Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. The second Holocaust will be different

The second Holocaust will be different

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
htmlcomtutorialquestionlounge
71 Posts 14 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C Chris S Kaiser

    This was to return to the internationally recognized borders. And by that, I mean, that this is land being returned. Not lost. There shouldn't be any settlers in Gaza. Or the West Bank. Jerusalem seems to be a bit different being the holy land to both. But I don't think that this was so much a give away as a return.

    What's in a sig? This statement is false. Build a bridge and get over it. ~ Chris Maunder

    J Offline
    J Offline
    Judah Gabriel Himango
    wrote on last edited by
    #60

    Chris, tell me why you think we should return to those borders.

    Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit. I'm currently blogging about: Check out this cutie The apostle Paul, modernly speaking: Epistles of Paul Judah Himango

    C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • C Chris S Kaiser

      Judah Himango wrote:

      One thing I want to ask you is, you seem to have a lot of faith in international law

      Nah. No faith in that. But, the borders agreed to must be adhered to. If you (Israel) decide to act on your own and decide which borders to recognize in the face of a previous agreement, then you lose credibility in your arguments.

      What's in a sig? This statement is false. Build a bridge and get over it. ~ Chris Maunder

      J Offline
      J Offline
      Judah Gabriel Himango
      wrote on last edited by
      #61

      Chris S Kaiser wrote:

      But, the borders agreed to must be adhered to.

      Agreed, unless war happens and borders change. No?

      Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit. I'm currently blogging about: Check out this cutie The apostle Paul, modernly speaking: Epistles of Paul Judah Himango

      C 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • J Judah Gabriel Himango

        Chris, tell me why you think we should return to those borders.

        Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit. I'm currently blogging about: Check out this cutie The apostle Paul, modernly speaking: Epistles of Paul Judah Himango

        C Offline
        C Offline
        Chris S Kaiser
        wrote on last edited by
        #62

        Because Israel agreed to it. No do overs. No deciding to change your mind and take matters into your own hands. Live up to your word. Else you can't cry for help.

        What's in a sig? This statement is false. Build a bridge and get over it. ~ Chris Maunder

        J 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • J Judah Gabriel Himango

          Chris S Kaiser wrote:

          But, the borders agreed to must be adhered to.

          Agreed, unless war happens and borders change. No?

          Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit. I'm currently blogging about: Check out this cutie The apostle Paul, modernly speaking: Epistles of Paul Judah Himango

          C Offline
          C Offline
          Chris S Kaiser
          wrote on last edited by
          #63

          This hasn't been war in the qualified sense. If its war, then it isn't terrorism. Is it civil war? Treaties have to be adhered to to hold any value. If you choose to ignore them, you can't expect to be taken seriously in future negotiations.

          What's in a sig? This statement is false. Build a bridge and get over it. ~ Chris Maunder

          J 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C Chris S Kaiser

            This hasn't been war in the qualified sense. If its war, then it isn't terrorism. Is it civil war? Treaties have to be adhered to to hold any value. If you choose to ignore them, you can't expect to be taken seriously in future negotiations.

            What's in a sig? This statement is false. Build a bridge and get over it. ~ Chris Maunder

            J Offline
            J Offline
            Judah Gabriel Himango
            wrote on last edited by
            #64

            I was speaking of the war in which the disputed territories were taken by Israel after the invasion by 4 of its hostile Islamic theocratic neighbors: Six Day War[^].

            Chris S Kaiser wrote:

            Treaties have to be adhered to to hold any value.

            I agree. The Oslo Accords guaranteed us peace if we gave up parts of Gaza and the West Bank which we won in the war earlier. We've transfered that land to Palestinian authority, but we still didn't get peace. We were then told to sign the Interim Agreement, assuring us that if we just signed away Bethlehem, Hebron, Jenin, Nablus, Qalqilya, Ramallah, and Tulkarm, peace would reign supreme. Those areas are now under Palestinian rule, but peace never came. We have since been convinced to sign 10 more agreements (citation[^]) that trade land for peace. But somehow, Chris, I suspect we won't have peace until there is no land left for us to live on.

            Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit. I'm currently blogging about: Check out this cutie The apostle Paul, modernly speaking: Epistles of Paul Judah Himango

            C 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • J Judah Gabriel Himango

              I was speaking of the war in which the disputed territories were taken by Israel after the invasion by 4 of its hostile Islamic theocratic neighbors: Six Day War[^].

              Chris S Kaiser wrote:

              Treaties have to be adhered to to hold any value.

              I agree. The Oslo Accords guaranteed us peace if we gave up parts of Gaza and the West Bank which we won in the war earlier. We've transfered that land to Palestinian authority, but we still didn't get peace. We were then told to sign the Interim Agreement, assuring us that if we just signed away Bethlehem, Hebron, Jenin, Nablus, Qalqilya, Ramallah, and Tulkarm, peace would reign supreme. Those areas are now under Palestinian rule, but peace never came. We have since been convinced to sign 10 more agreements (citation[^]) that trade land for peace. But somehow, Chris, I suspect we won't have peace until there is no land left for us to live on.

              Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit. I'm currently blogging about: Check out this cutie The apostle Paul, modernly speaking: Epistles of Paul Judah Himango

              C Offline
              C Offline
              Chris S Kaiser
              wrote on last edited by
              #65

              Judah Himango wrote:

              But somehow, Chris, I suspect we won't have peace until there is no land left for us to live on.

              Who's calling for more land than what was in the treaty?

              What's in a sig? This statement is false. Build a bridge and get over it. ~ Chris Maunder

              J 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • C Chris S Kaiser

                Because Israel agreed to it. No do overs. No deciding to change your mind and take matters into your own hands. Live up to your word. Else you can't cry for help.

                What's in a sig? This statement is false. Build a bridge and get over it. ~ Chris Maunder

                J Offline
                J Offline
                Judah Gabriel Himango
                wrote on last edited by
                #66

                By that logic, the United States ought to return to its original 13 colonies, the UK should disannex Scotland, hell, we might as well all return to our caves. ;) Fact is, the disputed territories were won after Syria, Egypt, Iraq, and Jordan invaded Israel in 1967. Wars change borders. In fact, they define them. If you can name some major nation whose borders were defined outside of war, I'd be more inclined to listen. Now Palestinians are crying about it because their Islamic theocratic allies lost control of territories in war. Like you said Chris, no do overs. :)

                Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit. I'm currently blogging about: Check out this cutie The apostle Paul, modernly speaking: Epistles of Paul Judah Himango

                C 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • J Judah Gabriel Himango

                  By that logic, the United States ought to return to its original 13 colonies, the UK should disannex Scotland, hell, we might as well all return to our caves. ;) Fact is, the disputed territories were won after Syria, Egypt, Iraq, and Jordan invaded Israel in 1967. Wars change borders. In fact, they define them. If you can name some major nation whose borders were defined outside of war, I'd be more inclined to listen. Now Palestinians are crying about it because their Islamic theocratic allies lost control of territories in war. Like you said Chris, no do overs. :)

                  Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit. I'm currently blogging about: Check out this cutie The apostle Paul, modernly speaking: Epistles of Paul Judah Himango

                  C Offline
                  C Offline
                  Chris S Kaiser
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #67

                  Its the internationally recognized borders set in 1967 that I'm speaking of.

                  What's in a sig? This statement is false. Build a bridge and get over it. ~ Chris Maunder

                  J 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • C Chris S Kaiser

                    Judah Himango wrote:

                    But somehow, Chris, I suspect we won't have peace until there is no land left for us to live on.

                    Who's calling for more land than what was in the treaty?

                    What's in a sig? This statement is false. Build a bridge and get over it. ~ Chris Maunder

                    J Offline
                    J Offline
                    Judah Gabriel Himango
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #68

                    The Islamic radicals controlling the Palestinian government, and certain people in the West that don't understand the situation. Gush Katif, for example, was never mentioned in the original treaty, yet just recently 9000 Jews were forced to pack up and leave.

                    Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit. I'm currently blogging about: Check out this cutie The apostle Paul, modernly speaking: Epistles of Paul Judah Himango

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • C Chris S Kaiser

                      Its the internationally recognized borders set in 1967 that I'm speaking of.

                      What's in a sig? This statement is false. Build a bridge and get over it. ~ Chris Maunder

                      J Offline
                      J Offline
                      Judah Gabriel Himango
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #69

                      Which ones are those? Where are they defined? And by whom? Can you show me some international maps that, for example, show the Golan Heights as belonging to Syria, as it was before the war? Or can you show me a map that shows the West Bank under Jordanian rule, as it was before the war? Chris, no one recognizes this, perhaps spare the few Islamic radicals that don't recognize Israel's existence. Again, the logic you're espousing could be applied to most any other nation in the world. "I think the US should go back to the recognized borders, the ones before the war for Independence." :rolleyes:

                      Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit. I'm currently blogging about: Check out this cutie The apostle Paul, modernly speaking: Epistles of Paul Judah Himango

                      C 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • J Judah Gabriel Himango

                        Which ones are those? Where are they defined? And by whom? Can you show me some international maps that, for example, show the Golan Heights as belonging to Syria, as it was before the war? Or can you show me a map that shows the West Bank under Jordanian rule, as it was before the war? Chris, no one recognizes this, perhaps spare the few Islamic radicals that don't recognize Israel's existence. Again, the logic you're espousing could be applied to most any other nation in the world. "I think the US should go back to the recognized borders, the ones before the war for Independence." :rolleyes:

                        Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit. I'm currently blogging about: Check out this cutie The apostle Paul, modernly speaking: Epistles of Paul Judah Himango

                        C Offline
                        C Offline
                        Chris S Kaiser
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #70

                        There was a treaty signed after in 1967 where borders were established. Israel should stay with what they agreed to or their word isn't worth anything.

                        What's in a sig? This statement is false. Build a bridge and get over it. ~ Chris Maunder

                        J 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • C Chris S Kaiser

                          There was a treaty signed after in 1967 where borders were established. Israel should stay with what they agreed to or their word isn't worth anything.

                          What's in a sig? This statement is false. Build a bridge and get over it. ~ Chris Maunder

                          J Offline
                          J Offline
                          Judah Gabriel Himango
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #71

                          So, you're saying Israel signed a treaty agreeing to give away all the land they won in the war? Can you show me that treaty? I just did some deeper research and have found no such treaty being signed by involved parties. (Lots of meaningless UN resolutions backed by Arab parties hoping to get back their land, as expected, but nothing signed by all involved parties).

                          Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit. I'm currently blogging about: Check out this cutie The apostle Paul, modernly speaking: Epistles of Paul Judah Himango

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups