Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Faster than light universe?

Faster than light universe?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
htmlcomperformancequestioncareer
92 Posts 25 Posters 9 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Jorgen Sigvardsson

    Just because light can't travel faster than a certain speed, doesn't mean that space itself can't expand faster. :)

    -- Pictures[^] from my Japan trip.

    Last modified: den 7 augusti 2006 12:36:48 --

    M Offline
    M Offline
    malockin
    wrote on last edited by
    #52

    Exactly :) Relativity says that information cannot travel than the speed of light, it says nothing about objects travelling faster than the speed of light (as far as I can remember from my college days). If there are any object that travel faster than the speed of light, we have no way of sensing that they are actually doing so. So it is perfectly plausible to think of a universe that is wider than ~31 light years. Nicola

    M A 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • E El Corazon

      Chris Maunder wrote:

      11 and 26 dimension versions are really unstable and back backwards compatibility problems, though.

      which is why superstring theory has moved onto compactification of dimensions to 10. Bosonic hyperspace of 26 dimensions suffers the problems of tachyon particles with imaginary mass. More current discussions involve supersymetry, dimensional compactification, and M-theory variants. :cool:

      _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

      C Offline
      C Offline
      Chris Losinger
      wrote on last edited by
      #53

      Jeffry J. Brickley wrote:

      Bosonic hyperspace of 26 dimensions suffers the problems of tachyon particles with imaginary mass.

      but what about the warp drives ?

      image processing | blogging

      E D 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • V Vikram A Punathambekar

        But how would we know? :confused:

        š Cheers, Vikram.


        I don't know and you don't either.    Militant Agnostic

        B Offline
        B Offline
        brianwelsch
        wrote on last edited by
        #54

        I don't think there is anyway currently to measure the existence of gravitons, nevermind trying to determine if they cross universal boundaries. I have no clue how they plan to figure it out either. The idea behind them, I think, is that they are can be closed strings which can leave the "surface" of the universe, called a brane, and travel to other branes. Open strings attach themselves to the brane thereby remaining within a single universe. I might have that wrong, it's all very new to me and a bit fantastic really.

        BW


        If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
        -- Steven Wright

        D R 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • B brianwelsch

          Isn't there a theory that gravitrons or something can jump between universes?

          BW


          If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
          -- Steven Wright

          D Offline
          D Offline
          Dan Neely
          wrote on last edited by
          #55

          I'm not sure if it's what you're thinking of, but acording to superstring/m-theories, unlike the other force cariers gravitons should able able to spread energy across the other 6 rolled up dimensions. This leaking would help explain why gravity is so many orders of magnitude weaker than any of the other three forces. THe interesting part is that this is the one prediction that the theories make that could actually be testable. We've only been able to measure gravity down to a resolution of ~1mm, which means the hidden dimensions could be upto that large. If they are, particles in the LHC and high energy cosmic rays would be energetic enough to create ultra low quantum black holes when they collide, thier immediate decay would produce identifyable particle showers that would be detectable by instruments.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C Christopher Duncan

            Because when you counted your gravitrons the next morning, you'd be missing a few. :-D

            Author of The Career Programmer and Unite the Tribes www.PracticalStrategyConsulting.com

            B Offline
            B Offline
            brianwelsch
            wrote on last edited by
            #56

            Heheh. You don't want to run around short a few gravitons, that's for sure. People look at you funny.

            BW


            If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
            -- Steven Wright

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M malockin

              Exactly :) Relativity says that information cannot travel than the speed of light, it says nothing about objects travelling faster than the speed of light (as far as I can remember from my college days). If there are any object that travel faster than the speed of light, we have no way of sensing that they are actually doing so. So it is perfectly plausible to think of a universe that is wider than ~31 light years. Nicola

              M Offline
              M Offline
              Marc Clifton
              wrote on last edited by
              #57

              DragoNick wrote:

              Relativity says that information cannot travel than the speed of light, it says nothing about objects travelling faster than the speed of light (as far as I can remember from my college days). If there are any object that travel faster than the speed of light, we have no way of sensing that they are actually doing so.

              And thus was born the concept of a tachyon which has led to much great science fiction! Marc

              XPressTier

              Some people believe what the bible says. Literally. At least [with Wikipedia] you have the chance to correct the wiki -- Jörgen Sigvardsson
              People are just notoriously impossible. --DavidCrow
              There's NO excuse for not commenting your code. -- John Simmons / outlaw programmer

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • E El Corazon

                Jeremy Falcon wrote:

                At least it compiled.

                It must be right then... I hear that all the time, no syntax error, it must be right... :laugh:

                _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

                J Offline
                J Offline
                Jeremy Falcon
                wrote on last edited by
                #58

                Jeffry J. Brickley wrote:

                I hear that all the time, no syntax error, it must be right...

                GPF, what GPF? I don't see no steekin' GPF!

                Jeremy Falcon

                E 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • J Jeremy Falcon

                  Jeffry J. Brickley wrote:

                  I hear that all the time, no syntax error, it must be right...

                  GPF, what GPF? I don't see no steekin' GPF!

                  Jeremy Falcon

                  E Offline
                  E Offline
                  El Corazon
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #59

                  Jeremy Falcon wrote:

                  GPF, what GPF? I don't see no steekin' GPF!

                  "Murphy's law" is really just ignored memory leaks.

                  _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • C Chris Losinger

                    Jeffry J. Brickley wrote:

                    Bosonic hyperspace of 26 dimensions suffers the problems of tachyon particles with imaginary mass.

                    but what about the warp drives ?

                    image processing | blogging

                    E Offline
                    E Offline
                    El Corazon
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #60

                    Chris Losinger wrote:

                    but what about the warp drives ?

                    Why do you think there is no warp 26?

                    _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • B brianwelsch

                      I don't think there is anyway currently to measure the existence of gravitons, nevermind trying to determine if they cross universal boundaries. I have no clue how they plan to figure it out either. The idea behind them, I think, is that they are can be closed strings which can leave the "surface" of the universe, called a brane, and travel to other branes. Open strings attach themselves to the brane thereby remaining within a single universe. I might have that wrong, it's all very new to me and a bit fantastic really.

                      BW


                      If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
                      -- Steven Wright

                      D Offline
                      D Offline
                      Dan Neely
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #61

                      brianwelsch wrote:

                      I don't think there is anyway currently to measure the existence of gravitons, nevermind trying to determine if they cross universal boundaries. I have no clue how they plan to figure it out either.

                      We're a looooong way from detecting a single graviton, we've yet to detect even the strongest gravity waves that should be passing through our planet. LIGO has proved thier nonpresence down to a contraction/expansion of 10^-20, the current science run is going at the design level of 10^-22, which is the equilant of changing the sun-saturn distance by the diameter of a hydrogen atom. A run carried out at an intermediate sensitivity is undergoing final analysis now (The brute force crunching part was completed about a month ago).

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • C Chris Losinger

                        Jeffry J. Brickley wrote:

                        Bosonic hyperspace of 26 dimensions suffers the problems of tachyon particles with imaginary mass.

                        but what about the warp drives ?

                        image processing | blogging

                        D Offline
                        D Offline
                        Dan Neely
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #62

                        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcubierre\_drive

                        E 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • D Dan Neely

                          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcubierre\_drive

                          E Offline
                          E Offline
                          El Corazon
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #63

                          I always preferred the gravity drive from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giants_series[^].

                          _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • J Jeremy Falcon

                            Christopher Duncan wrote:

                            Because if the radius of the universe is 90 billion light years but the universe is less than 20 billion years old, then you have to play some games with the term "year" to make the math work.

                            Ah, lessoned learned. I shouldn't talk astrophysics while my girlfriend is calling me to go get my food at the same time. :-D

                            Jeremy Falcon

                            C Offline
                            C Offline
                            Christopher Duncan
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #64

                            Doesn't the fact that you have a girlfriend pretty much disqualify you from being a physicist in the first place? :-D

                            Author of The Career Programmer and Unite the Tribes www.PracticalStrategyConsulting.com

                            A J 2 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • S Shog9 0

                              There is no beyond. or Cheese curds and beer.

                              ---- Scripts i’ve known... CPhog 1.8.2 - make CP better. Forum Bookmark 0.2.5 - bookmark forum posts on Pensieve Print forum 0.1.2 - printer-friendly forums Expand all 1.0 - Expand all messages In-place Delete 1.0 - AJAX-style post delete Syntax 0.1 - Syntax highlighting for code blocks in the forums

                              P Offline
                              P Offline
                              peterchen
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #65

                              you are almost right[^] :)


                              We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
                              Tree in C# || Fold With Us! || sighist

                              S 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • B brianwelsch

                                Isn't there a theory that gravitrons or something can jump between universes?

                                BW


                                If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
                                -- Steven Wright

                                A Offline
                                A Offline
                                Andy Brummer
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #66

                                From what I've read that sounds like some of the brane theories. We live on a 4 dimensional brane in a higher dimensional universe. Most particles we encounter are constrained to the brane and gravity works in the entire multidemnsional space. This is one way to explain why gravity is so weak and we have particles with the masses and interactions that we observe.

                                Using the GridView is like trying to explain to someone else how to move a third person's hands in order to tie your shoelaces for you. -Chris Maunder

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • S Shog9 0

                                  There is no beyond. or Cheese curds and beer.

                                  ---- Scripts i’ve known... CPhog 1.8.2 - make CP better. Forum Bookmark 0.2.5 - bookmark forum posts on Pensieve Print forum 0.1.2 - printer-friendly forums Expand all 1.0 - Expand all messages In-place Delete 1.0 - AJAX-style post delete Syntax 0.1 - Syntax highlighting for code blocks in the forums

                                  A Offline
                                  A Offline
                                  Andy Brummer
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #67

                                  Shog9 wrote:

                                  Cheese curds

                                  <homer drool>ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh</homer drool> Can you get them where you are?  I've only seen them in Cheeseland growing up they were one of my  favorite childhood treats.

                                  Using the GridView is like trying to explain to someone else how to move a third person's hands in order to tie your shoelaces for you. -Chris Maunder

                                  S 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • P peterchen

                                    you are almost right[^] :)


                                    We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
                                    Tree in C# || Fold With Us! || sighist

                                    S Offline
                                    S Offline
                                    Shog9 0
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #68

                                    ;) I was kinda hoping someone else would join in.

                                    ---- Scripts i’ve known... CPhog 1.8.2 - make CP better. Forum Bookmark 0.2.5 - bookmark forum posts on Pensieve Print forum 0.1.2 - printer-friendly forums Expand all 1.0 - Expand all messages In-place Delete 1.0 - AJAX-style post delete Syntax 0.1 - Syntax highlighting for code blocks in the forums

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • C Chris Maunder

                                      It all shows that you need to plan and document, plan and document before you start thinking you can just slap together 26 dimensions and assume it'll all work. Imaginary mass for tachyon particles? Can you say "kludge"? :rolleyes:

                                      cheers, Chris Maunder

                                      CodeProject.com : C++ MVP

                                      A Offline
                                      A Offline
                                      Andy Brummer
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #69

                                      Actually from what I've read, they've found a solution to that problem. I can't remember the details, but I think it involved dual strings. Esentially they were using a bad perterbation. Some of the latest non-string theories can shoehorn all the particles into a 4 dimensional subspace of a 5 dimensional space with exponentially increasing gravity in the 5th dimension. It sounds completely artificial but it does produce a solution with the big gap between the weak and strong scales.

                                      Using the GridView is like trying to explain to someone else how to move a third person's hands in order to tie your shoelaces for you. -Chris Maunder

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • C Chris S Kaiser

                                        One of my favorite notions is that science is more philosophy than fact. I mean come on... do we really think that with our limited brain pans that we can accurately calculate the beginning of this space and time we find ourselves in? Fun excercise and may uncover quite a bit of relevant information and useful data, but really, again, we're guessing. I'm fascinated by it though. Taking a look at the assumed view of the grand universe, our own milky way is like a gnat in comparison. When you get to the level of clusters of clusters of galaxies... all of my problems seem pretty insignificant indeed. I think that as science evolves this data will keep changing. As our understanding and technique improves so will the data, but I wonder if we can come up with the correct numbers and if it even matters. But the old number was 14 billion years. Side note: There's a book I'm reading called Programming the Universe[^]. Some very provacative ideas here. Maybe when the quantum computer is optimized it will tell us that we can't know the age or size of the universe as that data itself changes along with our ability to digest the details.

                                        This statement is false.

                                        A Offline
                                        A Offline
                                        Andy Brummer
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #70

                                        Chris S Kaiser wrote:

                                        Side note: There's a book I'm reading called Programming the Universe[^].

                                        I just finished it. It was pretty good, I was hoping for a little more meat to the book but it was interesting.

                                        Chris S Kaiser wrote:

                                        Maybe when the quantum computer is optimized it will tell us that we can't know the age or size of the universe as that data itself changes along with our ability to digest the details.

                                        What I got from it was that the universe is a quantum computer and the only quantum computer that can actually predict it has to be the same size or bigger.

                                        Chris S Kaiser wrote:

                                        One of my favorite notions is that science is more philosophy than fact.

                                        I'm not sure I follow. Science is guided by philosopy. The scientific method is essentially based on philosopy. The only question about the facts discovered by science are the error bars. For some things we know them down to 9 or 10 digits others not even one, but generally we keep learning.

                                        Using the GridView is like trying to explain to someone else how to move a third person's hands in order to tie your shoelaces for you. -Chris Maunder

                                        C 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • A Andy Brummer

                                          Shog9 wrote:

                                          Cheese curds

                                          <homer drool>ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh</homer drool> Can you get them where you are?  I've only seen them in Cheeseland growing up they were one of my  favorite childhood treats.

                                          Using the GridView is like trying to explain to someone else how to move a third person's hands in order to tie your shoelaces for you. -Chris Maunder

                                          S Offline
                                          S Offline
                                          Shog9 0
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #71

                                          Andy Brummer wrote:

                                          Can you get them where you are?

                                          Not proper ones. Colorado just isn't big on cheese the way Wisconsin is. Then again, it's also tough finding good beer and sausage here, even though there are lots of brewers and butchers. I suspect i don't quite "get" the local taste.

                                          ---- Scripts i’ve known... CPhog 1.8.2 - make CP better. Forum Bookmark 0.2.5 - bookmark forum posts on Pensieve Print forum 0.1.2 - printer-friendly forums Expand all 1.0 - Expand all messages In-place Delete 1.0 - AJAX-style post delete Syntax 0.1 - Syntax highlighting for code blocks in the forums

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups