Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. .NET IJW = Damn Slooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwww

.NET IJW = Damn Slooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwww

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
csharpdotnet
4 Posts 3 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    besmel
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Oh my... I decide to use the IJW to add some .NET to an unmanaged already working project.... Damn Slow ! Compiling the project now takes more than 10 times before adding the 'Common Language runtime option '/clr switch'. but wait : the linker, I dunno, still waiting... 30 minutes the linker is still linking... that's nice... now, I know, never touch a working project... but I wonder if anyone is using this nice but bloody slow feature available in VS2005...

    R 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • B besmel

      Oh my... I decide to use the IJW to add some .NET to an unmanaged already working project.... Damn Slow ! Compiling the project now takes more than 10 times before adding the 'Common Language runtime option '/clr switch'. but wait : the linker, I dunno, still waiting... 30 minutes the linker is still linking... that's nice... now, I know, never touch a working project... but I wonder if anyone is using this nice but bloody slow feature available in VS2005...

      R Offline
      R Offline
      Rama Krishna Vavilala
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Never compile a fully unmanaged application into CLI by adding /clr switch. This not only slows compilation but also increases the size of the executable or dll. Most books mention you to do that way, but that is plain wrong. I have compiled a big project using /clr and never got it to work. The proper solution is to add an adapter for the managed assembly.


      Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it. -Brian Kernighan

      J 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • R Rama Krishna Vavilala

        Never compile a fully unmanaged application into CLI by adding /clr switch. This not only slows compilation but also increases the size of the executable or dll. Most books mention you to do that way, but that is plain wrong. I have compiled a big project using /clr and never got it to work. The proper solution is to add an adapter for the managed assembly.


        Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it. -Brian Kernighan

        J Offline
        J Offline
        Jorgen Sigvardsson
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        So despite the name IJW, it just doesn't work? :rolleyes:

        -- Featuring GRATUITOUS ALIEN NUDITY

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • R Rama Krishna Vavilala

          Never compile a fully unmanaged application into CLI by adding /clr switch. This not only slows compilation but also increases the size of the executable or dll. Most books mention you to do that way, but that is plain wrong. I have compiled a big project using /clr and never got it to work. The proper solution is to add an adapter for the managed assembly.


          Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it. -Brian Kernighan

          J Offline
          J Offline
          Jorgen Sigvardsson
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          So despite the name IJW, it just doesn't work? :rolleyes:

          -- From the network that brought you "The Simpsons"

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          Reply
          • Reply as topic
          Log in to reply
          • Oldest to Newest
          • Newest to Oldest
          • Most Votes


          • Login

          • Don't have an account? Register

          • Login or register to search.
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular
          • World
          • Users
          • Groups