Armedinijad is a coward
-
Why didn't he do his usual Farsi skit? It has the same anti imperialist rhetoric that turns on all those rich leftist students, but with a little more conviction. I'm betting they still would have cheered[^]. Of course, MEMRI probably deliberately mistranslated "Death to Israel" from "Democratic self determination for the Palestinian people".
:suss:
-
Why didn't he do his usual Farsi skit? It has the same anti imperialist rhetoric that turns on all those rich leftist students, but with a little more conviction. I'm betting they still would have cheered[^]. Of course, MEMRI probably deliberately mistranslated "Death to Israel" from "Democratic self determination for the Palestinian people".
There are quite a few "leftists" who would not cheer Ahmadinejad, who would only be interested in hearing him speak for the sake of knowing the enemy (or as a study in abnormal psychology, to put it in an educational context), and who see him not as a respected world leader, but as a blustering, mentally deficient, hyper-religious tool. You know, just like the one running our country.
-
Why didn't he do his usual Farsi skit? It has the same anti imperialist rhetoric that turns on all those rich leftist students, but with a little more conviction. I'm betting they still would have cheered[^]. Of course, MEMRI probably deliberately mistranslated "Death to Israel" from "Democratic self determination for the Palestinian people".
I fully expected cheering from the leftists in the audience, but it's still unsettling that about 1/5 of our country falls into that camp. Even Vincent above is hesitant to overtly condemn Ahmadinejad and equates him to our own president. Sadly, that kind of treacherous extremism is becoming more and more common in this country.
If liberals are not traitors, their only fallback argument at this point is that they're really stupid. -Ann Coulter
-
There are quite a few "leftists" who would not cheer Ahmadinejad, who would only be interested in hearing him speak for the sake of knowing the enemy (or as a study in abnormal psychology, to put it in an educational context), and who see him not as a respected world leader, but as a blustering, mentally deficient, hyper-religious tool. You know, just like the one running our country.
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
There are quite a few "leftists" who would not cheer Ahmadinejad,
Yep, there are a fair number Harry's place[^] is one of the best political blogs in the UK. Oliver Kamm and Christopher Hitchens too. I'm sure you are aware of quite how much abuse they get from the (for want of a better word) Chomskyite left - where the enemies are American imperialism and Zionism and anyone who can spout the right rhetoric gets a pass.
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
hearing him speak for the sake of knowing the enemy
So what was with the cheering?
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
just like the one running our country.
George Bush is a theocrat?
-
I fully expected cheering from the leftists in the audience, but it's still unsettling that about 1/5 of our country falls into that camp. Even Vincent above is hesitant to overtly condemn Ahmadinejad and equates him to our own president. Sadly, that kind of treacherous extremism is becoming more and more common in this country.
If liberals are not traitors, their only fallback argument at this point is that they're really stupid. -Ann Coulter
Red Stateler wrote:
Even Vincent above is hesitant to overtly condemn Ahmadinejad and equates him to our own president.
I am overtly condemning him and equating him to our own president. No treachery, no extremism, and no hesitation. Reading comprehension, Red, will never be your strong suit. Unless, of course, you don't consider "blustering, mentally deficient, hyper-religious tool" to be a condemnation.
-
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
There are quite a few "leftists" who would not cheer Ahmadinejad,
Yep, there are a fair number Harry's place[^] is one of the best political blogs in the UK. Oliver Kamm and Christopher Hitchens too. I'm sure you are aware of quite how much abuse they get from the (for want of a better word) Chomskyite left - where the enemies are American imperialism and Zionism and anyone who can spout the right rhetoric gets a pass.
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
hearing him speak for the sake of knowing the enemy
So what was with the cheering?
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
just like the one running our country.
George Bush is a theocrat?
Ryan Roberts wrote:
George Bush is a theocrat?
That is certainly the view of leftists.
If liberals are not traitors, their only fallback argument at this point is that they're really stupid. -Ann Coulter
-
Red Stateler wrote:
Even Vincent above is hesitant to overtly condemn Ahmadinejad and equates him to our own president.
I am overtly condemning him and equating him to our own president. No treachery, no extremism, and no hesitation. Reading comprehension, Red, will never be your strong suit. Unless, of course, you don't consider "blustering, mentally deficient, hyper-religious tool" to be a condemnation.
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
I am overtly condemning him and equating him to our own president. No treachery, no extremism, and no hesitation. Reading comprehension, Red, will never be your strong suit. Unless, of course, you don't consider "blustering, mentally deficient, hyper-religious tool" to be a condemnation.
Absolutely not. Equating the head of a terrorist state to our own president is elevating him far beyond the stature he deserves. That is not condemnation by any stretch. This is precisely why the left is so despised by the reasonable people in this country.
If liberals are not traitors, their only fallback argument at this point is that they're really stupid. -Ann Coulter
-
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
There are quite a few "leftists" who would not cheer Ahmadinejad,
Yep, there are a fair number Harry's place[^] is one of the best political blogs in the UK. Oliver Kamm and Christopher Hitchens too. I'm sure you are aware of quite how much abuse they get from the (for want of a better word) Chomskyite left - where the enemies are American imperialism and Zionism and anyone who can spout the right rhetoric gets a pass.
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
hearing him speak for the sake of knowing the enemy
So what was with the cheering?
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
just like the one running our country.
George Bush is a theocrat?
Ryan Roberts wrote:
Yep, there are a fair number Harry's place[^] is one of the best political blogs in the UK. Oliver Kamm and Christopher Hitchens too. I'm sure you are aware of quite how much abuse they get from the (for want of a better word) Chomskyite left - where the enemies are American imperialism and Zionism and anyone who can spout the right rhetoric gets a pass.
Chomsky is an idiot. A very literate, well-spoken idiot, but an idiot nonetheless, as are those who hang on his every word like gospel.
Ryan Roberts wrote:
So what was with the cheering?
There is certainly no shortage of (to borrow your word) Chomskyites on college campuses.
Ryan Roberts wrote:
George Bush is a theocrat?
I didn't say he was a theocrat. I said he was a blustering, mentally deficient, hyper-religious tool. I think he would be comfortable as a theocrat, but I believe he's more likely to end up as a baseball commissioner.
-
Ryan Roberts wrote:
George Bush is a theocrat?
That is certainly the view of leftists.
If liberals are not traitors, their only fallback argument at this point is that they're really stupid. -Ann Coulter
Red Stateler wrote:
That is certainly the view of leftists.
Guess I'm not a leftist after all.
-
Ryan Roberts wrote:
Yep, there are a fair number Harry's place[^] is one of the best political blogs in the UK. Oliver Kamm and Christopher Hitchens too. I'm sure you are aware of quite how much abuse they get from the (for want of a better word) Chomskyite left - where the enemies are American imperialism and Zionism and anyone who can spout the right rhetoric gets a pass.
Chomsky is an idiot. A very literate, well-spoken idiot, but an idiot nonetheless, as are those who hang on his every word like gospel.
Ryan Roberts wrote:
So what was with the cheering?
There is certainly no shortage of (to borrow your word) Chomskyites on college campuses.
Ryan Roberts wrote:
George Bush is a theocrat?
I didn't say he was a theocrat. I said he was a blustering, mentally deficient, hyper-religious tool. I think he would be comfortable as a theocrat, but I believe he's more likely to end up as a baseball commissioner.
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
I think he would be comfortable as a theocrat, but I believe he's more likely to end up as a baseball commissioner.
:D
-
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
I am overtly condemning him and equating him to our own president. No treachery, no extremism, and no hesitation. Reading comprehension, Red, will never be your strong suit. Unless, of course, you don't consider "blustering, mentally deficient, hyper-religious tool" to be a condemnation.
Absolutely not. Equating the head of a terrorist state to our own president is elevating him far beyond the stature he deserves. That is not condemnation by any stretch. This is precisely why the left is so despised by the reasonable people in this country.
If liberals are not traitors, their only fallback argument at this point is that they're really stupid. -Ann Coulter
Red Stateler wrote:
Absolutely not. Equating the head of a terrorist state to our own president is elevating him far beyond the stature he deserves. That is not condemnation by any stretch. This is precisely why the left is so despised by the reasonable people in this country.
Again, Red, work on your reading comprehension. Ahmadenijad is a blustering, mentally deficient, hyper-religious tool. Do you consider that to be a condemnation?
-
Red Stateler wrote:
Absolutely not. Equating the head of a terrorist state to our own president is elevating him far beyond the stature he deserves. That is not condemnation by any stretch. This is precisely why the left is so despised by the reasonable people in this country.
Again, Red, work on your reading comprehension. Ahmadenijad is a blustering, mentally deficient, hyper-religious tool. Do you consider that to be a condemnation?
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
Again, Red, work on your reading comprehension. Ahmadenijad is a blustering, mentally deficient, hyper-religious tool. Do you consider that to be a condemnation?
I consider equating him to the position of our president to be a compliment. It's also further exposes your vitriolic, anti-American hatred.
If liberals are not traitors, their only fallback argument at this point is that they're really stupid. -Ann Coulter
-
Red Stateler wrote:
Absolutely not. Equating the head of a terrorist state to our own president is elevating him far beyond the stature he deserves. That is not condemnation by any stretch. This is precisely why the left is so despised by the reasonable people in this country.
Again, Red, work on your reading comprehension. Ahmadenijad is a blustering, mentally deficient, hyper-religious tool. Do you consider that to be a condemnation?
I guess I need to brush up on my reading as well, because when you say: "There are quite a few "leftists" who would not cheer Ahmadinejad, who would only be interested in hearing him speak for the sake of knowing the enemy (or as a study in abnormal psychology, to put it in an educational context), and who see him not as a respected world leader, but as a blustering, mentally deficient, hyper-religious tool. You know, just like the one running our country." That seems to imply that those people would equate the two. The only thing that seems unclear is whether you see Ahmadinejad as being a blustering, hyer-religous tool as well..... Your words, not mine.:|
Uptight Ex-Military Republican married to a Commie Lib - How weird is that?
-
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
Again, Red, work on your reading comprehension. Ahmadenijad is a blustering, mentally deficient, hyper-religious tool. Do you consider that to be a condemnation?
I consider equating him to the position of our president to be a compliment. It's also further exposes your vitriolic, anti-American hatred.
If liberals are not traitors, their only fallback argument at this point is that they're really stupid. -Ann Coulter
Red Stateler wrote:
I consider equating him to the position of our president to be a compliment. It's also further exposes your vitriolic, anti-American hatred.
I love my country. I don't like its current elected leaders. As much as it may make your brain hurt, those two views are not contradictory, and the ability to hold them both is one of the many things that makes this country great. And, as usual, you still didn't answer my question.
-
I guess I need to brush up on my reading as well, because when you say: "There are quite a few "leftists" who would not cheer Ahmadinejad, who would only be interested in hearing him speak for the sake of knowing the enemy (or as a study in abnormal psychology, to put it in an educational context), and who see him not as a respected world leader, but as a blustering, mentally deficient, hyper-religious tool. You know, just like the one running our country." That seems to imply that those people would equate the two. The only thing that seems unclear is whether you see Ahmadinejad as being a blustering, hyer-religous tool as well..... Your words, not mine.:|
Uptight Ex-Military Republican married to a Commie Lib - How weird is that?
Doug Goulden wrote:
That seems to imply that those people would equate the two. The only thing that seems unclear is whether you see Ahmadinejad as being a blustering, hyer-religous tool as well..... Your words, not mine.
Absolutely. And you left out "mentally deficient".
-
Ryan Roberts wrote:
Yep, there are a fair number Harry's place[^] is one of the best political blogs in the UK. Oliver Kamm and Christopher Hitchens too. I'm sure you are aware of quite how much abuse they get from the (for want of a better word) Chomskyite left - where the enemies are American imperialism and Zionism and anyone who can spout the right rhetoric gets a pass.
Chomsky is an idiot. A very literate, well-spoken idiot, but an idiot nonetheless, as are those who hang on his every word like gospel.
Ryan Roberts wrote:
So what was with the cheering?
There is certainly no shortage of (to borrow your word) Chomskyites on college campuses.
Ryan Roberts wrote:
George Bush is a theocrat?
I didn't say he was a theocrat. I said he was a blustering, mentally deficient, hyper-religious tool. I think he would be comfortable as a theocrat, but I believe he's more likely to end up as a baseball commissioner.
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
I didn't say he was a theocrat. I said he was a blustering, mentally deficient, hyper-religious tool. I think he would be comfortable as a theocrat, but I believe he's more likely to end up as a baseball commissioner.
:) What've you got against Bud Selig? In all honesty, I think Bush will be seen with contemptuous pity in 50 years. An otherwise half-way decent guy, utterly incapable of fulfilling his position and too proud to admit it. He's completely "out-Cartered" Jimmy Carter.
-- Russell Morris Morbo: "WINDMILLS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY!"
-
Vincent Reynolds wrote:
I am overtly condemning him and equating him to our own president. No treachery, no extremism, and no hesitation. Reading comprehension, Red, will never be your strong suit. Unless, of course, you don't consider "blustering, mentally deficient, hyper-religious tool" to be a condemnation.
Absolutely not. Equating the head of a terrorist state to our own president is elevating him far beyond the stature he deserves. That is not condemnation by any stretch. This is precisely why the left is so despised by the reasonable people in this country.
If liberals are not traitors, their only fallback argument at this point is that they're really stupid. -Ann Coulter
Red Stateler wrote:
is precisely why the left is so despised by the reasonable people in this country.
You wouldn't know reasonable if it jumped up and bit you in the ass. You're a right wing whack job just like your honey Ann Coulter.
Save an endangered species. The American Engineer.
-
Why didn't he do his usual Farsi skit? It has the same anti imperialist rhetoric that turns on all those rich leftist students, but with a little more conviction. I'm betting they still would have cheered[^]. Of course, MEMRI probably deliberately mistranslated "Death to Israel" from "Democratic self determination for the Palestinian people".
-
Why didn't he do his usual Farsi skit? It has the same anti imperialist rhetoric that turns on all those rich leftist students, but with a little more conviction. I'm betting they still would have cheered[^]. Of course, MEMRI probably deliberately mistranslated "Death to Israel" from "Democratic self determination for the Palestinian people".
You are on the same wavelenght as my three years old. Maybe he can teach you some of his really nasty dirty words to vamp up your post.
Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not money, I am become as a sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal.
George Orwell, "Keep the Aspidistra Flying", Opening words -
You are on the same wavelenght as my three years old. Maybe he can teach you some of his really nasty dirty words to vamp up your post.
Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not money, I am become as a sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal.
George Orwell, "Keep the Aspidistra Flying", Opening wordsI thought you would be a fan.