ASP.NET Hosting
-
I've been looking for options for hosting an ASP.NET website, just a personal/development site, nothing big. I'd like to have at least 2.0, ajax, and SQLExpress would be nice. This one seems like a good deal. Anyone have other suggestions? http://www.bizhostnet.com/[^]
only two letters away from being an asset
Go Daddy http://www.godaddy.com[^]might be worth looking into. They offer more data transfer and email addresses than BizHost. However, Go Daddy doesn't support .NET 3.0 like BizHost does. Dang slow internet. Ed beat me to the punch. :)
Smile and the world smiles with you. Laugh and the world thinks your insane.
-
Although I was a bit suspicious of them to begin with (and later on) GoDaddy have all the features you asked for plus 10 MySQL databases and Access database (can't remember the limit). They've got good domain management tools and recently the whole web interface for their shared hosting has been re-done. Vastly improving it's usability.
Wonder if those girls are on the tech support team? :)
only two letters away from being an asset
-
I've been looking for options for hosting an ASP.NET website, just a personal/development site, nothing big. I'd like to have at least 2.0, ajax, and SQLExpress would be nice. This one seems like a good deal. Anyone have other suggestions? http://www.bizhostnet.com/[^]
only two letters away from being an asset
I noticed yesterday that my site was not working, so I contacted the support dept. Turns out the site was switched from 2.0 to 1.1. This is the response I got explaining how it happened. "Well, we did Microsoft Windows updated on Tuesday night and that had patches for .NET and that may have broken it, we have seen this happen before right after a Windows update." They saw the behavior before, yet didn't bother to test for it after the patch was applied.:mad:
only two letters away from being an asset
-
I noticed yesterday that my site was not working, so I contacted the support dept. Turns out the site was switched from 2.0 to 1.1. This is the response I got explaining how it happened. "Well, we did Microsoft Windows updated on Tuesday night and that had patches for .NET and that may have broken it, we have seen this happen before right after a Windows update." They saw the behavior before, yet didn't bother to test for it after the patch was applied.:mad:
only two letters away from being an asset
Mark Nischalke wrote:
I noticed yesterday that my site was not working, so I contacted the support dept. Turns out the site was switched from 2.0 to 1.1. This is the response I got explaining how it happened. "Well, we did Microsoft Windows updated on Tuesday night and that had patches for .NET and that may have broken it, we have seen this happen before right after a Windows update."
Do you care to share the name of that hosting company so myself, and other CPians, can avoid them like the plague?
-
Mark Nischalke wrote:
I noticed yesterday that my site was not working, so I contacted the support dept. Turns out the site was switched from 2.0 to 1.1. This is the response I got explaining how it happened. "Well, we did Microsoft Windows updated on Tuesday night and that had patches for .NET and that may have broken it, we have seen this happen before right after a Windows update."
Do you care to share the name of that hosting company so myself, and other CPians, can avoid them like the plague?
SitePlot. They even once uninstalled .NET from the server because they thought no one was using it.:mad:
only two letters away from being an asset
-
I noticed yesterday that my site was not working, so I contacted the support dept. Turns out the site was switched from 2.0 to 1.1. This is the response I got explaining how it happened. "Well, we did Microsoft Windows updated on Tuesday night and that had patches for .NET and that may have broken it, we have seen this happen before right after a Windows update." They saw the behavior before, yet didn't bother to test for it after the patch was applied.:mad:
only two letters away from being an asset
Lie[^] - no update to .NET (2.0 or 1.1) in this month's security bulletins. The last security update to the .NET Framework was in July (MS07-040[^]). Also, we have servers with a mix of .NET 2.0 and 1.1 applications and have never seen a problem with an update changing the version in the metabase. What we do know is that if you have a server with a mix of applications running Windows Server 2003 (IIS 6.0), you must create separate application pools and assign the applications appropriately. Otherwise whichever application is requested first wins, because the .NET Framework taints the process - only one version of the CLR can ever be loaded into a process. The .NET 1.1 applications may run OK in a CLR 2.0 process, but it's still risky. .NET 2.0 apps which use .NET 2.0 features will not work in a CLR 1.1 process. If a .NET 1.1 application loads first into an application pool shared between different .NET versions, the 2.0 applications won't work. This does not affect IIS 5.x (Windows 2000, Windows XP) as different aspnet_wp.exe processes are created by the corresponding ISAPI filters. The ISAPI filters don't load the CLR themselves - inetinfo.exe itself is not tainted.
DoEvents: Generating unexpected recursion since 1991 -
Lie[^] - no update to .NET (2.0 or 1.1) in this month's security bulletins. The last security update to the .NET Framework was in July (MS07-040[^]). Also, we have servers with a mix of .NET 2.0 and 1.1 applications and have never seen a problem with an update changing the version in the metabase. What we do know is that if you have a server with a mix of applications running Windows Server 2003 (IIS 6.0), you must create separate application pools and assign the applications appropriately. Otherwise whichever application is requested first wins, because the .NET Framework taints the process - only one version of the CLR can ever be loaded into a process. The .NET 1.1 applications may run OK in a CLR 2.0 process, but it's still risky. .NET 2.0 apps which use .NET 2.0 features will not work in a CLR 1.1 process. If a .NET 1.1 application loads first into an application pool shared between different .NET versions, the 2.0 applications won't work. This does not affect IIS 5.x (Windows 2000, Windows XP) as different aspnet_wp.exe processes are created by the corresponding ISAPI filters. The ISAPI filters don't load the CLR themselves - inetinfo.exe itself is not tainted.
DoEvents: Generating unexpected recursion since 1991He, he :-D Thanks for the link. I'm waiting for their tech support to respond, just for my amusement. I've already begun the process of moving to another host.
only two letters away from being an asset
-
SitePlot. They even once uninstalled .NET from the server because they thought no one was using it.:mad:
only two letters away from being an asset
-
I've been looking for options for hosting an ASP.NET website, just a personal/development site, nothing big. I'd like to have at least 2.0, ajax, and SQLExpress would be nice. This one seems like a good deal. Anyone have other suggestions? http://www.bizhostnet.com/[^]
only two letters away from being an asset
On top of this, does anybody know any ASP.NET hosting providers that offer SQL 2005 CLR? I was trying to set up some CLR stored procedures for a project at my last job and we couldn't find any hosts that supported it. (FYI - doing financial transaction calculations in T-SQL is a nightmare. :sigh: )
Please don't bother me... I'm hacking right now. Don't look at me like that - doesn't anybody remember what "hacking" really means? :sigh:
-
I've been looking for options for hosting an ASP.NET website, just a personal/development site, nothing big. I'd like to have at least 2.0, ajax, and SQLExpress would be nice. This one seems like a good deal. Anyone have other suggestions? http://www.bizhostnet.com/[^]
only two letters away from being an asset
Little late... But I use WebHost4Life... http://www.webhost4life.com
--- Don't be irreplaceable. If you can't be replaced, you can't be promoted.
-
I've been looking for options for hosting an ASP.NET website, just a personal/development site, nothing big. I'd like to have at least 2.0, ajax, and SQLExpress would be nice. This one seems like a good deal. Anyone have other suggestions? http://www.bizhostnet.com/[^]
only two letters away from being an asset
Find some friends or clients and setup your own hosting on a ServerBeach.com server. Get ten friends to go in with you and it will only cost each of you about $12 per month and you will have tons of power, bandwidth and space along with full control of a Windows 2003 server box. You can even get it with different hosting tools to make it easy to host others. I have had a server there for almost four years (IIRC) and only twice has there been any issues. Even then they were handled decently. The most important part is that you have full control of the server. As a developer I can not understand how other developers can use those shared hosting companies for any decent development.
Rocky <>< Blog Post: Windows Live Authentication - Easy Stuff! Tech Blog Post: Finally, Free Legal Music Downloads! Tech Sites: SilverlightCity.com ~ TheSilverlightDirectory.com ~ TheWPFDirectory.com