Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. U.S. official: Chinese test missile obliterates satellite [modified]

U.S. official: Chinese test missile obliterates satellite [modified]

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
htmldatabasecomadobebusiness
32 Posts 10 Posters 5 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C Christian Graus

    Captain See Sharp wrote:

    If I remember right Bill Clinton sold China that technology.

    ROTFL !!!

    Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++ Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog

    L Offline
    L Offline
    Lost User
    wrote on last edited by
    #10

    =================================================================== Clinton's 1992 and 1996 campaigns were the beneficiaries of "contributions" from individuals and organizations associated with the People's Republic of China, or PRC, military/intelligence. These included "a massive cascade of illegally laundered foreign funds" injected into key states in the general election of 1992; "leaders of a Thai conglomerate that is in business with ... China's biggest arms smugglers had a White House meeting with Clinton at which they were illegally solicited for campaign donations"; "a People's Liberation Army [or PLA] partner sat next to Clinton at a Democratic National Committee fund-raiser and contributed thousands of dollars in illegal campaign funds to the Democrats"; and "the officers of an American defense contractor in business with China's missile builders became the No. 1 contributors" to the president's reelection campaign in 1995-1996." ==================================================================== http://www.salon.com/news/1998/05/29newsa.html[^] ==================================================================== Let us not forget China's Great Leap Forward in missile guidance technology courtesy of Bill Clinton's major donors, Bernard L. Schwartz of Loral and C. Michael Armstrong of Hughes. China was rewarded for its underwriting Bill Clinton's campaigns, and to insure the U.S. would not be the sole superpower. China's military technology had the Clinton & Clinton booster rocket. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1770582/posts[^] =====================================================================

    █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██

    C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • L Lost User

      =================================================================== Clinton's 1992 and 1996 campaigns were the beneficiaries of "contributions" from individuals and organizations associated with the People's Republic of China, or PRC, military/intelligence. These included "a massive cascade of illegally laundered foreign funds" injected into key states in the general election of 1992; "leaders of a Thai conglomerate that is in business with ... China's biggest arms smugglers had a White House meeting with Clinton at which they were illegally solicited for campaign donations"; "a People's Liberation Army [or PLA] partner sat next to Clinton at a Democratic National Committee fund-raiser and contributed thousands of dollars in illegal campaign funds to the Democrats"; and "the officers of an American defense contractor in business with China's missile builders became the No. 1 contributors" to the president's reelection campaign in 1995-1996." ==================================================================== http://www.salon.com/news/1998/05/29newsa.html[^] ==================================================================== Let us not forget China's Great Leap Forward in missile guidance technology courtesy of Bill Clinton's major donors, Bernard L. Schwartz of Loral and C. Michael Armstrong of Hughes. China was rewarded for its underwriting Bill Clinton's campaigns, and to insure the U.S. would not be the sole superpower. China's military technology had the Clinton & Clinton booster rocket. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1770582/posts[^] =====================================================================

      █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██

      C Offline
      C Offline
      Christian Graus
      wrote on last edited by
      #11

      OK, that sounds like it comes from a credible source...

      Christian Graus - C++ MVP 'Why don't we jump on a fad that hasn't already been widely discredited ?' - Dilbert

      L 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • C Christian Graus

        OK, that sounds like it comes from a credible source...

        Christian Graus - C++ MVP 'Why don't we jump on a fad that hasn't already been widely discredited ?' - Dilbert

        L Offline
        L Offline
        Lost User
        wrote on last edited by
        #12

        Christian Graus wrote:

        OK, that sounds like it comes from a credible source...

        Do you need more? I can give you plenty of links and quotes if you like.

        █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██

        C 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L Lost User

          Christian Graus wrote:

          OK, that sounds like it comes from a credible source...

          Do you need more? I can give you plenty of links and quotes if you like.

          █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██

          C Offline
          C Offline
          Christian Graus
          wrote on last edited by
          #13

          I can give you links to prove that man has not been to the moon.  But, what I was laughing at, was the idea that China couldn't possibly have had missiles without buying them from the US.

          Christian Graus - C++ MVP 'Why don't we jump on a fad that hasn't already been widely discredited ?' - Dilbert

          L 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C Christian Graus

            I can give you links to prove that man has not been to the moon.  But, what I was laughing at, was the idea that China couldn't possibly have had missiles without buying them from the US.

            Christian Graus - C++ MVP 'Why don't we jump on a fad that hasn't already been widely discredited ?' - Dilbert

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Lost User
            wrote on last edited by
            #14

            Christian Graus wrote:

            I can give you links to prove that man has not been to the moon.

            Thats easy, wikipedia would prove that he hasn't been to the moon, or another biography of him.

            Christian Graus wrote:

            But, what I was laughing at, was the idea that China couldn't possibly have had missiles without buying them from the US.

            Well they have been behind with the times but they are catching up. They still employ children in factories and pay them next to nothing.

            █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██

            C 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L Lost User

              Christian Graus wrote:

              I can give you links to prove that man has not been to the moon.

              Thats easy, wikipedia would prove that he hasn't been to the moon, or another biography of him.

              Christian Graus wrote:

              But, what I was laughing at, was the idea that China couldn't possibly have had missiles without buying them from the US.

              Well they have been behind with the times but they are catching up. They still employ children in factories and pay them next to nothing.

              █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██

              C Offline
              C Offline
              Christian Graus
              wrote on last edited by
              #15

              Captain See Sharp wrote:

              hey still employ children in factories and pay them next to nothing.

              Lucky for you.  Otherwise, you wouldn't be able to afford clothing.

              Christian Graus - C++ MVP 'Why don't we jump on a fad that hasn't already been widely discredited ?' - Dilbert

              L 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • C Christian Graus

                Captain See Sharp wrote:

                hey still employ children in factories and pay them next to nothing.

                Lucky for you.  Otherwise, you wouldn't be able to afford clothing.

                Christian Graus - C++ MVP 'Why don't we jump on a fad that hasn't already been widely discredited ?' - Dilbert

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Lost User
                wrote on last edited by
                #16

                Christian Graus wrote:

                Lucky for you. Otherwise, you wouldn't be able to afford clothing.

                Thats not true because the money saved by employing children who work for practically nothing, hell they are slaves, they don't have many options in China. They are told were to work and live. Anyways the money saved is just profit for the companies. It does not cost 20-40 bucks to produce and transport a pair of standard blue jeans. The quality of Chinese produced good is less than desirable also.

                █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██

                C 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L Lost User

                  Christian Graus wrote:

                  Lucky for you. Otherwise, you wouldn't be able to afford clothing.

                  Thats not true because the money saved by employing children who work for practically nothing, hell they are slaves, they don't have many options in China. They are told were to work and live. Anyways the money saved is just profit for the companies. It does not cost 20-40 bucks to produce and transport a pair of standard blue jeans. The quality of Chinese produced good is less than desirable also.

                  █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██

                  C Offline
                  C Offline
                  Christian Graus
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #17

                  No, what needs to be paid for is endorsements and marketing.  You think that the companies would happily cut their bottom line ? If so, why don't they just make them in the US ?

                  Christian Graus - C++ MVP 'Why don't we jump on a fad that hasn't already been widely discredited ?' - Dilbert

                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • C Christian Graus

                    No, what needs to be paid for is endorsements and marketing.  You think that the companies would happily cut their bottom line ? If so, why don't they just make them in the US ?

                    Christian Graus - C++ MVP 'Why don't we jump on a fad that hasn't already been widely discredited ?' - Dilbert

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Lost User
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #18

                    Christian Graus wrote:

                    why don't they just make them in the US ?

                    They cant pay workers pennies a day because that would cut profits. They are taking advantage of the workers in China to make more money.

                    Christian Graus wrote:

                    No, what needs to be paid for is endorsements and marketing.

                    Clothing is way too expensive, you don't need to advertise clothing all that much because everyone needs and buys clothes. I'm tired of paying big bucks for a jacket that will fall apart after a few months(it always happens to me). I just bought a pair of boots for over $80 USD a couple months ago and the laces are falling apart. They are suppose to be high quality rugged work boots. I bought them so I wouldn't have to worry about them falling apart on me and I don't want to buy another pair of shoes for at least another couple years. Quality is sacrificed for optimal profits.

                    █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██

                    L C 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • L Lost User

                      Christian Graus wrote:

                      why don't they just make them in the US ?

                      They cant pay workers pennies a day because that would cut profits. They are taking advantage of the workers in China to make more money.

                      Christian Graus wrote:

                      No, what needs to be paid for is endorsements and marketing.

                      Clothing is way too expensive, you don't need to advertise clothing all that much because everyone needs and buys clothes. I'm tired of paying big bucks for a jacket that will fall apart after a few months(it always happens to me). I just bought a pair of boots for over $80 USD a couple months ago and the laces are falling apart. They are suppose to be high quality rugged work boots. I bought them so I wouldn't have to worry about them falling apart on me and I don't want to buy another pair of shoes for at least another couple years. Quality is sacrificed for optimal profits.

                      █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██

                      L Offline
                      L Offline
                      Lost User
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #19

                      Captain See Sharp wrote:

                      They are taking advantage of the workers in China to make more money.

                      Who is?

                      System.IO.Path.IsPathRooted() does not behave as I would expect

                      L 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • L Lost User

                        Christian Graus wrote:

                        why don't they just make them in the US ?

                        They cant pay workers pennies a day because that would cut profits. They are taking advantage of the workers in China to make more money.

                        Christian Graus wrote:

                        No, what needs to be paid for is endorsements and marketing.

                        Clothing is way too expensive, you don't need to advertise clothing all that much because everyone needs and buys clothes. I'm tired of paying big bucks for a jacket that will fall apart after a few months(it always happens to me). I just bought a pair of boots for over $80 USD a couple months ago and the laces are falling apart. They are suppose to be high quality rugged work boots. I bought them so I wouldn't have to worry about them falling apart on me and I don't want to buy another pair of shoes for at least another couple years. Quality is sacrificed for optimal profits.

                        █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██

                        C Offline
                        C Offline
                        Christian Graus
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #20

                        Captain See Sharp wrote:

                        They are taking advantage of the workers in China to make more money.

                        No, you are.  You take advantage of them when you buy the clothes.

                        Captain See Sharp wrote:

                        Quality is sacrificed for optimal profits.

                        Of course, and you keep buying the goods.  That's not really the point, tho.  The Chinese economy is a success for two reasons 1 - the people being paid pennies probably have a higher standard of living than those who are not 2 - people keep buying the goods You can blame the clothing companies all you want.  If you buy brand name clothes, you're paying for the marketing campaign.  If you buy cheap clothes, they are cheap because of where they are made.

                        Christian Graus - C++ MVP 'Why don't we jump on a fad that hasn't already been widely discredited ?' - Dilbert

                        L 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • C Christian Graus

                          Captain See Sharp wrote:

                          They are taking advantage of the workers in China to make more money.

                          No, you are.  You take advantage of them when you buy the clothes.

                          Captain See Sharp wrote:

                          Quality is sacrificed for optimal profits.

                          Of course, and you keep buying the goods.  That's not really the point, tho.  The Chinese economy is a success for two reasons 1 - the people being paid pennies probably have a higher standard of living than those who are not 2 - people keep buying the goods You can blame the clothing companies all you want.  If you buy brand name clothes, you're paying for the marketing campaign.  If you buy cheap clothes, they are cheap because of where they are made.

                          Christian Graus - C++ MVP 'Why don't we jump on a fad that hasn't already been widely discredited ?' - Dilbert

                          L Offline
                          L Offline
                          Lost User
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #21

                          Christian Graus wrote:

                          You can blame the clothing companies all you want. If you buy brand name clothes, you're paying for the marketing campaign. If you buy cheap clothes, they are cheap because of where they are made.

                          What do you think about Bloodstone's anouncement last week that the boots will no longer be made in Tassie?

                          System.IO.Path.IsPathRooted() does not behave as I would expect

                          C 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • L Lost User

                            Captain See Sharp wrote:

                            They are taking advantage of the workers in China to make more money.

                            Who is?

                            System.IO.Path.IsPathRooted() does not behave as I would expect

                            L Offline
                            L Offline
                            Lost User
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #22

                            Josh Gray wrote:

                            Who is?

                            The businesses that outsource to China.

                            █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██

                            L 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • L Lost User

                              Josh Gray wrote:

                              Who is?

                              The businesses that outsource to China.

                              █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██

                              L Offline
                              L Offline
                              Lost User
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #23

                              Captain See Sharp wrote:

                              The businesses that outsource to China.

                              The majority of which come from what country?

                              System.IO.Path.IsPathRooted() does not behave as I would expect

                              L 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • C Christian Graus

                                Captain See Sharp wrote:

                                They are taking advantage of the workers in China to make more money.

                                No, you are.  You take advantage of them when you buy the clothes.

                                Captain See Sharp wrote:

                                Quality is sacrificed for optimal profits.

                                Of course, and you keep buying the goods.  That's not really the point, tho.  The Chinese economy is a success for two reasons 1 - the people being paid pennies probably have a higher standard of living than those who are not 2 - people keep buying the goods You can blame the clothing companies all you want.  If you buy brand name clothes, you're paying for the marketing campaign.  If you buy cheap clothes, they are cheap because of where they are made.

                                Christian Graus - C++ MVP 'Why don't we jump on a fad that hasn't already been widely discredited ?' - Dilbert

                                L Offline
                                L Offline
                                Lost User
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #24

                                Christian Graus wrote:

                                No, you are. You take advantage of them when you buy the clothes.

                                Not really, I would rather buy American made products because I have more confidence in the product. I never really pay attention to where things are made when I buy them anyways.

                                Christian Graus wrote:

                                Of course, and you keep buying the goods.

                                Yep.

                                Christian Graus wrote:

                                You can blame the clothing companies all you want. If you buy brand name clothes, you're paying for the marketing campaign. If you buy cheap clothes, they are cheap because of where they are made.

                                Cant disagree.

                                █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • L Lost User

                                  Captain See Sharp wrote:

                                  The businesses that outsource to China.

                                  The majority of which come from what country?

                                  System.IO.Path.IsPathRooted() does not behave as I would expect

                                  L Offline
                                  L Offline
                                  Lost User
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #25

                                  Josh Gray wrote:

                                  The majority of which come from what country?

                                  I don't really know but it does not matter, its out of my control regardless.

                                  █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██

                                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • L Lost User

                                    Josh Gray wrote:

                                    The majority of which come from what country?

                                    I don't really know but it does not matter, its out of my control regardless.

                                    █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██

                                    L Offline
                                    L Offline
                                    Lost User
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #26

                                    Captain See Sharp wrote:

                                    but it does not matter,

                                    It does matter. You are being critical of China, a country and a people you know next to nothing about when really the people that are causing the problem you are complaining about are products of our western culture.

                                    System.IO.Path.IsPathRooted() does not behave as I would expect

                                    L 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • L Lost User

                                      Captain See Sharp wrote:

                                      but it does not matter,

                                      It does matter. You are being critical of China, a country and a people you know next to nothing about when really the people that are causing the problem you are complaining about are products of our western culture.

                                      System.IO.Path.IsPathRooted() does not behave as I would expect

                                      L Offline
                                      L Offline
                                      Lost User
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #27

                                      Josh Gray wrote:

                                      It does matter. You are being critical of China, a country and a people you know next to nothing about when really the people that are causing the problem you are complaining about are products of our western culture.

                                      Of course I am critical of China, they are a communist country. I'm not blaming them for outsourcing, they aren't forcing businesses to outsource.

                                      █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██

                                      C 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • L Lost User

                                        Code2326 wrote:

                                        They can't even let China shoot down one of their OWN satellite without the world knowing.

                                        Low Earth-orbit satellites have become indispensable for U.S. military communications, GPS navigation for smart bombs and troops, and for real-time surveillance. The Chinese test highlights the satellites' vulnerability. "If we, for instance, got into a conflict over Taiwan, one of the first things they'd probably do would be to shoot down all of our lower Earth-orbit spy satellites, putting out our eyes," said John Pike of globalsecurity.org, a Web site that compiles information on worldwide security issues. "The thing that is surprising and disturbing is that [the Chinese] have chosen this moment to demonstrate a military capability that can only be aimed at the United States," he said. I don't like it. If I remember right Bill Clinton sold China that technology.

                                        █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██

                                        N Offline
                                        N Offline
                                        Nic Rowan
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #28

                                        Captain See Sharp wrote:

                                        If I remember right Bill Clinton sold China that technology.

                                        Maybe his wife can ask for it back...


                                        Dad always thought laughter was the best medicine, which I guess is why several of us died of tuberculosis. I can picture in my mind a world without war, a world without hate. And I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it.


                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • L Lost User

                                          Christian Graus wrote:

                                          You can blame the clothing companies all you want. If you buy brand name clothes, you're paying for the marketing campaign. If you buy cheap clothes, they are cheap because of where they are made.

                                          What do you think about Bloodstone's anouncement last week that the boots will no longer be made in Tassie?

                                          System.IO.Path.IsPathRooted() does not behave as I would expect

                                          C Offline
                                          C Offline
                                          Christian Graus
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #29

                                          Blundstones ? It made front page of the paper, or I wouldn't know. I buy Oliver boots - they're made near Bendigo, I am told. They rock. But, as for the rest, it's a shame to see some people go from minimum wage to the dole, but, I don't blame the company for wanting to stay in the market. I'm surprised they held out as long as they did.

                                          Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++ Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups