Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. No More Black Holes?

No More Black Holes?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
csharphtmlcomtoolsquestion
13 Posts 12 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    Bassam Abdul Baki
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Great, first Pluto is not a planet, now black holes[^] don't exist. Why even teach astronomy or science anymore?


    "Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive." - Sir Walter Scott Web - Blog - RSS - Math - LinkedIn - BM

    M D A S S 5 Replies Last reply
    0
    • B Bassam Abdul Baki

      Great, first Pluto is not a planet, now black holes[^] don't exist. Why even teach astronomy or science anymore?


      "Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive." - Sir Walter Scott Web - Blog - RSS - Math - LinkedIn - BM

      M Offline
      M Offline
      Marc Clifton
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Bassam Abdul-Baki wrote:

      Why even teach astronomy or science anymore?

      A wise question. It is much better to teach critical thinking than to fill our children's minds with "facts". Marc

      Thyme In The Country
      Interacx
      My Blog

      P J 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • B Bassam Abdul Baki

        Great, first Pluto is not a planet, now black holes[^] don't exist. Why even teach astronomy or science anymore?


        "Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive." - Sir Walter Scott Web - Blog - RSS - Math - LinkedIn - BM

        D Offline
        D Offline
        dighn
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        It has always been a theoretical construct with evidence that just suggests actual existence. Science is always evolving. It does not pretend to know EXACTLY how the universe functions; anything more is faith.

        M T 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • B Bassam Abdul Baki

          Great, first Pluto is not a planet, now black holes[^] don't exist. Why even teach astronomy or science anymore?


          "Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive." - Sir Walter Scott Web - Blog - RSS - Math - LinkedIn - BM

          A Offline
          A Offline
          Andy Brummer
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Yeah, I saw that earlier this week. From the article in science news that I read, it would do more then revolutionize astrophysics because it's based on a new theory that contradicts some existing accepted results, but again IANAP. I'm not saying it's right or wrong, just that there is a really good chance the media is just blowing this out of proportion.


          No, it's a man given right. Some things are cow given. Like milk. Milk doesn't kill, but is a much better calcium source than guns are. - Joergen Sigvardsson

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • D dighn

            It has always been a theoretical construct with evidence that just suggests actual existence. Science is always evolving. It does not pretend to know EXACTLY how the universe functions; anything more is faith.

            M Offline
            M Offline
            Marc Clifton
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            dighn wrote:

            It has always been a theoretical construct

            Sadly, "theoretical" is not in the vocabulary of our media or our education system. Unless you talk about creation and the theory of evolution, hahaha. Words are used to serve when they serve, and are omitted when they confuse or require people to think. The political system makes the world black and white while the politically correct would like to make it all a single shade of gray. Color? What's that? It's too threatening. Marc

            Thyme In The Country
            Interacx
            My Blog

            K 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • D dighn

              It has always been a theoretical construct with evidence that just suggests actual existence. Science is always evolving. It does not pretend to know EXACTLY how the universe functions; anything more is faith.

              T Offline
              T Offline
              TJDEV
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Precisely! I was reading about global warming and how everyone's so concerned because scientists are so positive its happening that they're mainly all in agreement. Then I found some web sites which throw a bit of logic at that theory and now I dont know what to believe. I think I believe that in 50 years or so scientists will probably have reversed their opinions several times. A lot of good reading on that if you're interested: http://www.norcalblogs.com/watts/ http://www.discussglobalwarming.com/blog/ http://gamoonbat.blogspot.com/ to name just a few. So, yea - I believe that they've changed their minds on blackholes.

              C 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • T TJDEV

                Precisely! I was reading about global warming and how everyone's so concerned because scientists are so positive its happening that they're mainly all in agreement. Then I found some web sites which throw a bit of logic at that theory and now I dont know what to believe. I think I believe that in 50 years or so scientists will probably have reversed their opinions several times. A lot of good reading on that if you're interested: http://www.norcalblogs.com/watts/ http://www.discussglobalwarming.com/blog/ http://gamoonbat.blogspot.com/ to name just a few. So, yea - I believe that they've changed their minds on blackholes.

                C Offline
                C Offline
                Chris Losinger
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                TJDEV wrote:

                Then I found some web sites which throw a bit of logic at that theory and now I dont know what to believe.

                you can either believe that the vast majority of scientists working in the field are illogical, deluded herd-followers, and that the world is teeming with idiot-savant amateur climatologists who can figure it all out without going through the hassle of learning the details, or you can believe the opposite.

                TJDEV wrote:

                So, yea - I believe that they've changed their minds on blackholes.

                the article doesn't say that at all. it says one group published a paper. their conclusions will now be tested by the rest of the cosmologists in the world.

                image processing toolkits | batch image processing | blogging

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • B Bassam Abdul Baki

                  Great, first Pluto is not a planet, now black holes[^] don't exist. Why even teach astronomy or science anymore?


                  "Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive." - Sir Walter Scott Web - Blog - RSS - Math - LinkedIn - BM

                  S Offline
                  S Offline
                  Steve Mayfield
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Black Holes do exist...I see one everytime I open my pay envelope... :rolleyes: :doh: :laugh: Steve

                  K 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Marc Clifton

                    dighn wrote:

                    It has always been a theoretical construct

                    Sadly, "theoretical" is not in the vocabulary of our media or our education system. Unless you talk about creation and the theory of evolution, hahaha. Words are used to serve when they serve, and are omitted when they confuse or require people to think. The political system makes the world black and white while the politically correct would like to make it all a single shade of gray. Color? What's that? It's too threatening. Marc

                    Thyme In The Country
                    Interacx
                    My Blog

                    K Offline
                    K Offline
                    keyboard warrior
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    @Marc haha! i love a good creation joke ;P

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • B Bassam Abdul Baki

                      Great, first Pluto is not a planet, now black holes[^] don't exist. Why even teach astronomy or science anymore?


                      "Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive." - Sir Walter Scott Web - Blog - RSS - Math - LinkedIn - BM

                      S Offline
                      S Offline
                      Stuart Dootson
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      That's the wonderful thing about the scientific method - we have to be willing to put aside commonly held theories (beliefs, if you will) when they can be shown not to fit the observable universe.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S Steve Mayfield

                        Black Holes do exist...I see one everytime I open my pay envelope... :rolleyes: :doh: :laugh: Steve

                        K Offline
                        K Offline
                        KevinMac
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        Yeah and so much for leakage since ever seems to get leaked out even randomly from my pay envelope. :-D

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • M Marc Clifton

                          Bassam Abdul-Baki wrote:

                          Why even teach astronomy or science anymore?

                          A wise question. It is much better to teach critical thinking than to fill our children's minds with "facts". Marc

                          Thyme In The Country
                          Interacx
                          My Blog

                          P Offline
                          P Offline
                          peterchen
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          Well, if you wrote your sentence like that: A wise question. It is much better to teach "critical thinking" than to fill our children's minds with facts. it would make sense, too.


                          We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
                          My first real C# project | Linkify!|FoldWithUs! | sighist

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M Marc Clifton

                            Bassam Abdul-Baki wrote:

                            Why even teach astronomy or science anymore?

                            A wise question. It is much better to teach critical thinking than to fill our children's minds with "facts". Marc

                            Thyme In The Country
                            Interacx
                            My Blog

                            J Offline
                            J Offline
                            Jerry Hammond
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            Still, one must ask themself--think about if it you will--how will we be able to identify critical thinking skills without the facts to support the conclusions?

                            "We are all repositories for genetically-encoded information that we're all spreading back and forth amongst each other, all the time. We're just lousy with information." - Neal Stephenson

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • World
                            • Users
                            • Groups