Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. JOTD

JOTD

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
question
16 Posts 11 Posters 3 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    Berry van Olphen
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN Let's say a guy named Roger is attracted to a woman named Elaine. He asks her out to a movie; she accepts; they have a pretty good time. A few nights later he asks her out to dinner, and again they enjoy themselves. They continue to see each other regularly, and after a while neither one of them is seeing anybody else. And then, one evening when they're driving home, a thought occurs to Elaine, and, without really thinking, she says it aloud: "Do you realise that, as of tonight, we've been seeing each other for exactly six months?" And then there is silence in the car. To Elaine, it seems like a very loud silence. She thinks to herself: Geez, I wonder if it bothers him that I said that. Maybe he's been feeling confined by our relationship; maybe he thinks I'm trying to push him into some kind of obligation that he doesn't want, or isn't sure of. And Roger is thinking: Gosh. Six months. And Elaine is thinking: But, hey, I'm not so sure I want this kind of relationship, either. Sometimes I wish I had a little more space, so I'd have time to think about whether I really want us to keep going the way we are, moving steadily toward... I mean, where are we going? Are we just going to keep seeing each other at this level of intimacy? Are we heading toward marriage? Toward children? Toward a lifetime together? Am I ready for that level of commitment? Do I really even know this person? And Roger is thinking: So, that means it was... let's see...February when we started going out, which was right after I had the car at the dealer's, which means...let me check the odometer... Whoa! I am way overdue for an oil change here. And Elaine is thinking: He's upset. I can see it on his face. Maybe I'm reading this completely wrong. Maybe he wants more from our relationship, more intimacy, more commitment; maybe he has sensed, even before I sensed it, that I was feeling some reservations. Yes, I bet that's it. That's why he's so reluctant to say anything about his own feelings. He's afraid of being rejected. And Roger is thinking: And I'm going to have them look at the transmission again. I don't care what those morons say, it's still not shifting right. And they better not try to blame it on the cold weather this time. What cold weather? It's 87 degrees and this thing is shifting like a garbage truck, and I paid those incompetent thieves $600. And Elaine is thinking: He's angry. And I don't blame him. I'd be angry,

    P H 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • B Berry van Olphen

      THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN Let's say a guy named Roger is attracted to a woman named Elaine. He asks her out to a movie; she accepts; they have a pretty good time. A few nights later he asks her out to dinner, and again they enjoy themselves. They continue to see each other regularly, and after a while neither one of them is seeing anybody else. And then, one evening when they're driving home, a thought occurs to Elaine, and, without really thinking, she says it aloud: "Do you realise that, as of tonight, we've been seeing each other for exactly six months?" And then there is silence in the car. To Elaine, it seems like a very loud silence. She thinks to herself: Geez, I wonder if it bothers him that I said that. Maybe he's been feeling confined by our relationship; maybe he thinks I'm trying to push him into some kind of obligation that he doesn't want, or isn't sure of. And Roger is thinking: Gosh. Six months. And Elaine is thinking: But, hey, I'm not so sure I want this kind of relationship, either. Sometimes I wish I had a little more space, so I'd have time to think about whether I really want us to keep going the way we are, moving steadily toward... I mean, where are we going? Are we just going to keep seeing each other at this level of intimacy? Are we heading toward marriage? Toward children? Toward a lifetime together? Am I ready for that level of commitment? Do I really even know this person? And Roger is thinking: So, that means it was... let's see...February when we started going out, which was right after I had the car at the dealer's, which means...let me check the odometer... Whoa! I am way overdue for an oil change here. And Elaine is thinking: He's upset. I can see it on his face. Maybe I'm reading this completely wrong. Maybe he wants more from our relationship, more intimacy, more commitment; maybe he has sensed, even before I sensed it, that I was feeling some reservations. Yes, I bet that's it. That's why he's so reluctant to say anything about his own feelings. He's afraid of being rejected. And Roger is thinking: And I'm going to have them look at the transmission again. I don't care what those morons say, it's still not shifting right. And they better not try to blame it on the cold weather this time. What cold weather? It's 87 degrees and this thing is shifting like a garbage truck, and I paid those incompetent thieves $600. And Elaine is thinking: He's angry. And I don't blame him. I'd be angry,

      P Offline
      P Offline
      Paresh Solanki
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      I have proof of this amazing statement: We all know that girls require time and money. this can be expressed mathematically as:

      Girls = time * money

      But we also know that time = money, so

      Girls = money * money = money ^ 2

      Finally, observation shows that money is the root of all evil

      Girls = (root(money))^ 2

      therefore

      Girls = evil

      :) Paresh Solanki There is no substitute for genuine lack of preparation.

      L B P R 4 Replies Last reply
      0
      • P Paresh Solanki

        I have proof of this amazing statement: We all know that girls require time and money. this can be expressed mathematically as:

        Girls = time * money

        But we also know that time = money, so

        Girls = money * money = money ^ 2

        Finally, observation shows that money is the root of all evil

        Girls = (root(money))^ 2

        therefore

        Girls = evil

        :) Paresh Solanki There is no substitute for genuine lack of preparation.

        L Offline
        L Offline
        l a u r e n
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        hmmmmmm should i say anything..... :)

        D P B R 4 Replies Last reply
        0
        • P Paresh Solanki

          I have proof of this amazing statement: We all know that girls require time and money. this can be expressed mathematically as:

          Girls = time * money

          But we also know that time = money, so

          Girls = money * money = money ^ 2

          Finally, observation shows that money is the root of all evil

          Girls = (root(money))^ 2

          therefore

          Girls = evil

          :) Paresh Solanki There is no substitute for genuine lack of preparation.

          B Offline
          B Offline
          Bruce Duncan
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Paresh Solanki wrote: Girls are Evil True, but the world would be so dull without them. ;) Bruce Duncan CP#9088, CPUA 0xA1EE, Sonork 100.10030
          Hi everyone. My name's Bruce. And I suffer from VB.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • P Paresh Solanki

            I have proof of this amazing statement: We all know that girls require time and money. this can be expressed mathematically as:

            Girls = time * money

            But we also know that time = money, so

            Girls = money * money = money ^ 2

            Finally, observation shows that money is the root of all evil

            Girls = (root(money))^ 2

            therefore

            Girls = evil

            :) Paresh Solanki There is no substitute for genuine lack of preparation.

            P Offline
            P Offline
            Paresh Solanki
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Men are worse: Men need time, money, girls and sex, so:-

            men = time X money X girls X sex

            but we know that time = money, so

            men = money X money X girls X sex

            Since all men want to have as much sex as possible with as many girls as possible, we can assert that (for men) sex = girls,

            men = money X money X girls X girls = money ^ 2 X girls ^ 2

            It has been determined that girls = evil (see previous post) and that money is the root of all evil, so

            money ^ 2 = evil

            this gives us

            men = evil X evil ^ 2

            proving that men are more evil than girls:) :) :) Paresh Solanki There is no substitute for genuine lack of preparation.

            J H 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • L l a u r e n

              hmmmmmm should i say anything..... :)

              D Offline
              D Offline
              Daniel Ferguson
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              lauren wrote: should i say anything Well, you are a girl/woman; you could give your point of view. It may start a pointless flame war, or maybe some of us would learn something. :) "There is a fine line between lunacy and genius; it is my goal in life to keep them guessing just where the line lies..." -- Unknown

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • L l a u r e n

                hmmmmmm should i say anything..... :)

                P Offline
                P Offline
                Paresh Solanki
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                I'd like to hear your point of view Paresh Solanki There is no substitute for genuine lack of preparation.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • P Paresh Solanki

                  I have proof of this amazing statement: We all know that girls require time and money. this can be expressed mathematically as:

                  Girls = time * money

                  But we also know that time = money, so

                  Girls = money * money = money ^ 2

                  Finally, observation shows that money is the root of all evil

                  Girls = (root(money))^ 2

                  therefore

                  Girls = evil

                  :) Paresh Solanki There is no substitute for genuine lack of preparation.

                  R Offline
                  R Offline
                  Roger Allen
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Paresh Solanki wrote: We all know that girls require time and money. this can be expressed mathematically as: Girls = time * money Sorry, but there is a mistake in this. If a girl requires time and money then the stament should read Girls = time + money whick gives girls = money + money = 2*Money If money is the root of all evil Girls = 2 * (root(Evil)) So girls are even more evil as evil hasn't been rooted! I was going to take logs of both sides but I forget how the maths envolved works, plus the log of a girl is a sh!tty subject. :laugh: Roger Allen Sonork 100.10016 If I had a quote, it would be a very good one.

                  P 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • R Roger Allen

                    Paresh Solanki wrote: We all know that girls require time and money. this can be expressed mathematically as: Girls = time * money Sorry, but there is a mistake in this. If a girl requires time and money then the stament should read Girls = time + money whick gives girls = money + money = 2*Money If money is the root of all evil Girls = 2 * (root(Evil)) So girls are even more evil as evil hasn't been rooted! I was going to take logs of both sides but I forget how the maths envolved works, plus the log of a girl is a sh!tty subject. :laugh: Roger Allen Sonork 100.10016 If I had a quote, it would be a very good one.

                    P Offline
                    P Offline
                    Paresh Solanki
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    I disagree. For each period of time, girls require money, so I stand by the initial assertion. Paresh Solanki There is no substitute for genuine lack of preparation.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • B Berry van Olphen

                      THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN Let's say a guy named Roger is attracted to a woman named Elaine. He asks her out to a movie; she accepts; they have a pretty good time. A few nights later he asks her out to dinner, and again they enjoy themselves. They continue to see each other regularly, and after a while neither one of them is seeing anybody else. And then, one evening when they're driving home, a thought occurs to Elaine, and, without really thinking, she says it aloud: "Do you realise that, as of tonight, we've been seeing each other for exactly six months?" And then there is silence in the car. To Elaine, it seems like a very loud silence. She thinks to herself: Geez, I wonder if it bothers him that I said that. Maybe he's been feeling confined by our relationship; maybe he thinks I'm trying to push him into some kind of obligation that he doesn't want, or isn't sure of. And Roger is thinking: Gosh. Six months. And Elaine is thinking: But, hey, I'm not so sure I want this kind of relationship, either. Sometimes I wish I had a little more space, so I'd have time to think about whether I really want us to keep going the way we are, moving steadily toward... I mean, where are we going? Are we just going to keep seeing each other at this level of intimacy? Are we heading toward marriage? Toward children? Toward a lifetime together? Am I ready for that level of commitment? Do I really even know this person? And Roger is thinking: So, that means it was... let's see...February when we started going out, which was right after I had the car at the dealer's, which means...let me check the odometer... Whoa! I am way overdue for an oil change here. And Elaine is thinking: He's upset. I can see it on his face. Maybe I'm reading this completely wrong. Maybe he wants more from our relationship, more intimacy, more commitment; maybe he has sensed, even before I sensed it, that I was feeling some reservations. Yes, I bet that's it. That's why he's so reluctant to say anything about his own feelings. He's afraid of being rejected. And Roger is thinking: And I'm going to have them look at the transmission again. I don't care what those morons say, it's still not shifting right. And they better not try to blame it on the cold weather this time. What cold weather? It's 87 degrees and this thing is shifting like a garbage truck, and I paid those incompetent thieves $600. And Elaine is thinking: He's angry. And I don't blame him. I'd be angry,

                      H Offline
                      H Offline
                      hollowMedia 0xFA7E
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      My girlfriend of 3 years says to me "I love you more then I have ever loved you." Then 1 week later she says "I don't know how I feel anymore" followed by "Things are just different." We go on like this for about 3 months. I feel like this is the longest breakup in history, but at least I can deal with it now. My question: How can feelings change from extreme love to indifference within 1 week? I mean...I didn't change. Women are confusing. ---- xian

                      L 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • P Paresh Solanki

                        Men are worse: Men need time, money, girls and sex, so:-

                        men = time X money X girls X sex

                        but we know that time = money, so

                        men = money X money X girls X sex

                        Since all men want to have as much sex as possible with as many girls as possible, we can assert that (for men) sex = girls,

                        men = money X money X girls X girls = money ^ 2 X girls ^ 2

                        It has been determined that girls = evil (see previous post) and that money is the root of all evil, so

                        money ^ 2 = evil

                        this gives us

                        men = evil X evil ^ 2

                        proving that men are more evil than girls:) :) :) Paresh Solanki There is no substitute for genuine lack of preparation.

                        J Offline
                        J Offline
                        James T Johnson
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        Only if evil has a value greater than 1, values less than 1 get smaller when you multiply them together. :) James - has way too much time on his hands to think even think about that Simplicity Rules!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • H hollowMedia 0xFA7E

                          My girlfriend of 3 years says to me "I love you more then I have ever loved you." Then 1 week later she says "I don't know how I feel anymore" followed by "Things are just different." We go on like this for about 3 months. I feel like this is the longest breakup in history, but at least I can deal with it now. My question: How can feelings change from extreme love to indifference within 1 week? I mean...I didn't change. Women are confusing. ---- xian

                          L Offline
                          L Offline
                          Lost User
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          If men were more logical we wouldn't have a problem ;P you're always going round in circles, its only the size that varies

                          H 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • L Lost User

                            If men were more logical we wouldn't have a problem ;P you're always going round in circles, its only the size that varies

                            H Offline
                            H Offline
                            hollowMedia 0xFA7E
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            My dad says the same thing. He thinks we're all on an spiral- similar to what you've stated. ---- xian

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • L l a u r e n

                              hmmmmmm should i say anything..... :)

                              B Offline
                              B Offline
                              Brian Delahunty
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              lauren wrote: hmmmmmm should i say anything yep. you should


                              Now taking suggestionsfor a new sig. please email me all suggestions.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • P Paresh Solanki

                                Men are worse: Men need time, money, girls and sex, so:-

                                men = time X money X girls X sex

                                but we know that time = money, so

                                men = money X money X girls X sex

                                Since all men want to have as much sex as possible with as many girls as possible, we can assert that (for men) sex = girls,

                                men = money X money X girls X girls = money ^ 2 X girls ^ 2

                                It has been determined that girls = evil (see previous post) and that money is the root of all evil, so

                                money ^ 2 = evil

                                this gives us

                                men = evil X evil ^ 2

                                proving that men are more evil than girls:) :) :) Paresh Solanki There is no substitute for genuine lack of preparation.

                                H Offline
                                H Offline
                                hollowMedia 0xFA7E
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                Paresh Solanki wrote: Since all men want to have as much sex as possible with as many girls as possible, we can assert that (for men) sex = girls, men = money X money X girls X girls = money ^ 2 X girls ^ 2 Unless you are a gay man, then you might get

                                men = money * money * men * men = money^2 * men

                                therefore

                                men * money^2 = 1

                                sqrt( money ) = sqrt( 1 / men )
                                +/- money = 1 / sqrt( men )
                                sqrt( men ) = 1 / money
                                sqrt( men ) = 1 / sqrt( evil )

                                Does this mean gay men with a lot of money = 1? Or that the root of gay men is that infinity as money reaches 0? Or that the root of gay men is the inverse of the root of evil? I never understood that lifestyle :\ ---- xian

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • L l a u r e n

                                  hmmmmmm should i say anything..... :)

                                  R Offline
                                  R Offline
                                  Roger Wright
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  Go for it... you're up to the challenge!:-D

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  Reply
                                  • Reply as topic
                                  Log in to reply
                                  • Oldest to Newest
                                  • Newest to Oldest
                                  • Most Votes


                                  • Login

                                  • Don't have an account? Register

                                  • Login or register to search.
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Categories
                                  • Recent
                                  • Tags
                                  • Popular
                                  • World
                                  • Users
                                  • Groups