The couple at the door
-
Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote:
I think it is evident that muslim and christian fanatics think the same.
Yes, they do. And I guess Hindu fanatics would be the same too. Regards, Nish
Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
The Ultimate Grid - The #1 MFC grid out there!It's funny how certain religions gets more exposure than others. Especially so when there must be almost as many hindus as there are muslims for instance. Are there half a billion hindus, would you say? The only fanaticism coming from hinduism that I know of, is the mistreatment of women in some instances where marriages have gone awry. Well, the pre-arranged weddings is a bit hard to understand from my point of view, but I suppose that could just as well be attributed to a totally different culture, instead of being attributed to fanaticism.
-
Alvaro Mendez wrote:
found your reaction ... interesting
why? i'm curious.
ahz wrote:
why? i'm curious.
Just the fact that you seemed to get upset over it, as if it had offended you. I'm curious, what religion (if any) do you follow? A religious person would probably not have resorted to name calling over some fictional story. Alvaro
... since we've descended to name calling, I'm thinking you're about twenty pounds of troll droppings in a ten pound bag. - Vincent Reynolds
-
It's funny how certain religions gets more exposure than others. Especially so when there must be almost as many hindus as there are muslims for instance. Are there half a billion hindus, would you say? The only fanaticism coming from hinduism that I know of, is the mistreatment of women in some instances where marriages have gone awry. Well, the pre-arranged weddings is a bit hard to understand from my point of view, but I suppose that could just as well be attributed to a totally different culture, instead of being attributed to fanaticism.
Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote:
Are there half a billion hindus, would you say?
I think there must be about 750 million Hindus in India, and possibly another 20 million outside India. Regards, Nish
Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
The Ultimate Grid - The #1 MFC grid out there! -
ahz wrote:
why? i'm curious.
Just the fact that you seemed to get upset over it, as if it had offended you. I'm curious, what religion (if any) do you follow? A religious person would probably not have resorted to name calling over some fictional story. Alvaro
... since we've descended to name calling, I'm thinking you're about twenty pounds of troll droppings in a ten pound bag. - Vincent Reynolds
Alvaro Mendez wrote:
you seemed to get upset over it
i wasn't upset at all, really. i was merely calling it as i saw it. i could see the humor in it, but i try not to take enjoyment with humor that is made at the expense of others.
Alvaro Mendez wrote:
I'm curious, what religion (if any) do you follow?
what specific religion i follow is irrelavant, but i am christian, or i try to be anyway.
Alvaro Mendez wrote:
name calling
actually i said the "story" was bigotted. i didn't say anything about you. and, like i said, i called it as i saw it. i'm pretty sure if i had posted something similar where the subject were people of the protected-class du jour, then it would have been called bigotted by others. So, I honestly don't understand why it's ok for others to say something is bigotted, but it's not ok for me. it's pretty clear that "Hank" represents a "god figure" while "Karl" is his "earthly representative" or "prophet" and the "letter" represents the religious writings of any number of religions (take your pick). Mary and John, then, represent that religion's missionaries. So, it's a pretty clear slam on religion, in general, and on the proselyting kind in particular. It makes one wonder why it's currently so fashionable to knock about people of a religious persuasion.
-
Let's leave not leave out atheists who place their faith in science while being ignorant of its details.
Strictly speaking an athiest doesn't necessarily place their faith in science. They just don't place their faith in theistic dogma. a-: Without; not -theist: one who believes in the existence of a god or gods := one who does not believe in the existance of a god or gods ColinMackay.net Scottish Developers are looking for speakers for user group sessions over the next few months. Do you want to know more?
-
Alvaro Mendez wrote:
Dude, I didn't brand it as a joke.
Yes you did.
Alvaro Mendez wrote:
Some are laughing at it. Some hate it. And some don't even get it.
It's not a matter of love, hate or getting it. It's a 5 page joke without a punchline that you sold as a must read! NOW GIVE ME MY MONEY BACK!
espeir wrote:
Yes you did.
No, he didn't. Nowhere in the original post is the word joke or a synonym thereof. ColinMackay.net Scottish Developers are looking for speakers for user group sessions over the next few months. Do you want to know more?
-
Strictly speaking an athiest doesn't necessarily place their faith in science. They just don't place their faith in theistic dogma. a-: Without; not -theist: one who believes in the existence of a god or gods := one who does not believe in the existance of a god or gods ColinMackay.net Scottish Developers are looking for speakers for user group sessions over the next few months. Do you want to know more?
the a- could also mean against or "anti" so an atheist is also someone who is against the belief in the existence of a god or gods.
-
I don't understand the ending?? :confused:
thealj wrote:
I don't understand the ending??
The local Jehova's Witnesses should take a leaf out of that book. I wish they'd give up on me. Of all the tactics I've tried over the years the one of telling them I'm an athiest and no I really wouldn't like to take a copy of the Watchtower (heck, I've even had Dutch JWs trying to get me to read it and my level of Dutch is to read a menu and buy a train ticket). Now I get a visit about once a month. - Religion has been the cause of most of the major wars in history. - But that is organised religion, apparently, and they don't believe in organised religion, yet they've organised themselves into a pair to go around the doors. They've organised themselves into a publishers by their magazine. - So where did the beautiful flowers in my garden come from? - My dad planted them for me. - Where did the bulbs come from? - The garden centre. [long story short] - They are a product of evolution - So God didn't create them? - No [Eventually - a brainwave] - Since you don't believe in receiving blood products I don't exist, for without the generous donation of blood from others I would not be here to have this discussion with you. They give up at this point, only to return to have the same meaningless conversation a month later. ColinMackay.net Scottish Developers are looking for speakers for user group sessions over the next few months. Do you want to know more?
-
the a- could also mean against or "anti" so an atheist is also someone who is against the belief in the existence of a god or gods.
ahz wrote:
the a- could also mean against or "anti"
Not according to my dictionary. Also the word antitheist means: A disbeliever in the existence of God While I am sure there are some athiests who are against the belief in the existance of God I would say most just don't believe in a God and that's it. ColinMackay.net Scottish Developers are looking for speakers for user group sessions over the next few months. Do you want to know more?
-
the a- could also mean against or "anti" so an atheist is also someone who is against the belief in the existence of a god or gods.
I'll be pedantic here. An atheist may be "against" the belief, but that in not inherent in atheism. According to Webster, atheism is: a : a disbelief in the existence of deity b : the doctrine that there is no deity Not to deny that some atheists, like some theists, can be antagonistic jackasses and shove their views in everyone's faces, but that behavior is not inherent in atheism. The antagonism is in the person, not the doctrine.
-
Alvaro Mendez wrote:
I don't hate Christians.
Liar.
Alvaro Mendez wrote:
Do you hate atheists?
Not as a general rule. I do get annoyed by militant atheists like yourself who are constantly tring to shove your belief system down other peoples' throats while saying that having a belief system is asinine. Very hypocritical (which is ironic since hypocrisy is the only vice of the atheist).
Alvaro Mendez wrote:
I happen to not enjoy much of the stuff you post here either.
And you make it known. So why complain when I make it known that your joke is a 5 page waste of time? Kind of hypocritical, don't you think?
espeir wrote:
militant atheists like yourself who are constantly tring to shove your belief system down other peoples' throats
I think you mean "disbelief system" ColinMackay.net Scottish Developers are looking for speakers for user group sessions over the next few months. Do you want to know more?
-
I'll be pedantic here. An atheist may be "against" the belief, but that in not inherent in atheism. According to Webster, atheism is: a : a disbelief in the existence of deity b : the doctrine that there is no deity Not to deny that some atheists, like some theists, can be antagonistic jackasses and shove their views in everyone's faces, but that behavior is not inherent in atheism. The antagonism is in the person, not the doctrine.
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
The antagonism is in the person
well, that's why I said "could" mean anti.
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
not the doctrine
perhaps in the "pure" form af atheistic thought, but there is a "sect" (for lack of a better word) of atheism that is virulently anti-religion/anti-theistic.
-
ahz wrote:
the a- could also mean against or "anti"
Not according to my dictionary. Also the word antitheist means: A disbeliever in the existence of God While I am sure there are some athiests who are against the belief in the existance of God I would say most just don't believe in a God and that's it. ColinMackay.net Scottish Developers are looking for speakers for user group sessions over the next few months. Do you want to know more?
Colin Angus Mackay wrote:
Not according to my dictionary.
I didn't say it was in a dictionary. I'm just making an observation: I said "could" mean "anti".
Colin Angus Mackay wrote:
I am sure there are some athiests who are against the belief
so, in essence, we're in agreement.
-
I was actually thinking Mormons. Whoever wrote this should consider that brevity is the soul of wit. The same thing could have been stated in 3 sentences.
espeir wrote:
Whoever wrote this should consider that brevity is the soul of wit
Oh, I don't know.... I've watch Billy Conolly DVDs where the joke is 90 minutes long and I'm almost hoarse with laughter at the end. ColinMackay.net Scottish Developers are looking for speakers for user group sessions over the next few months. Do you want to know more?
-
Colin Angus Mackay wrote:
Not according to my dictionary.
I didn't say it was in a dictionary. I'm just making an observation: I said "could" mean "anti".
Colin Angus Mackay wrote:
I am sure there are some athiests who are against the belief
so, in essence, we're in agreement.
ahz wrote:
so, in essence, we're in agreement.
No. You said: so an atheist is also someone who is against the belief in the existence of a god or gods To be essentially in agreement the above sentence would have to be changed to: so an atheist could also someone who is against the belief in the existence of a god or gods An athiest is someone who does not believe in a god or gods - not necessarily against that belief. For example, I am an atheist. I accept that there are people who happen to believe in a God or Gods. I am not against their beliefs, I just don't share them. You may think I am being pedantic, but I think that the distinction is important because one reflects what an athiest actually is, and the other reflects additional beliefs. ColinMackay.net Scottish Developers are looking for speakers for user group sessions over the next few months. Do you want to know more?
-
ahz wrote:
so, in essence, we're in agreement.
No. You said: so an atheist is also someone who is against the belief in the existence of a god or gods To be essentially in agreement the above sentence would have to be changed to: so an atheist could also someone who is against the belief in the existence of a god or gods An athiest is someone who does not believe in a god or gods - not necessarily against that belief. For example, I am an atheist. I accept that there are people who happen to believe in a God or Gods. I am not against their beliefs, I just don't share them. You may think I am being pedantic, but I think that the distinction is important because one reflects what an athiest actually is, and the other reflects additional beliefs. ColinMackay.net Scottish Developers are looking for speakers for user group sessions over the next few months. Do you want to know more?
Colin Angus Mackay wrote:
You may think I am being pedantic
I don't know, maybe you are. i can see though that you're trying to be exact, and I agree that is important. the definition of an athiest is what it is, as the definition of a christian, muslim, jews, etc are what they are. you also know that there are many religionists who don't live up to, and worse, act contrary to the stated teachings of their respective religions. those actions then get associated with the religion. unfair, but that's the way it is. the same happens with atheists. you say that you (and presumably other atheists) accept that other people believe in God or Gods and you (and the others) are not against their beliefs. but that is not what I and others (and perhaps you) have observed from many atheists. you also said you were sure there are some atheists that are against the belief in God. I agree with that statement. Which is why I said, in essence, we agree.
-
Colin Angus Mackay wrote:
You may think I am being pedantic
I don't know, maybe you are. i can see though that you're trying to be exact, and I agree that is important. the definition of an athiest is what it is, as the definition of a christian, muslim, jews, etc are what they are. you also know that there are many religionists who don't live up to, and worse, act contrary to the stated teachings of their respective religions. those actions then get associated with the religion. unfair, but that's the way it is. the same happens with atheists. you say that you (and presumably other atheists) accept that other people believe in God or Gods and you (and the others) are not against their beliefs. but that is not what I and others (and perhaps you) have observed from many atheists. you also said you were sure there are some atheists that are against the belief in God. I agree with that statement. Which is why I said, in essence, we agree.
-
thealj wrote:
I don't understand the ending??
The local Jehova's Witnesses should take a leaf out of that book. I wish they'd give up on me. Of all the tactics I've tried over the years the one of telling them I'm an athiest and no I really wouldn't like to take a copy of the Watchtower (heck, I've even had Dutch JWs trying to get me to read it and my level of Dutch is to read a menu and buy a train ticket). Now I get a visit about once a month. - Religion has been the cause of most of the major wars in history. - But that is organised religion, apparently, and they don't believe in organised religion, yet they've organised themselves into a pair to go around the doors. They've organised themselves into a publishers by their magazine. - So where did the beautiful flowers in my garden come from? - My dad planted them for me. - Where did the bulbs come from? - The garden centre. [long story short] - They are a product of evolution - So God didn't create them? - No [Eventually - a brainwave] - Since you don't believe in receiving blood products I don't exist, for without the generous donation of blood from others I would not be here to have this discussion with you. They give up at this point, only to return to have the same meaningless conversation a month later. ColinMackay.net Scottish Developers are looking for speakers for user group sessions over the next few months. Do you want to know more?
I've found an effective way to deal with these kinds of people. When I recognize what they are, they get one polite "I'm not interested, thank you". If they try to persist, I slam the door in their faces. I did leave one standing on my front step one time while I answered the phone and then came back and lectured them on being rude and inconsiderate of others beliefs. :laugh: At any given instant there are considerably more assholes than mouths in the universe.
-
In essence, you are the butt of the above joke. At any given instant there are considerably more assholes than mouths in the universe.
thanks for proving my point
-
espeir wrote:
. I do get annoyed by militant atheists like yourself who are constantly tring to shove your belief system down other peoples' throats while saying that having a belief system is asinine.
At least the atheist has balls to say that it is his beliefs, and not some commandment from some backward text.
Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote:
At least the atheist has balls to say that it is his beliefs
A Christian can also have the sack to say that. Just thought I'd spice things up a bit. :) Jeremy Falcon