Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Migrating to VS2005 and SQL2005

Migrating to VS2005 and SQL2005

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
csharpasp-netvisual-studioquestion
11 Posts 8 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    Pete Madden
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    We have a project running in .NET 1.1 built on SQLServer2000 and VS.NET 2003 ... now if we migrate the same project into VS2005 and SQLServer2005 does that mean we have migrated to .NET 2.0 (ASP.NET 2.0, C# 2.0)? ########################## Taking pride in one's work is good as long as ego isn't a part of it. ##########################

    L T J 3 Replies Last reply
    0
    • P Pete Madden

      We have a project running in .NET 1.1 built on SQLServer2000 and VS.NET 2003 ... now if we migrate the same project into VS2005 and SQLServer2005 does that mean we have migrated to .NET 2.0 (ASP.NET 2.0, C# 2.0)? ########################## Taking pride in one's work is good as long as ego isn't a part of it. ##########################

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Luis Alonso Ramos
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Pete Madden wrote:

      does that mean we have migrated to .NET 2.0 (ASP.NET 2.0, C# 2.0)?

      Yes. VS 2005 won't compile apps that use .NET 1.x (there might be ways around it, but not by default).

      Luis Alonso Ramos Intelectix Chihuahua, Mexico

      Not much here: My CP Blog!

      A E 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • P Pete Madden

        We have a project running in .NET 1.1 built on SQLServer2000 and VS.NET 2003 ... now if we migrate the same project into VS2005 and SQLServer2005 does that mean we have migrated to .NET 2.0 (ASP.NET 2.0, C# 2.0)? ########################## Taking pride in one's work is good as long as ego isn't a part of it. ##########################

        T Offline
        T Offline
        ToddHileHoffer
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Migrating can be a pain in the ass but it is worth the effort. how vital enterprise application are for proactive organizations leveraging collective synergy to think outside the box and formulate their key objectives into a win-win game plan with a quality-driven approach that focuses on empowering key players to drive-up their core competencies and increase expectations with an all-around initiative to drive up the bottom-line. But of course, that's all a "high level" overview of things --thedailywtf 3/21/06

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • P Pete Madden

          We have a project running in .NET 1.1 built on SQLServer2000 and VS.NET 2003 ... now if we migrate the same project into VS2005 and SQLServer2005 does that mean we have migrated to .NET 2.0 (ASP.NET 2.0, C# 2.0)? ########################## Taking pride in one's work is good as long as ego isn't a part of it. ##########################

          J Offline
          J Offline
          Jerry Hammond
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          yes.

          Visual Studio and SQL are dead. Long live Visual Studio and SQL!

          Richard Andrew x64R 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • J Jerry Hammond

            yes.

            Visual Studio and SQL are dead. Long live Visual Studio and SQL!

            Richard Andrew x64R Offline
            Richard Andrew x64R Offline
            Richard Andrew x64
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            How did you accomplish that signature that expands beyond the borders of the post? It's really obnoxious.

            J 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L Luis Alonso Ramos

              Pete Madden wrote:

              does that mean we have migrated to .NET 2.0 (ASP.NET 2.0, C# 2.0)?

              Yes. VS 2005 won't compile apps that use .NET 1.x (there might be ways around it, but not by default).

              Luis Alonso Ramos Intelectix Chihuahua, Mexico

              Not much here: My CP Blog!

              A Offline
              A Offline
              Albert Pascual
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Will use 1.1 compile DLLs! But as Luis said, won't compile to 1.1 Al

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Richard Andrew x64R Richard Andrew x64

                How did you accomplish that signature that expands beyond the borders of the post? It's really obnoxious.

                J Offline
                J Offline
                Jerry Hammond
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Are you using FF? It seems FF doesn't render some CSS2 margin and width element properly. :( Take a look at the following. I wanted to build it for different screen resolutions...

                Visual Studio and SQL are dead. Long live Visual Studio and SQL!

                Richard Andrew x64R 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • J Jerry Hammond

                  Are you using FF? It seems FF doesn't render some CSS2 margin and width element properly. :( Take a look at the following. I wanted to build it for different screen resolutions...

                  Visual Studio and SQL are dead. Long live Visual Studio and SQL!

                  Richard Andrew x64R Offline
                  Richard Andrew x64R Offline
                  Richard Andrew x64
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Toasty0 wrote:

                  It seems FF doesn't render some CSS2 margin and width element properly. :(

                  Hey, you're right, Toasty! It looks fine in IE, but FF has it very different!

                  M 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L Luis Alonso Ramos

                    Pete Madden wrote:

                    does that mean we have migrated to .NET 2.0 (ASP.NET 2.0, C# 2.0)?

                    Yes. VS 2005 won't compile apps that use .NET 1.x (there might be ways around it, but not by default).

                    Luis Alonso Ramos Intelectix Chihuahua, Mexico

                    Not much here: My CP Blog!

                    E Offline
                    E Offline
                    Edbert P
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Luis Alonso Ramos wrote:

                    VS 2005 won't compile apps that use .NET 1.x

                    FYI, Microsoft has introduced MSBee for that. Edbert Sydney, Australia

                    L 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • E Edbert P

                      Luis Alonso Ramos wrote:

                      VS 2005 won't compile apps that use .NET 1.x

                      FYI, Microsoft has introduced MSBee for that. Edbert Sydney, Australia

                      L Offline
                      L Offline
                      Luis Alonso Ramos
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      Yes, I know. That's why I remarked that by default you can't compile 1.x in VS 2005, and that there are ways around it. I have not used it though. But thanks! :)

                      Luis Alonso Ramos Intelectix Chihuahua, Mexico

                      Not much here: My CP Blog!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Richard Andrew x64R Richard Andrew x64

                        Toasty0 wrote:

                        It seems FF doesn't render some CSS2 margin and width element properly. :(

                        Hey, you're right, Toasty! It looks fine in IE, but FF has it very different!

                        M Offline
                        M Offline
                        Michael Bergman
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        Opera 8.51 also has this problem.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups