Next & Previous.
-
[messagetype=semi_joke/]
VuNic wrote:
Is it not just NOP ?:cool:
Yes, it is and the pronounciation is the same as "top", not "fool", in case the assembler is speech-based. :)
"It's supposed to be hard, otherwise anybody could do it!" - selfquote
"High speed never compensates for wrong direction!" - unknownRoger Stoltz wrote:
semi_joke
NOPe., it's a below_semi_joke. Now is this not a joke? :-Dloll
Press: 1500 to 2,200 messages in just 6 days? How's that possible sir? **Dr.Brad :**Well,I just replied to everything Graus did and then argued with Negus for a bit.
-
Roger Stoltz wrote:
semi_joke
NOPe., it's a below_semi_joke. Now is this not a joke? :-Dloll
Press: 1500 to 2,200 messages in just 6 days? How's that possible sir? **Dr.Brad :**Well,I just replied to everything Graus did and then argued with Negus for a bit.
:laugh:
VuNic wrote:
Now is this not a joke?
Oh, yes it is... Typical Friday afternoon level of amusement.
"It's supposed to be hard, otherwise anybody could do it!" - selfquote
"High speed never compensates for wrong direction!" - unknown -
:laugh:
VuNic wrote:
Now is this not a joke?
Oh, yes it is... Typical Friday afternoon level of amusement.
"It's supposed to be hard, otherwise anybody could do it!" - selfquote
"High speed never compensates for wrong direction!" - unknownRoger Stoltz wrote:
Typical Friday afternoon level of amusement.
Ah, it's Friday :jig: :-D I forgot it again. :doh:
Press: 1500 to 2,200 messages in just 6 days? How's that possible sir? **Dr.Brad :**Well,I just replied to everything Graus did and then argued with Negus for a bit.
-
Would you ever keep a "Next" link to the left and "Previous" to the right while letting someone navigate your page or application? It seriously sucks : A Sample[^], btw why did he do that? :~ I think nobody ever does it. X|
Press: 1500 to 2,200 messages in just 6 days? How's that possible sir? **Dr.Brad :**Well,I just replied to everything Graus did and then argued with Negus for a bit.
You actually see that a lot with GNU/OSS/GPL-ish documentation. My guess is that the tools used to generate the output of the documentation are responsible for the navigation elements. FWIW,
I hate it as well! :mad: I much rather a single large HTML document myself - I hate having to click back and forth trying to remember something I read a few "pages" ago... Also makes offline viewing easier; it is a royal PITA to have to assemble those single pages into a single document just to be able to print something I can read while traveling. Peace!-=- James
Please rate this message - let me know if I helped or not! * * *If you think it costs a lot to do it right, just wait until you find out how much it costs to do it wrong!
Avoid driving a vehicle taller than you and remember that Professional Driver on Closed Course does not mean your Dumb Ass on a Public Road!
See DeleteFXPFiles -
Would you ever keep a "Next" link to the left and "Previous" to the right while letting someone navigate your page or application? It seriously sucks : A Sample[^], btw why did he do that? :~ I think nobody ever does it. X|
Press: 1500 to 2,200 messages in just 6 days? How's that possible sir? **Dr.Brad :**Well,I just replied to everything Graus did and then argued with Negus for a bit.
Quite a bit of open sauce documentation does this.
-
Is it not just NOP ?:cool:
Press: 1500 to 2,200 messages in just 6 days? How's that possible sir? **Dr.Brad :**Well,I just replied to everything Graus did and then argued with Negus for a bit.
-
You actually see that a lot with GNU/OSS/GPL-ish documentation. My guess is that the tools used to generate the output of the documentation are responsible for the navigation elements. FWIW,
I hate it as well! :mad: I much rather a single large HTML document myself - I hate having to click back and forth trying to remember something I read a few "pages" ago... Also makes offline viewing easier; it is a royal PITA to have to assemble those single pages into a single document just to be able to print something I can read while traveling. Peace!-=- James
Please rate this message - let me know if I helped or not! * * *If you think it costs a lot to do it right, just wait until you find out how much it costs to do it wrong!
Avoid driving a vehicle taller than you and remember that Professional Driver on Closed Course does not mean your Dumb Ass on a Public Road!
See DeleteFXPFilesJames R. Twine wrote:
My guess is that the tools used to generate the output of the documentation are responsible for the navigation elements.
Hmm, I wonder if the author of the tools was Israeli or from one of the Arab countries. I see this a lot at the office (here in Israel) when my coworkers write in English, they still look at it right-to-left. That is, they staple the pages together on the top right, and so on. Very annoying.
-
You actually see that a lot with GNU/OSS/GPL-ish documentation. My guess is that the tools used to generate the output of the documentation are responsible for the navigation elements. FWIW,
I hate it as well! :mad: I much rather a single large HTML document myself - I hate having to click back and forth trying to remember something I read a few "pages" ago... Also makes offline viewing easier; it is a royal PITA to have to assemble those single pages into a single document just to be able to print something I can read while traveling. Peace!-=- James
Please rate this message - let me know if I helped or not! * * *If you think it costs a lot to do it right, just wait until you find out how much it costs to do it wrong!
Avoid driving a vehicle taller than you and remember that Professional Driver on Closed Course does not mean your Dumb Ass on a Public Road!
See DeleteFXPFilesEx-green screen users still have issues with scrolling so people have carried that over into web development, that is why you see all the paging instead of just a long document.
CleaKO
"I think you'll be okay here, they have a thin candy shell. 'Surprised you didn't know that." - Tommy Boy
"Fill it up again! Fill it up again! Once it hits your lips, it's so good!" - Frank the Tank (Old School) -
You actually see that a lot with GNU/OSS/GPL-ish documentation. My guess is that the tools used to generate the output of the documentation are responsible for the navigation elements. FWIW,
I hate it as well! :mad: I much rather a single large HTML document myself - I hate having to click back and forth trying to remember something I read a few "pages" ago... Also makes offline viewing easier; it is a royal PITA to have to assemble those single pages into a single document just to be able to print something I can read while traveling. Peace!-=- James
Please rate this message - let me know if I helped or not! * * *If you think it costs a lot to do it right, just wait until you find out how much it costs to do it wrong!
Avoid driving a vehicle taller than you and remember that Professional Driver on Closed Course does not mean your Dumb Ass on a Public Road!
See DeleteFXPFilesJames R. Twine wrote:
I hate having to click back and forth
Yeah me too. I hate it. A plain HTML with enough "#" bookmaks within the page would be just fine.
Press: 1500 to 2,200 messages in just 6 days? How's that possible sir? **Dr.Brad :**Well,I just replied to everything Graus did and then argued with Negus for a bit.
-
Would you ever keep a "Next" link to the left and "Previous" to the right while letting someone navigate your page or application? It seriously sucks : A Sample[^], btw why did he do that? :~ I think nobody ever does it. X|
Press: 1500 to 2,200 messages in just 6 days? How's that possible sir? **Dr.Brad :**Well,I just replied to everything Graus did and then argued with Negus for a bit.
-
Would you ever keep a "Next" link to the left and "Previous" to the right while letting someone navigate your page or application? It seriously sucks : A Sample[^], btw why did he do that? :~ I think nobody ever does it. X|
Press: 1500 to 2,200 messages in just 6 days? How's that possible sir? **Dr.Brad :**Well,I just replied to everything Graus did and then argued with Negus for a bit.
-
-
I was thinking that since the most often taken path would be Next, that choice was listed first.
'til next we type... HAVE FUN!! -- Jesse