Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. The Web just sucks

The Web just sucks

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
javascriptcssgraphicshelpquestion
54 Posts 20 Posters 7 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P Paul Watson

    :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

    regards, Paul Watson Ireland FeedHenry needs you

    Shog9 wrote:

    eh, stop bugging me about it, give it a couple of days, see what happens.

    M Offline
    M Offline
    Michael P Butler
    wrote on last edited by
    #14

    You laugh, but it is my personal mission to bring rich-client development back to the interweb thingy. Or at least take back the intranet development from the web-app developers. Web Apps are built on the sand of static pages, despite all the cool workarounds that people have come up with. The thing needs reinventing from the bottom up.

    Michael CP Blog [^] Development Blog [^]

    P S J 3 Replies Last reply
    0
    • D Dario Solera

      Technologically speaking, at least. Here is the situation in a nutshell: websites and web applications require more and more features, nice graphics, even special effects. AJAX (mostly SJAX, by the way) is the way to go, it seems. There are many technologies that help building complex web applications, supporting AJAX and all the like. What about the browsers? They simply suck, all of them. JavaScript support is simply arbitrary, like the implementation of CSS. Each browser behaves in its own way, no matter what the others do. To make a webside work decently in every browser, you need even more effort than to build the application itself. I'm tired of this. As I said, frameworks help a little, but they also have cons (like any technology). We are continuously adding pieces to "the web", without even planning in mind. W3C doesn't help much, since they approve standards but software developers do things their way anyway. The next big thing will add more confusion (like AJAX is doing nowadays), and the next even more, and so on. I think that the "web" is the most incoherent bunch of technologies and platforms ever built. It's a paradox, the web is the worst nightmare for a software designer and developer, and it's all developers' fault. Am I going crazy?

      ________________________________________________ Personal Blog [ITA] - Tech Blog [ENG] Developing ScrewTurn Wiki 1.1 (1.0.6 is out)

      R Offline
      R Offline
      Ray Kinsella
      wrote on last edited by
      #15

      Dario Solera wrote:

      I think that the "web" is the most incoherent bunch of technologies and platforms ever built. It's a paradox

      I am strangely reminded of Eric Raymond's The Cathedral and the Bazaar, sometimes letting things grow organically is the best approach, albeit with occasional direction from W3C, after all it has managed the web to the size it is today. Funny you say it sucks, I say people are voting with their feet.

      Regards Ray "Je Suis Mort De Rire" Blogging @ Keratoconus Watch

      P 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R Ray Kinsella

        Dario Solera wrote:

        I think that the "web" is the most incoherent bunch of technologies and platforms ever built. It's a paradox

        I am strangely reminded of Eric Raymond's The Cathedral and the Bazaar, sometimes letting things grow organically is the best approach, albeit with occasional direction from W3C, after all it has managed the web to the size it is today. Funny you say it sucks, I say people are voting with their feet.

        Regards Ray "Je Suis Mort De Rire" Blogging @ Keratoconus Watch

        P Offline
        P Offline
        Paul Watson
        wrote on last edited by
        #16

        Well said Ray. You said exactly what I was fumbling about for.

        regards, Paul Watson Ireland FeedHenry needs you

        Shog9 wrote:

        eh, stop bugging me about it, give it a couple of days, see what happens.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Michael P Butler

          You laugh, but it is my personal mission to bring rich-client development back to the interweb thingy. Or at least take back the intranet development from the web-app developers. Web Apps are built on the sand of static pages, despite all the cool workarounds that people have come up with. The thing needs reinventing from the bottom up.

          Michael CP Blog [^] Development Blog [^]

          P Offline
          P Offline
          Paul Watson
          wrote on last edited by
          #17

          Michael P Butler wrote:

          The thing needs reinventing from the bottom up

          *shudder* How will what you come up with be any different to the numerous projects that have attempted, and failed, already? How will it be different from XAML and .NET for instance? I'd rather see peoples efforts be directed at evolving the web than trying to overthrow it.

          regards, Paul Watson Ireland FeedHenry needs you

          Shog9 wrote:

          eh, stop bugging me about it, give it a couple of days, see what happens.

          M 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • P Paul Watson

            :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

            regards, Paul Watson Ireland FeedHenry needs you

            Shog9 wrote:

            eh, stop bugging me about it, give it a couple of days, see what happens.

            S Offline
            S Offline
            Sceptic Mole
            wrote on last edited by
            #18

            Funny indeed: 'The Web sucks, let's return to Fat Clients on Vista!' Posted on an Online Web Forum! :-D

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • P Paul Watson

              Michael P Butler wrote:

              The thing needs reinventing from the bottom up

              *shudder* How will what you come up with be any different to the numerous projects that have attempted, and failed, already? How will it be different from XAML and .NET for instance? I'd rather see peoples efforts be directed at evolving the web than trying to overthrow it.

              regards, Paul Watson Ireland FeedHenry needs you

              Shog9 wrote:

              eh, stop bugging me about it, give it a couple of days, see what happens.

              M Offline
              M Offline
              Michael P Butler
              wrote on last edited by
              #19

              Paul Watson wrote:

              How will what you come up with be any different to the numerous projects that have attempted, and failed, already? How will it be different from XAML and .NET for instance? I'd rather see peoples efforts be directed at evolving the web than trying to overthrow it.

              Well, I was thinking of putting my effort into XAML and .NET based apps. Whilst it would be nice to evolve the web, eventually every house built on sand gets washed away. Too many of the web technologies are being abused beyond their original limitations. That doesn't make me convinced about its future. If the standards bodies can't even secure SMTP and stop the spammers - I can't see them coming up with a solid foundation for building the complex web-apps. Most of what we've got are (very) creative hacks around the problems. Maybe one day the tools will be good enough to abstract the application developer away from the holes, but until that day web-apps are either going to be very poor or the preserve of the people who can afford to spend the time writing code to get around the fraility of the underlying technology.

              Michael CP Blog [^] Development Blog [^]

              R 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • D Dario Solera

                Technologically speaking, at least. Here is the situation in a nutshell: websites and web applications require more and more features, nice graphics, even special effects. AJAX (mostly SJAX, by the way) is the way to go, it seems. There are many technologies that help building complex web applications, supporting AJAX and all the like. What about the browsers? They simply suck, all of them. JavaScript support is simply arbitrary, like the implementation of CSS. Each browser behaves in its own way, no matter what the others do. To make a webside work decently in every browser, you need even more effort than to build the application itself. I'm tired of this. As I said, frameworks help a little, but they also have cons (like any technology). We are continuously adding pieces to "the web", without even planning in mind. W3C doesn't help much, since they approve standards but software developers do things their way anyway. The next big thing will add more confusion (like AJAX is doing nowadays), and the next even more, and so on. I think that the "web" is the most incoherent bunch of technologies and platforms ever built. It's a paradox, the web is the worst nightmare for a software designer and developer, and it's all developers' fault. Am I going crazy?

                ________________________________________________ Personal Blog [ITA] - Tech Blog [ENG] Developing ScrewTurn Wiki 1.1 (1.0.6 is out)

                M Offline
                M Offline
                Mindflow
                wrote on last edited by
                #20

                If you find web app building painful, which I agree it can be: 1) build interfaces in Flash 2) or use an app like TopStyle Pro which can help define CSS. In this app you can select which CSS level you want, and which browsers to support. (not perfect solution to problem, but helps a lot) 3) or force your user to use a certain client for your application, like MS do with Hotmail and Windows Update. It's not too much to ask when it's only one or two applications. 4) or get someone from rent a coder to worry about it for you heh ;) Word of advice, when setting sizes/widths/heights use Pixels in CSS for everything where you can. Why?... Coz it helps make proportions look the same on all monitors and resolutions. I tried using points, small/medium/etc... it never works out properly. I figure if someone is using 1600x1200 resolution on a small screen, they deserve not to read the text properly ;)

                R 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • D Dario Solera

                  Technologically speaking, at least. Here is the situation in a nutshell: websites and web applications require more and more features, nice graphics, even special effects. AJAX (mostly SJAX, by the way) is the way to go, it seems. There are many technologies that help building complex web applications, supporting AJAX and all the like. What about the browsers? They simply suck, all of them. JavaScript support is simply arbitrary, like the implementation of CSS. Each browser behaves in its own way, no matter what the others do. To make a webside work decently in every browser, you need even more effort than to build the application itself. I'm tired of this. As I said, frameworks help a little, but they also have cons (like any technology). We are continuously adding pieces to "the web", without even planning in mind. W3C doesn't help much, since they approve standards but software developers do things their way anyway. The next big thing will add more confusion (like AJAX is doing nowadays), and the next even more, and so on. I think that the "web" is the most incoherent bunch of technologies and platforms ever built. It's a paradox, the web is the worst nightmare for a software designer and developer, and it's all developers' fault. Am I going crazy?

                  ________________________________________________ Personal Blog [ITA] - Tech Blog [ENG] Developing ScrewTurn Wiki 1.1 (1.0.6 is out)

                  J Offline
                  J Offline
                  jpg 0
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #21

                  Unplug your network cable for a week. One week from now, come back here and tell us more about how suck the web is.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • P Paul Watson

                    :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

                    regards, Paul Watson Ireland FeedHenry needs you

                    Shog9 wrote:

                    eh, stop bugging me about it, give it a couple of days, see what happens.

                    N Offline
                    N Offline
                    NormDroid
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #22

                    Laugh you may young padewan, but the future may have a few surprices for you, as you know from the IT industry, nothing is set in stone.

                    We made the buttons on the screen look so good you'll want to lick them. Steve Jobs

                    P 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • N NormDroid

                      Laugh you may young padewan, but the future may have a few surprices for you, as you know from the IT industry, nothing is set in stone.

                      We made the buttons on the screen look so good you'll want to lick them. Steve Jobs

                      P Offline
                      P Offline
                      Paul Watson
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #23

                      Do you really think a proprietary system from Microsoft is going to come to dominate the web in the next 5 to 10 years? That web-apps will fall away to be replaced by desktop applications with internet smarts? Rich clients will be supporting players for web-apps. The huge numbers of web-mail users show that people are quite happy working through a browser. It is simpler for them to register on GMail or Hotmail than to download and run client software.

                      regards, Paul Watson Ireland FeedHenry needs you

                      Shog9 wrote:

                      eh, stop bugging me about it, give it a couple of days, see what happens.

                      M 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • D Dario Solera

                        Technologically speaking, at least. Here is the situation in a nutshell: websites and web applications require more and more features, nice graphics, even special effects. AJAX (mostly SJAX, by the way) is the way to go, it seems. There are many technologies that help building complex web applications, supporting AJAX and all the like. What about the browsers? They simply suck, all of them. JavaScript support is simply arbitrary, like the implementation of CSS. Each browser behaves in its own way, no matter what the others do. To make a webside work decently in every browser, you need even more effort than to build the application itself. I'm tired of this. As I said, frameworks help a little, but they also have cons (like any technology). We are continuously adding pieces to "the web", without even planning in mind. W3C doesn't help much, since they approve standards but software developers do things their way anyway. The next big thing will add more confusion (like AJAX is doing nowadays), and the next even more, and so on. I think that the "web" is the most incoherent bunch of technologies and platforms ever built. It's a paradox, the web is the worst nightmare for a software designer and developer, and it's all developers' fault. Am I going crazy?

                        ________________________________________________ Personal Blog [ITA] - Tech Blog [ENG] Developing ScrewTurn Wiki 1.1 (1.0.6 is out)

                        A Offline
                        A Offline
                        Ashley van Gerven
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #24

                        Fair enough, browser discrepancies suck big time. However, have you given any thought to the alternative - imagine *NOTHING* got implemented in ANY browser until EVERYONE agrees that is the correct way to do it... we would all be using text-based browsers or something archaic like that! X| Out of interest - were you doing web development 6-odd years ago, when Netscape 4 had to be supported. Now THAT was painful. Sure, back then we didn't have to worry about AJAX complexities etc... but just getting a static page to render the same in IE & NN was about as much fun as being dragged backwards thru a cactus garden! :)

                        "For fifty bucks I'd put my face in their soup and blow." - George Costanza

                        ~ Web SQL Utility - asp.net app to query Access, SQL server, MySQL. Stores history, favourites.

                        D A 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • P Paul Watson

                          Sure but show me something better?

                          regards, Paul Watson Ireland FeedHenry needs you

                          Shog9 wrote:

                          eh, stop bugging me about it, give it a couple of days, see what happens.

                          D Offline
                          D Offline
                          Duncan Edwards Jones
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #25

                          Desktop development...I'd say that is much better.

                          '--8<------------------------ Ex Datis: Duncan Jones Merrion Computing Ltd

                          P 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • D Dario Solera

                            Technologically speaking, at least. Here is the situation in a nutshell: websites and web applications require more and more features, nice graphics, even special effects. AJAX (mostly SJAX, by the way) is the way to go, it seems. There are many technologies that help building complex web applications, supporting AJAX and all the like. What about the browsers? They simply suck, all of them. JavaScript support is simply arbitrary, like the implementation of CSS. Each browser behaves in its own way, no matter what the others do. To make a webside work decently in every browser, you need even more effort than to build the application itself. I'm tired of this. As I said, frameworks help a little, but they also have cons (like any technology). We are continuously adding pieces to "the web", without even planning in mind. W3C doesn't help much, since they approve standards but software developers do things their way anyway. The next big thing will add more confusion (like AJAX is doing nowadays), and the next even more, and so on. I think that the "web" is the most incoherent bunch of technologies and platforms ever built. It's a paradox, the web is the worst nightmare for a software designer and developer, and it's all developers' fault. Am I going crazy?

                            ________________________________________________ Personal Blog [ITA] - Tech Blog [ENG] Developing ScrewTurn Wiki 1.1 (1.0.6 is out)

                            G Offline
                            G Offline
                            Gary Wheeler
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #26

                            Hmmm. Haven't had our coffee this morning, have we? :-D


                            Software Zen: delete this;

                            D 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • D Duncan Edwards Jones

                              Desktop development...I'd say that is much better.

                              '--8<------------------------ Ex Datis: Duncan Jones Merrion Computing Ltd

                              P Offline
                              P Offline
                              Paul Watson
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #27

                              I'm not really sure desktop development is better for an app that say replicates the Code Projects' functionality. Serving millions of users with full linking, search, advertising, email notification, editorial control etc. You'd need some kind of P2P engine or a lot of web-services on a central server and the desktop app would need complicated synching and conflict resolution technology. Much of that comes free with a web app. Desktop technology is good for a Word clone or an email client. I imagine the cost of developing a Flickr or del.icio.us clone with desktop technology would be far higher and a good deal harder than with web technology. The web has been built to support those types of apps and it works well for it. It has its problems but it is built that way while desktop technology isn't. The tools and technologies are different. They grew up differently. Sure, web dev has plenty of problems but it is a lot more than just some Ajax hacked onto a HTML and DOM base. Desktop dev is good for desktop apps. Web dev is good for web apps. Both are starting to impinge on the other and we need some new tools for that grey area but desktop dev isn't that.

                              regards, Paul Watson Ireland FeedHenry needs you

                              Shog9 wrote:

                              eh, stop bugging me about it, give it a couple of days, see what happens.

                              D 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • A Ashley van Gerven

                                Fair enough, browser discrepancies suck big time. However, have you given any thought to the alternative - imagine *NOTHING* got implemented in ANY browser until EVERYONE agrees that is the correct way to do it... we would all be using text-based browsers or something archaic like that! X| Out of interest - were you doing web development 6-odd years ago, when Netscape 4 had to be supported. Now THAT was painful. Sure, back then we didn't have to worry about AJAX complexities etc... but just getting a static page to render the same in IE & NN was about as much fun as being dragged backwards thru a cactus garden! :)

                                "For fifty bucks I'd put my face in their soup and blow." - George Costanza

                                ~ Web SQL Utility - asp.net app to query Access, SQL server, MySQL. Stores history, favourites.

                                D Offline
                                D Offline
                                Dario Solera
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #28

                                Ashley van Gerven wrote:

                                were you doing web development 6-odd years ago

                                No. :cool: Actually, I was not doing development at all.

                                ________________________________________________ Personal Blog [ITA] - Tech Blog [ENG] Developing ScrewTurn Wiki 1.1 (1.0.6 is out)

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • G Gary Wheeler

                                  Hmmm. Haven't had our coffee this morning, have we? :-D


                                  Software Zen: delete this;

                                  D Offline
                                  D Offline
                                  Dario Solera
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #29

                                  Gary Wheeler wrote:

                                  Hmmm. Haven't had our coffee this morning, have we?

                                  Actually, I had two espresso. :-D

                                  ________________________________________________ Personal Blog [ITA] - Tech Blog [ENG] Developing ScrewTurn Wiki 1.1 (1.0.6 is out)

                                  G 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • D Dario Solera

                                    Technologically speaking, at least. Here is the situation in a nutshell: websites and web applications require more and more features, nice graphics, even special effects. AJAX (mostly SJAX, by the way) is the way to go, it seems. There are many technologies that help building complex web applications, supporting AJAX and all the like. What about the browsers? They simply suck, all of them. JavaScript support is simply arbitrary, like the implementation of CSS. Each browser behaves in its own way, no matter what the others do. To make a webside work decently in every browser, you need even more effort than to build the application itself. I'm tired of this. As I said, frameworks help a little, but they also have cons (like any technology). We are continuously adding pieces to "the web", without even planning in mind. W3C doesn't help much, since they approve standards but software developers do things their way anyway. The next big thing will add more confusion (like AJAX is doing nowadays), and the next even more, and so on. I think that the "web" is the most incoherent bunch of technologies and platforms ever built. It's a paradox, the web is the worst nightmare for a software designer and developer, and it's all developers' fault. Am I going crazy?

                                    ________________________________________________ Personal Blog [ITA] - Tech Blog [ENG] Developing ScrewTurn Wiki 1.1 (1.0.6 is out)

                                    A Offline
                                    A Offline
                                    AbhishekBK
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #30

                                    Man........ the web rocks.

                                    Abhishek It is impossible to change your past. But it is very possible to ruin your present by worring about the future. -Chankya

                                    D 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • D Dario Solera

                                      Gary Wheeler wrote:

                                      Hmmm. Haven't had our coffee this morning, have we?

                                      Actually, I had two espresso. :-D

                                      ________________________________________________ Personal Blog [ITA] - Tech Blog [ENG] Developing ScrewTurn Wiki 1.1 (1.0.6 is out)

                                      G Offline
                                      G Offline
                                      Gary Wheeler
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #31

                                      :omg: I would be doing the anti-gravity dance on the ceiling after two espresso...


                                      Software Zen: delete this;

                                      D 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • A AbhishekBK

                                        Man........ the web rocks.

                                        Abhishek It is impossible to change your past. But it is very possible to ruin your present by worring about the future. -Chankya

                                        D Offline
                                        D Offline
                                        Dario Solera
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #32

                                        AbhishekBK wrote:

                                        Man........ the web rocks.

                                        Did you at least read my post?

                                        ________________________________________________ Personal Blog [ITA] - Tech Blog [ENG] Developing ScrewTurn Wiki 1.1 (1.0.6 is out)

                                        A 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • G Gary Wheeler

                                          :omg: I would be doing the anti-gravity dance on the ceiling after two espresso...


                                          Software Zen: delete this;

                                          D Offline
                                          D Offline
                                          Dario Solera
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #33

                                          I usually have 4-5 a day. :-O

                                          ________________________________________________ Personal Blog [ITA] - Tech Blog [ENG] Developing ScrewTurn Wiki 1.1 (1.0.6 is out)

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups