JOTD
-
THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN Let's say a guy named Roger is attracted to a woman named Elaine. He asks her out to a movie; she accepts; they have a pretty good time. A few nights later he asks her out to dinner, and again they enjoy themselves. They continue to see each other regularly, and after a while neither one of them is seeing anybody else. And then, one evening when they're driving home, a thought occurs to Elaine, and, without really thinking, she says it aloud: "Do you realise that, as of tonight, we've been seeing each other for exactly six months?" And then there is silence in the car. To Elaine, it seems like a very loud silence. She thinks to herself: Geez, I wonder if it bothers him that I said that. Maybe he's been feeling confined by our relationship; maybe he thinks I'm trying to push him into some kind of obligation that he doesn't want, or isn't sure of. And Roger is thinking: Gosh. Six months. And Elaine is thinking: But, hey, I'm not so sure I want this kind of relationship, either. Sometimes I wish I had a little more space, so I'd have time to think about whether I really want us to keep going the way we are, moving steadily toward... I mean, where are we going? Are we just going to keep seeing each other at this level of intimacy? Are we heading toward marriage? Toward children? Toward a lifetime together? Am I ready for that level of commitment? Do I really even know this person? And Roger is thinking: So, that means it was... let's see...February when we started going out, which was right after I had the car at the dealer's, which means...let me check the odometer... Whoa! I am way overdue for an oil change here. And Elaine is thinking: He's upset. I can see it on his face. Maybe I'm reading this completely wrong. Maybe he wants more from our relationship, more intimacy, more commitment; maybe he has sensed, even before I sensed it, that I was feeling some reservations. Yes, I bet that's it. That's why he's so reluctant to say anything about his own feelings. He's afraid of being rejected. And Roger is thinking: And I'm going to have them look at the transmission again. I don't care what those morons say, it's still not shifting right. And they better not try to blame it on the cold weather this time. What cold weather? It's 87 degrees and this thing is shifting like a garbage truck, and I paid those incompetent thieves $600. And Elaine is thinking: He's angry. And I don't blame him. I'd be angry,
I have proof of this amazing statement: We all know that girls require time and money. this can be expressed mathematically as:
Girls = time * money
But we also know that time = money, so
Girls = money * money = money ^ 2
Finally, observation shows that money is the root of all evil
Girls = (root(money))^ 2
therefore
Girls = evil
:) Paresh Solanki There is no substitute for genuine lack of preparation.
-
I have proof of this amazing statement: We all know that girls require time and money. this can be expressed mathematically as:
Girls = time * money
But we also know that time = money, so
Girls = money * money = money ^ 2
Finally, observation shows that money is the root of all evil
Girls = (root(money))^ 2
therefore
Girls = evil
:) Paresh Solanki There is no substitute for genuine lack of preparation.
hmmmmmm should i say anything..... :)
-
I have proof of this amazing statement: We all know that girls require time and money. this can be expressed mathematically as:
Girls = time * money
But we also know that time = money, so
Girls = money * money = money ^ 2
Finally, observation shows that money is the root of all evil
Girls = (root(money))^ 2
therefore
Girls = evil
:) Paresh Solanki There is no substitute for genuine lack of preparation.
Paresh Solanki wrote: Girls are Evil True, but the world would be so dull without them. ;) Bruce Duncan CP#9088, CPUA 0xA1EE, Sonork 100.10030
Hi everyone. My name's Bruce. And I suffer from VB. -
I have proof of this amazing statement: We all know that girls require time and money. this can be expressed mathematically as:
Girls = time * money
But we also know that time = money, so
Girls = money * money = money ^ 2
Finally, observation shows that money is the root of all evil
Girls = (root(money))^ 2
therefore
Girls = evil
:) Paresh Solanki There is no substitute for genuine lack of preparation.
Men are worse: Men need time, money, girls and sex, so:-
men = time X money X girls X sex
but we know that time = money, so
men = money X money X girls X sex
Since all men want to have as much sex as possible with as many girls as possible, we can assert that (for men) sex = girls,
men = money X money X girls X girls = money ^ 2 X girls ^ 2
It has been determined that girls = evil (see previous post) and that money is the root of all evil, so
money ^ 2 = evil
this gives us
men = evil X evil ^ 2
proving that men are more evil than girls:) :) :) Paresh Solanki There is no substitute for genuine lack of preparation.
-
hmmmmmm should i say anything..... :)
lauren wrote: should i say anything Well, you are a girl/woman; you could give your point of view. It may start a pointless flame war, or maybe some of us would learn something. :) "There is a fine line between lunacy and genius; it is my goal in life to keep them guessing just where the line lies..." -- Unknown
-
hmmmmmm should i say anything..... :)
I'd like to hear your point of view Paresh Solanki There is no substitute for genuine lack of preparation.
-
I have proof of this amazing statement: We all know that girls require time and money. this can be expressed mathematically as:
Girls = time * money
But we also know that time = money, so
Girls = money * money = money ^ 2
Finally, observation shows that money is the root of all evil
Girls = (root(money))^ 2
therefore
Girls = evil
:) Paresh Solanki There is no substitute for genuine lack of preparation.
Paresh Solanki wrote: We all know that girls require time and money. this can be expressed mathematically as: Girls = time * money Sorry, but there is a mistake in this. If a girl requires time and money then the stament should read Girls = time + money whick gives girls = money + money = 2*Money If money is the root of all evil Girls = 2 * (root(Evil)) So girls are even more evil as evil hasn't been rooted! I was going to take logs of both sides but I forget how the maths envolved works, plus the log of a girl is a sh!tty subject. :laugh: Roger Allen Sonork 100.10016 If I had a quote, it would be a very good one.
-
Paresh Solanki wrote: We all know that girls require time and money. this can be expressed mathematically as: Girls = time * money Sorry, but there is a mistake in this. If a girl requires time and money then the stament should read Girls = time + money whick gives girls = money + money = 2*Money If money is the root of all evil Girls = 2 * (root(Evil)) So girls are even more evil as evil hasn't been rooted! I was going to take logs of both sides but I forget how the maths envolved works, plus the log of a girl is a sh!tty subject. :laugh: Roger Allen Sonork 100.10016 If I had a quote, it would be a very good one.
I disagree. For each period of time, girls require money, so I stand by the initial assertion. Paresh Solanki There is no substitute for genuine lack of preparation.
-
THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN Let's say a guy named Roger is attracted to a woman named Elaine. He asks her out to a movie; she accepts; they have a pretty good time. A few nights later he asks her out to dinner, and again they enjoy themselves. They continue to see each other regularly, and after a while neither one of them is seeing anybody else. And then, one evening when they're driving home, a thought occurs to Elaine, and, without really thinking, she says it aloud: "Do you realise that, as of tonight, we've been seeing each other for exactly six months?" And then there is silence in the car. To Elaine, it seems like a very loud silence. She thinks to herself: Geez, I wonder if it bothers him that I said that. Maybe he's been feeling confined by our relationship; maybe he thinks I'm trying to push him into some kind of obligation that he doesn't want, or isn't sure of. And Roger is thinking: Gosh. Six months. And Elaine is thinking: But, hey, I'm not so sure I want this kind of relationship, either. Sometimes I wish I had a little more space, so I'd have time to think about whether I really want us to keep going the way we are, moving steadily toward... I mean, where are we going? Are we just going to keep seeing each other at this level of intimacy? Are we heading toward marriage? Toward children? Toward a lifetime together? Am I ready for that level of commitment? Do I really even know this person? And Roger is thinking: So, that means it was... let's see...February when we started going out, which was right after I had the car at the dealer's, which means...let me check the odometer... Whoa! I am way overdue for an oil change here. And Elaine is thinking: He's upset. I can see it on his face. Maybe I'm reading this completely wrong. Maybe he wants more from our relationship, more intimacy, more commitment; maybe he has sensed, even before I sensed it, that I was feeling some reservations. Yes, I bet that's it. That's why he's so reluctant to say anything about his own feelings. He's afraid of being rejected. And Roger is thinking: And I'm going to have them look at the transmission again. I don't care what those morons say, it's still not shifting right. And they better not try to blame it on the cold weather this time. What cold weather? It's 87 degrees and this thing is shifting like a garbage truck, and I paid those incompetent thieves $600. And Elaine is thinking: He's angry. And I don't blame him. I'd be angry,
My girlfriend of 3 years says to me "I love you more then I have ever loved you." Then 1 week later she says "I don't know how I feel anymore" followed by "Things are just different." We go on like this for about 3 months. I feel like this is the longest breakup in history, but at least I can deal with it now. My question: How can feelings change from extreme love to indifference within 1 week? I mean...I didn't change. Women are confusing. ---- xian
-
Men are worse: Men need time, money, girls and sex, so:-
men = time X money X girls X sex
but we know that time = money, so
men = money X money X girls X sex
Since all men want to have as much sex as possible with as many girls as possible, we can assert that (for men) sex = girls,
men = money X money X girls X girls = money ^ 2 X girls ^ 2
It has been determined that girls = evil (see previous post) and that money is the root of all evil, so
money ^ 2 = evil
this gives us
men = evil X evil ^ 2
proving that men are more evil than girls:) :) :) Paresh Solanki There is no substitute for genuine lack of preparation.
Only if
evilhas a value greater than 1, values less than 1 get smaller when you multiply them together. :) James - has way too much time on his hands to think even think about that Simplicity Rules! -
My girlfriend of 3 years says to me "I love you more then I have ever loved you." Then 1 week later she says "I don't know how I feel anymore" followed by "Things are just different." We go on like this for about 3 months. I feel like this is the longest breakup in history, but at least I can deal with it now. My question: How can feelings change from extreme love to indifference within 1 week? I mean...I didn't change. Women are confusing. ---- xian
-
If men were more logical we wouldn't have a problem ;P you're always going round in circles, its only the size that varies
My dad says the same thing. He thinks we're all on an spiral- similar to what you've stated. ---- xian
-
hmmmmmm should i say anything..... :)
lauren wrote: hmmmmmm should i say anything yep. you should
Now taking suggestionsfor a new sig. please email me all suggestions.
-
Men are worse: Men need time, money, girls and sex, so:-
men = time X money X girls X sex
but we know that time = money, so
men = money X money X girls X sex
Since all men want to have as much sex as possible with as many girls as possible, we can assert that (for men) sex = girls,
men = money X money X girls X girls = money ^ 2 X girls ^ 2
It has been determined that girls = evil (see previous post) and that money is the root of all evil, so
money ^ 2 = evil
this gives us
men = evil X evil ^ 2
proving that men are more evil than girls:) :) :) Paresh Solanki There is no substitute for genuine lack of preparation.
Paresh Solanki wrote: Since all men want to have as much sex as possible with as many girls as possible, we can assert that (for men) sex = girls, men = money X money X girls X girls = money ^ 2 X girls ^ 2 Unless you are a gay man, then you might get
men = money * money * men * men = money^2 * men
therefore
men * money^2 = 1
sqrt( money ) = sqrt( 1 / men )
+/- money = 1 / sqrt( men )
sqrt( men ) = 1 / money
sqrt( men ) = 1 / sqrt( evil )Does this mean gay men with a lot of money = 1? Or that the root of gay men is that infinity as money reaches 0? Or that the root of gay men is the inverse of the root of evil? I never understood that lifestyle :\ ---- xian
-
hmmmmmm should i say anything..... :)
Go for it... you're up to the challenge!:-D