Finally Gave Up on MySQL
-
I've been trying for two weeks to get MySQL (5.0) and PHP (5.12) to play together on a 2003 Server box, and last night I gave up. I installed Oracle 10g EX, and i'm in a much better mnood about the whole thing.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001 -
I've been trying for two weeks to get MySQL (5.0) and PHP (5.12) to play together on a 2003 Server box, and last night I gave up. I installed Oracle 10g EX, and i'm in a much better mnood about the whole thing.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:
I installed Oracle 10g EX,
How come not SQL Server Express? Marc Pensieve Some people believe what the bible says. Literally. At least [with Wikipedia] you have the chance to correct the wiki -- Jörgen Sigvardsson
-
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:
I installed Oracle 10g EX,
How come not SQL Server Express? Marc Pensieve Some people believe what the bible says. Literally. At least [with Wikipedia] you have the chance to correct the wiki -- Jörgen Sigvardsson
Because Oracle is a much better DB than anything MS might be able to buy from someone else (unless, of course, if they bought Oracle, but then we'd be subjected to more of that "Microsoft Genuine Advantage" crap)... :)
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001-- modified at 16:29 Thursday 11th May, 2006
-
I've been trying for two weeks to get MySQL (5.0) and PHP (5.12) to play together on a 2003 Server box, and last night I gave up. I installed Oracle 10g EX, and i'm in a much better mnood about the whole thing.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001 -
Lucky you, I finally gave up on Oracle years ago. Never send a human to do a machine's job Agent Smith
norm.net wrote:
Lucky you, I finally gave up on Oracle years ago.
What do you use now? Sql Server by any chance? Regards, Nish
Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
Currently working on C++/CLI in Action for Manning Publications. -
Because Oracle is a much better DB than anything MS might be able to buy from someone else (unless, of course, if they bought Oracle, but then we'd be subjected to more of that "Microsoft Genuine Advantage" crap)... :)
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001-- modified at 16:29 Thursday 11th May, 2006
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:
Because Oracle is a much better DB
I'm not trying to bait you, but why? I gave up on Oracle after 7, as they were getting really bloated and embracing Java too much. Marc Pensieve Some people believe what the bible says. Literally. At least [with Wikipedia] you have the chance to correct the wiki -- Jörgen Sigvardsson
-
norm.net wrote:
Lucky you, I finally gave up on Oracle years ago.
What do you use now? Sql Server by any chance? Regards, Nish
Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
Currently working on C++/CLI in Action for Manning Publications.Why, what else? :) Actually 2005 Standard Edition, had a fews bugs in the .net UI, but altogether is far better and easier to use than Oracle will ever be. Never send a human to do a machine's job Agent Smith -- modified at 11:00 Thursday 11th May, 2006
-
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:
Because Oracle is a much better DB
I'm not trying to bait you, but why? I gave up on Oracle after 7, as they were getting really bloated and embracing Java too much. Marc Pensieve Some people believe what the bible says. Literally. At least [with Wikipedia] you have the chance to correct the wiki -- Jörgen Sigvardsson
A back-end is a back-end (just ask J-Lo). If I can use it from PHP and .NET, it's all good.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001 -
I've been trying for two weeks to get MySQL (5.0) and PHP (5.12) to play together on a 2003 Server box, and last night I gave up. I installed Oracle 10g EX, and i'm in a much better mnood about the whole thing.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001John, you should consider looking at Firebird[^]. Once you find an Admin client you like, it really is a fast, solid and tiny DB engine. Just a thought.
:..::. Douglas H. Troy ::..
Bad Astronomy |Development Blogging|Viksoe.dk's Site -- modified at 11:01 Thursday 11th May, 2006 -
A back-end is a back-end (just ask J-Lo). If I can use it from PHP and .NET, it's all good.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:
A back-end is a back-end (just ask J-Lo)
:doh: :laugh:
:..::. Douglas H. Troy ::..
Bad Astronomy |Development Blogging|Viksoe.dk's Site -
Why, what else? :) Actually 2005 Standard Edition, had a fews bugs in the .net UI, but altogether is far better and easier to use than Oracle will ever be. Never send a human to do a machine's job Agent Smith -- modified at 11:00 Thursday 11th May, 2006
norm.net wrote:
Why, what else?
Just asked. :-) Recently someone told me that, for anything other than amateur use, stuff like postgres and mysql never really worked out well, and that big companies always used oracle or sql server. Regards, Nish
Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
Currently working on C++/CLI in Action for Manning Publications. -
I've been trying for two weeks to get MySQL (5.0) and PHP (5.12) to play together on a 2003 Server box, and last night I gave up. I installed Oracle 10g EX, and i'm in a much better mnood about the whole thing.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001I tried MySQL some time back...I gotta say, John, you should give SQL2005 a spin. It is so cool and with the Management Studio you should be up and running in no time. If an idiot like myself can create a database and have it running it less than 20 minutes you should be creating and deploying in no time.
Asking someone to define CP is like asking someone to define art. To define it is to miss its true nature.
-
I've been trying for two weeks to get MySQL (5.0) and PHP (5.12) to play together on a 2003 Server box, and last night I gave up. I installed Oracle 10g EX, and i'm in a much better mnood about the whole thing.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001Never used Oracle, I would like to know if it's better than SQL 2005. As I have been using it, however to deploy one server cost me too much money. Can you create a cluster of server in Oracle? How much is the database per server and how the cluster works? Also how fast is compared to MS SQL 2005 and do I need to change the way I perform queries in C# or ASP.NET 2.0? Al PS Well ... give me all the white papers :-) My eMail control My Blog
-
I've been trying for two weeks to get MySQL (5.0) and PHP (5.12) to play together on a 2003 Server box, and last night I gave up. I installed Oracle 10g EX, and i'm in a much better mnood about the whole thing.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001 -
I tried MySQL some time back...I gotta say, John, you should give SQL2005 a spin. It is so cool and with the Management Studio you should be up and running in no time. If an idiot like myself can create a database and have it running it less than 20 minutes you should be creating and deploying in no time.
Asking someone to define CP is like asking someone to define art. To define it is to miss its true nature.
Jerry Hammond wrote:
If an idiot like myself can create a database and have it running it less than 20 minutes you should be creating and deploying in no time.
Exactly, the bigger the idiot, the less time it takes.
-
Because I have to be able to support .NET 2.0. Linux/mono doesn't support 2.0 yet, and won't until near the end of this year (or next year).
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001 -
Jerry Hammond wrote:
If an idiot like myself can create a database and have it running it less than 20 minutes you should be creating and deploying in no time.
Exactly, the bigger the idiot, the less time it takes.
Blue Bird wrote:
Exactly, the bigger the idiot, the less time it takes.
Then you're only a heartbeat away...[snicker]
Asking someone to define CP is like asking someone to define art. To define it is to miss its true nature.
-
Never used Oracle, I would like to know if it's better than SQL 2005. As I have been using it, however to deploy one server cost me too much money. Can you create a cluster of server in Oracle? How much is the database per server and how the cluster works? Also how fast is compared to MS SQL 2005 and do I need to change the way I perform queries in C# or ASP.NET 2.0? Al PS Well ... give me all the white papers :-) My eMail control My Blog
I can't answer any of those questions, so consider google to be your friend.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001 -
Never used Oracle, I would like to know if it's better than SQL 2005. As I have been using it, however to deploy one server cost me too much money. Can you create a cluster of server in Oracle? How much is the database per server and how the cluster works? Also how fast is compared to MS SQL 2005 and do I need to change the way I perform queries in C# or ASP.NET 2.0? Al PS Well ... give me all the white papers :-) My eMail control My Blog
Read this for an insite into Oracle 10g Express Edition. Oracle Database 10g Express Edition: Not Just for Learners[^] While your there, have a look around, and if you like what you see, register yourself with them for future technical product information etc.
-
norm.net wrote:
Why, what else?
Just asked. :-) Recently someone told me that, for anything other than amateur use, stuff like postgres and mysql never really worked out well, and that big companies always used oracle or sql server. Regards, Nish
Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
Currently working on C++/CLI in Action for Manning Publications.Oracle, has the worst interface(s) from installing right down to using, their version of a window to retreive data, constisted of a UI similar to notepad, absolute farce all the money you pay for a product like that, even MS Access beats Oracle. SQL Server 2005, is good, the management studio has a few bugs, but it's so easy to set up and use. Long live SqlServer!!! :cool: Never send a human to do a machine's job Agent Smith