Start-up network admins read this:
-
Ok I have seen this in way too many companies in the last couple days: website blocking. Guys this is not right, it inspires distrust and a us and them mentality between management and workers. I am not saying that you cannot block anything, in fact i have a long list of what you can block:
- Pornography
After that there is nothing that truly justifies blocking. Buy I hear screaming.... "What about productivity".... well I will tell you how I handle this: I monitor the browsing habits of every employee. This means I can get the amount of time that is spent browsing certain websites and I graph it all. Then I spend a couple minutes every week looking through the graphs and look for the high browsing activity. If this happens to be MySpace then I look at which employees are using it the most and make a note of it. If this happens continually I just have a casual conversation with them and ask they don't visit the site as much. Now I have hardly had to do that because they know I will pick it up on it and also they are generally a great bunch anyway. One thing to be careful about here is that you may upset an employee if you come out of the blue and tell them to stop reading so many emails, so just use tact. Also it helps to do it in a group without specifying certain people. Does anyone have a strict network administrator?
Brad Australian - Christian Graus on "Best books for VBscript" A big thick one, so you can whack yourself on the head with it.
-
Ok I have seen this in way too many companies in the last couple days: website blocking. Guys this is not right, it inspires distrust and a us and them mentality between management and workers. I am not saying that you cannot block anything, in fact i have a long list of what you can block:
- Pornography
After that there is nothing that truly justifies blocking. Buy I hear screaming.... "What about productivity".... well I will tell you how I handle this: I monitor the browsing habits of every employee. This means I can get the amount of time that is spent browsing certain websites and I graph it all. Then I spend a couple minutes every week looking through the graphs and look for the high browsing activity. If this happens to be MySpace then I look at which employees are using it the most and make a note of it. If this happens continually I just have a casual conversation with them and ask they don't visit the site as much. Now I have hardly had to do that because they know I will pick it up on it and also they are generally a great bunch anyway. One thing to be careful about here is that you may upset an employee if you come out of the blue and tell them to stop reading so many emails, so just use tact. Also it helps to do it in a group without specifying certain people. Does anyone have a strict network administrator?
Brad Australian - Christian Graus on "Best books for VBscript" A big thick one, so you can whack yourself on the head with it.
Bradml wrote:
Ok I have seen this in way too many companies in the last couple days: website blocking. Guys this is not right, it inspires distrust and a us and them mentality between management and workers.
Most fortune 500 companies are doing this. Youtube is one of the ones getting block now. I don't see anything illogical about it. If associates want to watch youtube all day then have them bring in their own laptops and own ISPs. 500 companies can't afford to loose stock price and they have good lawyers to back them up. Its business not a feel good love meeting. Just my two cents.
Later, JoeSox "Pleasure in the job puts perfection in the work." -Aristotle CPMCv1.0 ↔ humanaiproject.org ↔ Last.fm
-
Bradml wrote:
Ok I have seen this in way too many companies in the last couple days: website blocking. Guys this is not right, it inspires distrust and a us and them mentality between management and workers.
Most fortune 500 companies are doing this. Youtube is one of the ones getting block now. I don't see anything illogical about it. If associates want to watch youtube all day then have them bring in their own laptops and own ISPs. 500 companies can't afford to loose stock price and they have good lawyers to back them up. Its business not a feel good love meeting. Just my two cents.
Later, JoeSox "Pleasure in the job puts perfection in the work." -Aristotle CPMCv1.0 ↔ humanaiproject.org ↔ Last.fm
Well if I get hit by a "This page has been Blocked" message and it isn't met with a damn good explanation then I stop working, walk to the IT managers office and ask for an administrator account. Also there are guys who work 14 hour days regularly, can you really deny them a bit of R&R every now and then? It actually increases productivity and motivation.
JoeSox wrote:
500 companies can't afford to loose stock price and they have good lawyers to back them up.
:wtf: Care to explain that?
JoeSox wrote:
Its business not a feel good love meeting.
If it were a "feel good love meeting" then of course there would be no blocking.... or pants for that matter, but I am approaching this from a strictly business point of view. I find it rude for employers to treat employees like they are children who do not take work seriously. I know that sometimes employees abuse this but you can easily catch this and the benefits from responsible employees' motivation is enormous.
Brad Australian - Me on "Public interest" If you actually read this let me know.
-
Ok I have seen this in way too many companies in the last couple days: website blocking. Guys this is not right, it inspires distrust and a us and them mentality between management and workers. I am not saying that you cannot block anything, in fact i have a long list of what you can block:
- Pornography
After that there is nothing that truly justifies blocking. Buy I hear screaming.... "What about productivity".... well I will tell you how I handle this: I monitor the browsing habits of every employee. This means I can get the amount of time that is spent browsing certain websites and I graph it all. Then I spend a couple minutes every week looking through the graphs and look for the high browsing activity. If this happens to be MySpace then I look at which employees are using it the most and make a note of it. If this happens continually I just have a casual conversation with them and ask they don't visit the site as much. Now I have hardly had to do that because they know I will pick it up on it and also they are generally a great bunch anyway. One thing to be careful about here is that you may upset an employee if you come out of the blue and tell them to stop reading so many emails, so just use tact. Also it helps to do it in a group without specifying certain people. Does anyone have a strict network administrator?
Brad Australian - Christian Graus on "Best books for VBscript" A big thick one, so you can whack yourself on the head with it.
I completely agree, and this is the way it was at Microsoft -- no sites blocked, employees were on their honour as to what they felt they needed for their work. Sure, some people abused it. One person in my department played Asheron's Call almost all day, and even contacted internal Tech Support to get a faster video card to make her experience better. On the whole, however, it meant we were happier and more productive as it made us feel more valuable, as we weren't constantly hitting "You shouldn't be looking at that site."
-------------- TTFN - Kent
-
Ok I have seen this in way too many companies in the last couple days: website blocking. Guys this is not right, it inspires distrust and a us and them mentality between management and workers. I am not saying that you cannot block anything, in fact i have a long list of what you can block:
- Pornography
After that there is nothing that truly justifies blocking. Buy I hear screaming.... "What about productivity".... well I will tell you how I handle this: I monitor the browsing habits of every employee. This means I can get the amount of time that is spent browsing certain websites and I graph it all. Then I spend a couple minutes every week looking through the graphs and look for the high browsing activity. If this happens to be MySpace then I look at which employees are using it the most and make a note of it. If this happens continually I just have a casual conversation with them and ask they don't visit the site as much. Now I have hardly had to do that because they know I will pick it up on it and also they are generally a great bunch anyway. One thing to be careful about here is that you may upset an employee if you come out of the blue and tell them to stop reading so many emails, so just use tact. Also it helps to do it in a group without specifying certain people. Does anyone have a strict network administrator?
Brad Australian - Christian Graus on "Best books for VBscript" A big thick one, so you can whack yourself on the head with it.
Bradml wrote:
Does anyone have a strict network administrator?
Nope. When i first started, they had some sort of filtering proxy in place, but they took it out when they upgraded to the current proxy (which also introduced authentication via the domain login). Damn good move, that.
----
It appears that everybody is under the impression that I approve of the documentation. You probably also blame Ken Burns for supporting slavery.
--Raymond Chen on MSDN
-
Ok I have seen this in way too many companies in the last couple days: website blocking. Guys this is not right, it inspires distrust and a us and them mentality between management and workers. I am not saying that you cannot block anything, in fact i have a long list of what you can block:
- Pornography
After that there is nothing that truly justifies blocking. Buy I hear screaming.... "What about productivity".... well I will tell you how I handle this: I monitor the browsing habits of every employee. This means I can get the amount of time that is spent browsing certain websites and I graph it all. Then I spend a couple minutes every week looking through the graphs and look for the high browsing activity. If this happens to be MySpace then I look at which employees are using it the most and make a note of it. If this happens continually I just have a casual conversation with them and ask they don't visit the site as much. Now I have hardly had to do that because they know I will pick it up on it and also they are generally a great bunch anyway. One thing to be careful about here is that you may upset an employee if you come out of the blue and tell them to stop reading so many emails, so just use tact. Also it helps to do it in a group without specifying certain people. Does anyone have a strict network administrator?
Brad Australian - Christian Graus on "Best books for VBscript" A big thick one, so you can whack yourself on the head with it.
-
IMO watching and graphing my browsing habits is a heck of a lot more distrusting and strict than simply blocking some sites. Cheers, Drew.
Well you would probably be well aware that almost all networks log everything you do. This means that when they look through the logs they find out exactly the same data that I take (BTW I only monitor domains). Anyway the reason I use graphs is because only sites that seem to be seriously over used show up. This way your personal browsing habits can continue without them being watched (unless you go to a site enough to trigger something).
Brad Australian - Christian Graus on "Best books for VBscript" A big thick one, so you can whack yourself on the head with it.
-
Well if I get hit by a "This page has been Blocked" message and it isn't met with a damn good explanation then I stop working, walk to the IT managers office and ask for an administrator account. Also there are guys who work 14 hour days regularly, can you really deny them a bit of R&R every now and then? It actually increases productivity and motivation.
JoeSox wrote:
500 companies can't afford to loose stock price and they have good lawyers to back them up.
:wtf: Care to explain that?
JoeSox wrote:
Its business not a feel good love meeting.
If it were a "feel good love meeting" then of course there would be no blocking.... or pants for that matter, but I am approaching this from a strictly business point of view. I find it rude for employers to treat employees like they are children who do not take work seriously. I know that sometimes employees abuse this but you can easily catch this and the benefits from responsible employees' motivation is enormous.
Brad Australian - Me on "Public interest" If you actually read this let me know.
Bradml wrote:
Well if I get hit by a "This page has been Blocked" message and it isn't met with a damn good explanation then I stop working, walk to the IT managers office and ask for an administrator account.
Then what are you complaining about?
Bradml wrote:
Also there are guys who work 14 hour days regularly, can you really deny them a bit of R&R every now and then?
Then they can afford their own laptops and aircards. Or geez, go for a freaking walk. If you are tired of sitting at your desk, get up and walk around for crying out loud. I'm sure the 15 minutes checking your myspace account won't change your destroy R&R.
Bradml wrote:
Care to explain that?
What's to explain? Why risk your company's stock price to drop because your company gets bad press about employees surfing the internet, posting work youtubes, posting blogs during working hours, etc. or/and the company is evaluated as a high productivity risk. From an executive standpoint, they are controlling productivity.
Bradml wrote:
but I am approaching this from a strictly business point of view.
I don't see how. What specific sites do you need access to for you to keep your sanity at work. This sounds like a bigger issue here. Why can't you just bring in a laptop and surf what you want? That's what I do. Works for me, and gives me all the freedom I need.
Later, JoeSox "Pleasure in the job puts perfection in the work." -Aristotle CPMCv1.0 ↔ humanaiproject.org ↔ Last.fm
-
Well you would probably be well aware that almost all networks log everything you do. This means that when they look through the logs they find out exactly the same data that I take (BTW I only monitor domains). Anyway the reason I use graphs is because only sites that seem to be seriously over used show up. This way your personal browsing habits can continue without them being watched (unless you go to a site enough to trigger something).
Brad Australian - Christian Graus on "Best books for VBscript" A big thick one, so you can whack yourself on the head with it.
Network admins don't want to babysit their users. They have more important daily disasters to fix and monitor. Website blocking is an effective and totally legal way of handling the problem. What happens if your heart surgeon stopped half way during performing surgery on you because he got a text message about a cool youtube video?
Later, JoeSox "Pleasure in the job puts perfection in the work." -Aristotle CPMCv1.0 ↔ humanaiproject.org ↔ Last.fm
-
Bradml wrote:
Well if I get hit by a "This page has been Blocked" message and it isn't met with a damn good explanation then I stop working, walk to the IT managers office and ask for an administrator account.
Then what are you complaining about?
Bradml wrote:
Also there are guys who work 14 hour days regularly, can you really deny them a bit of R&R every now and then?
Then they can afford their own laptops and aircards. Or geez, go for a freaking walk. If you are tired of sitting at your desk, get up and walk around for crying out loud. I'm sure the 15 minutes checking your myspace account won't change your destroy R&R.
Bradml wrote:
Care to explain that?
What's to explain? Why risk your company's stock price to drop because your company gets bad press about employees surfing the internet, posting work youtubes, posting blogs during working hours, etc. or/and the company is evaluated as a high productivity risk. From an executive standpoint, they are controlling productivity.
Bradml wrote:
but I am approaching this from a strictly business point of view.
I don't see how. What specific sites do you need access to for you to keep your sanity at work. This sounds like a bigger issue here. Why can't you just bring in a laptop and surf what you want? That's what I do. Works for me, and gives me all the freedom I need.
Later, JoeSox "Pleasure in the job puts perfection in the work." -Aristotle CPMCv1.0 ↔ humanaiproject.org ↔ Last.fm
JoeSox wrote:
Then what are you complaining about?
Not everyone who has the rules imposed on them is in a position to get an Admin account.
JoeSox wrote:
Then they can afford their own laptops and aircards. Or geez, go for a freaking walk. If you are tired of sitting at your desk, get up and walk around for crying out loud. I'm sure the 15 minutes checking your myspace account won't change your destroy R&R.
Of course they can afford it, but then why not just use the equipment that is provided for them. As for the walk... physical exercise is great but do you seriously expect to be let out of the office every time you need a little break from coding?
JoeSox wrote:
hat's to explain? Why risk your company's stock price to drop because your company gets bad press about employees surfing the internet, posting work youtubes, posting blogs during working hours, etc. or/and the company is evaluated as a high productivity risk. From an executive standpoint, they are controlling productivity
Ok I get it now, well as stated before it is actually beneficial to productivity when used responsibly. And I feel that it is a misunderstanding in personal control that if you stop them doing anything else, they will do what you want them too better.
JoeSox wrote:
I don't see how. What specific sites do you need access to for you to keep your sanity at work. This sounds like a bigger issue here. Why can't you just bring in a laptop and surf what you want? That's what I do. Works for me, and gives me all the freedom I need.
So you are saying make them less productive?
Brad Australian - peterchen on "Who has the worst keyboard" Keyboard? Ha! I throw magnets over the RAM chips!
-
Ok I have seen this in way too many companies in the last couple days: website blocking. Guys this is not right, it inspires distrust and a us and them mentality between management and workers. I am not saying that you cannot block anything, in fact i have a long list of what you can block:
- Pornography
After that there is nothing that truly justifies blocking. Buy I hear screaming.... "What about productivity".... well I will tell you how I handle this: I monitor the browsing habits of every employee. This means I can get the amount of time that is spent browsing certain websites and I graph it all. Then I spend a couple minutes every week looking through the graphs and look for the high browsing activity. If this happens to be MySpace then I look at which employees are using it the most and make a note of it. If this happens continually I just have a casual conversation with them and ask they don't visit the site as much. Now I have hardly had to do that because they know I will pick it up on it and also they are generally a great bunch anyway. One thing to be careful about here is that you may upset an employee if you come out of the blue and tell them to stop reading so many emails, so just use tact. Also it helps to do it in a group without specifying certain people. Does anyone have a strict network administrator?
Brad Australian - Christian Graus on "Best books for VBscript" A big thick one, so you can whack yourself on the head with it.
Well, if a company employs you, thus your are their employee, using their equipment and their dime, then they have the right to control anything they like and most of them should. Too many employees waste company resources to non-company business. While I think developers would be more apt to use the resources properly, there is still plenty of room for abuse.
Rocky <>< Latest Code Blog Post: 20 Years to Web standards or a New Dream? Latest Tech Blog Post: Corel Lightning - what is the plan?
-
Network admins don't want to babysit their users. They have more important daily disasters to fix and monitor. Website blocking is an effective and totally legal way of handling the problem. What happens if your heart surgeon stopped half way during performing surgery on you because he got a text message about a cool youtube video?
Later, JoeSox "Pleasure in the job puts perfection in the work." -Aristotle CPMCv1.0 ↔ humanaiproject.org ↔ Last.fm
I never said it was illegal, but actually good employees don't need babysitting. For the ones who abuse privilege then they are easily caught. Anyway I think that is there is a slight difference between writing a piece of software and performing open heart surgery... Anyway you aren't permitted to have cell phones in an operating theater so this situation is highly unlikely to ever happen.
Brad Australian - Christian Graus on "Best books for VBscript" A big thick one, so you can whack yourself on the head with it.
-
Well, if a company employs you, thus your are their employee, using their equipment and their dime, then they have the right to control anything they like and most of them should. Too many employees waste company resources to non-company business. While I think developers would be more apt to use the resources properly, there is still plenty of room for abuse.
Rocky <>< Latest Code Blog Post: 20 Years to Web standards or a New Dream? Latest Tech Blog Post: Corel Lightning - what is the plan?
Yes they have the right to do this, but as to if they should i disagree. Yes there is plenty of room for abuse, but I trust most of my employees not to abuse something like this and if they do I handle it, instead of punishing all of the other employees who do the right thing. Anyway your profile states that you are a business owner so maybe in your offices you don't think that employees can be trusted with a bit of freedom or that it would effect your productivity levels if they were to be able to focus on something other then work every now and again. I find it encourages a healthy work community but you could quite possibly have found that it does not with people in your office.
Brad Australian - Christian Graus on "Best books for VBscript" A big thick one, so you can whack yourself on the head with it.
-
Network admins don't want to babysit their users. They have more important daily disasters to fix and monitor. Website blocking is an effective and totally legal way of handling the problem. What happens if your heart surgeon stopped half way during performing surgery on you because he got a text message about a cool youtube video?
Later, JoeSox "Pleasure in the job puts perfection in the work." -Aristotle CPMCv1.0 ↔ humanaiproject.org ↔ Last.fm
JoeSox wrote:
What happens if your heart surgeon stopped half way during performing surgery on you because he got a text message about a cool youtube video?
What happens if your heart surgeon shows up burned out and crabby because someone in the lounge kept slapping the copy of Newsweek out of his hands? Or shutting off the TV while he was trying to wind down from the previous 12-hour surgery? Maybe we should just lock surgeons into little windowless rooms between surgeries... think that'd help anything?
----
It appears that everybody is under the impression that I approve of the documentation. You probably also blame Ken Burns for supporting slavery.
--Raymond Chen on MSDN
-
Well, if a company employs you, thus your are their employee, using their equipment and their dime, then they have the right to control anything they like and most of them should. Too many employees waste company resources to non-company business. While I think developers would be more apt to use the resources properly, there is still plenty of room for abuse.
Rocky <>< Latest Code Blog Post: 20 Years to Web standards or a New Dream? Latest Tech Blog Post: Corel Lightning - what is the plan?
Rocky Moore wrote:
Too many employees waste company resources to non-company business.
You know, you're right. I spend a lot of time during the day browsing through news sites, reading CP forums, scanning blogs... Of course, i've also been teetering on the edge of complete burnout for many months now. I have a huge workload with no end in sight, and way too many things with my job that i'm unhappy about but can't seem to change. The "non-company business" is one of the few things that helps me relax enough during the day to keep something approaching a professional attitude towards the rest of it. So hey, why not lock everything down just for the heck of it. I hear prison inmates are some pretty motivated, cheerful folk. :|
----
It appears that everybody is under the impression that I approve of the documentation. You probably also blame Ken Burns for supporting slavery.
--Raymond Chen on MSDN
-
JoeSox wrote:
Then what are you complaining about?
Not everyone who has the rules imposed on them is in a position to get an Admin account.
JoeSox wrote:
Then they can afford their own laptops and aircards. Or geez, go for a freaking walk. If you are tired of sitting at your desk, get up and walk around for crying out loud. I'm sure the 15 minutes checking your myspace account won't change your destroy R&R.
Of course they can afford it, but then why not just use the equipment that is provided for them. As for the walk... physical exercise is great but do you seriously expect to be let out of the office every time you need a little break from coding?
JoeSox wrote:
hat's to explain? Why risk your company's stock price to drop because your company gets bad press about employees surfing the internet, posting work youtubes, posting blogs during working hours, etc. or/and the company is evaluated as a high productivity risk. From an executive standpoint, they are controlling productivity
Ok I get it now, well as stated before it is actually beneficial to productivity when used responsibly. And I feel that it is a misunderstanding in personal control that if you stop them doing anything else, they will do what you want them too better.
JoeSox wrote:
I don't see how. What specific sites do you need access to for you to keep your sanity at work. This sounds like a bigger issue here. Why can't you just bring in a laptop and surf what you want? That's what I do. Works for me, and gives me all the freedom I need.
So you are saying make them less productive?
Brad Australian - peterchen on "Who has the worst keyboard" Keyboard? Ha! I throw magnets over the RAM chips!
Bradml wrote:
Not everyone who has the rules imposed on them is in a position to get an Admin account.
Well, it sounds like you may have the authority to ask your net admin yourself why your company is blocking sites. Who knows, maybe the bosses wife is on that site that just got blocked. :rolleyes:
Bradml wrote:
So you are saying make them less productive?
My spidey sense detects fallacy of interrogation but I shall proceed, No, I did not say that and your context makes no sense as to my statements. If your company is blocking websites you desire, you have legal rights too and bring in your own laptop. Its better then creating a dramatic scene at your job. Its a far more classier and gentlemanly solution, imo. The company I work for doesn't block websites and I still bring in my own laptop in addition to using my company's pc. I'm so darn busy I don't even have time to do "R&R" things, must be nice, I remember those times when I use to have my on office. Ah, the good 'ol days. I only do personal stuff on my breaks and at lunch now, but if I do some personal compositions here and there I generally use my laptop. It legally tougher for a company to ban you or fire you for using your personal computer than it is to get caught on a company pc. If its really an issue. Another reason for using my laptop is so I have all my music on one common place. My last company pc had a bunch of music and it just takes too long to back it all up and transfer that crap, this way I avoid any difficulties and have a better conscious too.
Later, JoeSox "Pleasure in the job puts perfection in the work." -Aristotle CPMCv1.0 ↔ humanaiproject.org ↔ Last.fm
-
Well, if a company employs you, thus your are their employee, using their equipment and their dime, then they have the right to control anything they like and most of them should. Too many employees waste company resources to non-company business. While I think developers would be more apt to use the resources properly, there is still plenty of room for abuse.
Rocky <>< Latest Code Blog Post: 20 Years to Web standards or a New Dream? Latest Tech Blog Post: Corel Lightning - what is the plan?
Rocky Moore wrote:
waste company resources to non-company business
Yes some employees do waste company resources on non-company business but speaking from the perspective of the employee. I know that after working on a project for a week straight if I don't do anything else I am completely burnt out and sick of the project. If I take a bit of time off each day to check forums like here and relax a bit i am much more productive and I sometimes get work done ahead of time.
-
I never said it was illegal, but actually good employees don't need babysitting. For the ones who abuse privilege then they are easily caught. Anyway I think that is there is a slight difference between writing a piece of software and performing open heart surgery... Anyway you aren't permitted to have cell phones in an operating theater so this situation is highly unlikely to ever happen.
Brad Australian - Christian Graus on "Best books for VBscript" A big thick one, so you can whack yourself on the head with it.
Bradml wrote:
Anyway I think that is there is a slight difference between writing a piece of software and performing open heart surgery... Anyway you aren't permitted to have cell phones in an operating theater so this situation is highly unlikely to ever happen.
Of course, objection sustained. :)
Later, JoeSox "Pleasure in the job puts perfection in the work." -Aristotle CPMCv1.0 ↔ humanaiproject.org ↔ Last.fm
-
Yes they have the right to do this, but as to if they should i disagree. Yes there is plenty of room for abuse, but I trust most of my employees not to abuse something like this and if they do I handle it, instead of punishing all of the other employees who do the right thing. Anyway your profile states that you are a business owner so maybe in your offices you don't think that employees can be trusted with a bit of freedom or that it would effect your productivity levels if they were to be able to focus on something other then work every now and again. I find it encourages a healthy work community but you could quite possibly have found that it does not with people in your office.
Brad Australian - Christian Graus on "Best books for VBscript" A big thick one, so you can whack yourself on the head with it.
I think it is real simple, if you are working for someone, you should be working for them, not checking your person email, not scanning for the new TV you want to buy, not keeping up with the latest ebay finds, you are there to work, it is best to be about it and not playing around. It is sad, but in today's world one of the biggest shopping days after Thanksgiving is on the following Monday when people get back to work. A business is just that a business, if people want to play or whatever, then they should do it in their off time. As for me, I work for myself, by myself. I just wish I could get my lazy employee to work and quite spending so much time on CP... Vista has a nice method of blocking sites, but unfortunately, I know the password and can always unblock them :)
Rocky <>< Latest Code Blog Post: 20 Years to Web standards or a New Dream? Latest Tech Blog Post: Corel Lightning - what is the plan?
-
Rocky Moore wrote:
Too many employees waste company resources to non-company business.
You know, you're right. I spend a lot of time during the day browsing through news sites, reading CP forums, scanning blogs... Of course, i've also been teetering on the edge of complete burnout for many months now. I have a huge workload with no end in sight, and way too many things with my job that i'm unhappy about but can't seem to change. The "non-company business" is one of the few things that helps me relax enough during the day to keep something approaching a professional attitude towards the rest of it. So hey, why not lock everything down just for the heck of it. I hear prison inmates are some pretty motivated, cheerful folk. :|
----
It appears that everybody is under the impression that I approve of the documentation. You probably also blame Ken Burns for supporting slavery.
--Raymond Chen on MSDN
Shog9 wrote:
way too many things with my job that i'm unhappy about but can't seem to change
Then clearly you should not be working in that company as you are harming you and the company. They need an employee that wants to work and shares their goals. You clearly want a change. So, if you did not have the option to waste their time, you might already have quit and done both you and the business good ;)
Rocky <>< Latest Code Blog Post: 20 Years to Web standards or a New Dream? Latest Tech Blog Post: Corel Lightning - what is the plan?