Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Choosing a Environment

Choosing a Environment

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
csharpc++delphivisual-studiocom
24 Posts 14 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P Programm3r

    Hi all, So the other day my boss asked me to make a decision on whether we should continue using Borland C++ Builder 2006 or whether we should make a shift to Visual Studio 2005. So I thought lets hear what the CP members have so say. So which one would you choose and why? Many Thanks Regards,


    The only programmers that are better than C programmers are those who code in 1's and 0's..... :) :)Programm3r My Blog: ^_^

    B Offline
    B Offline
    Brady Kelly
    wrote on last edited by
    #14

    Have you found a Community Dist. agent? Maybe you can use the Orcas beta in making your decision. If you like Orcas beta, then VS2005 is the right step in that direction.

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • P Programm3r

      Hi all, So the other day my boss asked me to make a decision on whether we should continue using Borland C++ Builder 2006 or whether we should make a shift to Visual Studio 2005. So I thought lets hear what the CP members have so say. So which one would you choose and why? Many Thanks Regards,


      The only programmers that are better than C programmers are those who code in 1's and 0's..... :) :)Programm3r My Blog: ^_^

      D Offline
      D Offline
      DavidNohejl
      wrote on last edited by
      #15

      I don't know Borland C++ Builder 2006 but why is VS so great? Integration, integration... Does VS have better intellisense? Better debugger? Better plugins? Integration with more languages? (Even if you stick with C++, for some interop it sure is handy? ) btw, Choosing an Environment ;)


      "Throughout human history, we have been dependent on machines to survive. Fate, it seems, is not without a sense of irony. " - Morpheus "Real men use mspaint for writing code and notepad for designing graphics." - Anna-Jayne Metcalfe

      P 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • B Brady Kelly

        Have you found a Community Dist. agent? Maybe you can use the Orcas beta in making your decision. If you like Orcas beta, then VS2005 is the right step in that direction.

        P Offline
        P Offline
        Programm3r
        wrote on last edited by
        #16

        Brady Kelly wrote:

        Have you found a Community Dist. agent?

        Yes I have found one, and I'm going in next week to pick up Orcas at his work ... can't wait. (Downloading it ... it's tooooooo big) Regards,


        The only programmers that are better than C programmers are those who code in 1's and 0's..... :) :)Programm3r My Blog: ^_^

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • D DavidNohejl

          I don't know Borland C++ Builder 2006 but why is VS so great? Integration, integration... Does VS have better intellisense? Better debugger? Better plugins? Integration with more languages? (Even if you stick with C++, for some interop it sure is handy? ) btw, Choosing an Environment ;)


          "Throughout human history, we have been dependent on machines to survive. Fate, it seems, is not without a sense of irony. " - Morpheus "Real men use mspaint for writing code and notepad for designing graphics." - Anna-Jayne Metcalfe

          P Offline
          P Offline
          Programm3r
          wrote on last edited by
          #17

          Thanks for your reply ... well to answer your question, that is what I'm trying to establish. Regards,


          The only programmers that are better than C programmers are those who code in 1's and 0's..... :) :)Programm3r My Blog: ^_^

          D 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • P Programm3r

            Thanks for your reply ... well to answer your question, that is what I'm trying to establish. Regards,


            The only programmers that are better than C programmers are those who code in 1's and 0's..... :) :)Programm3r My Blog: ^_^

            D Offline
            D Offline
            DavidNohejl
            wrote on last edited by
            #18

            Programm3r wrote:

            well to answer your question, that is what I'm trying to establish.

            Well as I said I don't know C++ Builder so I can't answer that for you, but you can get trial version or express edition of VS and find out, I was just pointing where I think VS is very strong.


            "Throughout human history, we have been dependent on machines to survive. Fate, it seems, is not without a sense of irony. " - Morpheus "Real men use mspaint for writing code and notepad for designing graphics." - Anna-Jayne Metcalfe

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • P Programm3r

              Hi all, So the other day my boss asked me to make a decision on whether we should continue using Borland C++ Builder 2006 or whether we should make a shift to Visual Studio 2005. So I thought lets hear what the CP members have so say. So which one would you choose and why? Many Thanks Regards,


              The only programmers that are better than C programmers are those who code in 1's and 0's..... :) :)Programm3r My Blog: ^_^

              L Offline
              L Offline
              Lost User
              wrote on last edited by
              #19

              Borland is fading away, try to find a site similar to :bob:land that supports it.

              The tigress is here :-D

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • P Programm3r

                Hi all, So the other day my boss asked me to make a decision on whether we should continue using Borland C++ Builder 2006 or whether we should make a shift to Visual Studio 2005. So I thought lets hear what the CP members have so say. So which one would you choose and why? Many Thanks Regards,


                The only programmers that are better than C programmers are those who code in 1's and 0's..... :) :)Programm3r My Blog: ^_^

                E Offline
                E Offline
                ednrgc
                wrote on last edited by
                #20

                For windows development, stay with Builder. For web development make the move.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • P Programm3r

                  Hi all, So the other day my boss asked me to make a decision on whether we should continue using Borland C++ Builder 2006 or whether we should make a shift to Visual Studio 2005. So I thought lets hear what the CP members have so say. So which one would you choose and why? Many Thanks Regards,


                  The only programmers that are better than C programmers are those who code in 1's and 0's..... :) :)Programm3r My Blog: ^_^

                  D Offline
                  D Offline
                  da toolman
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #21

                  Having used both, I prefer VS 2005. Borland has good tools, but I think that VS 2005 has a richer feature set. Besides, for the amount of $$$ it takes to get into Borland, you can spend roughly the same amount and get into MSDN and get a whole lot more than just a development environment.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • P Programm3r

                    Hi all, So the other day my boss asked me to make a decision on whether we should continue using Borland C++ Builder 2006 or whether we should make a shift to Visual Studio 2005. So I thought lets hear what the CP members have so say. So which one would you choose and why? Many Thanks Regards,


                    The only programmers that are better than C programmers are those who code in 1's and 0's..... :) :)Programm3r My Blog: ^_^

                    D Offline
                    D Offline
                    David Crow
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #22

                    Is there something that Borland C++ Builder 2006 is not doing for you?


                    "A good athlete is the result of a good and worthy opponent." - David Crow

                    "To have a respect for ourselves guides our morals; to have deference for others governs our manners." - Laurence Sterne

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • P Programm3r

                      Hi all, So the other day my boss asked me to make a decision on whether we should continue using Borland C++ Builder 2006 or whether we should make a shift to Visual Studio 2005. So I thought lets hear what the CP members have so say. So which one would you choose and why? Many Thanks Regards,


                      The only programmers that are better than C programmers are those who code in 1's and 0's..... :) :)Programm3r My Blog: ^_^

                      J Offline
                      J Offline
                      Joan M
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #23

                      In my case I prefer VS. I have worked with Borland in the past and I've found it very easy to handle the VCL objects and components, but it is more powerful to use the MFC if needed. Hope this helps.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • P Programm3r

                        Hi all, So the other day my boss asked me to make a decision on whether we should continue using Borland C++ Builder 2006 or whether we should make a shift to Visual Studio 2005. So I thought lets hear what the CP members have so say. So which one would you choose and why? Many Thanks Regards,


                        The only programmers that are better than C programmers are those who code in 1's and 0's..... :) :)Programm3r My Blog: ^_^

                        J Offline
                        J Offline
                        Joe Woodbury
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #24

                        One reason to go with VS 2005 is that it's much easier to hire people. It also gives you a more marketable skill. On the other hand, you become more replaceable.

                        Anyone who thinks he has a better idea of what's good for people than people do is a swine. - P.J. O'Rourke

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups