Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. All change!

All change!

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
csscomhardwarebusinessperformance
9 Posts 6 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Davy Mitchell
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    At the weekend I wiped XP and installed Redhat on my 'experimental' hard disk.
    Of the two, I prefer RH for overall performance though XP has some nice bits - fast startup of OS and apps. RH comes with oodles of software - development and office etc. XP has less but WIMP and Messenger are fairly good. Both have handy update programs though Windows Update is only for the OS. XP seems a bit more clever with hardware.
    With a blank sheet, I would choose RH over XP but due to legacy hardware and work requirements I'll keep my W2K hard disk going too! Best of both worlds? Or will I waste time jumping between the two?
    Cheers, Davy http://www.LateDecember.com

    M D J 3 Replies Last reply
    0
    • D Davy Mitchell

      At the weekend I wiped XP and installed Redhat on my 'experimental' hard disk.
      Of the two, I prefer RH for overall performance though XP has some nice bits - fast startup of OS and apps. RH comes with oodles of software - development and office etc. XP has less but WIMP and Messenger are fairly good. Both have handy update programs though Windows Update is only for the OS. XP seems a bit more clever with hardware.
      With a blank sheet, I would choose RH over XP but due to legacy hardware and work requirements I'll keep my W2K hard disk going too! Best of both worlds? Or will I waste time jumping between the two?
      Cheers, Davy http://www.LateDecember.com

      M Offline
      M Offline
      Michael P Butler
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      I found that the development tools that came with Redhat weren't a patch on Visual Studio. It does come in handy when wanting to test what websites look like in different browsers. Michael :-)

      N 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Michael P Butler

        I found that the development tools that came with Redhat weren't a patch on Visual Studio. It does come in handy when wanting to test what websites look like in different browsers. Michael :-)

        N Offline
        N Offline
        Nish Nishant
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Michael P Butler wrote: found that the development tools that came with Redhat weren't a patch on Visual Studio Yeah but Visual Studio does not come with XP :-) You gotta buy it separate. So your comparison is disqualified of validity. Nish_


        One little CD gone, Then two CDs gone, Then 5 more gone, For a total 7 gones, If I was a CD R, I'd wanna cry, Cause I'd be just a goner, For a nasty CD burner. [funny how frustration wakes up the poet in me]_

        M 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • D Davy Mitchell

          At the weekend I wiped XP and installed Redhat on my 'experimental' hard disk.
          Of the two, I prefer RH for overall performance though XP has some nice bits - fast startup of OS and apps. RH comes with oodles of software - development and office etc. XP has less but WIMP and Messenger are fairly good. Both have handy update programs though Windows Update is only for the OS. XP seems a bit more clever with hardware.
          With a blank sheet, I would choose RH over XP but due to legacy hardware and work requirements I'll keep my W2K hard disk going too! Best of both worlds? Or will I waste time jumping between the two?
          Cheers, Davy http://www.LateDecember.com

          D Offline
          D Offline
          Dan Pomerchik
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          RH is a great os - fast and reliable, and very nice GUI. However, you can't use it to develop VS. Win2k is the best choice out of all windows version available. :-) - Dan "Intel inside - Idiot outside"

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • N Nish Nishant

            Michael P Butler wrote: found that the development tools that came with Redhat weren't a patch on Visual Studio Yeah but Visual Studio does not come with XP :-) You gotta buy it separate. So your comparison is disqualified of validity. Nish_


            One little CD gone, Then two CDs gone, Then 5 more gone, For a total 7 gones, If I was a CD R, I'd wanna cry, Cause I'd be just a goner, For a nasty CD burner. [funny how frustration wakes up the poet in me]_

            M Offline
            M Offline
            Michael A Barnhart
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Nish, I am sypathetic to your cost issue but why stop there? I can download linux versions for free. So why added anything that is not free. By your argument XP should not even be considered. To be conscious that you are ignorant of the facts is a great step towards Knowledge. Benjamin Disraeli

            N D 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • M Michael A Barnhart

              Nish, I am sypathetic to your cost issue but why stop there? I can download linux versions for free. So why added anything that is not free. By your argument XP should not even be considered. To be conscious that you are ignorant of the facts is a great step towards Knowledge. Benjamin Disraeli

              N Offline
              N Offline
              Nish Nishant
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Michael A. Barnhart wrote: By your argument XP should not even be considered. Isnt that what I was talking too? Michael tried to say the Visual Studio was an advantage for XP, but I reminded him VS was a separate package unlike KDevelop which came free with Red Hat Linux Nish_


              One little CD gone, Then two CDs gone, Then 5 more gone, For a total 7 gones, If I was a CD R, I'd wanna cry, Cause I'd be just a goner, For a nasty CD burner. [funny how frustration wakes up the poet in me]_

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • D Davy Mitchell

                At the weekend I wiped XP and installed Redhat on my 'experimental' hard disk.
                Of the two, I prefer RH for overall performance though XP has some nice bits - fast startup of OS and apps. RH comes with oodles of software - development and office etc. XP has less but WIMP and Messenger are fairly good. Both have handy update programs though Windows Update is only for the OS. XP seems a bit more clever with hardware.
                With a blank sheet, I would choose RH over XP but due to legacy hardware and work requirements I'll keep my W2K hard disk going too! Best of both worlds? Or will I waste time jumping between the two?
                Cheers, Davy http://www.LateDecember.com

                J Offline
                J Offline
                Jeremy Falcon
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                For those who want to develop on Unix/Linux and like KDE... http://www.kdevelop.org/graphics/pic_corner/kdevelop-2.0.gif Take a gander. Jeremy L. Falcon "The One Who Said, 'The One Who Said...'" Homepage : Sonork = 100.16311
                01000010011011110110001000100000011101110110000101110011
                00100000011010000110010101110010011001010010111000000000

                D 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Michael A Barnhart

                  Nish, I am sypathetic to your cost issue but why stop there? I can download linux versions for free. So why added anything that is not free. By your argument XP should not even be considered. To be conscious that you are ignorant of the facts is a great step towards Knowledge. Benjamin Disraeli

                  D Offline
                  D Offline
                  Dan Pomerchik
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Michael A. Barnhart wrote: I can download linux versions for free Versions of development enviroments? Yes, but you won't be able to program for the crappy Windows, and that's what you need isnt it ? Btw, I like linux very much, it is excellent, and have great GUI. :-) - Dan "Intel inside - Idiot outside"

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • J Jeremy Falcon

                    For those who want to develop on Unix/Linux and like KDE... http://www.kdevelop.org/graphics/pic_corner/kdevelop-2.0.gif Take a gander. Jeremy L. Falcon "The One Who Said, 'The One Who Said...'" Homepage : Sonork = 100.16311
                    01000010011011110110001000100000011101110110000101110011
                    00100000011010000110010101110010011001010010111000000000

                    D Offline
                    D Offline
                    Dan Pomerchik
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Very nice indeed :-) It's pity that microsoft controls the universe... there could been so much better things.. - Dan "Intel inside - Idiot outside"

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    Reply
                    • Reply as topic
                    Log in to reply
                    • Oldest to Newest
                    • Newest to Oldest
                    • Most Votes


                    • Login

                    • Don't have an account? Register

                    • Login or register to search.
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    0
                    • Categories
                    • Recent
                    • Tags
                    • Popular
                    • World
                    • Users
                    • Groups