Culture of Corruption
-
led mike wrote:
That's not a theory, however it is a conspiracy. Explain that.
So it's not a "theory" that conservatives hatched a plot to kill Kennedy? Yes...That certainly does explain a lot. Tell me more crackpot theories...I mean facts.
No it's not a theory that the Warren Commission gave us the Magic Bullet Theory and hid the finding of the commission from the public. It's a fact therefore not a theory. The act of hiding the truth is a conspiracy of itself and of course since the magic bullet theory is an obvious lie it is also evidence of a conspiracy. And I would have to do some checking but I don't remember conservatives being alone in this effort.
led mike
-
No it's not a theory that the Warren Commission gave us the Magic Bullet Theory and hid the finding of the commission from the public. It's a fact therefore not a theory. The act of hiding the truth is a conspiracy of itself and of course since the magic bullet theory is an obvious lie it is also evidence of a conspiracy. And I would have to do some checking but I don't remember conservatives being alone in this effort.
led mike
led mike wrote:
No it's not a theory that the Warren Commission gave us the Magic Bullet Theory and hid the finding of the commission from the public. It's a fact therefore not a theory. The act of hiding the truth is a conspiracy of itself and of course since the magic bullet theory is an obvious lie it is also evidence of a conspiracy.
I am, of course, referring to this:
led mike wrote:
Like they attempted to do back in the sixties with the Kennedy's and King
"They", huh? Is "they" the conservatives who attempted to undermine the government by killing Kennedy (who fought Communism and was conservative by today's standards and a moderate back then) and replacing him with his liberal vice president?. Surely it was conservatives, since JFK (who's election was won with the aid of organized crime in Ohio) who killed him because nobody (like organized crime which he and his brother pursued, despite being helped by them, and who killed Oswald) would want him dead. Surely the fact that Oswald spent quite a bit of time in the USSR could have nothing to do with it. It was conservatives. Tell me more "facts". This is very telling.
-
Stan Shannon wrote:
and need to be destroyed.
Like they attempted to do back in the sixties with the Kennedy's and King. Then gave us the Warren Report and the Magic Bullet Theory. That was the turning point in this country. That was when and how we carved out the direction for our culture, a culture devoid of all morality, a culture built on murder and lies, a culture espousing success through any means necessary. People like you created our culture and people like you will insure it continues until every last acre of this country is either burned or covered in blood.
"Christianity is not about tolerance"
Stan Shannon in the Soap BoxChristianity is about getting into heavan, and nothing else.
Stan Shannon in the SoapboxThats because you're a f****ing leftist idiot.
Stan Shannon in the SoapboxAnd you worthless bastards are proud of that. You assholes just suck.
Stan Shannon in the SoapboxBeing classy is for losers.
Stan Shannon in the Soapboxa coalition of hispanics, blacks, and white leftists.
Stan Shannon in the Soapboxled mike
led mike wrote:
Like they attempted to do back in the sixties with the Kennedy's and King. Then gave us the Warren Report and the Magic Bullet Theory. That was the turning point in this country. That was when and how we carved out the direction for our culture, a culture devoid of all morality, a culture built on murder and lies, a culture espousing success through any means necessary.
Wow, that really explain a lot. Too bad "they" didn't think of that back when FDR was in charge - when it would actually have done some good. I suppose that explains why Nixon went on to become one of our most liberal presidents. :rolleyes:
led mike wrote:
People like you created our culture
Thank you.
led mike wrote:
and people like you will insure it continues until every last acre of this country is either burned or covered in blood.
If that is what it takes to be free from the tyranny of the people you support, than yes, certainly.
Modern liberalism has never achieved anything other than giving Secularists something to feel morally superior about
-
As I noted above, there is a distinct difference between Republicans and Democrats. While Republicans actually remove those people guilty of corruption, Democrats promote them. I mean...The FBI has a freakin' videotape of Jefferson accepting bribes. I couldn't agree more! Like the way they did with DeLay. Oh wait... That's right, they tried to RELAX ethics rules just for him. :rolleyes: As for Frist, he wasn't removed by the republican establishment for ethical lapses he was widely viewed by republicans as ineffective as majority leader. His heavy involvement in the 2006 Elections and the Drubbing they recieved didn't help his cause any either. To address the issue of Jackson I don't know that there's much that can be done. He won't resign and the democrates can't make him. Hell he was re-elected while the investigation was ongoing. It's not much different than Cornyn who stayed till he was convicted. The party doesn't decide who stays and who goes. It's up to the individual congress member.
cruest wrote:
It's up to the individual congress member.
And the voters. Despite Bush's best efforts, this is still a (somewhat) democracy.
-
led mike wrote:
No it's not a theory that the Warren Commission gave us the Magic Bullet Theory and hid the finding of the commission from the public. It's a fact therefore not a theory. The act of hiding the truth is a conspiracy of itself and of course since the magic bullet theory is an obvious lie it is also evidence of a conspiracy.
I am, of course, referring to this:
led mike wrote:
Like they attempted to do back in the sixties with the Kennedy's and King
"They", huh? Is "they" the conservatives who attempted to undermine the government by killing Kennedy (who fought Communism and was conservative by today's standards and a moderate back then) and replacing him with his liberal vice president?. Surely it was conservatives, since JFK (who's election was won with the aid of organized crime in Ohio) who killed him because nobody (like organized crime which he and his brother pursued, despite being helped by them, and who killed Oswald) would want him dead. Surely the fact that Oswald spent quite a bit of time in the USSR could have nothing to do with it. It was conservatives. Tell me more "facts". This is very telling.
Red Stateler wrote:
JFK (who's election was won with the aid of organized crime in Ohio)
Talk about crazy conspiracy theories. You are one wacked-out mother-f***er.
-
Red Stateler wrote:
JFK (who's election was won with the aid of organized crime in Ohio)
Talk about crazy conspiracy theories. You are one wacked-out mother-f***er.
Ed Gadziemski wrote:
You are one wacked-out mother-f***er.
Yeah, but everybody already knew that.
-
cruest wrote:
It's up to the individual congress member.
And the voters. Despite Bush's best efforts, this is still a (somewhat) democracy.
Ed Gadziemski wrote:
And the voters. Despite Bush's best efforts, this is still a (somewhat) democracy.
Which doesn't say much for Democratic voters.
-
led mike wrote:
No it's not a theory that the Warren Commission gave us the Magic Bullet Theory and hid the finding of the commission from the public. It's a fact therefore not a theory. The act of hiding the truth is a conspiracy of itself and of course since the magic bullet theory is an obvious lie it is also evidence of a conspiracy.
I am, of course, referring to this:
led mike wrote:
Like they attempted to do back in the sixties with the Kennedy's and King
"They", huh? Is "they" the conservatives who attempted to undermine the government by killing Kennedy (who fought Communism and was conservative by today's standards and a moderate back then) and replacing him with his liberal vice president?. Surely it was conservatives, since JFK (who's election was won with the aid of organized crime in Ohio) who killed him because nobody (like organized crime which he and his brother pursued, despite being helped by them, and who killed Oswald) would want him dead. Surely the fact that Oswald spent quite a bit of time in the USSR could have nothing to do with it. It was conservatives. Tell me more "facts". This is very telling.
Don't even attempt to spin your garbage about the Kennedy assassination. The Warren Commissions lies are all you need to know to be certain that Oswald did not act alone, if he was even involved in any way besides being a patsy. Anything else is pure conjecture and a waste of time since the commission knows the truth but won't tell us. As far as who "they" are, it's the morally corrupt assholes that have created our current culture through their complete disdain for Democracy, you know the "power to the people part". Unlike you I don't believe for a second that slapping a label on someone like Conservative or Liberal excludes them from being an asshole. Politicians that are assholes will take up a label just because they know that ignorant bigots, like you, will lick up their bullshit and think the sun shines out their ass giving them the power to carry out their immoral acts leaving yet more scars on the fabric of our civilization.
led mike
-
led mike wrote:
Like they attempted to do back in the sixties with the Kennedy's and King. Then gave us the Warren Report and the Magic Bullet Theory. That was the turning point in this country. That was when and how we carved out the direction for our culture, a culture devoid of all morality, a culture built on murder and lies, a culture espousing success through any means necessary.
Wow, that really explain a lot. Too bad "they" didn't think of that back when FDR was in charge - when it would actually have done some good. I suppose that explains why Nixon went on to become one of our most liberal presidents. :rolleyes:
led mike wrote:
People like you created our culture
Thank you.
led mike wrote:
and people like you will insure it continues until every last acre of this country is either burned or covered in blood.
If that is what it takes to be free from the tyranny of the people you support, than yes, certainly.
Modern liberalism has never achieved anything other than giving Secularists something to feel morally superior about
Stan Shannon wrote:
Thank you.
Recently you were bemoaning our culture and blaming liberalism for it's demise, now you believe it's a great culture due to the assassinations and are proud of it. You are one giant flip flopping freak show dude.
Stan Shannon wrote:
If that is what it takes to be free from the tyranny of the people you support, than yes, certainly.
And when you talk out the other side of your ass you blame liberalism for the violent propensities of people like Cho. You right wingnuts can't discuss more than a single topic without contradicting yourselves.
Stan Shannon wrote:
that explains why Nixon went on to become one of our most liberal presidents.
:wtf: does that have to do with it?
led mike
-
Stan Shannon wrote:
Thank you.
Recently you were bemoaning our culture and blaming liberalism for it's demise, now you believe it's a great culture due to the assassinations and are proud of it. You are one giant flip flopping freak show dude.
Stan Shannon wrote:
If that is what it takes to be free from the tyranny of the people you support, than yes, certainly.
And when you talk out the other side of your ass you blame liberalism for the violent propensities of people like Cho. You right wingnuts can't discuss more than a single topic without contradicting yourselves.
Stan Shannon wrote:
that explains why Nixon went on to become one of our most liberal presidents.
:wtf: does that have to do with it?
led mike
led mike wrote:
Recently you were bemoaning our culture and blaming liberalism for it's demise, now you believe it's a great culture due to the assassinations and are proud of it. You are one giant flip flopping freak show dude.
Oh, I misunderstood. I thought when you said people like me created our culture you meant the general American culture as it existed prior to the Marxist dominated new age - which was created by people just like me - free thinking Americans. I didn't realize you were referring specifically to your deluded conspiratorial ravings about the Kennedy assasination.
led mike wrote:
And when you talk out the other side of your ass you blame liberalism for the violent propensities of people like Cho.
I'm actually pretty sure I never said that. But I do think that it is perfectly legitimate to argue that he was heavily influenced by the seething leftist negativity towards American society.
led mike wrote:
You right wingnuts can't discuss more than a single topic without contradicting yourselves.
No, its just difficult to keep up with your ramblings.
led mike wrote:
does that have to do with it?
Well, if you are going to blame 'people like me' for the assasinations of the sixties, Nixon was the ultimate beneficiary of all that. Obviously, the evil conservative plan to create a fascist state by knocking of all your Marxist heroes (although actually Kennedy would be conservative by your standards) backfired tremendously.
Modern liberalism has never achieved anything other than giving Secularists something to feel morally superior about
-
led mike wrote:
Recently you were bemoaning our culture and blaming liberalism for it's demise, now you believe it's a great culture due to the assassinations and are proud of it. You are one giant flip flopping freak show dude.
Oh, I misunderstood. I thought when you said people like me created our culture you meant the general American culture as it existed prior to the Marxist dominated new age - which was created by people just like me - free thinking Americans. I didn't realize you were referring specifically to your deluded conspiratorial ravings about the Kennedy assasination.
led mike wrote:
And when you talk out the other side of your ass you blame liberalism for the violent propensities of people like Cho.
I'm actually pretty sure I never said that. But I do think that it is perfectly legitimate to argue that he was heavily influenced by the seething leftist negativity towards American society.
led mike wrote:
You right wingnuts can't discuss more than a single topic without contradicting yourselves.
No, its just difficult to keep up with your ramblings.
led mike wrote:
does that have to do with it?
Well, if you are going to blame 'people like me' for the assasinations of the sixties, Nixon was the ultimate beneficiary of all that. Obviously, the evil conservative plan to create a fascist state by knocking of all your Marxist heroes (although actually Kennedy would be conservative by your standards) backfired tremendously.
Modern liberalism has never achieved anything other than giving Secularists something to feel morally superior about
Stan Shannon wrote:
But I do think that it is perfectly legitimate to argue that he was heavily influenced by the seething leftist negativity towards American society.
I think it is prefectly legitimate to argue that he was heavily influenced by our murderous lying leadership.
Stan Shannon wrote:
Nixon was the ultimate beneficiary of all that.
As far as you can tell. You have no idea who our how people and companies benefited or at least they expected to, certainly they could have been wrong. It wouldn't surprise me at all if things didn't turn out as they planned.
Stan Shannon wrote:
deluded conspiratorial ravings about the Kennedy assasination.
You don't believe there was a conspiracy? Well that explains a lot. It explains how they got you to trade your heroes for ghosts, Hot ashes for trees, Hot air for a cool breeze. So you think you can tell Heaven from Hell, blue skies from pain? Can you tell a green field from a cold steel rail? A smile from a veil? You are lost my friend, I grieve your passing.
led mike