Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Another Silly puzzle

Another Silly puzzle

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
questioncom
51 Posts 19 Posters 2 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Smitha Nishant

    Nishant Sivakumar wrote:

    blow the air away creating a small vacuum pocket

    :omg::omg::omg: Every problem has a gift for you in its hands. -- Richard Bach

    C Offline
    C Offline
    Chris Losinger
    wrote on last edited by
    #9

    do you know how airplane wings work? Cleek | Image Toolkits | Thumbnail maker

    N 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • C Chris Losinger

      do you know how airplane wings work? Cleek | Image Toolkits | Thumbnail maker

      N Offline
      N Offline
      Nish Nishant
      wrote on last edited by
      #10

      Chris Losinger wrote:

      do you know how airplane wings work?

      That works on the vacuum principle too, eh? Regards, Nish


      Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
      The Ultimate Grid - The #1 MFC grid out there!

      C 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • J Jon Sagara

        Quartz... wrote:

        When will the sum of this series exceed 100 ?

        e100? Jon Sagara When I grow up, I'm changing my name to Joe Kickass! My Site | My Blog | My Articles -- modified at 15:12 Tuesday 9th May, 2006

        R Offline
        R Offline
        Russell Morris
        wrote on last edited by
        #11

        The series for e^x is more complicated than that: e^x = 1 + x + x^2/2! + x^3/3! + ... + x^n/n! + ... where n is an integer and goes from 0 to infinity If you differentiate term n of this series, you find that you get term n-1 as a result. That's why the derivative of e^x is still e^x :) I always liked that for some reason.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • R Raj Lal

          1/2 + 1/3 + 1/4 + 1/5 + 1/6 + 1/7 + 1/8 ...... When will the sum of this series exceed 100 ? Will it EVER ? For the thinkers, Why does a candle extinguishes when we blow on it? (Never paid attention to it, right?) Looks simple but it isn't ! * you are right, this guy has got nothing to do... but if you read this we are in the same boat --- My Unedited article^

          Richard Andrew x64R Offline
          Richard Andrew x64R Offline
          Richard Andrew x64
          wrote on last edited by
          #12

          The sum will never even reach the number 1, much less exceed 100. And the candle gets extinguished from the carbon dioxide in our breath. Rich ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸

          W N R J 4 Replies Last reply
          0
          • N Nish Nishant

            Chris Losinger wrote:

            do you know how airplane wings work?

            That works on the vacuum principle too, eh? Regards, Nish


            Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
            The Ultimate Grid - The #1 MFC grid out there!

            C Offline
            C Offline
            Chris Losinger
            wrote on last edited by
            #13

            Nishant Sivakumar wrote:

            That works on the vacuum principle too, eh?

            a wing will create small pockets of (partial) vacuum as air moves around it. it's under debate as to whether this is the actual source of lift or not. Cleek | Image Toolkits | Thumbnail maker

            M A P 3 Replies Last reply
            0
            • W Wjousts

              Quartz... wrote:

              For the thinkers, Why does a candle extinguishes when we blow on it? (Never paid attention to it, right?) Looks simple but it isn't !

              Because you are blowing away the fuel for the flame, i.e. the vaporized candle wax.

              R Offline
              R Offline
              Raj Lal
              wrote on last edited by
              #14

              You got it right. Here is your prize Up [^] --- My Unedited article^

              W 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Richard Andrew x64R Richard Andrew x64

                The sum will never even reach the number 1, much less exceed 100. And the candle gets extinguished from the carbon dioxide in our breath. Rich ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸

                W Offline
                W Offline
                Wjousts
                wrote on last edited by
                #15

                Funny, 'cos I'm up to 34000000000 or so and I've got a total of nearly 24 which is clearly more than 1. Look at the sequence more carefully. It's not 1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 +....

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Richard Andrew x64R Richard Andrew x64

                  The sum will never even reach the number 1, much less exceed 100. And the candle gets extinguished from the carbon dioxide in our breath. Rich ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸

                  N Offline
                  N Offline
                  Nish Nishant
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #16

                  Troposphere wrote:

                  The sum will never even reach the number 1, much less exceed 100.

                  You are kidding, right? :omg: It crosses 1 after the 3rd fraction in the series. 1/2 + 1/3 + 1/4 = 1.08333 Regards, Nish


                  Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
                  The Ultimate Grid - The #1 MFC grid out there!

                  Richard Andrew x64R 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • R Raj Lal

                    You got it right. Here is your prize Up [^] --- My Unedited article^

                    W Offline
                    W Offline
                    Wjousts
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #17

                    Woohoo! Now that's a big candle. Need a lot of puff to blow that one out. That's what she said ;)

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Richard Andrew x64R Richard Andrew x64

                      The sum will never even reach the number 1, much less exceed 100. And the candle gets extinguished from the carbon dioxide in our breath. Rich ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸

                      R Offline
                      R Offline
                      Raj Lal
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #18

                      Troposphere wrote:

                      And the candle gets extinguished from the carbon dioxide in our breath.

                      And if you blow air by some other method it won't ? --- My Unedited article^

                      Richard Andrew x64R 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • R Raj Lal

                        1/2 + 1/3 + 1/4 + 1/5 + 1/6 + 1/7 + 1/8 ...... When will the sum of this series exceed 100 ? Will it EVER ? For the thinkers, Why does a candle extinguishes when we blow on it? (Never paid attention to it, right?) Looks simple but it isn't ! * you are right, this guy has got nothing to do... but if you read this we are in the same boat --- My Unedited article^

                        D Offline
                        D Offline
                        Dan Neely
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #19

                        I want to say this is a nonconverging series, but it's been a long time since I did those in math, and google ignores /'s even when they're inside of quotes.

                        C R 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • R Raj Lal

                          1/2 + 1/3 + 1/4 + 1/5 + 1/6 + 1/7 + 1/8 ...... When will the sum of this series exceed 100 ? Will it EVER ? For the thinkers, Why does a candle extinguishes when we blow on it? (Never paid attention to it, right?) Looks simple but it isn't ! * you are right, this guy has got nothing to do... but if you read this we are in the same boat --- My Unedited article^

                          R Offline
                          R Offline
                          Raj Lal
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #20

                          OK lets divide it in two parts Question 1

                          Quartz... wrote:

                          When will the sum of this series exceed 100 ?

                          Question 2

                          Quartz... wrote:

                          Will it EVER ?

                          simple looking problems, are sometimes the most challenging ones. --- My Unedited article^

                          W 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • N Nish Nishant

                            Quartz... wrote:

                            Why does a candle extinguishes when we blow on it?

                            We blow the air away creating a small vacuum pocket and a fire cannot burn in a vacuum. That's my guess anyway :-) Regards, Nish


                            Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
                            The Ultimate Grid - The #1 MFC grid out there!

                            J Offline
                            J Offline
                            Jerry Hammond
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #21

                            I usually clean the wax out of my ears for that effect... Asking someone to define CP is like asking someone to define art. It is a known, a tangable thing, a state of being. To define it is to limit and miss its true nature.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • D Dan Neely

                              I want to say this is a nonconverging series, but it's been a long time since I did those in math, and google ignores /'s even when they're inside of quotes.

                              C Offline
                              C Offline
                              Chris Losinger
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #22

                              it's very close to the Harmonic Series[^], it just starts with i=2, instead of i=1. Cleek | Image Toolkits | Thumbnail maker

                              D 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • D Dan Neely

                                I want to say this is a nonconverging series, but it's been a long time since I did those in math, and google ignores /'s even when they're inside of quotes.

                                R Offline
                                R Offline
                                Raj Lal
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #23

                                Mathworld here[^] --- My Unedited article^

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • C Chris Losinger

                                  Nishant Sivakumar wrote:

                                  That works on the vacuum principle too, eh?

                                  a wing will create small pockets of (partial) vacuum as air moves around it. it's under debate as to whether this is the actual source of lift or not. Cleek | Image Toolkits | Thumbnail maker

                                  M Offline
                                  M Offline
                                  Marc Clifton
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #24

                                  Chris Losinger wrote:

                                  it's under debate as to whether this is the actual source of lift or not.

                                  You mean they still don't know? I've always been told that's why the plane lifts (but honestly, I never quite believed it. Just stick your hand out a moving car window and it seems that the angle of attack has a major affect as well, though maybe that's BECAUSE of the low pressure on the back of one's hand). Marc Pensieve Some people believe what the bible says. Literally. At least [with Wikipedia] you have the chance to correct the wiki -- Jörgen Sigvardsson

                                  N C 2 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • M Marc Clifton

                                    Chris Losinger wrote:

                                    it's under debate as to whether this is the actual source of lift or not.

                                    You mean they still don't know? I've always been told that's why the plane lifts (but honestly, I never quite believed it. Just stick your hand out a moving car window and it seems that the angle of attack has a major affect as well, though maybe that's BECAUSE of the low pressure on the back of one's hand). Marc Pensieve Some people believe what the bible says. Literally. At least [with Wikipedia] you have the chance to correct the wiki -- Jörgen Sigvardsson

                                    N Offline
                                    N Offline
                                    Nish Nishant
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #25

                                    Marc Clifton wrote:

                                    You mean they still don't know?

                                    Explains those bumpy rides, and if you are flying Air Canada or a domestic Indian airline, the bumpy part of the ride is seriously stressed upon! Regards, Nish


                                    Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
                                    The Ultimate Grid - The #1 MFC grid out there!

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • R Raj Lal

                                      OK lets divide it in two parts Question 1

                                      Quartz... wrote:

                                      When will the sum of this series exceed 100 ?

                                      Question 2

                                      Quartz... wrote:

                                      Will it EVER ?

                                      simple looking problems, are sometimes the most challenging ones. --- My Unedited article^

                                      W Offline
                                      W Offline
                                      Wjousts
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #26

                                      Quartz... wrote:

                                      Question 1 Quartz... wrote: When will the sum of this series exceed 100 ?

                                      Don't know. Some very large number, I'm up to around 58000000000 and it's only at about 24.36 doing this by brute force. I'm sure this is some known sequence and there is some very clever and simple way to calculate it, but I'm not up to the challenge.

                                      Quartz... wrote:

                                      Question 2 Quartz... wrote: Will it EVER ?

                                      I'm pretty sure it has to eventually. The number keeps growing but by progressively smaller steps, but it still keeps growing. Shouldn't you ask question 2 first?

                                      B 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • M Marc Clifton

                                        Chris Losinger wrote:

                                        it's under debate as to whether this is the actual source of lift or not.

                                        You mean they still don't know? I've always been told that's why the plane lifts (but honestly, I never quite believed it. Just stick your hand out a moving car window and it seems that the angle of attack has a major affect as well, though maybe that's BECAUSE of the low pressure on the back of one's hand). Marc Pensieve Some people believe what the bible says. Literally. At least [with Wikipedia] you have the chance to correct the wiki -- Jörgen Sigvardsson

                                        C Offline
                                        C Offline
                                        Chris Losinger
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #27

                                        Marc Clifton wrote:

                                        You mean they still don't know?

                                        this site[^] explains it pretty well, i think. but it's not the traditioinal Bernoulli's explanation (high pressure below, low pressure above). this one explains it as: The lift of a wing is proportional to the amount of air diverted down times the downward velocity of that air. so, some might know, but the rest of the world disagrees. Cleek | Image Toolkits | Thumbnail maker

                                        A 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • J Jon Sagara

                                          Quartz... wrote:

                                          When will the sum of this series exceed 100 ?

                                          e100? Jon Sagara When I grow up, I'm changing my name to Joe Kickass! My Site | My Blog | My Articles -- modified at 15:12 Tuesday 9th May, 2006

                                          R Offline
                                          R Offline
                                          Russell Morris
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #28

                                          Jon Sagara wrote:

                                          e100?

                                          Wait - after working this a bit, I'm getting that e100 is a good approximation of the number of terms it would take for the sum of that series to get up to 100. Is that what you were indicating? If so, I apologize for my first 'correction' :-O From my musings, the above series is the Harmonic Series, but starting at k=2 (Chris Losinger has noted this already, it appears). In addition, ln(n) is a good approximation of this series' value at n. Therefore solving: ln(n) = 100 for n would approximate the number of terms in the series needed to get the sum of the series to 100. Solving this equation, I get: n = e100 which is what you originally wrote. Did you come to this conclusion in the same way I did? I hope I'm not making myself look silly - I'm 6 years away from my last math class. It's amazing how the details become so fuzzy after such a short time...

                                          J S 2 Replies Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups