Satips- I-am :)
-
peterchen wrote:
The ending makes me suspicous...
And not the title?:rolleyes:
He's become a household word in the Lounge. A whole new phraseology has evolved. Post a link or reply with a smiley and rose, and you've made a "Satipsism". So what? It's an interesting thing about the Internet, the evolution (as in change, not progress) of tone, quality, terminology, etc. -Marc Clifton. Best wishes to Rexx[^
Which title? peterchen pulls his notebook, ready to take note of every suspicous and/or conspiring behavior
We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
My first real C# project | Linkify!|FoldWithUs! | sighist -
Which title? peterchen pulls his notebook, ready to take note of every suspicous and/or conspiring behavior
We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
My first real C# project | Linkify!|FoldWithUs! | sighistIn the actual post I've put lots of :laugh: :rose:(LOLs&ROSE!) at the end. I guessed if that made you suspect if Satips had actually posted that message. So I said "why not the title".. which is ofcourse "Satips-I-am" :-D. Or you meant the story's ending?
He's become a household word in the Lounge. A whole new phraseology has evolved. Post a link or reply with a smiley and rose, and you've made a "Satipsism". So what? It's an interesting thing about the Internet, the evolution (as in change, not progress) of tone, quality, terminology, etc. -Marc Clifton. Best wishes to Rexx[^
-
Yeah I'll spend time if it amuses ;).. moreover I'd be just reading the messages in the lounge & youtubing if I hadn't typed that one..Anyway Satips things have taken up a considerable time of mine though.
He's become a household word in the Lounge. A whole new phraseology has evolved. Post a link or reply with a smiley and rose, and you've made a "Satipsism". So what? It's an interesting thing about the Internet, the evolution (as in change, not progress) of tone, quality, terminology, etc. -Marc Clifton. Best wishes to Rexx[^
VuNic wrote:
Satips things have taken up a considerable time of mine
Time to move on. :rolleyes:
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes -
VuNic wrote:
But dude dont talk rude I dont like it. If you dont like the post, vote it down or ignore.
Weren't you and other satip haters being rude again n again to him? I have been ignoring such kind of posts for sometime, but this one took the cake.
Prakash. wrote:
I have been ignoring such kind of posts for sometime
The noise level is up pretty high lately. Sometimes worse than the thing they are supposedly trying to stop.
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes -
Watch this Video before you go ahead..It's about Norm.net & Satips[^] It's taken more than 20 mins of my Sunday.. Anyway that's fun. A theme song for the Satipsians :-D.. go ahead. **Satips:**I am Satips. Satips-I-am. Norm.net : "Satips I am" ??:~ I do not like that Satips I am.:zzz: Satips: Would you like some LOLs:laugh::laugh: and :rose:Rose? Norm.net: I do not like "Satips I am" X| , I do not like LOLS&ROSE. X| CHORUS:(He does not like Satips I am.. he does not like LOLs&ROSE) Satips: Wld u lyk 2 read thm here ? Wld u lyke 2 read thm thre? Norm.net : I would NOT like to read them here. I would NOT like to read them there. I WOULD NOT LIKE TO READ THEM ANYWHERE.:mad: I do not like LOLs&ROSE and I do not like Satips-I-am. Satips: Wld u lyk thm in the lonuge? wld u like them wid the blunge? Norm.net: I Would not like them in the lounge! would not like them with the blunge!.:doh: Satips: Wld u like thm in the (Soap)Box? wld u like thm wid the toxx Norm.net : No! Not in the Box, not with the Toxx. Not in the lounge , not with with a blunge. Satips : wld u ? cld u? with Vasu..D.Kumar? Read thm, read thm.. Hre they R[^] Norm.net : I would not, I could not read them anywhere!! Satips: wld u lyk to read thm with Kyle?:-> wld u lyk to read with a smile?:-O Norm.net : Not with smile not with Kyle!!!. Satips: U may lyk thm U wil C. U wil lyk thm in the (Message)tree. Norm.net : I will not I cannot in a tree, let me free. Not with in a box.. not with the toxx.. not not not... Satips: U do not lyk them so 2 say, try thm try thm and U may I say. Norm.net : Satips,If U let me free, I will try them and you'll see. ( Reads his posts....
This is an unnecessarily vindictive affront to Santips. Santips is trying to reform his behavior to be more acceptable in the lounge. Let your hatred rest. I hope if you're ever in a similar situation that people are more compassionate.
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes -
Watch this Video before you go ahead..It's about Norm.net & Satips[^] It's taken more than 20 mins of my Sunday.. Anyway that's fun. A theme song for the Satipsians :-D.. go ahead. **Satips:**I am Satips. Satips-I-am. Norm.net : "Satips I am" ??:~ I do not like that Satips I am.:zzz: Satips: Would you like some LOLs:laugh::laugh: and :rose:Rose? Norm.net: I do not like "Satips I am" X| , I do not like LOLS&ROSE. X| CHORUS:(He does not like Satips I am.. he does not like LOLs&ROSE) Satips: Wld u lyk 2 read thm here ? Wld u lyke 2 read thm thre? Norm.net : I would NOT like to read them here. I would NOT like to read them there. I WOULD NOT LIKE TO READ THEM ANYWHERE.:mad: I do not like LOLs&ROSE and I do not like Satips-I-am. Satips: Wld u lyk thm in the lonuge? wld u like them wid the blunge? Norm.net: I Would not like them in the lounge! would not like them with the blunge!.:doh: Satips: Wld u like thm in the (Soap)Box? wld u like thm wid the toxx Norm.net : No! Not in the Box, not with the Toxx. Not in the lounge , not with with a blunge. Satips : wld u ? cld u? with Vasu..D.Kumar? Read thm, read thm.. Hre they R[^] Norm.net : I would not, I could not read them anywhere!! Satips: wld u lyk to read thm with Kyle?:-> wld u lyk to read with a smile?:-O Norm.net : Not with smile not with Kyle!!!. Satips: U may lyk thm U wil C. U wil lyk thm in the (Message)tree. Norm.net : I will not I cannot in a tree, let me free. Not with in a box.. not with the toxx.. not not not... Satips: U do not lyk them so 2 say, try thm try thm and U may I say. Norm.net : Satips,If U let me free, I will try them and you'll see. ( Reads his posts....
-
Prakash. wrote:
I have been ignoring such kind of posts for sometime
The noise level is up pretty high lately. Sometimes worse than the thing they are supposedly trying to stop.
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes -
JimmyRopes wrote:
Sometimes worse than the thing they are supposedly trying to stop.
And often the meta-posts that talk about noise levels of the anti-noise posts overwhelms everything.:rolleyes:
:beer:
Smith# wrote:
And often the meta-posts that talk about noise levels of the anti-noise posts overwhelms everything.
Perfect description of your post. :rolleyes:
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes -
VuNic wrote:
But dude dont talk rude I dont like it. If you dont like the post, vote it down or ignore.
Weren't you and other satip haters being rude again n again to him? I have been ignoring such kind of posts for sometime, but this one took the cake.
Prakash. wrote:
Weren't you and other satip haters being rude again n again to him?
WTF you want here? Trying to say something?:confused: "Satips-Haters"? Are you trying to coin a new word? Dont strain, it's already there as "Spam-Haters". Spammers/Tolls/Bots have to be treated in a different way untill they stop doing it. :mad:
:beer:
-
Smith# wrote:
And often the meta-posts that talk about noise levels of the anti-noise posts overwhelms everything.
Perfect description of your post. :rolleyes:
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes -
I thought you are a smart man, but this makes you look like a parasite attached on to satips back. But satip is trying hard to shake you off but no he can't coz you have your .... wtf, move on dude.
I am sure Satips enjoys a bit of adulation :-)
Regards, Nish
Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
My latest book : C++/CLI in Action / Amazon.com link -
This is an unnecessarily vindictive affront to Santips. Santips is trying to reform his behavior to be more acceptable in the lounge. Let your hatred rest. I hope if you're ever in a similar situation that people are more compassionate.
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes -
I am sure Satips enjoys a bit of adulation :-)
Regards, Nish
Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
My latest book : C++/CLI in Action / Amazon.com link -
Why do you tend to give a soft handle to spams mate? Crush em. If not crushed on time they'll crush us with junks very soon.
:beer:
Smith# wrote:
Why do you tend to give a soft handle to spams mate?
Santips is trying to reform. If only vindictive people would just let it rest there is room for him in this community. His transgression wasn't mean spirited or vindictive like other abusers so why all the hatred toward him in particular? Could it be that he is viewed as an easy target because he doesn't respond in kind? Are the predators just looking for a soft target?
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes -
Smith# wrote:
Why do you tend to give a soft handle to spams mate?
Santips is trying to reform. If only vindictive people would just let it rest there is room for him in this community. His transgression wasn't mean spirited or vindictive like other abusers so why all the hatred toward him in particular? Could it be that he is viewed as an easy target because he doesn't respond in kind? Are the predators just looking for a soft target?
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopesJimmyRopes wrote:
Santips is trying to reform.
If he's really under transformation, he'd have stopped posting for a while and started thinking what not to do. Atleast for a few days, till he resumes his "activity". I've never seen him stop. Though I couldn't spot him around today. I'll be happy if he takes a break and comes back afresh as a sane-tips.
:beer:
-
Smith# wrote:
I guess he's gone. He's not been seen around for a while
He's here alright - except under a new identity. :-) You just can't keep Satips out of the action!
Regards, Nish
Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
My latest book : C++/CLI in Action / Amazon.com link -
Smith# wrote:
I guess he's gone. He's not been seen around for a while
He's here alright - except under a new identity. :-) You just can't keep Satips out of the action!
Regards, Nish
Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
My latest book : C++/CLI in Action / Amazon.com link -
JimmyRopes wrote:
Santips is trying to reform.
If he's really under transformation, he'd have stopped posting for a while and started thinking what not to do. Atleast for a few days, till he resumes his "activity". I've never seen him stop. Though I couldn't spot him around today. I'll be happy if he takes a break and comes back afresh as a sane-tips.
:beer:
Smith# wrote:
If he's really under transformation, he'd have stopped posting for a while and started thinking what not to do. Atleast for a few days, till he resumes his "activity". I've never seen him stop.
Why does he need to stop? Because the jackals want to taste blood? He has toned down his posts in response to criticism so why does he need to be banished? Good behavior should be rewarded.
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes -
In the actual post I've put lots of :laugh: :rose:(LOLs&ROSE!) at the end. I guessed if that made you suspect if Satips had actually posted that message. So I said "why not the title".. which is ofcourse "Satips-I-am" :-D. Or you meant the story's ending?
He's become a household word in the Lounge. A whole new phraseology has evolved. Post a link or reply with a smiley and rose, and you've made a "Satipsism". So what? It's an interesting thing about the Internet, the evolution (as in change, not progress) of tone, quality, terminology, etc. -Marc Clifton. Best wishes to Rexx[^
Yessss the latter - in the end he start to like Sam-I-Ams plate of food. IIRC (and my memory is dim here), Nish started out with as mush pointless and frequent posting. (Though he showed more.. use of brain right from the beginning)
We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
My first real C# project | Linkify!|FoldWithUs! | sighist -
Smith# wrote:
Why do you tend to give a soft handle to spams mate?
Santips is trying to reform. If only vindictive people would just let it rest there is room for him in this community. His transgression wasn't mean spirited or vindictive like other abusers so why all the hatred toward him in particular? Could it be that he is viewed as an easy target because he doesn't respond in kind? Are the predators just looking for a soft target?
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes