Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Athlon 64 3400 vs Pentium 4 3.0?

Athlon 64 3400 vs Pentium 4 3.0?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
csharpasp-netvisual-studiocomquestion
15 Posts 9 Posters 3 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R Rocky Moore

    Which type of system do you think would be the best bang? I am builind a termporary system that will last until second quarter of 2007 when I will upgrade to a new MS Vista system (probably a duo).

    Rocky <>< Latest Code Blog Post: ASP.NET HttpException - Cannot use leading "..".. Latest Tech Blog Post: Microsoft Zune to be built by Toshiba

    R Offline
    R Offline
    Rama Krishna Vavilala
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    Find it out yourslef:) http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu.html[^]


    Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it. -Brian Kernighan

    O R 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • R Rocky Moore

      Which type of system do you think would be the best bang? I am builind a termporary system that will last until second quarter of 2007 when I will upgrade to a new MS Vista system (probably a duo).

      Rocky <>< Latest Code Blog Post: ASP.NET HttpException - Cannot use leading "..".. Latest Tech Blog Post: Microsoft Zune to be built by Toshiba

      S Offline
      S Offline
      Stuart Dootson
      wrote on last edited by
      #3

      If it's for development, I'd go with the Athlon...and even if it isn't, I'd go Athlon anyway. Are these systems significantly cheaper than a Core 2 Duo system?

      R E 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • R Rama Krishna Vavilala

        Find it out yourslef:) http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu.html[^]


        Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it. -Brian Kernighan

        O Offline
        O Offline
        Orhun Birsoy
        wrote on last edited by
        #4

        I wish they had a Visual Studio benchmark like compiling a big project. Although compilation might be affected by other components like hard disk access, which benchmark do you think will give a better idea about the performance of compilation?

        Orhun Birsoy

        E S 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • R Rocky Moore

          Which type of system do you think would be the best bang? I am builind a termporary system that will last until second quarter of 2007 when I will upgrade to a new MS Vista system (probably a duo).

          Rocky <>< Latest Code Blog Post: ASP.NET HttpException - Cannot use leading "..".. Latest Tech Blog Post: Microsoft Zune to be built by Toshiba

          V Offline
          V Offline
          Varindir Rajesh Mahdihar
          wrote on last edited by
          #5

          get yourself 8 x 3.0GHZ itanium cpu's and solaris 10.1


          You don't see a WTF in spawning hundreds of threads ?? Or using code found on places like codeproject.com in production applications ... Code that is most likely untested, or barely test, more often than not, not made by reputable developers/development groups/etc ?? .... Wow ...---WTF

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • O Orhun Birsoy

            I wish they had a Visual Studio benchmark like compiling a big project. Although compilation might be affected by other components like hard disk access, which benchmark do you think will give a better idea about the performance of compilation?

            Orhun Birsoy

            E Offline
            E Offline
            ed welch
            wrote on last edited by
            #6

            the office productivity benchmarks

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • S Stuart Dootson

              If it's for development, I'd go with the Athlon...and even if it isn't, I'd go Athlon anyway. Are these systems significantly cheaper than a Core 2 Duo system?

              R Offline
              R Offline
              Rocky Moore
              wrote on last edited by
              #7

              Stuart Dootson wrote:

              Are these systems significantly cheaper than a Core 2 Duo system?

              Yep, motherboard/cpu/memory packages are several hundred less. Since it is just temporary until next year's major upgrades, I plan to keep it as cheap as possible while still having a little punch.

              Rocky <>< Latest Code Blog Post: ASP.NET HttpException - Cannot use leading "..".. Latest Tech Blog Post: Microsoft Zune to be built by Toshiba

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Stuart Dootson

                If it's for development, I'd go with the Athlon...and even if it isn't, I'd go Athlon anyway. Are these systems significantly cheaper than a Core 2 Duo system?

                E Offline
                E Offline
                ed welch
                wrote on last edited by
                #8

                You should be able to get a fairly decient core 2 (E6300) for about $500 sans monitor

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • R Rama Krishna Vavilala

                  Find it out yourslef:) http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu.html[^]


                  Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it. -Brian Kernighan

                  R Offline
                  R Offline
                  Rocky Moore
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #9

                  Toms Hardware can be hard to read at times. They have lots of tests, but most seem to oppose each other. Most of the time, it is still a coin toss.. I figured if I asked here, there would be some developers that had experience with these chips, as development machines. Thanks for the link!

                  Rocky <>< Latest Code Blog Post: ASP.NET HttpException - Cannot use leading "..".. Latest Tech Blog Post: Microsoft Zune to be built by Toshiba

                  S 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • R Rocky Moore

                    Which type of system do you think would be the best bang? I am builind a termporary system that will last until second quarter of 2007 when I will upgrade to a new MS Vista system (probably a duo).

                    Rocky <>< Latest Code Blog Post: ASP.NET HttpException - Cannot use leading "..".. Latest Tech Blog Post: Microsoft Zune to be built by Toshiba

                    J Offline
                    J Offline
                    Joe Woodbury
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    For a cheap system, I'd go with an Athlon 64 3500+ and an MSI K8N Neo4 Platinum MB. (These are the core of my system and are now about $215 cheaper than when I bought them 18 months ago.)

                    Anyone who thinks he has a better idea of what's good for people than people do is a swine. - P.J. O'Rourke

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • O Orhun Birsoy

                      I wish they had a Visual Studio benchmark like compiling a big project. Although compilation might be affected by other components like hard disk access, which benchmark do you think will give a better idea about the performance of compilation?

                      Orhun Birsoy

                      S Offline
                      S Offline
                      Stuart Dootson
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      This[^], although a couple of years old, shows how much faster an Athlon 64 is at compiling code than a Pentium 4 - and I can confirm the figures (roughly) from my experience with Athlon 64 and Pentium 4!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • R Rocky Moore

                        Toms Hardware can be hard to read at times. They have lots of tests, but most seem to oppose each other. Most of the time, it is still a coin toss.. I figured if I asked here, there would be some developers that had experience with these chips, as development machines. Thanks for the link!

                        Rocky <>< Latest Code Blog Post: ASP.NET HttpException - Cannot use leading "..".. Latest Tech Blog Post: Microsoft Zune to be built by Toshiba

                        S Offline
                        S Offline
                        Stuart Dootson
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #12

                        Rocky Moore wrote:

                        I figured if I asked here, there would be some developers that had experience with these chips, as development machines.

                        Rocky - I've had said experience - I've found an Athlon64 3400+ to take around 2/3 the time to build (C++) projects that a Pentium 4 3GHz does. These timings were repeatable, so I would definitely recommend the Athlon.

                        R J 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • S Stuart Dootson

                          Rocky Moore wrote:

                          I figured if I asked here, there would be some developers that had experience with these chips, as development machines.

                          Rocky - I've had said experience - I've found an Athlon64 3400+ to take around 2/3 the time to build (C++) projects that a Pentium 4 3GHz does. These timings were repeatable, so I would definitely recommend the Athlon.

                          R Offline
                          R Offline
                          Rocky Moore
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #13

                          Thanks!

                          Rocky <>< Latest Code Blog Post: ASP.NET HttpException - Cannot use leading "..".. Latest Tech Blog Post: Microsoft Zune to be built by Toshiba

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • S Stuart Dootson

                            Rocky Moore wrote:

                            I figured if I asked here, there would be some developers that had experience with these chips, as development machines.

                            Rocky - I've had said experience - I've found an Athlon64 3400+ to take around 2/3 the time to build (C++) projects that a Pentium 4 3GHz does. These timings were repeatable, so I would definitely recommend the Athlon.

                            J Offline
                            J Offline
                            John M Drescher
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #14

                            I have the same experience as Stuart and I would like to add the the Athlon64 will also do this consuming 1/2 to 2/3 of the power of the Pentium4 3Ghz.

                            John

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • R Rocky Moore

                              Which type of system do you think would be the best bang? I am builind a termporary system that will last until second quarter of 2007 when I will upgrade to a new MS Vista system (probably a duo).

                              Rocky <>< Latest Code Blog Post: ASP.NET HttpException - Cannot use leading "..".. Latest Tech Blog Post: Microsoft Zune to be built by Toshiba

                              A Offline
                              A Offline
                              Anna Jayne Metcalfe
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #15

                              I routinely use three "legacy" systems: an Athlon XP 2500 (1GB RAM), a P4/3GHz (1GB RAM) and a P4M/2GHz notebook (1.25GB RAM). Of them, the P4 desktop is by far the slowest. It's no contest - go for the Athlon.

                              Anna :rose: Currently working mostly on: Visual Lint :cool: Anna's Place | Tears and Laughter "Be yourself - not what others think you should be" - Marcia Graesch "Anna's just a sexy-looking lesbian tart" - A friend, trying to wind me up. It didn't work.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • World
                              • Users
                              • Groups