a 5 page joke without a punchline that you sold as a must read! NOW GIVE ME MY MONEY BACK!
espeir wrote:
Yes you did.
No, he didn't. Nowhere in the original post is the word joke or a synonym thereof. ColinMackay.net Scottish Developers are looking for speakers for user group sessions over the next few months. Do you want to know more?
-
Strictly speaking an athiest doesn't necessarily place their faith in science. They just don't place their faith in theistic dogma. a-: Without; not -theist: one who believes in the existence of a god or gods := one who does not believe in the existance of a god or gods ColinMackay.net Scottish Developers are looking for speakers for user group sessions over the next few months. Do you want to know more?
the a- could also mean against or "anti" so an atheist is also someone who is against the belief in the existence of a god or gods.
-
I don't understand the ending?? :confused:
thealj wrote:
I don't understand the ending??
The local Jehova's Witnesses should take a leaf out of that book. I wish they'd give up on me. Of all the tactics I've tried over the years the one of telling them I'm an athiest and no I really wouldn't like to take a copy of the Watchtower (heck, I've even had Dutch JWs trying to get me to read it and my level of Dutch is to read a menu and buy a train ticket). Now I get a visit about once a month. - Religion has been the cause of most of the major wars in history. - But that is organised religion, apparently, and they don't believe in organised religion, yet they've organised themselves into a pair to go around the doors. They've organised themselves into a publishers by their magazine. - So where did the beautiful flowers in my garden come from? - My dad planted them for me. - Where did the bulbs come from? - The garden centre. [long story short] - They are a product of evolution - So God didn't create them? - No [Eventually - a brainwave] - Since you don't believe in receiving blood products I don't exist, for without the generous donation of blood from others I would not be here to have this discussion with you. They give up at this point, only to return to have the same meaningless conversation a month later. ColinMackay.net Scottish Developers are looking for speakers for user group sessions over the next few months. Do you want to know more?
-
the a- could also mean against or "anti" so an atheist is also someone who is against the belief in the existence of a god or gods.
ahz wrote:
the a- could also mean against or "anti"
Not according to my dictionary. Also the word antitheist means: A disbeliever in the existence of God While I am sure there are some athiests who are against the belief in the existance of God I would say most just don't believe in a God and that's it. ColinMackay.net Scottish Developers are looking for speakers for user group sessions over the next few months. Do you want to know more?
-
the a- could also mean against or "anti" so an atheist is also someone who is against the belief in the existence of a god or gods.
I'll be pedantic here. An atheist may be "against" the belief, but that in not inherent in atheism. According to Webster, atheism is: a : a disbelief in the existence of deity b : the doctrine that there is no deity Not to deny that some atheists, like some theists, can be antagonistic jackasses and shove their views in everyone's faces, but that behavior is not inherent in atheism. The antagonism is in the person, not the doctrine.
-
Alvaro Mendez wrote:
I don't hate Christians.
Liar.
Alvaro Mendez wrote:
Do you hate atheists?
Not as a general rule. I do get annoyed by militant atheists like yourself who are constantly tring to shove your belief system down other peoples' throats while saying that having a belief system is asinine. Very hypocritical (which is ironic since hypocrisy is the only vice of the atheist).
Alvaro Mendez wrote:
I happen to not enjoy much of the stuff you post here either.
And you make it known. So why complain when I make it known that your joke is a 5 page waste of time? Kind of hypocritical, don't you think?
espeir wrote:
militant atheists like yourself who are constantly tring to shove your belief system down other peoples' throats
I think you mean "disbelief system" ColinMackay.net Scottish Developers are looking for speakers for user group sessions over the next few months. Do you want to know more?
-
I'll be pedantic here. An atheist may be "against" the belief, but that in not inherent in atheism. According to Webster, atheism is: a : a disbelief in the existence of deity b : the doctrine that there is no deity Not to deny that some atheists, like some theists, can be antagonistic jackasses and shove their views in everyone's faces, but that behavior is not inherent in atheism. The antagonism is in the person, not the doctrine.
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
The antagonism is in the person
well, that's why I said "could" mean anti.
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
not the doctrine
perhaps in the "pure" form af atheistic thought, but there is a "sect" (for lack of a better word) of atheism that is virulently anti-religion/anti-theistic.