Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. RealBasic

RealBasic

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
csharpdotnetcomlinux
17 Posts 9 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C Christian Graus

    ESTANNY wrote:

    "REALbasic is highly compatible with Visual Basic, so Visual Basic developers are productive very quickly with REALbasic."

    At it's core, this means REALBasis has really ugly syntax and annoying rules that make no sense whatsoever. The world is definately not waiting for REALBasic.

    Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++ "I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )

    V Offline
    V Offline
    Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
    wrote on last edited by
    #5

    Is it just a Proof of Concept?

    Vasudevan Deepak Kumar Personal Homepage Tech Gossips

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • E ESTAN

      I am really curious how it is going to deal with Imports System.Management :-)

      P Offline
      P Offline
      Pete OHanlon
      wrote on last edited by
      #6

      ESTANNY wrote:

      Imports System.Management

      Well - seeing that it's VB6 and not VB.NET then I would say pretty well.:laugh:

      Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • V Vasudevan Deepak Kumar

        Is it just a Proof of Concept?

        Vasudevan Deepak Kumar Personal Homepage Tech Gossips

        P Offline
        P Offline
        Pete OHanlon
        wrote on last edited by
        #7

        Vasudevan Deepak Kumar wrote:

        Proof of Concept

        Nope - it's a Pile Of Crap.

        Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

        V 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • P Pete OHanlon

          Vasudevan Deepak Kumar wrote:

          Proof of Concept

          Nope - it's a Pile Of Crap.

          Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

          V Offline
          V Offline
          Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
          wrote on last edited by
          #8

          There you go. You get my '5'. :)

          Vasudevan Deepak Kumar Personal Homepage Tech Gossips

          P 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • V Vasudevan Deepak Kumar

            There you go. You get my '5'. :)

            Vasudevan Deepak Kumar Personal Homepage Tech Gossips

            P Offline
            P Offline
            Pete OHanlon
            wrote on last edited by
            #9

            Thanks.:-D

            Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • E ESTAN

              about: RealBasic Did someone test this already? What do you think about the introduction of there developer language? "REALbasic is highly compatible with Visual Basic, so Visual Basic developers are productive very quickly with REALbasic." Do you think people are waiting for it when we have a sort of .NET framework for Linux? And if it does get accepted by the public, does it make a chance on codeproject.com?

              N Offline
              N Offline
              NormDroid
              wrote on last edited by
              #10

              ESTANNY wrote:

              productive

              Ha.

              Chuck Norris counted to infinity - twice.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • C Christian Graus

                ESTANNY wrote:

                "REALbasic is highly compatible with Visual Basic, so Visual Basic developers are productive very quickly with REALbasic."

                At it's core, this means REALBasis has really ugly syntax and annoying rules that make no sense whatsoever. The world is definately not waiting for REALBasic.

                Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++ "I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )

                F Offline
                F Offline
                Fred_Smith
                wrote on last edited by
                #11

                Christian Graus wrote:

                The world is definately not waiting for REALBasic.

                No, but a real-time spell checker would help... :) I swear, 9 people out of 10 can't spell "definite"....

                C H 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • F Fred_Smith

                  Christian Graus wrote:

                  The world is definately not waiting for REALBasic.

                  No, but a real-time spell checker would help... :) I swear, 9 people out of 10 can't spell "definite"....

                  C Offline
                  C Offline
                  Christian Graus
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #12

                  dagnamit. I took two shots at it too ( both wrong, apparently )

                  Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++ "I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • E ESTAN

                    about: RealBasic Did someone test this already? What do you think about the introduction of there developer language? "REALbasic is highly compatible with Visual Basic, so Visual Basic developers are productive very quickly with REALbasic." Do you think people are waiting for it when we have a sort of .NET framework for Linux? And if it does get accepted by the public, does it make a chance on codeproject.com?

                    R Offline
                    R Offline
                    Rama Krishna Vavilala
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #13

                    Most of the comments you got so far seems to be from people who have not really used it and commented based on the word Basic.

                    ESTANNY wrote:

                    Did someone test this already? What do you think about the introduction of there developer language?

                    It is a pretty good tool and has been around for a quite some time. It does differ from basic in many ways. I did play with it for sometime when investigating cross platform development and I liked what I saw. However, due to the specific requirements of my project it was not possible to use it.

                    Co-Author ASP.NET AJAX in Action

                    P 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • R Rama Krishna Vavilala

                      Most of the comments you got so far seems to be from people who have not really used it and commented based on the word Basic.

                      ESTANNY wrote:

                      Did someone test this already? What do you think about the introduction of there developer language?

                      It is a pretty good tool and has been around for a quite some time. It does differ from basic in many ways. I did play with it for sometime when investigating cross platform development and I liked what I saw. However, due to the specific requirements of my project it was not possible to use it.

                      Co-Author ASP.NET AJAX in Action

                      P Offline
                      P Offline
                      Pete OHanlon
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #14

                      Errm. I did use it, I just didn't really like it. To be honest, cross platform applications tend to have to take the lowest common denominator, i.e. the things that are common across all platforms. I just really don't like being constrained that way - especially as our customers are all Windows users anyway.

                      Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

                      E 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • P Pete OHanlon

                        Errm. I did use it, I just didn't really like it. To be honest, cross platform applications tend to have to take the lowest common denominator, i.e. the things that are common across all platforms. I just really don't like being constrained that way - especially as our customers are all Windows users anyway.

                        Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

                        E Offline
                        E Offline
                        ESTAN
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #15

                        For cross platform we have Java isn't it? Not that it is my favorite language, but I see people doing nice stuff with it. ;-)

                        P 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • E ESTAN

                          For cross platform we have Java isn't it? Not that it is my favorite language, but I see people doing nice stuff with it. ;-)

                          P Offline
                          P Offline
                          Pete OHanlon
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #16

                          We do indeed have Java, but I come back to the point that most of our customers use Windows so the cross platform stuff is largely irrelevant to me.

                          Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • F Fred_Smith

                            Christian Graus wrote:

                            The world is definately not waiting for REALBasic.

                            No, but a real-time spell checker would help... :) I swear, 9 people out of 10 can't spell "definite"....

                            H Offline
                            H Offline
                            hairy_hats
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #17

                            Or 'Ridiculous'.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • World
                            • Users
                            • Groups