Just watched Harry Potter 3 and 4...
-
Rage wrote:
as good as the books
Rage wrote:
Lord of the Rings, really awesome.
:wtf: the films don't come close to the book. Yes the movies are excellent but as a representation of the book :~ they simply miss so much out.
Yah, but the movie is not a representation of the book, it is just another telling of the same story. when you tell two people to write something down, they write down what you tell them to, but it still wil be diffrent than what you told them.
My second computer is your linux box.
-
fat_boy wrote:
as mundane as ones own life.
My life is not mundane, but then again, I don't watch TV or very many movies, so my measure of mundane is not biased by superheros, 2D cartoon characters, or people stuck on islands with great healthcare plans. :) Marc
-
And my god are they good films. With the structure, depth, and realism of the books are added superb direction, and for kids, good acting. Particularly the dragon vs broomstick sequence where the dragon is climbing around the roof of a spire to get to Harry. Very gritty, very real.
Truth is the subjection of reality to an individuals perception
Not sure if you have read the books. Movie four was a big disappointment for us book fans because they had to cut out so much from the book. In the book the Quiddich World Cup is over 100 pages long and the movie cut it to about 10 minutes.
______________________ stuff + cats = awesome
-
Not sure if you have read the books. Movie four was a big disappointment for us book fans because they had to cut out so much from the book. In the book the Quiddich World Cup is over 100 pages long and the movie cut it to about 10 minutes.
______________________ stuff + cats = awesome
Sure, but that book was three times the size of the first three. They had to cut alot of stuff. I am not a Harry Potter fan, but I have huge respect for her writing skills. What I liked about the movie was the way it was made, the quality of it, and that it follwed the spirit of the book closely and that it was a mature filem, not affraid to tackle sensitive issues, and not suffering from political correctness. That, as a film, it would sell widely abroad, and that it shows that there is still massive tallent in the British Film industry beyond Hugh Grant.
Truth is the subjection of reality to an individuals perception
-
Sure, but that book was three times the size of the first three. They had to cut alot of stuff. I am not a Harry Potter fan, but I have huge respect for her writing skills. What I liked about the movie was the way it was made, the quality of it, and that it follwed the spirit of the book closely and that it was a mature filem, not affraid to tackle sensitive issues, and not suffering from political correctness. That, as a film, it would sell widely abroad, and that it shows that there is still massive tallent in the British Film industry beyond Hugh Grant.
Truth is the subjection of reality to an individuals perception
fat_boy wrote:
beyond Hugh Grant.
No one has talent beyond Hugh Grant. :rolleyes:
BW
Quick to judge, quick to anger, slow to understand.
Ignorance and prejudice and fear walk hand in hand.
-- Neil Peart -
Sure, but that book was three times the size of the first three. They had to cut alot of stuff. I am not a Harry Potter fan, but I have huge respect for her writing skills. What I liked about the movie was the way it was made, the quality of it, and that it follwed the spirit of the book closely and that it was a mature filem, not affraid to tackle sensitive issues, and not suffering from political correctness. That, as a film, it would sell widely abroad, and that it shows that there is still massive tallent in the British Film industry beyond Hugh Grant.
Truth is the subjection of reality to an individuals perception
-
Sure, but that book was three times the size of the first three. They had to cut alot of stuff. I am not a Harry Potter fan, but I have huge respect for her writing skills. What I liked about the movie was the way it was made, the quality of it, and that it follwed the spirit of the book closely and that it was a mature filem, not affraid to tackle sensitive issues, and not suffering from political correctness. That, as a film, it would sell widely abroad, and that it shows that there is still massive tallent in the British Film industry beyond Hugh Grant.
Truth is the subjection of reality to an individuals perception
-
fat_boy wrote:
as mundane as ones own life.
My life is not mundane, but then again, I don't watch TV or very many movies, so my measure of mundane is not biased by superheros, 2D cartoon characters, or people stuck on islands with great healthcare plans. :) Marc
-
Not sure if you have read the books. Movie four was a big disappointment for us book fans because they had to cut out so much from the book. In the book the Quiddich World Cup is over 100 pages long and the movie cut it to about 10 minutes.
______________________ stuff + cats = awesome
leckey wrote:
In the book the Quiddich World Cup is over 100 pages long and the movie cut it to about 10 minutes.
You think that's bad? Lord of the Rings had something like 100 pages just on Frodo's food cravings - how much of that do you think made it into the movie... :rolleyes: ;P
----
...the wind blows over it and it is gone, and its place remembers it no more...
-
Rage wrote:
Lord of the Rings, really awesome.
After years of ignoring these movies, I watched out of curiousity a few weeks ago. I was disguisted with the changes to the storyline. It added nothing to the story for me and certainly was not as good as the book. Marc
Personally, I've never been able to finish the Lord of the Rings books. I always seem to get partway through the second book, put it down and just never pick it up again. This is not because I don't like reading, or am a slow reader or anything else - it's because the books just aren't that great. The movies on the other hand, are extremely good - and I am not usually one to prefer the movie over the book.
Sunrise Wallpaper Project | The StartPage Randomizer | A Random Web Page
-
fat_boy wrote:
very real
When was the last time you were chased by a dragon while riding a broomstick? Marc
My last design review. Incidentally, the dragon took the broomstick away from me, and tried to shove it up my a**. Next question?
Software Zen:
delete this; -
fat_boy wrote:
very real
When was the last time you were chased by a dragon while riding a broomstick? Marc
Marc Clifton wrote:
When was the last time you were chased by a dragon while riding a broomstick?
Personally never, but how long has it been since your divorce? (Not that I can fathom what the process was like, but from the way you have described her well need I say more) :rolleyes: