Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. J# finally bites the dust

J# finally bites the dust

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
com
26 Posts 19 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • E Eric Georgiades

    the J# feature set is good, and doesn't need changing. the language is declining. thus they discontinue it.

    Ericos Georgiades

    Y Offline
    Y Offline
    Yadrif
    wrote on last edited by
    #9

    So exactly what is the J# feature set? Thanks.

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Marc Clifton

      ad3z wrote:

      the language is declining.

      Why is it declining? It obviously isn't meeting some need, right? Marc

      Thyme In The Country
      Interacx

      People are just notoriously impossible. --DavidCrow
      There's NO excuse for not commenting your code. -- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
      People who say that they will refactor their code later to make it "good" don't understand refactoring, nor the art and craft of programming. -- Josh Smith

      E Offline
      E Offline
      Eric Georgiades
      wrote on last edited by
      #10

      I guess what Microsoft means that when a product needs advancement, doesn't fully meet your needs and it's usage inclines, then (and only then) should they continue to advance the technology.

      Ericos Georgiades

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Marc Clifton

        Since customers have told us that the existing J# feature set largely meets their needs and usage of J# is declining Doesn't that seem, um, contradictory? If something meets your needs, wouldn't you expect to see usage increasing? :rolleyes: Marc

        Thyme In The Country
        Interacx

        People are just notoriously impossible. --DavidCrow
        There's NO excuse for not commenting your code. -- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
        People who say that they will refactor their code later to make it "good" don't understand refactoring, nor the art and craft of programming. -- Josh Smith

        J Offline
        J Offline
        Jim Crafton
        wrote on last edited by
        #11

        These must be the same customers who demand 1500 different kinds of useless gradients in every damn GUI control. Or the same customers who demanded that "Add/Remove Programs" should be renamed to "Program Files"*! *I would seriously like to give a Mega-Wedgie to whomever OK'd that change.

        ¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! Real Mentats use only 100% pure, unfooled around with Sapho Juice(tm)! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! Techno Silliness

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • K Kevin McFarlane

          http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/vjsharp/default.aspx[^]

          N Offline
          N Offline
          Nish Nishant
          wrote on last edited by
          #12

          A sad day for those of us who enjoyed making J# jokes :-(

          Regards, Nish


          Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
          Currently working on C++/CLI in Action for Manning Publications. (*Sample chapter available online*)

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Marc Clifton

            Since customers have told us that the existing J# feature set largely meets their needs and usage of J# is declining Doesn't that seem, um, contradictory? If something meets your needs, wouldn't you expect to see usage increasing? :rolleyes: Marc

            Thyme In The Country
            Interacx

            People are just notoriously impossible. --DavidCrow
            There's NO excuse for not commenting your code. -- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
            People who say that they will refactor their code later to make it "good" don't understand refactoring, nor the art and craft of programming. -- Josh Smith

            D Offline
            D Offline
            Dan Neely
            wrote on last edited by
            #13

            all their customer feedback was probably "I'm not using it, so I can't suggest any needed features".

            -- Rules of thumb should not be taken for the whole hand.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • K Kevin McFarlane

              http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/vjsharp/default.aspx[^]

              J Offline
              J Offline
              Josh Smith
              wrote on last edited by
              #14

              :(( All those years of intensive J# study down the drain. Whatever shall I do?! ;P

              :josh: My WPF Blog[^]

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Y Yadrif

                So exactly what is the J# feature set? Thanks.

                M Offline
                M Offline
                Mike Dimmick
                wrote on last edited by
                #15

                Serious question? J# is an implementation of the Java language and libraries, version 1.1, for the .NET CLR, including Microsoft's proprietary extensions that were what caused Sun to withdraw Microsoft's right to produce Visual J++. As such, the J++ feature set was pretty much locked-off as of version 1.0. It was intended for people to migrate their J++ applications to .NET, but in practice, people found that migrating them to C# was just as easy or even easier. See for example this case study[^].

                Stability. What an interesting concept. -- Chris Maunder

                J 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • K Kevin McFarlane

                  http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/vjsharp/default.aspx[^]

                  C Offline
                  C Offline
                  Clickok
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #16

                  J# still exists?


                  Engaged in learning of English grammar ;)
                  For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.(John 3:16) :badger:

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Marc Clifton

                    ad3z wrote:

                    the language is declining.

                    Why is it declining? It obviously isn't meeting some need, right? Marc

                    Thyme In The Country
                    Interacx

                    People are just notoriously impossible. --DavidCrow
                    There's NO excuse for not commenting your code. -- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
                    People who say that they will refactor their code later to make it "good" don't understand refactoring, nor the art and craft of programming. -- Josh Smith

                    J Offline
                    J Offline
                    Judah Gabriel Himango
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #17

                    Marc Clifton wrote:

                    Why is it declining?

                    J# served one purpose: to move Java projects to .NET easily. I used it to convert a large Java project to the .NET world relatively painlessly. But no one wants to maintain that in the long run. Its usage is declining because now those projects are being moved to a first class .NET citizen language, like C# or VB.NET.

                    Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit. I'm currently blogging about: The Lord's Prayer in Aramaic song (audio) The apostle Paul, modernly speaking: Epistles of Paul Judah Himango

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M Mike Dimmick

                      Serious question? J# is an implementation of the Java language and libraries, version 1.1, for the .NET CLR, including Microsoft's proprietary extensions that were what caused Sun to withdraw Microsoft's right to produce Visual J++. As such, the J++ feature set was pretty much locked-off as of version 1.0. It was intended for people to migrate their J++ applications to .NET, but in practice, people found that migrating them to C# was just as easy or even easier. See for example this case study[^].

                      Stability. What an interesting concept. -- Chris Maunder

                      J Offline
                      J Offline
                      Judah Gabriel Himango
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #18

                      Mike Dimmick wrote:

                      but in practice, people found that migrating them to C# was just as easy or even easier

                      I disagree. I just ported a large Java app over to a J# winforms app and it was easy. I tried converting to C#, but there were so many tedious manual conversions to work out, it just wasn't worth it.

                      Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit. I'm currently blogging about: The Lord's Prayer in Aramaic song (audio) The apostle Paul, modernly speaking: Epistles of Paul Judah Himango

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • K Kevin McFarlane

                        http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/vjsharp/default.aspx[^]

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        l a u r e n
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #19

                        well thats good cos its been biting a*s ever since it was unleashed on the world if ever there was a more pointless development product from ms ive yet to discover it :cool:

                        "there is no spoon" {me}

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • W WillemM

                          I could see that one coming, last week I had a discussion with a fellow consultant on the usage of J# and it seems we were right, it isn't popular.

                          WM. What about weapons of mass-construction? "What? Its an Apple MacBook Pro. They are sexy!" - Paul Watson

                          K Offline
                          K Offline
                          Kevin McFarlane
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #20

                          I expected it not to last long. I couldn't see it as being any more than a transitional migration tool for the few J++ apps that were around.

                          W 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • K Kevin McFarlane

                            http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/vjsharp/default.aspx[^]

                            M Offline
                            M Offline
                            Michael Dunn
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #21

                            A sad day for the three people still using J#... :-O

                            --Mike-- Visual C++ MVP :cool: LINKS~! Ericahist | PimpFish | CP SearchBar v3.0 | C++ Forum FAQ Ford, what's this fish doing in my ear?

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • K Kevin McFarlane

                              http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/vjsharp/default.aspx[^]

                              R Offline
                              R Offline
                              Rocky Moore
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #22

                              That is amazing to me. I would not think MS would "drop" any language for .NET as it tries to be everything to everyone. Does not seem like it would take that many resources to keep the language where it is for years to come. Guess Java people are more comfortable just moving to C# :)

                              Rocky <>< Latest Code Blog Post: OpenID/CardSpace - Is it time? Latest Tech Blog Post: Corel Lightning - what is the plan?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • K Kevin McFarlane

                                I expected it not to last long. I couldn't see it as being any more than a transitional migration tool for the few J++ apps that were around.

                                W Offline
                                W Offline
                                WillemM
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #23

                                Yes, I think that would be the one thing that J# is handy for.

                                WM. What about weapons of mass-construction? "What? Its an Apple MacBook Pro. They are sexy!" - Paul Watson

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • M Marc Clifton

                                  Since customers have told us that the existing J# feature set largely meets their needs and usage of J# is declining Doesn't that seem, um, contradictory? If something meets your needs, wouldn't you expect to see usage increasing? :rolleyes: Marc

                                  Thyme In The Country
                                  Interacx

                                  People are just notoriously impossible. --DavidCrow
                                  There's NO excuse for not commenting your code. -- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
                                  People who say that they will refactor their code later to make it "good" don't understand refactoring, nor the art and craft of programming. -- Josh Smith

                                  W Offline
                                  W Offline
                                  WillemM
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #24

                                  I think that it's something like 5 developers are using it and are content with what the language has to offer. 5 developers is too few justify development costs, so they stop producing it. (Ok, 5 developers is indeed a bit on the extreme side, but you get my point)

                                  WM. What about weapons of mass-construction? "What? Its an Apple MacBook Pro. They are sexy!" - Paul Watson

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • M Marc Clifton

                                    Since customers have told us that the existing J# feature set largely meets their needs and usage of J# is declining Doesn't that seem, um, contradictory? If something meets your needs, wouldn't you expect to see usage increasing? :rolleyes: Marc

                                    Thyme In The Country
                                    Interacx

                                    People are just notoriously impossible. --DavidCrow
                                    There's NO excuse for not commenting your code. -- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
                                    People who say that they will refactor their code later to make it "good" don't understand refactoring, nor the art and craft of programming. -- Josh Smith

                                    C Offline
                                    C Offline
                                    Chris Maunder
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #25

                                    I actually read that as "largely met their needs". It was a conversion helper, not a serious development platform. All I can say is: About time.

                                    cheers, Chris Maunder

                                    CodeProject.com : C++ MVP

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • K Kevin McFarlane

                                      http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/vjsharp/default.aspx[^]

                                      V Offline
                                      V Offline
                                      Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #26

                                      Some of the features like java.util.zip etc are really very useful and excellent.

                                      Vasudevan Deepak Kumar Personal Homepage Tech Gossips

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • Login

                                      • Don't have an account? Register

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Tags
                                      • Popular
                                      • World
                                      • Users
                                      • Groups