My new box rocks (brag)
-
compiling lenghty project: P IV 3GHz, 1GB RAM: 13min AMD XP2800+ (2GHz), 1GB RAM: 12 min Opteron 150 2.4GHz, 2GB RAM: 7min woot! (I'd like to see the times on an AMD64 system, though..) Could be reduced further by maybe 30% by shoving the temp files onto a RAM disk...
Some of us walk the memory lane, others plummet into a rabbit hole
Tree in C# || Fold With Us! || sighistSpeed it up further - set up your own compile farm Incredibuild[^] -- Help me! I'm turning into a grapefruit! Buzzwords!
-
Speed it up further - set up your own compile farm Incredibuild[^] -- Help me! I'm turning into a grapefruit! Buzzwords!
doesn't work for command line builds :-/ (And for that money, I can give everyone yet another gig of ram)
Some of us walk the memory lane, others plummet into a rabbit hole
Tree in C# || Fold With Us! || sighist -
doesn't work for command line builds :-/ (And for that money, I can give everyone yet another gig of ram)
Some of us walk the memory lane, others plummet into a rabbit hole
Tree in C# || Fold With Us! || sighistpeterchen wrote:
doesn't work for command line builds :-/
According to their FAQ it does http://www.xoreax.com/support_faq.htm#q5[^]
peterchen wrote:
(And for that money, I can give everyone yet another gig of ram)
But is that needed? In my experience, I work on one solution that contains 26 projects (400-odd source files) A full batch rebuild (release and debug) with incredibuild takes just over 3 minutes. The same rebuild done with VS's compiler takes about 15 minutes, so that's 12 minutes saved every time I need to do a rebuild (which in the course of a few days certainly adds up!) -- Help me! I'm turning into a grapefruit! Buzzwords!
-
compiling lenghty project: P IV 3GHz, 1GB RAM: 13min AMD XP2800+ (2GHz), 1GB RAM: 12 min Opteron 150 2.4GHz, 2GB RAM: 7min woot! (I'd like to see the times on an AMD64 system, though..) Could be reduced further by maybe 30% by shoving the temp files onto a RAM disk...
Some of us walk the memory lane, others plummet into a rabbit hole
Tree in C# || Fold With Us! || sighist -
doesn't work for command line builds :-/ (And for that money, I can give everyone yet another gig of ram)
Some of us walk the memory lane, others plummet into a rabbit hole
Tree in C# || Fold With Us! || sighistpeterchen wrote:
(And for that money, I can give everyone yet another gig of ram)
Yeah but that extra gig won't speed up your build nearly as much as Incredibuild would. IMO, when the only goal is faster (full) builds, Incredibuild is much more bang for the buck than any new machine is (of course if you regularly compile only 1 file and then relink, the gains go down).
-
compiling lenghty project: P IV 3GHz, 1GB RAM: 13min AMD XP2800+ (2GHz), 1GB RAM: 12 min Opteron 150 2.4GHz, 2GB RAM: 7min woot! (I'd like to see the times on an AMD64 system, though..) Could be reduced further by maybe 30% by shoving the temp files onto a RAM disk...
Some of us walk the memory lane, others plummet into a rabbit hole
Tree in C# || Fold With Us! || sighistpeterchen wrote:
(I'd like to see the times on an AMD64 system, though..)
A build-all takes about 20 minutes on my software using the intel compiler. Even though I have a few extra compiler flag options set, I doubt it will help you in a comparison, you aren't using my code. :) _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)
-
AMD Athlon 64 x 2 Dual Process 4800+ 2 GB Ram 300 GB 7200rpm SATA NVidia GeForce 7800 GTX Dell 30" 3007WPF monitor ;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P Blogless
norm.net wrote:
300 GB 7200rpm SATA
yuck! WD Raptors: 150 (windows XP), 74(old windows, soon to be BSD), 36 (Linux) 10,000 rpm drives 500GB Sata II with 16mb Cache for big storage.... I use that 300gb for a backup device because it is too slow to be used for anything else. ;P:laugh:;P _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)
-
norm.net wrote:
300 GB 7200rpm SATA
yuck! WD Raptors: 150 (windows XP), 74(old windows, soon to be BSD), 36 (Linux) 10,000 rpm drives 500GB Sata II with 16mb Cache for big storage.... I use that 300gb for a backup device because it is too slow to be used for anything else. ;P:laugh:;P _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)
-
AMD Athlon 64 x 2 Dual Process 4800+ 2 GB Ram 300 GB 7200rpm SATA NVidia GeForce 7800 GTX Dell 30" 3007WPF monitor ;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P Blogless
norm.net wrote:
Dell 30" 3007WPF monitor
How many lines of code can you see at the same time? I guess at least one whole function at a time. :) jhaga --------------------------------- Every generation laughs at the old fashions, but follows religiously the new. Henry David Thoreau, "Walden", 1854
-
Oh, well I got cheated on the drive, but rest of the system rocks, especially for .net development. Blogless
norm.net wrote:
but rest of the system rocks
nice monitor. ;P I am only a tad below you on the rest, so figure it a tie.... I have much faster drives. :) but before you write off the drive.... check it.... grab HD Tach and/or HD Tune and find out it's speed. http://www.xyzcomputing.com/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=585&Itemid=0&limit=1&limitstart=4[^] _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)
-
AMD Athlon 64 x 2 Dual Process 4800+ 2 GB Ram 300 GB 7200rpm SATA NVidia GeForce 7800 GTX Dell 30" 3007WPF monitor ;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P Blogless
norm.net wrote:
AMD Athlon 64 x 2 Dual Process 4800+
That doesn't help much with builds (AFAIK) as they are not multithreaded. (How about VS2005?) :suss:
Some of us walk the memory lane, others plummet into a rabbit hole
Tree in C# || Fold With Us! || sighist -
norm.net wrote:
AMD Athlon 64 x 2 Dual Process 4800+
That doesn't help much with builds (AFAIK) as they are not multithreaded. (How about VS2005?) :suss:
Some of us walk the memory lane, others plummet into a rabbit hole
Tree in C# || Fold With Us! || sighistpeterchen wrote:
That doesn't help much with builds (AFAIK) as they are not multithreaded.
Elementary! He can be browsing Codeproject during the rebuild without affecting the performance of either! ;P :laugh: _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)
-
peterchen wrote:
That doesn't help much with builds (AFAIK) as they are not multithreaded.
Elementary! He can be browsing Codeproject during the rebuild without affecting the performance of either! ;P :laugh: _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)
So he needs three threads for CP, and one for the build? :suss:
Some of us walk the memory lane, others plummet into a rabbit hole
Tree in C# || Fold With Us! || sighist -
peterchen wrote:
(I'd like to see the times on an AMD64 system, though..)
A build-all takes about 20 minutes on my software using the intel compiler. Even though I have a few extra compiler flag options set, I doubt it will help you in a comparison, you aren't using my code. :) _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)
Jeffry J. Brickley wrote:
I doubt it will help you in a comparison, you aren't using my code
:laugh:
Some of us walk the memory lane, others plummet into a rabbit hole
Tree in C# || Fold With Us! || sighist -
norm.net wrote:
AMD Athlon 64 x 2 Dual Process 4800+
That doesn't help much with builds (AFAIK) as they are not multithreaded. (How about VS2005?) :suss:
Some of us walk the memory lane, others plummet into a rabbit hole
Tree in C# || Fold With Us! || sighistVS 2005 can do multithreaded builds with the new MSBuild build engine. Regards Senthil _____________________________ My Blog | My Articles | My Flickr | WinMacro
-
So he needs three threads for CP, and one for the build? :suss:
Some of us walk the memory lane, others plummet into a rabbit hole
Tree in C# || Fold With Us! || sighistpeterchen wrote:
So he needs three threads for CP, and one for the build?
well, not completely.... one for CP, one for email replies to CP messages, one for the build, and one for ... what the internet was made for. _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)
-
compiling lenghty project: P IV 3GHz, 1GB RAM: 13min AMD XP2800+ (2GHz), 1GB RAM: 12 min Opteron 150 2.4GHz, 2GB RAM: 7min woot! (I'd like to see the times on an AMD64 system, though..) Could be reduced further by maybe 30% by shoving the temp files onto a RAM disk...
Some of us walk the memory lane, others plummet into a rabbit hole
Tree in C# || Fold With Us! || sighistWell - I've compiled the same solution (18 projects) on my work desktop (3GHz P4, 1GB RAM, 7200RPM drive) and my laptop (AMD 64 3400+ (2.2GHz clock?), 1GB RAM, 7200RPM drive). My laptop consistently takes 2/3 of the time the desktop takes. So, for one project that takes 2 minutes to compile on my desktop, it takes 1min 20s to compile on my laptop. That performance difference is repeated over all the projects.... AMD64 rules - but I wouldn't mind seeing if an Opteron rules more :-)
-
VS 2005 can do multithreaded builds with the new MSBuild build engine. Regards Senthil _____________________________ My Blog | My Articles | My Flickr | WinMacro
Ahh finally! thanks.
Some of us walk the memory lane, others plummet into a rabbit hole
Tree in C# || Fold With Us! || sighist -
norm.net wrote:
but rest of the system rocks
nice monitor. ;P I am only a tad below you on the rest, so figure it a tie.... I have much faster drives. :) but before you write off the drive.... check it.... grab HD Tach and/or HD Tune and find out it's speed. http://www.xyzcomputing.com/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=585&Itemid=0&limit=1&limitstart=4[^] _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)
Jeffry J. Brickley wrote:
nice monitor
Also has custom resolutions, which gets what you want just right.
Jeffry J. Brickley wrote:
but before you write off the drive.... check it.... grab HD Tach and/or HD Tune and find out it's speed.
Thanks for the link! Blogless