Java and .net
-
Hi everyone, My intention was not to compare all the features of java and .net.But generally there is a feeling(atleast in india) among freshers that, those who choose .net are lazy guys and those who choose java are bright guys. I think there is some reason behind that.now a days in most of the cases a fresher who wants a programming career would not take a java course if he does not have any programming knowledge .because he/she feels that J2EE is tougher.But guys who love programming during their graduation will not hesitate to jump into java. Clearly we can see this when biggies started calling even from 6 months of experienced people in j2ee ,where they would call a .net professional only if he has atleast two years of experience. -- modified at 5:34 Monday 1st May, 2006
jitAtran wrote:
among freshers
So then, why is it that Java is taught to freshmen to introduce programming? Keep in mind, teaching Java replaced teaching BASIC. ;P Disclaimer--I really have no idea whether what I just said is accurate Marc Pensieve Some people believe what the bible says. Literally. At least [with Wikipedia] you have the chance to correct the wiki -- Jörgen Sigvardsson
-
jitAtran wrote:
among freshers
So then, why is it that Java is taught to freshmen to introduce programming? Keep in mind, teaching Java replaced teaching BASIC. ;P Disclaimer--I really have no idea whether what I just said is accurate Marc Pensieve Some people believe what the bible says. Literally. At least [with Wikipedia] you have the chance to correct the wiki -- Jörgen Sigvardsson
Marc Clifton wrote:
Java is taught to freshmen to introduce programming
As far as I know, it's JavaScript... :-D:rolleyes:
Maxwell Chen
-
jitAtran wrote:
among freshers
So then, why is it that Java is taught to freshmen to introduce programming? Keep in mind, teaching Java replaced teaching BASIC. ;P Disclaimer--I really have no idea whether what I just said is accurate Marc Pensieve Some people believe what the bible says. Literally. At least [with Wikipedia] you have the chance to correct the wiki -- Jörgen Sigvardsson
Marc Clifton wrote:
Java is taught to freshmen to introduce programming
No. Not here, at least. We had a good C basis befor coming into Java and OO. ___________________________________ Tozzi is right: Gaia is getting rid of us. My Blog [ITA]
-
Hi everyone, My intention was not to compare all the features of java and .net.But generally there is a feeling(atleast in india) among freshers that, those who choose .net are lazy guys and those who choose java are bright guys. I think there is some reason behind that.now a days in most of the cases a fresher who wants a programming career would not take a java course if he does not have any programming knowledge .because he/she feels that J2EE is tougher.But guys who love programming during their graduation will not hesitate to jump into java. Clearly we can see this when biggies started calling even from 6 months of experienced people in j2ee ,where they would call a .net professional only if he has atleast two years of experience. -- modified at 5:34 Monday 1st May, 2006
jitAtran wrote:
But guys who love programming during their graduation will not hesitate to jump into java.
Well, I love programming, and I did not hesitate to jump into C++. :-D;P
Maxwell Chen
-
jitAtran wrote:
But guys who love programming during their graduation will not hesitate to jump into java.
Well, I love programming, and I did not hesitate to jump into C++. :-D;P
Maxwell Chen
Microsoft has arguments for all.Many companies are moving to linux servers.and its being said that some opensource tools like squid web proxy outperforms microsoft's. Altogther it remains me that fighting scene in matrix where the hero fights with thousands of clones.Similarly microsoft desperately fights with the rest of the world.
-
Hi everyone, My intention was not to compare all the features of java and .net.But generally there is a feeling(atleast in india) among freshers that, those who choose .net are lazy guys and those who choose java are bright guys. I think there is some reason behind that.now a days in most of the cases a fresher who wants a programming career would not take a java course if he does not have any programming knowledge .because he/she feels that J2EE is tougher.But guys who love programming during their graduation will not hesitate to jump into java. Clearly we can see this when biggies started calling even from 6 months of experienced people in j2ee ,where they would call a .net professional only if he has atleast two years of experience. -- modified at 5:34 Monday 1st May, 2006
jitAtran wrote:
My intention was not to compare all the features of java and .net.But generally there is a feeling(atleast in india) among freshers that, those who choose .net are lazy guys and those who choose java are bright guys.
Well obviously they aren't very bright. An experienced developer chooses the right tool for the job and doesn't worry about whether they are considered lazy or bright. Both Java and .NET platforms have their own strengths and weaknesses, so you judge which tool to use depending on what your customer requirements are. Michael CP Blog [^] Development Blog [^]
-
Microsoft has arguments for all.Many companies are moving to linux servers.and its being said that some opensource tools like squid web proxy outperforms microsoft's. Altogther it remains me that fighting scene in matrix where the hero fights with thousands of clones.Similarly microsoft desperately fights with the rest of the world.
Not sure what you were talking about. Are you trying to say :
C++ belongs to Linux world? C++ belongs to the rest of the world?:~
Maxwell Chen
-
jitAtran wrote:
My intention was not to compare all the features of java and .net.But generally there is a feeling(atleast in india) among freshers that, those who choose .net are lazy guys and those who choose java are bright guys.
Well obviously they aren't very bright. An experienced developer chooses the right tool for the job and doesn't worry about whether they are considered lazy or bright. Both Java and .NET platforms have their own strengths and weaknesses, so you judge which tool to use depending on what your customer requirements are. Michael CP Blog [^] Development Blog [^]
My 5 for you. :-D
Maxwell Chen
-
jitAtran wrote:
My intention was not to compare all the features of java and .net.But generally there is a feeling(atleast in india) among freshers that, those who choose .net are lazy guys and those who choose java are bright guys.
Well obviously they aren't very bright. An experienced developer chooses the right tool for the job and doesn't worry about whether they are considered lazy or bright. Both Java and .NET platforms have their own strengths and weaknesses, so you judge which tool to use depending on what your customer requirements are. Michael CP Blog [^] Development Blog [^]
I just jumped back into Java for one of my classes here at UCSD[^]. I hate it. Java sucks. And Java's generics suck harder. And in general, Java just sucks. Give me C# and .NET any day of the week.
Oh geez... the forum keeps spinning... you'll take care o f it i'm sure, c'ause ... yeah, i neede this. *cough* anyway good job finding the bug.
-Shog9 on...a Firefox bug. -
I just jumped back into Java for one of my classes here at UCSD[^]. I hate it. Java sucks. And Java's generics suck harder. And in general, Java just sucks. Give me C# and .NET any day of the week.
Oh geez... the forum keeps spinning... you'll take care o f it i'm sure, c'ause ... yeah, i neede this. *cough* anyway good job finding the bug.
-Shog9 on...a Firefox bug.I was speaking about freshers who knows only some C or C++ and plans to make it big.Their attitude is to go for some .net course rather than getting into J2EE ,since they feel J2EE is very difficult.And this genral attitude helps java developers to increase their market value.
-
I just jumped back into Java for one of my classes here at UCSD[^]. I hate it. Java sucks. And Java's generics suck harder. And in general, Java just sucks. Give me C# and .NET any day of the week.
Oh geez... the forum keeps spinning... you'll take care o f it i'm sure, c'ause ... yeah, i neede this. *cough* anyway good job finding the bug.
-Shog9 on...a Firefox bug.My 5 for u. :-D
============================================ Sohail
-
I just jumped back into Java for one of my classes here at UCSD[^]. I hate it. Java sucks. And Java's generics suck harder. And in general, Java just sucks. Give me C# and .NET any day of the week.
Oh geez... the forum keeps spinning... you'll take care o f it i'm sure, c'ause ... yeah, i neede this. *cough* anyway good job finding the bug.
-Shog9 on...a Firefox bug. -
Hi everyone, My intention was not to compare all the features of java and .net.But generally there is a feeling(atleast in india) among freshers that, those who choose .net are lazy guys and those who choose java are bright guys. I think there is some reason behind that.now a days in most of the cases a fresher who wants a programming career would not take a java course if he does not have any programming knowledge .because he/she feels that J2EE is tougher.But guys who love programming during their graduation will not hesitate to jump into java. Clearly we can see this when biggies started calling even from 6 months of experienced people in j2ee ,where they would call a .net professional only if he has atleast two years of experience. -- modified at 5:34 Monday 1st May, 2006
jitAtran wrote:
those who choose .net are lazy guys and those who choose java are bright guys
They should torture both camps, by making them learn Scheme or Haskell :P Or some crazy fork of a language cooked up by one of the Professors - I was taught mainly with a Pascal dialect. There was meant to be tutition in Prolog and Lisp too, but the course was becoming increasingly vocational. I think that might be a fundamental issue with the teaching of programming / software engineering - the conflict between acedemic computer science and the vocational skills that you will use for 90% of your work unless you are in a specialist field like compiler design, graphics or AI. My course was a mish mash of both and not in a good way. The vocational stuff was all about 5 years out of date (or just useless, like teaching RAD with Access) and the acedemic stuff remained to theoretical - concurrent programming, networking theory and language / compiler design were all taught with little or no practical application. I'm currently using ANTLR to develop a custom query language for Lucene, and damn am I rusty. As this field is still so young, and so faddy, many courses are teaching a vocational curriculum that is wildly out of date. Be happy that they are offering a course that has any immediately applicable content. I taught myself C++ while at university as I was lucky enough to get a job programming to help with living expenses. Ryan
"Michael Moore and Mel Gibson are the same person, except for a few sit-ups. Moore thought his cheesy political blooper reel was going to tell people how to vote. Mel thought that his little gay SM movie about his imaginary friend was going to help him get to heaven." - Penn Jillette
-- modified at 7:48 Monday 1st May, 2006
-
I was speaking about freshers who knows only some C or C++ and plans to make it big.Their attitude is to go for some .net course rather than getting into J2EE ,since they feel J2EE is very difficult.And this genral attitude helps java developers to increase their market value.
jitAtran wrote:
some C or C++
Which are far more difficult languages than either .NET or Java. C has pointers and C++ has pointers and mindblowingly complicated and powerful sideffects of its template mechanism. Ryan
"Michael Moore and Mel Gibson are the same person, except for a few sit-ups. Moore thought his cheesy political blooper reel was going to tell people how to vote. Mel thought that his little gay SM movie about his imaginary friend was going to help him get to heaven." - Penn Jillette
-
jitAtran wrote:
My intention was not to compare all the features of java and .net.But generally there is a feeling(atleast in india) among freshers that, those who choose .net are lazy guys and those who choose java are bright guys.
Well obviously they aren't very bright. An experienced developer chooses the right tool for the job and doesn't worry about whether they are considered lazy or bright. Both Java and .NET platforms have their own strengths and weaknesses, so you judge which tool to use depending on what your customer requirements are. Michael CP Blog [^] Development Blog [^]
Michael P Butler wrote:
Both Java and .NET platforms have their own strengths and weaknesses, so you judge which tool to use depending on what your customer requirements are.
I gather that in the UK City financial sector there has been a trend towards using both Java and .NET - Enterprise Java at the back-end, and ASP.NET or Windows Forms at the front end. Presumably this is because they see as MS being comparatively strong at the GUI/Desktop level with J2EE being comparatively strong on the server-side - or maybe just more mature. Kevin
-
Uhmmm... You cannot compare Mono to .NET: Mono is just a copy of the .NET class library and has a C# compiler. The class library is not complete, and it's stuck to .NET 1.1, moreover you have to use GTK# and different namespaces in order to create GUIs. So it's not really usable, unless you have a strict need to make a cross-platform application, but in that case I wouldn't go for .NET nor Mono at all. Maybe Java (God forgive me :-D). IMHO. :) ___________________________________ Tozzi is right: Gaia is getting rid of us. My Blog [ITA]
While I agree that you cannot compare Mono and the .Net Framework, you're wrong in some assumptions: .NET 2.0 support is planned and under heavy work and you can as well run applications built using Windows.Forms, just they don't feel as smooth as native (GTK) apps. And it's going to be better with newer releases. Luca The Price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance.
-
jitAtran wrote:
among freshers
So then, why is it that Java is taught to freshmen to introduce programming? Keep in mind, teaching Java replaced teaching BASIC. ;P Disclaimer--I really have no idea whether what I just said is accurate Marc Pensieve Some people believe what the bible says. Literally. At least [with Wikipedia] you have the chance to correct the wiki -- Jörgen Sigvardsson
Marc Clifton wrote:
Keep in mind, teaching Java replaced teaching BASIC
i had 3 years of Modula-2 when i was in school, and no BASIC at all :( Cleek | Image Toolkits | Thumbnail maker
-
jitAtran wrote:
some C or C++
Which are far more difficult languages than either .NET or Java. C has pointers and C++ has pointers and mindblowingly complicated and powerful sideffects of its template mechanism. Ryan
"Michael Moore and Mel Gibson are the same person, except for a few sit-ups. Moore thought his cheesy political blooper reel was going to tell people how to vote. Mel thought that his little gay SM movie about his imaginary friend was going to help him get to heaven." - Penn Jillette
Ryan Roberts wrote:
jitAtran wrote: some C or C++ Which are far more difficult languages than either .NET or Java. C has pointers and C++ has pointers and mindblowingly complicated and powerful sideffects of its template mechanism
Sorry dear ...I must have changed it into some basics of C or C++.Generally in india even if you are studying for electrical engineering or mechanical engineering you will have to learn C or C++ . -- modified at 10:02 Monday 1st May, 2006
-
While I agree that you cannot compare Mono and the .Net Framework, you're wrong in some assumptions: .NET 2.0 support is planned and under heavy work and you can as well run applications built using Windows.Forms, just they don't feel as smooth as native (GTK) apps. And it's going to be better with newer releases. Luca The Price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance.
Luca Leonardo Scorcia wrote:
you can as well run applications built using Windows.Forms, just they don't feel as smooth as native (GTK) apps.
Can you run them cross platform? It was my understanding tha gtk was needed if you wanted to target a nonwindows desktop.
-
Luca Leonardo Scorcia wrote:
you can as well run applications built using Windows.Forms, just they don't feel as smooth as native (GTK) apps.
Can you run them cross platform? It was my understanding tha gtk was needed if you wanted to target a nonwindows desktop.
Yes, you can. Of course, many advanced features are under development, but you can easily take a dialog based Windows.Forms binary and run it under mono. They have rewritten the entire Windows.Forms using GDI+ calls. Slow, but works (mostly). Check out the screenshots on the mono-project web site. Luca The Price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance.