Cisco to sue Apple on iPhone name
-
It's going to be interesting to see if they have to change the name. Possible names: Apple Phone (like Apple TV) Mac Phone Mac Phone X (like Mac OS X) Add your own Apple/Mac derived name to the list... :)
Fumle wrote:
It's going to be interesting to see if they have to change the name.
CallPod? :rolleyes:
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero ப்ரம்மா
-
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6250511.stm[^]
Cisco is suing Apple Computer for trademark infringement in a federal court, for using the iPhone name.
Oops. :rolleyes: There's no publicity like, well, Apple's... They'll still make millions off Cisco's trademark*. * Cisco own Linksys, who manufacture and sell the iPhone.
Ðavid Wulff What kind of music should programmers listen to?
Join the Code Project Last.fm group | dwulff
I'm so gangsta I eat cereal without the milkiUnknown? ;P
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero ப்ரம்மா
-
Fumle wrote:
It's going to be interesting to see if they have to change the name.
CallPod? :rolleyes:
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero ப்ரம்மா
-
Gee.... who would have seen this coming? Apple is going to lose this case. Cisco owns the trademark and they manufacture a product under it so Apple has not got a hope in hell unless Cisco lets them use it.
Brad Australian -CAUTION- The previous statement may contain traces of PHP, and by reading this statement you negate the right to vote me down.
Bradml wrote:
Apple is going to lose this case. Cisco owns the trademark and they manufacture a product under it so Apple has not got a hope in hell unless Cisco lets them use it.
There will probably be an out of court settlement where Cisco allow the use of the name of iPhone for an undisclosed shed load of money. :-)
Never argue with an imbecile; they bring you down to their level, and beat you with experience.
-
In the thread here about the IPhone yesterday I pointed out that Apple was unlikely to ever be able to use the name since Cisco was already using it in business and had the trademark and someone indicated that Cisco and Apple had signed some agreement about this. I guess they hadn't or it fell through.
John Cardinal wrote:
Cisco was already using it in business and had the trademark and someone indicated that Cisco and Apple had signed some agreement about this
Never deal with Apple or Steve Jobs. He entered into an agreement with Apple Records (the Beatles music company) to use the name "Apple" for his computer. Apple Records agreed on condition that Apple Computer never enter the music business. And exactly what business is iPod and iTunes in? Cisco should tell Jobs to stuff Apple's iPhone up where the sun doesn't shine.
-
It's going to be interesting to see if they have to change the name. Possible names: Apple Phone (like Apple TV) Mac Phone Mac Phone X (like Mac OS X) Add your own Apple/Mac derived name to the list... :)
iFone :) or maybe eyePhone or iCall
-
Fumle wrote:
It's going to be interesting to see if they have to change the name.
CallPod? :rolleyes:
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero ப்ரம்மா
Not bad :-D
regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa
Shog9 wrote:
I don't see it happening, at least not until it becomes pointless.
-
John Cardinal wrote:
Cisco was already using it in business and had the trademark and someone indicated that Cisco and Apple had signed some agreement about this
Never deal with Apple or Steve Jobs. He entered into an agreement with Apple Records (the Beatles music company) to use the name "Apple" for his computer. Apple Records agreed on condition that Apple Computer never enter the music business. And exactly what business is iPod and iTunes in? Cisco should tell Jobs to stuff Apple's iPhone up where the sun doesn't shine.
Vivic wrote:
And exactly what business is iPod and iTunes in?
Which kinda makes you think Apple are going to tell Cisco to stuff iPhone up where the sun doesn't shine. Not the other way around.
regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa
Shog9 wrote:
I don't see it happening, at least not until it becomes pointless.
-
Gee.... who would have seen this coming? Apple is going to lose this case. Cisco owns the trademark and they manufacture a product under it so Apple has not got a hope in hell unless Cisco lets them use it.
Brad Australian -CAUTION- The previous statement may contain traces of PHP, and by reading this statement you negate the right to vote me down.
Bradml wrote:
Apple is going to lose this case
Don't bet money on it mate. They got around the Beatles.
regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa
Shog9 wrote:
I don't see it happening, at least not until it becomes pointless.
-
Apple should have called it the iConnect, iCom, iMobile, or iGo. One of their biggest marketing points is that it's not just another phone!
Russell Morris wrote:
iConnect, iCom, iMobile, or iGo
All gone, all used. iGo is a car actually.
regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa
Shog9 wrote:
I don't see it happening, at least not until it becomes pointless.
-
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6250511.stm[^]
Cisco is suing Apple Computer for trademark infringement in a federal court, for using the iPhone name.
Oops. :rolleyes: There's no publicity like, well, Apple's... They'll still make millions off Cisco's trademark*. * Cisco own Linksys, who manufacture and sell the iPhone.
Ðavid Wulff What kind of music should programmers listen to?
Join the Code Project Last.fm group | dwulff
I'm so gangsta I eat cereal without the milkJust to be clear; I think Apple is wrong and that Cisco has the rights but I also think Apple has been here before and won so they have a good chance of doing it again.
regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa
Shog9 wrote:
I don't see it happening, at least not until it becomes pointless.
-
Just to be clear; I think Apple is wrong and that Cisco has the rights but I also think Apple has been here before and won so they have a good chance of doing it again.
regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa
Shog9 wrote:
I don't see it happening, at least not until it becomes pointless.
I would not be surprised if Apple will use their size and the fact that 90% of consumers will associate Cisco's mark with Apple, to get away with it. There has got ot be an association rule somewhere in US trademark law.
Ðavid Wulff What kind of music should programmers listen to?
Join the Code Project Last.fm group | dwulff
I'm so gangsta I eat cereal without the milk -
MacApho?
Only if it looks like a burger.
-
Vivic wrote:
And exactly what business is iPod and iTunes in?
Which kinda makes you think Apple are going to tell Cisco to stuff iPhone up where the sun doesn't shine. Not the other way around.
regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa
Shog9 wrote:
I don't see it happening, at least not until it becomes pointless.
I don't think so. Apple Records was nice to Apple Computer; they had no clue -- nor did Apple Computer -- how computers would evolve and how we would end up with digital form of music instead of the old analog form. Cisco has no reason to be nice to Steve Jobs. There is no way they will give up their trademark. Cisco is a bigger gorilla than Apple Computer.
-
I don't think so. Apple Records was nice to Apple Computer; they had no clue -- nor did Apple Computer -- how computers would evolve and how we would end up with digital form of music instead of the old analog form. Cisco has no reason to be nice to Steve Jobs. There is no way they will give up their trademark. Cisco is a bigger gorilla than Apple Computer.
The deal Apple made with Apple Records many years ago was that Apple could use the Apple trademark for computers but never enter the music industry. But now Apple is most definitely in the music industry (iTunes, iPod etc.) Recently Apple Records got angry with Apple but Apple swatted them aside. They walked all over the trademark deal. Recently, not years ago. Watch them do the same with Cisco.
Vivic wrote:
There is no way they will give up their trademark.
Apple is contesting that Cisco can keep their iPhone trademark because it pertains only to IP phones, not what Apple says the iPhone is.
regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa
Shog9 wrote:
I don't see it happening, at least not until it becomes pointless.
-
Only if it looks like a burger.
Actually, I was trying to imply McAfee. :-D Phoebe vs. Phoebo.
-
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6250511.stm[^]
Cisco is suing Apple Computer for trademark infringement in a federal court, for using the iPhone name.
Oops. :rolleyes: There's no publicity like, well, Apple's... They'll still make millions off Cisco's trademark*. * Cisco own Linksys, who manufacture and sell the iPhone.
Ðavid Wulff What kind of music should programmers listen to?
Join the Code Project Last.fm group | dwulff
I'm so gangsta I eat cereal without the milk -
Bradml wrote:
Apple is going to lose this case
Don't bet money on it mate. They got around the Beatles.
regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa
Shog9 wrote:
I don't see it happening, at least not until it becomes pointless.
Paul Watson wrote:
Bradml wrote: Apple is going to lose this case Don't bet money on it mate. They got around the Beatles.
The Beatles? You're kidding right? On the Monkey Scale (TM) if Apple Inc. is the 400lbs silverback, then Cisco is King Kong and Apple Records is Tarzan's chimp Cheetah! :-D The iPhone BRAND belongs to Cisco, if Apple Inc. wants to use it, they need to play nice with Cisco. The two will likely settle, but right now its just lawyers waving their junk around getting things all wet.
-
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6250511.stm[^]
Cisco is suing Apple Computer for trademark infringement in a federal court, for using the iPhone name.
Oops. :rolleyes: There's no publicity like, well, Apple's... They'll still make millions off Cisco's trademark*. * Cisco own Linksys, who manufacture and sell the iPhone.
Ðavid Wulff What kind of music should programmers listen to?
Join the Code Project Last.fm group | dwulff
I'm so gangsta I eat cereal without the milk -
The thing is Apple is probably doing this for the publicity. Forget about the lawsuit, look how much time has been spent talking about this already. Even if they have to change the name now, they have gotten a lot of free publicity for their product. And that is probably worth a lot more than if they lose a lawsuit.