Secrets to Will Smith and Jada Pinkett happy marriage
-
Honey, I love you, but could you give me a minute with her.[^] Makes her feel like the queen of the world every day, while banging someone else. Yeah, it could work. :-D
There are II kinds of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who understand Roman numerals. Web - Blog - RSS - Math
:omg: Whatever works, I guess. :~
A casual stroll through the lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything. - Friedrich Nietzsche
-
Bassam Abdul-Baki wrote:
What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
How does that apply here? Are you saying all marriages should be "open"? Should we all start wearing leisure suits?
Red Stateler wrote:
How does that apply here?
I think he meant that both Will and Jada had the option - not just one of them.
Red Stateler wrote:
Are you saying all marriages should be "open"?
I didn't get the impression from Bassam or the original article. I personally doubt that human monogamy is as 'social' of a construct as some folks would like to think. Our children take a long time to reach basic self-sufficiency, and even more time to learn enough to be useful to society at large. There is much to be gained by strong family bonds & long-term parents. However, as we see deviations from the norm in other aspects of human behavior, we should expect it here as well. If two folks decide that their marriage should be like this, then so be it. It's not harming society at large in the least bit - society should stay out of their hair. I think the only thing society should say is "why'd you bother getting married in the first place? Didn't think that one all the way through, huh?" :)
Red Stateler wrote:
Should we all start wearing leisure suits?
Stop looking for excuses and just go buy one already! You know you want to!
-
Bassam Abdul-Baki wrote:
What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
How does that apply here? Are you saying all marriages should be "open"? Should we all start wearing leisure suits?
-
Red Stateler wrote:
How does that apply here?
I think he meant that both Will and Jada had the option - not just one of them.
Red Stateler wrote:
Are you saying all marriages should be "open"?
I didn't get the impression from Bassam or the original article. I personally doubt that human monogamy is as 'social' of a construct as some folks would like to think. Our children take a long time to reach basic self-sufficiency, and even more time to learn enough to be useful to society at large. There is much to be gained by strong family bonds & long-term parents. However, as we see deviations from the norm in other aspects of human behavior, we should expect it here as well. If two folks decide that their marriage should be like this, then so be it. It's not harming society at large in the least bit - society should stay out of their hair. I think the only thing society should say is "why'd you bother getting married in the first place? Didn't think that one all the way through, huh?" :)
Red Stateler wrote:
Should we all start wearing leisure suits?
Stop looking for excuses and just go buy one already! You know you want to!
-
There's supposed to be a comedy movie coming up where the wife and husband to be decide to share their deepest secret and the wife's (based on the trailer) happens to be that she did it with the dog. They had a shot where the man and woman where in the car and the dog in between them and the husband was feeling awkward. We may not agree on much, but on this kind of filth I think we're in agreement. X| In both cases, the directors are using mainstream movies to promote bestiality and pedophilia (NAMBLA). I think they should be sued.
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive." - Sir Walter Scott Web - Blog - RSS - Math - LinkedIn - BM
-
Red Stateler wrote:
How does that apply here?
I think he meant that both Will and Jada had the option - not just one of them.
Red Stateler wrote:
Are you saying all marriages should be "open"?
I didn't get the impression from Bassam or the original article. I personally doubt that human monogamy is as 'social' of a construct as some folks would like to think. Our children take a long time to reach basic self-sufficiency, and even more time to learn enough to be useful to society at large. There is much to be gained by strong family bonds & long-term parents. However, as we see deviations from the norm in other aspects of human behavior, we should expect it here as well. If two folks decide that their marriage should be like this, then so be it. It's not harming society at large in the least bit - society should stay out of their hair. I think the only thing society should say is "why'd you bother getting married in the first place? Didn't think that one all the way through, huh?" :)
Red Stateler wrote:
Should we all start wearing leisure suits?
Stop looking for excuses and just go buy one already! You know you want to!
Russell Morris wrote:
You know you want to!
So?
-
There's supposed to be a comedy movie coming up where the wife and husband to be decide to share their deepest secret and the wife's (based on the trailer) happens to be that she did it with the dog. They had a shot where the man and woman where in the car and the dog in between them and the husband was feeling awkward. We may not agree on much, but on this kind of filth I think we're in agreement. X| In both cases, the directors are using mainstream movies to promote bestiality and pedophilia (NAMBLA). I think they should be sued.
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive." - Sir Walter Scott Web - Blog - RSS - Math - LinkedIn - BM
Bassam Abdul-Baki wrote:
In both cases, the directors are using mainstream movies to promote bestiality
Whats wrong with that? We are all animals. If I want to express my love to another creature then that is my business. JUST KIDDING!!!! This is how homosexuality and trans-gender trash is promoted but it seems to have been a successful push as everyone seems indifferent of it. Soon it will be the same for bestiality and there will be homosexual animal fuckers getting married to their pets and cartoons will have these type of characters in them because its politically correct and tolerant. X|
█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██
-
Bassam Abdul-Baki wrote:
In both cases, the directors are using mainstream movies to promote bestiality
Whats wrong with that? We are all animals. If I want to express my love to another creature then that is my business. JUST KIDDING!!!! This is how homosexuality and trans-gender trash is promoted but it seems to have been a successful push as everyone seems indifferent of it. Soon it will be the same for bestiality and there will be homosexual animal fuckers getting married to their pets and cartoons will have these type of characters in them because its politically correct and tolerant. X|
█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██
Captain See Sharp wrote:
This is how homosexuality and trans-gender trash is promoted
No, this is how people like you try to frame it. People having sex with people will never be the same as people having sex with animals.
Eat right.
Exercise.
Die anyway. -
There's supposed to be a comedy movie coming up where the wife and husband to be decide to share their deepest secret and the wife's (based on the trailer) happens to be that she did it with the dog. They had a shot where the man and woman where in the car and the dog in between them and the husband was feeling awkward. We may not agree on much, but on this kind of filth I think we're in agreement. X| In both cases, the directors are using mainstream movies to promote bestiality and pedophilia (NAMBLA). I think they should be sued.
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive." - Sir Walter Scott Web - Blog - RSS - Math - LinkedIn - BM
Bassam Abdul-Baki wrote:
We may not agree on much, but on this kind of filth I think we're in agreement.
Except that I believe that it represents a lot more than filth. It represents the norms of tomorrow. And it represents why current definitions of 'freedom' are so flawed.
Modern liberalism has never achieved anything other than giving Secularists something to feel morally superior about
-
Captain See Sharp wrote:
This is how homosexuality and trans-gender trash is promoted
No, this is how people like you try to frame it. People having sex with people will never be the same as people having sex with animals.
Eat right.
Exercise.
Die anyway.Alvaro Mendez wrote:
No, this is how people like you try to frame it.
No, the media has a HUGE influence on people's lives, they can change the way you think very easily.
Alvaro Mendez wrote:
People having sex with people will never be the same as people having sex with animals.
That is not politically correct and is very intolerant. How dare you. :laugh: The zooers would argue that we are all animals and it does not matter. However I agree with you, but never say never because things are changing. Lets hope it starts moving in a different direction.
█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██
-
There's supposed to be a comedy movie coming up where the wife and husband to be decide to share their deepest secret and the wife's (based on the trailer) happens to be that she did it with the dog. They had a shot where the man and woman where in the car and the dog in between them and the husband was feeling awkward. We may not agree on much, but on this kind of filth I think we're in agreement. X| In both cases, the directors are using mainstream movies to promote bestiality and pedophilia (NAMBLA). I think they should be sued.
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive." - Sir Walter Scott Web - Blog - RSS - Math - LinkedIn - BM
You don't have to watch the movie. You can even change the channel during the commercials. Free speech needs to be protected even when you don't agree.
_________________________________________________________________________________ Some buildings don't have a Floor 13 because of superstition...yet every airport has a gate C-4.
-
Captain See Sharp wrote:
This is how homosexuality and trans-gender trash is promoted
No, this is how people like you try to frame it. People having sex with people will never be the same as people having sex with animals.
Eat right.
Exercise.
Die anyway.Alvaro Mendez wrote:
People having sex with people will never be the same as people having sex with animals.
Barring the reasons, what would you say if and when it does happen? Will you believe that the cause was due to this acceptance in the here and now or just how nature intended it to be?
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive." - Sir Walter Scott Web - Blog - RSS - Math - LinkedIn - BM
-
Bassam Abdul-Baki wrote:
We may not agree on much, but on this kind of filth I think we're in agreement.
Except that I believe that it represents a lot more than filth. It represents the norms of tomorrow. And it represents why current definitions of 'freedom' are so flawed.
Modern liberalism has never achieved anything other than giving Secularists something to feel morally superior about
Stan Shannon wrote:
Except that I believe that it represents a lot more than filth. It represents the norms of tomorrow.
Scary, but quite possible.
Stan Shannon wrote:
nd it represents why current definitions of 'freedom' are so flawed.
Possibly true too, but your way, according to those of us who also don't agree with your so-called "leftists", is also extreme. If I was made emperor of the world, I'd be what's best for it. :)
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive." - Sir Walter Scott Web - Blog - RSS - Math - LinkedIn - BM
-
You don't have to watch the movie. You can even change the channel during the commercials. Free speech needs to be protected even when you don't agree.
_________________________________________________________________________________ Some buildings don't have a Floor 13 because of superstition...yet every airport has a gate C-4.
leckey wrote:
Free speech needs to be protected even when you don't agree.
Freedom of expression. However child porn is illegal and for good reasons. Do you defend child porn, even if it is computer generated and no real children were filmed?
█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██
-
Stan Shannon wrote:
Except that I believe that it represents a lot more than filth. It represents the norms of tomorrow.
Scary, but quite possible.
Stan Shannon wrote:
nd it represents why current definitions of 'freedom' are so flawed.
Possibly true too, but your way, according to those of us who also don't agree with your so-called "leftists", is also extreme. If I was made emperor of the world, I'd be what's best for it. :)
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive." - Sir Walter Scott Web - Blog - RSS - Math - LinkedIn - BM
Bassam Abdul-Baki wrote:
Possibly true too, but your way, according to those of us who also don't agree with your so-called "leftists", is also extreme. If I was made emperor of the world, I'd be what's best for it.
Not unless you consider how this country governed itself for the first 200 years or so to have been 'extreme'. If local communities still maintained their original power to define moral standards at the local level without the courts attacking them on bogus freedom of speech or separation of church and state charges, these sorts of excercises in pushing the moral envelope would never escape the depraved minds of their creators.
Modern liberalism has never achieved anything other than giving Secularists something to feel morally superior about
-
Alvaro Mendez wrote:
No, this is how people like you try to frame it.
No, the media has a HUGE influence on people's lives, they can change the way you think very easily.
Alvaro Mendez wrote:
People having sex with people will never be the same as people having sex with animals.
That is not politically correct and is very intolerant. How dare you. :laugh: The zooers would argue that we are all animals and it does not matter. However I agree with you, but never say never because things are changing. Lets hope it starts moving in a different direction.
█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██
Captain See Sharp wrote:
the media has a HUGE influence on people's lives, they can change the way you think very easily.
Then you'd better change the channel, quick!
The evolution of the human genome is too important to be left to chance idiots like CSS.
-
You don't have to watch the movie. You can even change the channel during the commercials. Free speech needs to be protected even when you don't agree.
_________________________________________________________________________________ Some buildings don't have a Floor 13 because of superstition...yet every airport has a gate C-4.
Sorry I couldnt vote your post a 1. I like to think for myself and not let society / government tell what type of FICTION I use to entertain myself. If I were using REALITY, then society / government can do what ever they deem necessary to punish me. Seeing how this movie is FICTION and Im capable of determining wrong from right, Im going to have to agree with you. You get a 5.
I win because I have the most fun in life...
-
Stan Shannon wrote:
right up there with this [^] and this [^]
If you cant make a good movie make an offensive movie, nothing new in that, just people looking to make a buck out of something shit
System.IO.Path.IsPathRooted() does not behave as I would expect
-
leckey wrote:
Free speech needs to be protected even when you don't agree.
Freedom of expression. However child porn is illegal and for good reasons. Do you defend child porn, even if it is computer generated and no real children were filmed?
█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██
I've never thought about computer generated. My philosophy has always been as long as no one is physically hurt or being forced to do something against their will, let them do what they want. Real beastiality would hurt the animal so I'm against it. if they want to talk about it in a movie, I have no problem. With virtual child po*n one could argue that no child is getting hurt. But the idea of someone looking at it themselves needs help. The process of viewing could definately lead to actual child po*n or worse. So I would probably say it shouldn't be allowed as a preventative action, but then you get into a legal battle of trying to predict and punish future behavior that hasn't occured.
_________________________________________________________________________________ Some buildings don't have a Floor 13 because of superstition...yet every airport has a gate C-4.
-
Alvaro Mendez wrote:
No, this is how people like you try to frame it.
No, the media has a HUGE influence on people's lives, they can change the way you think very easily.
Alvaro Mendez wrote:
People having sex with people will never be the same as people having sex with animals.
That is not politically correct and is very intolerant. How dare you. :laugh: The zooers would argue that we are all animals and it does not matter. However I agree with you, but never say never because things are changing. Lets hope it starts moving in a different direction.
█▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒██████▒█▒██ █▒█████▒▒▒▒▒█ █▒▒▒▒▒██▒█▒██
Captain See Sharp wrote:
the media has a HUGE influence on people's lives
So does family, friends, co-workers...It is unfortunate that there are some people who can't think for themselves, but I am really tired of the media getting all the blame.
Captain See Sharp wrote:
The zooers would argue
I'm not sure who the 'zooers' are or if you are just referring to animal lovers. Are you their spokesperson? If not, stop making arguments for other people that you do not know.
_________________________________________________________________________________ Some buildings don't have a Floor 13 because of superstition...yet every airport has a gate C-4.