C# or VB.NET ? Which one do you perefer ?
-
-
-
-
c#, Vb.net is better left for the hobbists.
WPF - Imagineers Wanted Follow your nose using DoubleAnimationUsingPath
norm .net wrote:
hobbists
Is that an intentional misspelling?
-
My only objection to C# is that just about everyone that programs in it is a complete intellectual snob. You only have to look at most of the replies to your post to see this. When I want to knock a wall down, I use a sledge-hammer. When I want to crack open a nut, I use a nut-cracker. Besides which - who cares? Just use what you are happy using, if you can, and be happy using what you are, if you can't. Fred
-
norm .net wrote:
hobbists
Is that an intentional misspelling?
Smelly hobbitses, hmph!:~
"Neque porro quisquam est qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit..." "There is no one who loves pain itself, who seeks after it and wants to have it, simply because it is pain..."
-
norm .net wrote:
hobbists
Is that an intentional misspelling?
-
Smelly hobbitses, hmph!:~
"Neque porro quisquam est qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit..." "There is no one who loves pain itself, who seeks after it and wants to have it, simply because it is pain..."
-
I spent my first 2 and 1/2 years working with vb.net. Then a little over two years ago I took a contracting job. I have been programming in C# for the last two years. I like C# a lot better. The last few weeks I have had a new contract which is vb.net again. My personal feeling is C# is a lot better to work with. If I had a choice I would choose C#. Ben
-
My only objection to C# is that just about everyone that programs in it is a complete intellectual snob. You only have to look at most of the replies to your post to see this. When I want to knock a wall down, I use a sledge-hammer. When I want to crack open a nut, I use a nut-cracker. Besides which - who cares? Just use what you are happy using, if you can, and be happy using what you are, if you can't. Fred
-
My only objection to C# is that just about everyone that programs in it is a complete intellectual snob. You only have to look at most of the replies to your post to see this. When I want to knock a wall down, I use a sledge-hammer. When I want to crack open a nut, I use a nut-cracker. Besides which - who cares? Just use what you are happy using, if you can, and be happy using what you are, if you can't. Fred
-
Fred_Smith wrote:
When I want to knock a wall down, I use a sledge-hammer. When I want to crack open a nut, I use a nut-cracker.
Well then, sledge-hammer it is. :-D
Poor little nut... :-D
-
It's just a high percentage of c# users probably come from C++ backgrounds, where as VB.net users will come from scripting backgrounds (ie. VB).
WPF - Imagineers Wanted Follow your nose using DoubleAnimationUsingPath
Yes.... ok... and....? Actually, that might make an interesting CP poll one day.... "How did you progress to your current programming language (of choice)?" (or something like that) except that I guess there'd be too mnay possible answers... personally I came to VB via the ZX-Spectrum and the BBC Micro - QBasic and the like... just stuck with it as I have never needed anything more powerful or which requires more structure. VB.NET is quite powerful enough for the SME -size aspplications I have been involved in, and I find it quick and easy. I have had no compelling reason to move to C#, which I quite accept is better structured. I guess C# is a "programmer's language". I love programming, but it isn't my whole life.
-
My only objection to C# is that just about everyone that programs in it is a complete intellectual snob. You only have to look at most of the replies to your post to see this. When I want to knock a wall down, I use a sledge-hammer. When I want to crack open a nut, I use a nut-cracker. Besides which - who cares? Just use what you are happy using, if you can, and be happy using what you are, if you can't. Fred
But then, what would you use VB for, if you had the choice? Cracking your own nuts with a sledgehammer, maybe? (I can afford my snobism - I do C++, Win32 and templates ;P)
We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
My first real C# project | Linkify!|FoldWithUs! | sighist -
My only objection to C# is that just about everyone that programs in it is a complete intellectual snob. You only have to look at most of the replies to your post to see this. When I want to knock a wall down, I use a sledge-hammer. When I want to crack open a nut, I use a nut-cracker. Besides which - who cares? Just use what you are happy using, if you can, and be happy using what you are, if you can't. Fred
Fred_Smith wrote:
When I want to crack open a nut, I use a nut-cracker.
VB. Nuts or crackers?
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
-
But then, what would you use VB for, if you had the choice? Cracking your own nuts with a sledgehammer, maybe? (I can afford my snobism - I do C++, Win32 and templates ;P)
We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
My first real C# project | Linkify!|FoldWithUs! | sighistI do use VB, by choice. Only because that's what I started in and I have never felt the need to use anything different. Most of my clients (I am self-employed) are SME sized concerns, and I find VB quite adequate for the job. Quick and easy.
-
Yes.... ok... and....? Actually, that might make an interesting CP poll one day.... "How did you progress to your current programming language (of choice)?" (or something like that) except that I guess there'd be too mnay possible answers... personally I came to VB via the ZX-Spectrum and the BBC Micro - QBasic and the like... just stuck with it as I have never needed anything more powerful or which requires more structure. VB.NET is quite powerful enough for the SME -size aspplications I have been involved in, and I find it quick and easy. I have had no compelling reason to move to C#, which I quite accept is better structured. I guess C# is a "programmer's language". I love programming, but it isn't my whole life.
You see I came from a Mini Mainframe background DATA/Basic (Mid 80s), Assembler, moved to Windows in '92 use C, then C++. I made a decision in 2000 that the future of development would be done in .net and the 'native' popular language of choice would be C# - logical I guess.
WPF - Imagineers Wanted Follow your nose using DoubleAnimationUsingPath
-
Fred_Smith wrote:
When I want to crack open a nut, I use a nut-cracker.
VB. Nuts or crackers?
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
-
-
But then, what would you use VB for, if you had the choice? Cracking your own nuts with a sledgehammer, maybe? (I can afford my snobism - I do C++, Win32 and templates ;P)
We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
My first real C# project | Linkify!|FoldWithUs! | sighistWell, personally I prefer
C#but I also agree with Fred_Smith about 'intellectual snobism'.C#andVB.NET, under the hood, are not such different languages. I think it's mainly matter of personal taste. :)If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.