Dont let your infants watch tv!
-
"All the current research is pointing the same way. It is not clear-cut, but it is very suggestive, that excessive viewing, more than 30 to 60 minutes a day before 3 years of age, is associated with a lot or problems later on, such as obesity, poor cognitive development, poor attention control and aggressive behavior. Much more research needs to be done in these areas, though, before we have a crystal-clear picture of these effects." [^] I know when I have children I plan to prevent them from watching TV but I know that has to be hard because of daycares and other households that use it as a way to keep the child occupied. What do you guys do and what do you think?
CleaKO
"I think you'll be okay here, they have a thin candy shell. 'Surprised you didn't know that.'" - Tommy (Tommy Boy)
"Fill it up again! Fill it up again! Once it hits your lips, it's so good!" - Frank the Tank (Old School) -
"All the current research is pointing the same way. It is not clear-cut, but it is very suggestive, that excessive viewing, more than 30 to 60 minutes a day before 3 years of age, is associated with a lot or problems later on, such as obesity, poor cognitive development, poor attention control and aggressive behavior. Much more research needs to be done in these areas, though, before we have a crystal-clear picture of these effects." [^] I know when I have children I plan to prevent them from watching TV but I know that has to be hard because of daycares and other households that use it as a way to keep the child occupied. What do you guys do and what do you think?
CleaKO
"I think you'll be okay here, they have a thin candy shell. 'Surprised you didn't know that.'" - Tommy (Tommy Boy)
"Fill it up again! Fill it up again! Once it hits your lips, it's so good!" - Frank the Tank (Old School)Well, I have a 2 and 4 year old and we let them watch things like Blue's Clues, Dora, and programing of an educational manner. There are times when they want to watch a movie or a particular sitcom. The 4 year girl like watching Reba[^] and the 2 year old boy like watching the horse shows on RFDTV[^]. For the most part, we have them play with toys, learning tools, show them how to use a computer, and be outdoors. We are a little lucky because our babysitter(daycare) is at a lady's house where they feed and play with horses, cows, goats, and whatever animal that comes up. We are very strict on discipline. We do not allow our children to act up or miss-behave. If they do there is an appropriate discipline given. They say yes sir and no ma'am and we pray before we eat. You can raise your children the way you see fit. But as for mine, my wife and I have worked hard at raising them up right and it shows in our kids. They are polite, obedient, the girl prays(whenever, where ever, and for however), the boy hold holds open doors for ladies and for his momma. And one last thing, my kids are not scared of anything, why? Because I didn't teach them to be scared. -- modified at 10:25 Tuesday 8th May, 2007 Forgot to proof read. Fixed some spelling.
God Bless, Jason
DavidCrow wrote:
It would not affect me or my family one iota. My wife and I are in charge of when the tv is on, and what it displays. I do not need any external input for that.
-
"All the current research is pointing the same way. It is not clear-cut, but it is very suggestive, that excessive viewing, more than 30 to 60 minutes a day before 3 years of age, is associated with a lot or problems later on, such as obesity, poor cognitive development, poor attention control and aggressive behavior. Much more research needs to be done in these areas, though, before we have a crystal-clear picture of these effects." [^] I know when I have children I plan to prevent them from watching TV but I know that has to be hard because of daycares and other households that use it as a way to keep the child occupied. What do you guys do and what do you think?
CleaKO
"I think you'll be okay here, they have a thin candy shell. 'Surprised you didn't know that.'" - Tommy (Tommy Boy)
"Fill it up again! Fill it up again! Once it hits your lips, it's so good!" - Frank the Tank (Old School)Most modern research makes not attempt to truly separate cause and effect, only to prove a theory or paid for point of view. It's just as likely that parents with those same problems are more likely to sit their child in front of a tv for hours a day, in other words, the problems were passed on genetically or through learned behaviour, the tv likely has nothing to do with the actual characteristics mentioned. This sort of fuzzy research or more often than not fuzzy reporting on the actual research clearly shows that the best policy is to disregard any of this type of information. Whenever you see or hear or read the red flag phrase "Much more research needs to be done..." you can be confident it's bullshit not worth the time it takes to read or listen to it.
"110%" - it's the new 70%
-
"All the current research is pointing the same way. It is not clear-cut, but it is very suggestive, that excessive viewing, more than 30 to 60 minutes a day before 3 years of age, is associated with a lot or problems later on, such as obesity, poor cognitive development, poor attention control and aggressive behavior. Much more research needs to be done in these areas, though, before we have a crystal-clear picture of these effects." [^] I know when I have children I plan to prevent them from watching TV but I know that has to be hard because of daycares and other households that use it as a way to keep the child occupied. What do you guys do and what do you think?
CleaKO
"I think you'll be okay here, they have a thin candy shell. 'Surprised you didn't know that.'" - Tommy (Tommy Boy)
"Fill it up again! Fill it up again! Once it hits your lips, it's so good!" - Frank the Tank (Old School)CleaKO wrote:
" ... Much more research needs to be done in these areas, though, before we have a crystal-clear picture of these effects."
No, you don't need more research. What you need is a HD TV to get crystal-clear pictures. :-D
-
Well, I have a 2 and 4 year old and we let them watch things like Blue's Clues, Dora, and programing of an educational manner. There are times when they want to watch a movie or a particular sitcom. The 4 year girl like watching Reba[^] and the 2 year old boy like watching the horse shows on RFDTV[^]. For the most part, we have them play with toys, learning tools, show them how to use a computer, and be outdoors. We are a little lucky because our babysitter(daycare) is at a lady's house where they feed and play with horses, cows, goats, and whatever animal that comes up. We are very strict on discipline. We do not allow our children to act up or miss-behave. If they do there is an appropriate discipline given. They say yes sir and no ma'am and we pray before we eat. You can raise your children the way you see fit. But as for mine, my wife and I have worked hard at raising them up right and it shows in our kids. They are polite, obedient, the girl prays(whenever, where ever, and for however), the boy hold holds open doors for ladies and for his momma. And one last thing, my kids are not scared of anything, why? Because I didn't teach them to be scared. -- modified at 10:25 Tuesday 8th May, 2007 Forgot to proof read. Fixed some spelling.
God Bless, Jason
DavidCrow wrote:
It would not affect me or my family one iota. My wife and I are in charge of when the tv is on, and what it displays. I do not need any external input for that.
jason_lakewhitney wrote:
Well, I have a 2 and 4 year old and we let them watch things like Blue's Clues, Dora, and programing of an educational manner.
According to the article it says up until 2 you shouldnt let the child watch TV so I guess you are now past that. The reason I posted this is because a lot of people use the TV, candy, toys from the store, etc to just make their kids stay quiet and to not bother them.
CleaKO
"I think you'll be okay here, they have a thin candy shell. 'Surprised you didn't know that.'" - Tommy (Tommy Boy)
"Fill it up again! Fill it up again! Once it hits your lips, it's so good!" - Frank the Tank (Old School) -
Most modern research makes not attempt to truly separate cause and effect, only to prove a theory or paid for point of view. It's just as likely that parents with those same problems are more likely to sit their child in front of a tv for hours a day, in other words, the problems were passed on genetically or through learned behaviour, the tv likely has nothing to do with the actual characteristics mentioned. This sort of fuzzy research or more often than not fuzzy reporting on the actual research clearly shows that the best policy is to disregard any of this type of information. Whenever you see or hear or read the red flag phrase "Much more research needs to be done..." you can be confident it's bullshit not worth the time it takes to read or listen to it.
"110%" - it's the new 70%
John Cardinal wrote:
Whenever you see or hear or read the red flag phrase "Much more research needs to be done..." you can be confident it's bullsh*t not worth the time it takes to read or listen to it.
Even so, many times it just causes people to think about what they are doing and what the outcomes might be. I heard but dont remember of a publication that actually works to inform people of the experiments that failed to prove a theory which in a way is what you are talking about. You never hear about how they tried to prove it and they couldnt you only hear that they were able to prove it. If you know what that publication is I would like to know.
CleaKO
"I think you'll be okay here, they have a thin candy shell. 'Surprised you didn't know that.'" - Tommy (Tommy Boy)
"Fill it up again! Fill it up again! Once it hits your lips, it's so good!" - Frank the Tank (Old School) -
Well, I have a 2 and 4 year old and we let them watch things like Blue's Clues, Dora, and programing of an educational manner. There are times when they want to watch a movie or a particular sitcom. The 4 year girl like watching Reba[^] and the 2 year old boy like watching the horse shows on RFDTV[^]. For the most part, we have them play with toys, learning tools, show them how to use a computer, and be outdoors. We are a little lucky because our babysitter(daycare) is at a lady's house where they feed and play with horses, cows, goats, and whatever animal that comes up. We are very strict on discipline. We do not allow our children to act up or miss-behave. If they do there is an appropriate discipline given. They say yes sir and no ma'am and we pray before we eat. You can raise your children the way you see fit. But as for mine, my wife and I have worked hard at raising them up right and it shows in our kids. They are polite, obedient, the girl prays(whenever, where ever, and for however), the boy hold holds open doors for ladies and for his momma. And one last thing, my kids are not scared of anything, why? Because I didn't teach them to be scared. -- modified at 10:25 Tuesday 8th May, 2007 Forgot to proof read. Fixed some spelling.
God Bless, Jason
DavidCrow wrote:
It would not affect me or my family one iota. My wife and I are in charge of when the tv is on, and what it displays. I do not need any external input for that.
jason_lakewhitney wrote:
I have a 2 and 4 year old and we let them watch things like Blue's Clues
That's harmless, but they will quickly grow up to Pokemon, then to Dragon Ball Z, then to everything on YouTube.com. By that time, they won't be able to hear anything you say. :(
-
jason_lakewhitney wrote:
I have a 2 and 4 year old and we let them watch things like Blue's Clues
That's harmless, but they will quickly grow up to Pokemon, then to Dragon Ball Z, then to everything on YouTube.com. By that time, they won't be able to hear anything you say. :(
Wrong. My responsibility of raising my children does not stop when they reach the age 8, 10, 16 or what ever. I am their father and I will be there to share knowledge and wisdom with them long after the leave my house.
God Bless, Jason
DavidCrow wrote:
It would not affect me or my family one iota. My wife and I are in charge of when the tv is on, and what it displays. I do not need any external input for that.
-
CleaKO wrote:
" ... Much more research needs to be done in these areas, though, before we have a crystal-clear picture of these effects."
No, you don't need more research. What you need is a HD TV to get crystal-clear pictures. :-D
Xiangyang Liu wrote:
No, you don't need more research. What you need is a HD TV to get crystal-clear pictures.
:| Believe me the man has a point, much more research has to be done, most of these researchers based whatever they find on theories and pre-calculated assumptions.
AlbertDadze
-
Well, I have a 2 and 4 year old and we let them watch things like Blue's Clues, Dora, and programing of an educational manner. There are times when they want to watch a movie or a particular sitcom. The 4 year girl like watching Reba[^] and the 2 year old boy like watching the horse shows on RFDTV[^]. For the most part, we have them play with toys, learning tools, show them how to use a computer, and be outdoors. We are a little lucky because our babysitter(daycare) is at a lady's house where they feed and play with horses, cows, goats, and whatever animal that comes up. We are very strict on discipline. We do not allow our children to act up or miss-behave. If they do there is an appropriate discipline given. They say yes sir and no ma'am and we pray before we eat. You can raise your children the way you see fit. But as for mine, my wife and I have worked hard at raising them up right and it shows in our kids. They are polite, obedient, the girl prays(whenever, where ever, and for however), the boy hold holds open doors for ladies and for his momma. And one last thing, my kids are not scared of anything, why? Because I didn't teach them to be scared. -- modified at 10:25 Tuesday 8th May, 2007 Forgot to proof read. Fixed some spelling.
God Bless, Jason
DavidCrow wrote:
It would not affect me or my family one iota. My wife and I are in charge of when the tv is on, and what it displays. I do not need any external input for that.
jason_lakewhitney wrote:
and we pray before we eat
What if your kid concludes that there is no god, would you let them sit out the prayer? Or would they be disciplined?
Upcoming events: * Glasgow: SQL Server 2005 - XML and XML Query Plans, Mock Objects, SQL Server Reporting Services... Never write for other people. Write for yourself, because you have a passion for it. -- Marc Clifton My website
-
jason_lakewhitney wrote:
Well, I have a 2 and 4 year old and we let them watch things like Blue's Clues, Dora, and programing of an educational manner.
According to the article it says up until 2 you shouldnt let the child watch TV so I guess you are now past that. The reason I posted this is because a lot of people use the TV, candy, toys from the store, etc to just make their kids stay quiet and to not bother them.
CleaKO
"I think you'll be okay here, they have a thin candy shell. 'Surprised you didn't know that.'" - Tommy (Tommy Boy)
"Fill it up again! Fill it up again! Once it hits your lips, it's so good!" - Frank the Tank (Old School)CleaKO wrote:
you are now past that.
Nope last one is in the oven, be out in a month or so.
God Bless, Jason
DavidCrow wrote:
It would not affect me or my family one iota. My wife and I are in charge of when the tv is on, and what it displays. I do not need any external input for that.
-
Wrong. My responsibility of raising my children does not stop when they reach the age 8, 10, 16 or what ever. I am their father and I will be there to share knowledge and wisdom with them long after the leave my house.
God Bless, Jason
DavidCrow wrote:
It would not affect me or my family one iota. My wife and I are in charge of when the tv is on, and what it displays. I do not need any external input for that.
jason_lakewhitney wrote:
My responsibility of raising my children does not stop when they reach the age 8, 10, 16 or what ever. I am their father and I will be there to share knowledge and wisdom with them long after the leave my house.
Good luck.
-
jason_lakewhitney wrote:
and we pray before we eat
What if your kid concludes that there is no god, would you let them sit out the prayer? Or would they be disciplined?
Upcoming events: * Glasgow: SQL Server 2005 - XML and XML Query Plans, Mock Objects, SQL Server Reporting Services... Never write for other people. Write for yourself, because you have a passion for it. -- Marc Clifton My website
Colin Angus Mackay wrote:
What if your kid concludes that there is no god
If there was no God, then my children would not be here today. At least that is what modern medical science told me after a four wheeler wreck I had about 6 years ago.
Colin Angus Mackay wrote:
would they be disciplined?
No, I grew up in a home that believes in God, for clarity of 'God' I am a Christian. When I left that house, I left every teaching that was given to me and lived my life the way I saw fit. My parents did not disown me or hate me but they just continued to love me. After some long hard years, I reverted back to the teachings of my parents and it is just amazing to me to look back and see what God has done in my life. Now everyone here knows my stance, you can like it or not but I will not change.
God Bless, Jason
DavidCrow wrote:
It would not affect me or my family one iota. My wife and I are in charge of when the tv is on, and what it displays. I do not need any external input for that.
-
John Cardinal wrote:
Whenever you see or hear or read the red flag phrase "Much more research needs to be done..." you can be confident it's bullsh*t not worth the time it takes to read or listen to it.
Even so, many times it just causes people to think about what they are doing and what the outcomes might be. I heard but dont remember of a publication that actually works to inform people of the experiments that failed to prove a theory which in a way is what you are talking about. You never hear about how they tried to prove it and they couldnt you only hear that they were able to prove it. If you know what that publication is I would like to know.
CleaKO
"I think you'll be okay here, they have a thin candy shell. 'Surprised you didn't know that.'" - Tommy (Tommy Boy)
"Fill it up again! Fill it up again! Once it hits your lips, it's so good!" - Frank the Tank (Old School)CleaKO wrote:
Even so, many times it just causes people to think about what they are doing and what the outcomes might be.
More often than not it leaves people in a state of greater ignorance than they were previously. Not a good thing.
CleaKO wrote:
You never hear about how they tried to prove it and they couldnt you only hear that they were able to prove it.
There are no "proven" theories, nothing is proven. Ever.
"110%" - it's the new 70%
-
Colin Angus Mackay wrote:
What if your kid concludes that there is no god
If there was no God, then my children would not be here today. At least that is what modern medical science told me after a four wheeler wreck I had about 6 years ago.
Colin Angus Mackay wrote:
would they be disciplined?
No, I grew up in a home that believes in God, for clarity of 'God' I am a Christian. When I left that house, I left every teaching that was given to me and lived my life the way I saw fit. My parents did not disown me or hate me but they just continued to love me. After some long hard years, I reverted back to the teachings of my parents and it is just amazing to me to look back and see what God has done in my life. Now everyone here knows my stance, you can like it or not but I will not change.
God Bless, Jason
DavidCrow wrote:
It would not affect me or my family one iota. My wife and I are in charge of when the tv is on, and what it displays. I do not need any external input for that.
jason_lakewhitney wrote:
When I left that house, I left every teaching that was given to me and lived my life the way I saw fit. My parents did not disown me or hate me but they just continued to love me.
Since you don't say it directly, I can only assume that you are implying that you would do the same for your children. And that's fine. I don't like the idea of parents defining a path for their children. I feel it is up to the child to find their own path, even if it isn't the one the parents hoped for.
jason_lakewhitney wrote:
Now everyone here knows my stance, you can like it or not but I will not change.
Your stance is your choice and I respect that. So long as that stance does not impact on the freedom of others to choose their own stance then great.
jason_lakewhitney wrote:
If there was no God, then my children would not be here today. At least that is what modern medical science told me after a four wheeler wreck I had about 6 years ago.
I have to take that statement with some skeptisism. I would personally put it down to either the injuries not being as bad as first thought, or that the doctors did a better job than they expected to be able to do. To me, these are more rational explanations. But, that's just my stance. I don't claim to be right or wrong.
Upcoming events: * Glasgow: SQL Server 2005 - XML and XML Query Plans, Mock Objects, SQL Server Reporting Services... Never write for other people. Write for yourself, because you have a passion for it. -- Marc Clifton My website
-
jason_lakewhitney wrote:
When I left that house, I left every teaching that was given to me and lived my life the way I saw fit. My parents did not disown me or hate me but they just continued to love me.
Since you don't say it directly, I can only assume that you are implying that you would do the same for your children. And that's fine. I don't like the idea of parents defining a path for their children. I feel it is up to the child to find their own path, even if it isn't the one the parents hoped for.
jason_lakewhitney wrote:
Now everyone here knows my stance, you can like it or not but I will not change.
Your stance is your choice and I respect that. So long as that stance does not impact on the freedom of others to choose their own stance then great.
jason_lakewhitney wrote:
If there was no God, then my children would not be here today. At least that is what modern medical science told me after a four wheeler wreck I had about 6 years ago.
I have to take that statement with some skeptisism. I would personally put it down to either the injuries not being as bad as first thought, or that the doctors did a better job than they expected to be able to do. To me, these are more rational explanations. But, that's just my stance. I don't claim to be right or wrong.
Upcoming events: * Glasgow: SQL Server 2005 - XML and XML Query Plans, Mock Objects, SQL Server Reporting Services... Never write for other people. Write for yourself, because you have a passion for it. -- Marc Clifton My website
Colin Angus Mackay wrote:
I don't like the idea of parents defining a path for their children. I feel it is up to the child to find their own path, even if it isn't the one the parents hoped for.
I disagree wholeheartedly. It is the parents' obligation to teach their kids about the right path and make sure that they follow that path while they're children. After their adults it's their choice.
-
"All the current research is pointing the same way. It is not clear-cut, but it is very suggestive, that excessive viewing, more than 30 to 60 minutes a day before 3 years of age, is associated with a lot or problems later on, such as obesity, poor cognitive development, poor attention control and aggressive behavior. Much more research needs to be done in these areas, though, before we have a crystal-clear picture of these effects." [^] I know when I have children I plan to prevent them from watching TV but I know that has to be hard because of daycares and other households that use it as a way to keep the child occupied. What do you guys do and what do you think?
CleaKO
"I think you'll be okay here, they have a thin candy shell. 'Surprised you didn't know that.'" - Tommy (Tommy Boy)
"Fill it up again! Fill it up again! Once it hits your lips, it's so good!" - Frank the Tank (Old School)CleaKO wrote:
I know when I have children I plan to prevent them from watching TV but I know that has to be hard because of daycares and other households that use it as a way to keep the child occupied. What do you guys do and what do you think?
Regarding the research, all I can say is "duh". Regarding daycares--go find a nice Waldorf Kindergarten. Regarding other households--well, don't go to crazy about it. Marc
People are just notoriously impossible. --DavidCrow
There's NO excuse for not commenting your code. -- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
People who say that they will refactor their code later to make it "good" don't understand refactoring, nor the art and craft of programming. -- Josh Smith -
"All the current research is pointing the same way. It is not clear-cut, but it is very suggestive, that excessive viewing, more than 30 to 60 minutes a day before 3 years of age, is associated with a lot or problems later on, such as obesity, poor cognitive development, poor attention control and aggressive behavior. Much more research needs to be done in these areas, though, before we have a crystal-clear picture of these effects." [^] I know when I have children I plan to prevent them from watching TV but I know that has to be hard because of daycares and other households that use it as a way to keep the child occupied. What do you guys do and what do you think?
CleaKO
"I think you'll be okay here, they have a thin candy shell. 'Surprised you didn't know that.'" - Tommy (Tommy Boy)
"Fill it up again! Fill it up again! Once it hits your lips, it's so good!" - Frank the Tank (Old School)To bad actual science isn't used for crap like this. The notion that a TV or a DVD is some bugaboo is utter nonsense. Every year or so, someone makes up a bunch of "facts" because they don't like television. (Incidentally, self-reported observational studies are among the worse and most useless. They almost always end up reinforcing the conclusions of the people running the study and nothing more.) Contrary to the core claims, NO valid scientific studies suggest ANYTHING like these people are claiming. This is nothing more than scare mongering by a bunch of idiots who need to justify their existence. (EDIT: As an FYI, my kids actually didn't watch much television as infants. They weren't that interested. Oddly, none of them liked Sesame Street and most "child" programming. Now that my oldest is out of the house and youngest is 11, I can say with confidence that being in the same room as children watching Digimon, Dragonball-Z and Pokemon will drive you insane.)
Anyone who thinks he has a better idea of what's good for people than people do is a swine. - P.J. O'Rourke
-
Colin Angus Mackay wrote:
I don't like the idea of parents defining a path for their children. I feel it is up to the child to find their own path, even if it isn't the one the parents hoped for.
I disagree wholeheartedly. It is the parents' obligation to teach their kids about the right path and make sure that they follow that path while they're children. After their adults it's their choice.
tgrt wrote:
I disagree wholeheartedly.
No, you don't. Your final sentence "After their adults it's their choice" shows that it isn't a "wholehearted" disagreement. Once your child is an adult, they are still your child. They are just no longer a minor.
Upcoming events: * Glasgow: SQL Server 2005 - XML and XML Query Plans, Mock Objects, SQL Server Reporting Services... Never write for other people. Write for yourself, because you have a passion for it. -- Marc Clifton My website
-
John Cardinal wrote:
Whenever you see or hear or read the red flag phrase "Much more research needs to be done..." you can be confident it's bullsh*t not worth the time it takes to read or listen to it.
Even so, many times it just causes people to think about what they are doing and what the outcomes might be. I heard but dont remember of a publication that actually works to inform people of the experiments that failed to prove a theory which in a way is what you are talking about. You never hear about how they tried to prove it and they couldnt you only hear that they were able to prove it. If you know what that publication is I would like to know.
CleaKO
"I think you'll be okay here, they have a thin candy shell. 'Surprised you didn't know that.'" - Tommy (Tommy Boy)
"Fill it up again! Fill it up again! Once it hits your lips, it's so good!" - Frank the Tank (Old School)CleaKO wrote:
Even so, many times it just causes people to think about what they are doing and what the outcomes might be.
In my experience, no it doesn't. Experiences that should end up "making you think" almost never do. People are too busy to be bothered with trivialities like what's best for your kids. We have bills to pay and vacations to plan, after all. If you can't tell, I'm just a little bitter. I have still found no reliable way to "encourage" people to stop even for a second and figure something out that will have a lasting effect on them. The few times I thought I succeeded, they just reverted straight back to the previous behavior. I'm starting to think it's a design flaw.
Cheers, Patrick