Why Firefox 2.0 Rocks
-
Installation 1) Windows restart not needed (IE7 requires a long restart) 2) Take less than 1 minute to install (IE7 took almost 5-10 minutes) 3) Even I removing the previous versions, Firefox maintained my settings and add-ons (IE7 I need set the home page again) Using 1) FAST!!! (IE7 SLOW!!!) 2) Unobtrusive Syntax Checker (I will post in CP with Firefox - less typos!) 3) My website is nicest in Firefox (IE7 is not standards compliant - not fixed the table height problems yet...) 4) I talked before what is FAST??? (IE is in each version more slow...) Cheers...
Jesus is Love! Tell to someone! :badger:
Clickok wrote:
- Windows restart not needed (IE7 requires a long restart)
That's definitely a plus although it's just a one time thing, so no big deal.
Clickok wrote:
- Take less than 1 minute to install (IE7 took almost 5-10 minutes)
Again, that's great but in the grand scheme of things it's a one time savings.
Clickok wrote:
- Even I removing the previous versions, Firefox maintained my settings and add-ons (IE7 I need set the home page again)
Hmm, IE7 retained my home page just fine.
Clickok wrote:
- FAST!!! (IE7 SLOW!!!)
They seem to be about the same to me.
Clickok wrote:
- Unobtrusive Syntax Checker (I will post in CP with Firefox - less typos!)
Spell check is a good addition. It doesn't fix a common problem though: the people who really need it can't write in the first place. Spelling is the least of their problems. I do like the spell check though - it is handy.
Clickok wrote:
- My website is nicest in Firefox (IE7 is not standards compliant - not fixed the table height problems yet...)
I don't know about you, but as a developer I make sure my sites look good in all the common browsers.
Clickok wrote:
- I talked before what is FAST??? (IE is in each version more slow...)
I just don't see this. IE7 seems faster than 6 on my machine. On another note, I took a look at your website. You may want to have a native english speaker review it for you. It looks like you used an online translator and, unfortunately, it did a pretty bad job. Just thought you might like to know. Cheers, Drew.
-
Clickok wrote:
.jpg wrote: I can install VS2005 and use it without restart. So? Good to you. Do you browse with it too?
You can
Matt Newman
Even the very best tools in the hands of an idiot will produce something of little or no value. - Chris Meech on Idiots -
But then you really would be browsing with IE, wouldn't you? ;)
-- In Hypno-Vision
-
Clickok wrote:
- Windows restart not needed (IE7 requires a long restart)
That's definitely a plus although it's just a one time thing, so no big deal.
Clickok wrote:
- Take less than 1 minute to install (IE7 took almost 5-10 minutes)
Again, that's great but in the grand scheme of things it's a one time savings.
Clickok wrote:
- Even I removing the previous versions, Firefox maintained my settings and add-ons (IE7 I need set the home page again)
Hmm, IE7 retained my home page just fine.
Clickok wrote:
- FAST!!! (IE7 SLOW!!!)
They seem to be about the same to me.
Clickok wrote:
- Unobtrusive Syntax Checker (I will post in CP with Firefox - less typos!)
Spell check is a good addition. It doesn't fix a common problem though: the people who really need it can't write in the first place. Spelling is the least of their problems. I do like the spell check though - it is handy.
Clickok wrote:
- My website is nicest in Firefox (IE7 is not standards compliant - not fixed the table height problems yet...)
I don't know about you, but as a developer I make sure my sites look good in all the common browsers.
Clickok wrote:
- I talked before what is FAST??? (IE is in each version more slow...)
I just don't see this. IE7 seems faster than 6 on my machine. On another note, I took a look at your website. You may want to have a native english speaker review it for you. It looks like you used an online translator and, unfortunately, it did a pretty bad job. Just thought you might like to know. Cheers, Drew.
Drew Stainton wrote:
On another note, I took a look at your website. You may want to have a native english speaker review it for you. It looks like you used an online translator and, unfortunately, it did a pretty bad job. Just thought you might like to know.
Thanks, my english website is a bit "in corner", because I'm working another projects. When I fix, I will tell you ;) PS: I not used a online translator, is my english what is really bad :laugh:
Jesus is Love! Tell to someone! :badger:
-
Joergen Sigvardsson wrote:
But then you really would be browsing with IE, wouldn't you?
REPOST!;P Roswell
"Angelinos -- excuse me. There will be civility today."
Antonio VillaRaigosa
City Mayor, Los Angeles, CA:laugh: The server made me do it!!!
-- The Show That Watches Back
-
Installation 1) Windows restart not needed (IE7 requires a long restart) 2) Take less than 1 minute to install (IE7 took almost 5-10 minutes) 3) Even I removing the previous versions, Firefox maintained my settings and add-ons (IE7 I need set the home page again) Using 1) FAST!!! (IE7 SLOW!!!) 2) Unobtrusive Syntax Checker (I will post in CP with Firefox - less typos!) 3) My website is nicest in Firefox (IE7 is not standards compliant - not fixed the table height problems yet...) 4) I talked before what is FAST??? (IE is in each version more slow...) Cheers...
Jesus is Love! Tell to someone! :badger:
Clickok wrote:
- Windows restart not needed (IE7 requires a long restart) 2) Take less than 1 minute to install (IE7 took almost 5-10 minutes)
One of the worst features of MS apps. is that they typically take longer than comparable products to install. The Restart scenarios are poor as well.
Kevin
-
Clickok wrote:
less typos
That should be "fewer typos".
-
Clickok wrote:
less typos
That should be "fewer typos".
Well, it could be less typos too. Fewr is less of a typo than frwee. :)
-- Federal law prohibits changing the channel
-
:laugh: The server made me do it!!!
-- The Show That Watches Back
-
Clickok wrote:
- Windows restart not needed (IE7 requires a long restart)
That's definitely a plus although it's just a one time thing, so no big deal.
Clickok wrote:
- Take less than 1 minute to install (IE7 took almost 5-10 minutes)
Again, that's great but in the grand scheme of things it's a one time savings.
Clickok wrote:
- Even I removing the previous versions, Firefox maintained my settings and add-ons (IE7 I need set the home page again)
Hmm, IE7 retained my home page just fine.
Clickok wrote:
- FAST!!! (IE7 SLOW!!!)
They seem to be about the same to me.
Clickok wrote:
- Unobtrusive Syntax Checker (I will post in CP with Firefox - less typos!)
Spell check is a good addition. It doesn't fix a common problem though: the people who really need it can't write in the first place. Spelling is the least of their problems. I do like the spell check though - it is handy.
Clickok wrote:
- My website is nicest in Firefox (IE7 is not standards compliant - not fixed the table height problems yet...)
I don't know about you, but as a developer I make sure my sites look good in all the common browsers.
Clickok wrote:
- I talked before what is FAST??? (IE is in each version more slow...)
I just don't see this. IE7 seems faster than 6 on my machine. On another note, I took a look at your website. You may want to have a native english speaker review it for you. It looks like you used an online translator and, unfortunately, it did a pretty bad job. Just thought you might like to know. Cheers, Drew.
Drew Stainton wrote:
Clickok wrote: 1) FAST!!! (IE7 SLOW!!!) They seem to be about the same to me.
I've yet to notice any significant difference in speed between the various browsers despite repeated claims (I run IE, FF and Opera). Most of the wait time is network latency so any differences in speed seem moot. I switch browsers based on feature set rather than speed or security.
Kevin
-
Clickok wrote:
- Windows restart not needed (IE7 requires a long restart) 2) Take less than 1 minute to install (IE7 took almost 5-10 minutes)
One of the worst features of MS apps. is that they typically take longer than comparable products to install. The Restart scenarios are poor as well.
Kevin
Kevin McFarlane wrote:
One of the worst features of MS apps. is that they typically take longer than comparable products to install. The Restart scenarios are poor as well.
Until you try Adobe at which time you can't wait to go back to Microsoft. Just installing updates to their CS2 package last week required 2 restarts. The full install took over 90 minutes (and a restart). Cheers, Drew.
-
Kevin McFarlane wrote:
One of the worst features of MS apps. is that they typically take longer than comparable products to install. The Restart scenarios are poor as well.
Until you try Adobe at which time you can't wait to go back to Microsoft. Just installing updates to their CS2 package last week required 2 restarts. The full install took over 90 minutes (and a restart). Cheers, Drew.
Only Adobe I've used is the Reader.
Kevin
-
I'm running IE7 :) Though I seriously that was how you spelled it.
Matt Newman
Even the very best tools in the hands of an idiot will produce something of little or no value. - Chris Meech on IdiotsMatt Newman wrote:
Though I seriously that was how you spelled it. (sic)
And a missing word checker. ;)
Using the GridView is like trying to explain to someone else how to move a third person's hands in order to tie your shoelaces for you. -Chris Maunder
-
Kevin McFarlane wrote:
One of the worst features of MS apps. is that they typically take longer than comparable products to install. The Restart scenarios are poor as well.
Until you try Adobe at which time you can't wait to go back to Microsoft. Just installing updates to their CS2 package last week required 2 restarts. The full install took over 90 minutes (and a restart). Cheers, Drew.
Drew Stainton wrote:
Until you try Adobe at which time you can't wait to go back to Microsoft. Just installing updates to their CS2 package last week required 2 restarts. The full install took over 90 minutes (and a restart).
Maybe is Adobe developing some operating system... take more time and restarts than Windows XP installation... :wtf:
Jesus is Love! Tell to someone! :badger:
-
Joergen Sigvardsson wrote:
:laugh:The server made me do it!!!
That's odd...the server usually catches me:wtf:... Roswell
"Angelinos -- excuse me. There will be civility today."
Antonio VillaRaigosa
City Mayor, Los Angeles, CA -
Only Adobe I've used is the Reader.
Kevin
-
Drew Stainton wrote:
Clickok wrote: 1) FAST!!! (IE7 SLOW!!!) They seem to be about the same to me.
I've yet to notice any significant difference in speed between the various browsers despite repeated claims (I run IE, FF and Opera). Most of the wait time is network latency so any differences in speed seem moot. I switch browsers based on feature set rather than speed or security.
Kevin
IE takes forever to stop loading a page when you hit stop, sometimes it won't stop at all. Firefox stops immediately.
-
Installation 1) Windows restart not needed (IE7 requires a long restart) 2) Take less than 1 minute to install (IE7 took almost 5-10 minutes) 3) Even I removing the previous versions, Firefox maintained my settings and add-ons (IE7 I need set the home page again) Using 1) FAST!!! (IE7 SLOW!!!) 2) Unobtrusive Syntax Checker (I will post in CP with Firefox - less typos!) 3) My website is nicest in Firefox (IE7 is not standards compliant - not fixed the table height problems yet...) 4) I talked before what is FAST??? (IE is in each version more slow...) Cheers...
Jesus is Love! Tell to someone! :badger:
-
IE takes forever to stop loading a page when you hit stop, sometimes it won't stop at all. Firefox stops immediately.
Hey wait a minute there I had that happen in FF when I had multiple tabs open. So FF doesn't always stop immediately I had to terminate the browser and it was still stuck in memory till I killed it via Taskman. This might be more of a browser independent problem something with either how the page was coded, the server is configured or even just a temporary connection problem?
Where did my glasses go...
-
Installation 1&2) Heaven forbid you step away from the computer for a few minutes and experience what is called "real life". 3) OMG the horror! Though it remembered my start page. Using 1) It turns out they are equally as fast on my computer 2) Too bad it doesn't have an obtrusive grammer checker. 3) Odd my website looks nicest in IE (standards are defined by market share, not idealists) 4) Umm, wow... they really need a grammer checker.
Matt Newman
Even the very best tools in the hands of an idiot will produce something of little or no value. - Chris Meech on IdiotsMatt Newman wrote:
(standards are defined by market share, not idealists)
Standards? *cough*.. W3C standards must be the idealism you speak of then. Which standards were you referring to? IE standards?
This statement is false.