Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Please Microsoft, Stop Holding .NET Back!

Please Microsoft, Stop Holding .NET Back!

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
csharp
15 Posts 12 Posters 4 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J jpg 0

    [url]http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/please-microsoft-stop-holding-net-back/\[/url\]

    S Offline
    S Offline
    Shog9 0
    wrote on last edited by
    #6

    Doesn't interest me. Now, i'd love to see the .NET platform open-sourced. Let the Linux people port it to Linux, the Mac people port it to MacOS, etc. And yeah, i'm talking proper open source where folks can freely view, build and modify it, not the weird licensing and lineage of Rotor. Do i think we'll ever see such a thing? Not a chance. But Mono is cool...

    ----

    i hope you are feeling sleepy for people not calling you by the same.

    --BarnaKol on abusive words

    J V 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • V Vikram A Punathambekar

      [edit]Ok, I clicked the link and saw that Java is what the first line of the article talks about. I feel stupid now.[/edit] I know the analogy isn't very pertinent, as Windows' sales outstrip that of Solaris, but Sun continues to sell Solaris and make Java available on a variety of platforms. -- modified at 16:22 Sunday 20th May, 2007

      Cheers, Vıkram.


      Déjà moo - The feeling that you've seen this bull before. Join the CP group at NationStates. Password: byalmightybob

      J Offline
      J Offline
      Judah Gabriel Himango
      wrote on last edited by
      #7

      Yes, because if Java was available only for Solaris, nobody would use it.

      Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit. I'm currently blogging about: Repentance The apostle Paul, modernly speaking: Epistles of Paul Judah Himango

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • S Shog9 0

        Doesn't interest me. Now, i'd love to see the .NET platform open-sourced. Let the Linux people port it to Linux, the Mac people port it to MacOS, etc. And yeah, i'm talking proper open source where folks can freely view, build and modify it, not the weird licensing and lineage of Rotor. Do i think we'll ever see such a thing? Not a chance. But Mono is cool...

        ----

        i hope you are feeling sleepy for people not calling you by the same.

        --BarnaKol on abusive words

        J Offline
        J Offline
        Judah Gabriel Himango
        wrote on last edited by
        #8

        Shog9 wrote:

        i'd love to see the .NET platform open-sourced.

        I'd go for that. I mean, given tools like reflector, we can already see the source. :)

        Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit. I'm currently blogging about: Repentance The apostle Paul, modernly speaking: Epistles of Paul Judah Himango

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • C Chris Maunder

          1. Clickety[^] 2. "why can’t Microsoft just swallow the pill already and provide real support for the .NET Framework on all operating systems? Yes, that includes Linux and Mac too." Because Microsoft is in the business of selling Windows, not Linux or MacOS

          cheers, Chris Maunder

          CodeProject.com : C++ MVP

          P Offline
          P Offline
          peterchen
          wrote on last edited by
          #9

          <humming>Logic killed the Internet rant</humming>


          We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
          My first real C# project | Linkify!|FoldWithUs! | sighist

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • N Nemanja Trifunovic

            This comment[^] explains it very well, IMHO.


            Programming Blog utf8-cpp

            V Offline
            V Offline
            Virtual Coder
            wrote on last edited by
            #10

            Nemanja Trifunovic wrote:

            This comment[^] explains it very well, IMHO.

            Microsoft has never created any product without lock-in.

            J 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • S Shog9 0

              Doesn't interest me. Now, i'd love to see the .NET platform open-sourced. Let the Linux people port it to Linux, the Mac people port it to MacOS, etc. And yeah, i'm talking proper open source where folks can freely view, build and modify it, not the weird licensing and lineage of Rotor. Do i think we'll ever see such a thing? Not a chance. But Mono is cool...

              ----

              i hope you are feeling sleepy for people not calling you by the same.

              --BarnaKol on abusive words

              V Offline
              V Offline
              Virtual Coder
              wrote on last edited by
              #11

              Doesn't interest me.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • C Chris Maunder

                1. Clickety[^] 2. "why can’t Microsoft just swallow the pill already and provide real support for the .NET Framework on all operating systems? Yes, that includes Linux and Mac too." Because Microsoft is in the business of selling Windows, not Linux or MacOS

                cheers, Chris Maunder

                CodeProject.com : C++ MVP

                M Offline
                M Offline
                Muammar
                wrote on last edited by
                #12

                Few but perfect words!!


                Smile: A curve that can set a lot of things straight! (\ /) (O.o) (><)

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • V Virtual Coder

                  Nemanja Trifunovic wrote:

                  This comment[^] explains it very well, IMHO.

                  Microsoft has never created any product without lock-in.

                  J Offline
                  J Offline
                  Joe Woodbury
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #13

                  That's patently and fully demonstrably not true. I've moved documents from Word to WordPerfect and back again. I've move C/C++/Assembler code between compilers and IDEs. I've moved my bookmarks to FireFox (use both for various reasons.) I'm 100% sure I could move my money files to Quicken without any loss. About the only files I've never attempted to move are PowerPoint, but that's because I've only done one PowerPoint presentation and all the competing products suck badly.

                  Anyone who thinks he has a better idea of what's good for people than people do is a swine. - P.J. O'Rourke

                  V 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • J jpg 0

                    [url]http://neosmart.net/blog/2007/please-microsoft-stop-holding-net-back/\[/url\]

                    D Offline
                    D Offline
                    Dave Kreskowiak
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #14

                    I can't see the link because the page won't load, but, I get the feeling that whoever wrote something along the lines of "Microsoft is holding the .NET Framework back!!" is utter crap. The ".NET Framework" is Microsoft implementation of the Common Language Infrastructure which is an international standard, both ECMA and ISO approved. Even though it's an invention that Microsoft/HP/Intel created, it's open for anyone to implement on any platform they want. Microsoft isn't holding it back. The industry just hasn't picked up the ball and done anything with it, other than Mono of course. There's probably some other, smaller, implementations that I don't know about running around though. Since it's a standard that anyone can implement, who's really holding anything back?

                    A guide to posting questions on CodeProject[^]
                    Dave Kreskowiak Microsoft MVP Visual Developer - Visual Basic
                         2006, 2007

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • J Joe Woodbury

                      That's patently and fully demonstrably not true. I've moved documents from Word to WordPerfect and back again. I've move C/C++/Assembler code between compilers and IDEs. I've moved my bookmarks to FireFox (use both for various reasons.) I'm 100% sure I could move my money files to Quicken without any loss. About the only files I've never attempted to move are PowerPoint, but that's because I've only done one PowerPoint presentation and all the competing products suck badly.

                      Anyone who thinks he has a better idea of what's good for people than people do is a swine. - P.J. O'Rourke

                      V Offline
                      V Offline
                      Virtual Coder
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #15

                      Joe Woodbury wrote:

                      That's patently and fully demonstrably not true. I've moved documents from Word to WordPerfect and back again.

                      The Word format is proprietary and not documented.

                      Joe Woodbury wrote:

                      I've move C/C++/Assembler code between compilers and IDEs.

                      The Windows API is a lock-in.

                      Joe Woodbury wrote:

                      I've moved my bookmarks to FireFox (use both for various reasons.)

                      Oh, great! One point for you. Of course IE had ActiveX and future versions will have XAML.

                      Joe Woodbury wrote:

                      I'm 100% sure I could move my money files to Quicken without any loss. About the only files I've never attempted to move are PowerPoint, but that's because I've only done one PowerPoint presentation and all the competing products suck badly.

                      Because someone reverse-engineered proprietary formats?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups