What do you people think of this?
-
ROTFL. The big question is - who is apparently going to be employed to read all my documents, and how will they stop what I said from being disseminated over the web, even if they can stop a specific Word doc from being loadable ? It's just plain silly.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++ Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog
The problem I see is them forcing you to allow them this ability...There will always be hackers, and with enought time and patients...access to control every computer running this operating system.
Pablo Sometimes I think there's no reason to get out of bed . . . then I feel wet, and I realize there is.
-
Henize wrote:
Gee - who'd have thought they would be the ones publishing this drivel. Oh no, I can't see the source code for my OS. How terrible !!! Movie companies want people to pay to download movies - what a catastrophe !!!! Give me a break.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++ Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog
So if you automatically discard the validity of the article, should others do the same to your comment, because you're a Microsoft MVP?
---------- Siderite
-
I sure hope that this never gets put into people's computers. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/can-you-trust.html[^]
static int Sqrt(int x) { if (x<0) throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException(); int temp, y=0, b=0x8000, bshft=15, v=x; do { if (v>=(temp=(y<<1)+b<>=1)>0); return y; :omg:
I believe no one will implement this because of two reasons. The first is that there is an alternative. No matter how some Windows zealots feel about Linux or how little you know about it or how good or bad it is, the fact that it's there changes the things Microsoft dares do. If there were no Linux, this discussion would not even take place. It would be copyrighted or something :) The second reason is that even the legislators (including some pretty secretive and paranoid people, so... legislators even more than other people) want control over their computer and what it does. It is my belief that after a few weeks or months of trial, the technology would be outlawed as spyware is now. So, to conclude, I am not paranoid, I let people abuse me ocasionally, I am to lazy to take action most of the time and I feel good about myself, but I am surely glad some people are not like me.
---------- Siderite
-
I think if that happens then I will be left behind in the stone age because I will disconect from the net and use a pirated version of all of the old software LOL
Pablo Sometimes I think there's no reason to get out of bed . . . then I feel wet, and I realize there is.
I would be worried about this, but to be honest the chances of microsoft getting something like this WORKING are very slim. We have this kind of issue with MS software all along, this is nothing new! Not being able to see the source code of my PC, is not a real issue to me, but the fact that I can still crack it is!! Software being what it is, there will always be a back door.
"a fool will not learn from a wise man, but a wise man will learn from a fool" "It is hard to fail, but it is worse never to have tried to succeed." - Theodore Roosevelt "Success is going from failure to failure without losing your enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
-
So if you automatically discard the validity of the article, should others do the same to your comment, because you're a Microsoft MVP?
---------- Siderite
Siderite Zaqwedex wrote:
So if you automatically discard the validity of the article, should others do the same to your comment, because you're a Microsoft MVP?
I fail to see how his MVP status has anything to do with it. That article was written either by an overly paranoid user or someone who is desperately trying to promote Linux through the use of scare tactics (which may work on your average Joe Public but is less likely to affect the techy types that hang out here). I hold no MVP and think it's bull. Now, does that making me a sheep or demonstrate that the capacity for reasonable thought, not believing everything I read on the internet?
don't believe everything that you breathe
you get a parking violation and a maggot on your sleeve...
- Beck:Loser -
Siderite Zaqwedex wrote:
So if you automatically discard the validity of the article, should others do the same to your comment, because you're a Microsoft MVP?
I fail to see how his MVP status has anything to do with it. That article was written either by an overly paranoid user or someone who is desperately trying to promote Linux through the use of scare tactics (which may work on your average Joe Public but is less likely to affect the techy types that hang out here). I hold no MVP and think it's bull. Now, does that making me a sheep or demonstrate that the capacity for reasonable thought, not believing everything I read on the internet?
don't believe everything that you breathe
you get a parking violation and a maggot on your sleeve...
- Beck:LoserWhat I was protesting to was using the name of the site where the article was posted as an argument on discarding its message. That you think the article is crap is a personal opinion, but to label everything at gnu.org as crap is the same thing Linux users do when they say everything Micro$oft is evil. I don't condone either practice.
---------- Siderite
-
What I was protesting to was using the name of the site where the article was posted as an argument on discarding its message. That you think the article is crap is a personal opinion, but to label everything at gnu.org as crap is the same thing Linux users do when they say everything Micro$oft is evil. I don't condone either practice.
---------- Siderite
Everything on gnu.org, written about Microsoft is crap. They hate Microsoft, especally Stallman who wrote the article we talk about.
- Anders My new photo website[^]
-
I sure hope that this never gets put into people's computers. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/can-you-trust.html[^]
static int Sqrt(int x) { if (x<0) throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException(); int temp, y=0, b=0x8000, bshft=15, v=x; do { if (v>=(temp=(y<<1)+b<>=1)>0); return y; :omg:
OK, Richard Stallman is a nut job, but that does not make him automatically wrong. The issue is that there is a great deal of control here. Let's take an example a little closer to home. I have a copy of Microsoft Office. Microsoft would like to move to a fee base (pay per month) model for Office. One reason they can't is because the genie is out of the bottle. I have Office on my PC. If TRM existed today, Microsoft could exercise their rights and tell my computer to not run Office anymore. Now I have a choice of switching to some other office suite (Open Office??), or paying Microsoft a monthly fee. Are you OK with that?
Tanks for you Support
_ _ _
/*\== /*\== /*\==
<ooo> <ooo> <ooo>Pat O
-
I sure hope that this never gets put into people's computers. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/can-you-trust.html[^]
static int Sqrt(int x) { if (x<0) throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException(); int temp, y=0, b=0x8000, bshft=15, v=x; do { if (v>=(temp=(y<<1)+b<>=1)>0); return y; :omg:
I think that we can all agree that Stallman is either a nutjob or is pursuing his own anti-MS agenda. It is true that in computing, as in the rest of society, that we all suffer because of the minority that wants to pursue crime and vandalism. Computer security inevitably curtails my freedoms and consumes resources (and money) that I'd rather have at my disposal. Protection of IPR is always a hot potato; I certainly don't want people stealing my ideas and I shouldn't be condoning stealing the fruits of other peoples labours, but there has to be a balance. The US in general has moved too far against consumer rights, including trying to prevent me copying a CD so that I don't scratch the original when playing music in my car. Add to this the inevitable incompetence. Napolean said "never ascribe to malice that which can be ascribed to incompetence." There's been a lot of incompetence (OK, maybe just honest mistakes!) around security and IPR protection. Anyone that knows MS knows that they are driven by a paranoia that they will become the next IBM. They are hyper-sensitive to criticism and are well aware that there's plenty of competition out there. someone on this thread said something about Linux keeping MS somewhat honest. This is true, but if it wasn't Linux it would be something else. The two biggest reasons that MS dominate is that their marketing (true marketing, i.e. identifying what people want) is effective and that they spend huge amounts on R&D to try to realize their marketing strategies. We should never drop our guards, but this includes guarding against the rantings of the bigoted and the disturbed!
Life is like a s**t sandwich; the more bread you have, the less s**t you eat.
-
What I was protesting to was using the name of the site where the article was posted as an argument on discarding its message. That you think the article is crap is a personal opinion, but to label everything at gnu.org as crap is the same thing Linux users do when they say everything Micro$oft is evil. I don't condone either practice.
---------- Siderite
My mistake in speedreading. Apologies.
-
I sure hope that this never gets put into people's computers. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/can-you-trust.html[^]
static int Sqrt(int x) { if (x<0) throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException(); int temp, y=0, b=0x8000, bshft=15, v=x; do { if (v>=(temp=(y<<1)+b<>=1)>0); return y; :omg:
-
The artical said
Programs that use treacherous computing will continually download new authorization rules through the Internet, and impose those rules automatically on your work. If Microsoft, or the US government, does not like what you said in a document you wrote, they could post new instructions telling all computers to refuse to let anyone read that document. Each computer would obey when it downloads the new instructions. Your writing would be subject to 1984-style retroactive erasure. You might be unable to read it yourself.
Think about the evils that can be done with TRM. Think more thoroughly about things and you will notice a lot more about everything.
static int Sqrt(int x) { if (x<0) throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException(); int temp, y=0, b=0x8000, bshft=15, v=x; do { if (v>=(temp=(y<<1)+b<>=1)>0); return y; :omg:
Henize wrote:
Think about the evils that can be done with TRM.
Evil? You seriously think that? Rape, torture, killing for pleasure, those things are evil in my world. Companies that put their heart and sould and their balls on the line to publish useful or entertaining things to the rest of the world wanting to be remunerated for it surely doesn't fall into the category of evil except in a socialist state the likes of which we haven't seen in several decades.
-
Henize wrote:
Think about the evils that can be done with TRM.
Evil? You seriously think that? Rape, torture, killing for pleasure, those things are evil in my world. Companies that put their heart and sould and their balls on the line to publish useful or entertaining things to the rest of the world wanting to be remunerated for it surely doesn't fall into the category of evil except in a socialist state the likes of which we haven't seen in several decades.
Think about the evils that can be done with it. You listed the usage its designed for. You obviously didnt think about the evils so why did you reply?.
static int Sqrt(int x) { if (x<0) throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException(); int temp, y=0, b=0x8000, bshft=15, v=x; do { if (v>=(temp=(y<<1)+b<>=1)>0); return y; :omg:
-
I sure hope that this never gets put into people's computers. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/can-you-trust.html[^]
static int Sqrt(int x) { if (x<0) throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException(); int temp, y=0, b=0x8000, bshft=15, v=x; do { if (v>=(temp=(y<<1)+b<>=1)>0); return y; :omg:
I think the article is well-thought-out and written. I think the author is naive if he/she thinks all software will come with source code. It's neither likely nor appropriate. I do think that DRM is a slippery slope. We should be on guard against the possibility that the wheels of justice could be subverted by "disappearing" email messages, etc. Still, we're not there yet.
-
Think about the evils that can be done with it. You listed the usage its designed for. You obviously didnt think about the evils so why did you reply?.
static int Sqrt(int x) { if (x<0) throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException(); int temp, y=0, b=0x8000, bshft=15, v=x; do { if (v>=(temp=(y<<1)+b<>=1)>0); return y; :omg:
-
Evil - immoral, corrupt, corrupting, inhumane, selfish, and wicked.
static int Sqrt(int x) { if (x<0) throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException(); int temp, y=0, b=0x8000, bshft=15, v=x; do { if (v>=(temp=(y<<1)+b<>=1)>0); return y; :omg:
Hmmm...I'd set the bar a little higher for my personal definition of evil, I don't see selfish as being "evil" per-se and immoral is the most slippery concept in the world. By that definition just about any thing or any one could be called evil. So I guess I understand where you're coming from.
-
I think the article is well-thought-out and written. I think the author is naive if he/she thinks all software will come with source code. It's neither likely nor appropriate. I do think that DRM is a slippery slope. We should be on guard against the possibility that the wheels of justice could be subverted by "disappearing" email messages, etc. Still, we're not there yet.
Jim from NoVA wrote:
I do think that DRM is a slippery slope. We should be on guard against the possibility that the wheels of justice could be subverted by "disappearing" email messages, etc. Still, we're not there yet.
ISP's are required by law to keep all eMail messages and they can be granted access to if they are relevant to a lawsuit or criminal investigation and a subpoena has been granted Roswell
"Angelinos -- excuse me. There will be civility today."
Antonio VillaRaigosa
City Mayor, Los Angeles, CA -
Jim from NoVA wrote:
I do think that DRM is a slippery slope. We should be on guard against the possibility that the wheels of justice could be subverted by "disappearing" email messages, etc. Still, we're not there yet.
ISP's are required by law to keep all eMail messages and they can be granted access to if they are relevant to a lawsuit or criminal investigation and a subpoena has been granted Roswell
"Angelinos -- excuse me. There will be civility today."
Antonio VillaRaigosa
City Mayor, Los Angeles, CAThank you. I think we will continue to see these types of safeguards, so the slope may not be as slippery as it might appear. I should ask, though, how is the employee of a company protected when he executes an emailed order, but the email can't be referenced later because the company won't produce it (since they're covering their butts...)?
-
So if you automatically discard the validity of the article, should others do the same to your comment, because you're a Microsoft MVP?
---------- Siderite
That's just dumb. What makes you think that a - I 'automatically' discarded it ( i.e. that I didn't consider it before deciding it was rubbish ) and b - that I ever implied anyone should be influenced by my opinion because of the MVP ? Are you suggesting that being an MVP means I'm not allowed to state my opinions ?
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++ Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog