Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Txtspk...

Txtspk...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
question
59 Posts 18 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C Colin Angus Mackay

    ChandraRam wrote:

    Just as the language has changed from Shakesperean times to now, do you think txtspk will eventually replace English as we know it?

    I hope not. It is a crude mechanism used by the lazy. I don't use txtspk even when texting.


    Upcoming FREE developer events: * Glasgow: SQL Server Managed Objects AND Reporting Services ... My website

    B Offline
    B Offline
    Brady Kelly
    wrote on last edited by
    #15

    No, it's actually much easier to let my phone's predictive text fill in the proper words.

    I do not believe they are right who say that the defects of famous men should be ignored. I think it is better that we should know them. Then, though we are conscious of having faults as glaring as theirs, we can believe that that is no hindrance to our achieving also something of their virtues. - W. Somerset Maugham My New Blog

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • C Colin Angus Mackay

      ChandraRam wrote:

      Just as the language has changed from Shakesperean times to now, do you think txtspk will eventually replace English as we know it?

      I hope not. It is a crude mechanism used by the lazy. I don't use txtspk even when texting.


      Upcoming FREE developer events: * Glasgow: SQL Server Managed Objects AND Reporting Services ... My website

      R Offline
      R Offline
      Ralph Unden
      wrote on last edited by
      #16

      Is it really used by the lazy? I figured it was to shorten the language by shaving off some characters to fit more information into a short message.

      C 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • J Jorgen Sigvardsson

        Dalek Dave wrote:

        Actually in capitals it looks like a unix command!

        Really? :~ Unix commands are lower case...

        -- Kein Mitleid Für Die Mehrheit

        D Offline
        D Offline
        Dalek Dave
        wrote on last edited by
        #17

        You are of course quite right, my brain must have been on screen saver mode. Tell me what I mean? :)

        ------------------------------------ Happy Primes Lead to Happy Memories. Don't Google FGI

        J 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • C ChandraRam

          Just as the language has changed from Shakesperean times to now, do you think txtspk will eventually replace English as we know it? :)

          V Offline
          V Offline
          VonHagNDaz
          wrote on last edited by
          #18

          i make it my duty to punch everyone i hear saying lol, wtf, or g2g. i seriously want these people dead. we invented the cell phone for a reason, and it sure as hell wasnt so we could revert back to instant messaging...

          [Insert Witty Sig Here]

          D 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • D Dalek Dave

            You are of course quite right, my brain must have been on screen saver mode. Tell me what I mean? :)

            ------------------------------------ Happy Primes Lead to Happy Memories. Don't Google FGI

            J Offline
            J Offline
            Jorgen Sigvardsson
            wrote on last edited by
            #19

            Well, I'm not a mind reader, but I think you meant environment variables. They are most often capitalized (like they are in Windows in fact). export VARIABLE=value or setenv VARIABLE value depending a little on your shell flavor...

            -- Kein Mitleid Für Die Mehrheit

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • B Brady Kelly

              Colin Angus Mackay wrote:

              English is also a grand amalgam of many languages including Latin, Greek, German, Dutch, Norse, Gaelic, French, and many others. Each of these languages has its own evolutionary path also.

              And didn't the speakers of those languages cringe when they heard the pro-English proto-English so abusing their pure and lovely languages?


              Last modified: 27mins after originally posted --

              I do not believe they are right who say that the defects of famous men should be ignored. I think it is better that we should know them. Then, though we are conscious of having faults as glaring as theirs, we can believe that that is no hindrance to our achieving also something of their virtues. - W. Somerset Maugham My New Blog

              D Offline
              D Offline
              Dalek Dave
              wrote on last edited by
              #20

              Brady Kelly wrote:

              And didn't the speakers of those languages cringe when they heard the pro-English so abusing their pure and lovely languages?

              Por English and Proto English:-D

              ------------------------------------ Happy Primes Lead to Happy Memories. Don't Google FGI

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • P Paul Watson

                Colin Angus Mackay wrote:

                Languages have been evolving all the time. English HAS taken thousands of years of construction just has humans have taken millions or billions of years of construction. It is just that at a certain point in the past it didn't exist yet. At a certain point in the past humans didn't exist either, but we evolved from things that did.

                Homo sapiens came into existence at a certain period. Before that it wasn't homo spaiens, it was something else. The "something else" contributed to homo sapiens but it wasn't homo sapiens. Same for English. It came into existence at a certain period and before that it didn't exist. We can't carpet bomb every language that contributed to English and call them English. English is on the cusp of a thousand years old. Not thousands of years. If people want to be dramatic and say "Thousands of years old!" then it needs to be thousands of years old, not one thousand and one years old. I just don't want people thinking English is some ancient language like Aramaic. People needn't be ignorant and arrogant about their language.

                regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa

                Andy Brummer wrote:

                Watson's law: As an online discussion of cars grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving the Bugatti Veyron approaches one.

                S Offline
                S Offline
                stevepqr
                wrote on last edited by
                #21

                Pedants Society member are we? (at this point you say "actually no its the Pedants Association") I think the guy was just trying to get across that its an old language rather than be historically accurate to the nearest fortnight. I could be wrong though :|

                Apathy Rules - I suppose...

                P D 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • C ChandraRam

                  Just as the language has changed from Shakesperean times to now, do you think txtspk will eventually replace English as we know it? :)

                  S Offline
                  S Offline
                  Shog9 0
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #22

                  No. It isn't practical or even terribly useful outside of the narrow technically-constrained environment where it evolved. I've seen more fights than i care to think about arise due to its ambiguity. That's not to say English isn't changing - it changes all the time. But if you want to know how it's changing, go listen to the way people talk...

                  every night, i kneel at the foot of my bed and thank the Great Overseeing Politicians for protecting my freedoms by reducing their number, as if they were deer in a state park. -- Chris Losinger, Online Poker Players?

                  D B 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • P Paul Watson

                    Colin Angus Mackay wrote:

                    Languages have been evolving all the time. English HAS taken thousands of years of construction just has humans have taken millions or billions of years of construction. It is just that at a certain point in the past it didn't exist yet. At a certain point in the past humans didn't exist either, but we evolved from things that did.

                    Homo sapiens came into existence at a certain period. Before that it wasn't homo spaiens, it was something else. The "something else" contributed to homo sapiens but it wasn't homo sapiens. Same for English. It came into existence at a certain period and before that it didn't exist. We can't carpet bomb every language that contributed to English and call them English. English is on the cusp of a thousand years old. Not thousands of years. If people want to be dramatic and say "Thousands of years old!" then it needs to be thousands of years old, not one thousand and one years old. I just don't want people thinking English is some ancient language like Aramaic. People needn't be ignorant and arrogant about their language.

                    regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa

                    Andy Brummer wrote:

                    Watson's law: As an online discussion of cars grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving the Bugatti Veyron approaches one.

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Lost User
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #23

                    Paul Watson wrote:

                    Homo sapiens

                    But we're actually Homo Sapien Sapien. And I don't like the fact that we're all bloody homo's.

                    Michael Martin Australia "I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible." - Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004

                    P L 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • L Lost User

                      Paul Watson wrote:

                      Homo sapiens

                      But we're actually Homo Sapien Sapien. And I don't like the fact that we're all bloody homo's.

                      Michael Martin Australia "I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible." - Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004

                      P Offline
                      P Offline
                      Paul Watson
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #24

                      Don't worry Michael, men like us are surely of the pan paniscus species. We aren't no flaming homos. :rolleyes:

                      regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa

                      Andy Brummer wrote:

                      Watson's law: As an online discussion of cars grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving the Bugatti Veyron approaches one.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • C Colin Angus Mackay

                        Paul Watson wrote:

                        Thousands of years? I don't think it is that old. Old English came first and even that isn't thousands of years old.

                        Languages have been evolving all the time. English HAS taken thousands of years of costruction just has humans have taken millions or billions of years of construction. It is just that at a certain point in the past it didn't exist yet. At a certain point in the past humans didn't exist either, but we evolved from things that did. English is also a grand amalgam of many languages including Latin, Greek, German, Dutch, Norse, Gaelic, French, and many others. Each of these languages has its own evolutionary path also. So, I would say that the English language as it exists is the product of thousands of years of linguistic evolution.


                        Upcoming FREE developer events: * Glasgow: SQL Server Managed Objects AND Reporting Services ... My website

                        M Offline
                        M Offline
                        MatthysDT
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #25

                        On the topic.... I found out the other day, that the language I speak (basically my 1st tongue, english being my 2nd) and grew up with, happens to be the youngest language in existence[^]. (other than programming languages):)

                        http://www.notreadytogiveup.com/Doubts.aspx[^] A treat for all down voters...[^] "you can't forget something you never knew..." M. Du Toit

                        D 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • V VonHagNDaz

                          i make it my duty to punch everyone i hear saying lol, wtf, or g2g. i seriously want these people dead. we invented the cell phone for a reason, and it sure as hell wasnt so we could revert back to instant messaging...

                          [Insert Witty Sig Here]

                          D Offline
                          D Offline
                          DavidNohejl
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #26

                          VonHagNDaz wrote:

                          i make it my duty to punch everyone i hear saying lol, wtf, or g2g. i seriously want these people dead.

                          Sometimes I feel the same about people who start sentence with lowercase letter, el ou el. ;P


                          [My Blog]
                          "Visual studio desperately needs some performance improvements. It is sometimes almost as slow as eclipse." - Rüdiger Klaehn
                          "Real men use mspaint for writing code and notepad for designing graphics." - Anna-Jayne Metcalfe

                          V 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • D DavidNohejl

                            VonHagNDaz wrote:

                            i make it my duty to punch everyone i hear saying lol, wtf, or g2g. i seriously want these people dead.

                            Sometimes I feel the same about people who start sentence with lowercase letter, el ou el. ;P


                            [My Blog]
                            "Visual studio desperately needs some performance improvements. It is sometimes almost as slow as eclipse." - Rüdiger Klaehn
                            "Real men use mspaint for writing code and notepad for designing graphics." - Anna-Jayne Metcalfe

                            V Offline
                            V Offline
                            VonHagNDaz
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #27

                            its not my fault that programming has ruined my ability to capitalize. i could always type likeThis or strLikeThis, but its much faster to just go with all lower cases... :laugh:

                            [Insert Witty Sig Here]

                            B 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • S stevepqr

                              Pedants Society member are we? (at this point you say "actually no its the Pedants Association") I think the guy was just trying to get across that its an old language rather than be historically accurate to the nearest fortnight. I could be wrong though :|

                              Apathy Rules - I suppose...

                              P Offline
                              P Offline
                              Paul Watson
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #28

                              Sure. I'm not a real pedant. I just dislike dramatising fact to get your point across. He tried to use "English is thousands of years old" to over-power other thoughts. "Java is used by billions of coders, you should use it too!" when in fact it is only millions of coders. etc.

                              regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa

                              Andy Brummer wrote:

                              Watson's law: As an online discussion of cars grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving the Bugatti Veyron approaches one.

                              S 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • P Paul Watson

                                Sure. I'm not a real pedant. I just dislike dramatising fact to get your point across. He tried to use "English is thousands of years old" to over-power other thoughts. "Java is used by billions of coders, you should use it too!" when in fact it is only millions of coders. etc.

                                regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa

                                Andy Brummer wrote:

                                Watson's law: As an online discussion of cars grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving the Bugatti Veyron approaches one.

                                S Offline
                                S Offline
                                stevepqr
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #29

                                ...but if we're going to be picky the original point was that english was thousands of years in construction which is most certainly true - unless you're a creationist of course :|

                                Apathy Rules - I suppose...

                                P 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • M MatthysDT

                                  On the topic.... I found out the other day, that the language I speak (basically my 1st tongue, english being my 2nd) and grew up with, happens to be the youngest language in existence[^]. (other than programming languages):)

                                  http://www.notreadytogiveup.com/Doubts.aspx[^] A treat for all down voters...[^] "you can't forget something you never knew..." M. Du Toit

                                  D Offline
                                  D Offline
                                  Dan Neely
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #30

                                  In some suburbs of the London, English is now a second language. The same is happening - or has taken place - in cities such as New York, Los Angeles, Miami and Singapore. This has been the case for centuries, if not longer, in cities with large immigrant populations. Generally the first generation to become fully assimilated into a new culture are the grandkids of the original immigrants.

                                  -- If you view money as inherently evil, I view it as my duty to assist in making you more virtuous.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • S stevepqr

                                    ...but if we're going to be picky the original point was that english was thousands of years in construction which is most certainly true - unless you're a creationist of course :|

                                    Apathy Rules - I suppose...

                                    P Offline
                                    P Offline
                                    Paul Watson
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #31

                                    No, that isn't true. The languages that came before English and which contributed to English weren't wandering around with the intent that they would "construct" English. Frisian didn't have a goal to become English one day, it was just Frisian. At some point branches of Frisian and other languages diverged significantly enough that someone classed it as English. There was a grey period during which it wasn't called English but in which it was but before that it wasn't English and nobody was "constructing" it. You can't apply hindsight to history and carpet bomb other threads of history. They are threads in of themselves, not some building block to our almighty English language. As for creationism, English wasn't the language of the Christians anyway. Jesus certainly didn't speak it.

                                    regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa

                                    Andy Brummer wrote:

                                    Watson's law: As an online discussion of cars grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving the Bugatti Veyron approaches one.

                                    S 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • S stevepqr

                                      Pedants Society member are we? (at this point you say "actually no its the Pedants Association") I think the guy was just trying to get across that its an old language rather than be historically accurate to the nearest fortnight. I could be wrong though :|

                                      Apathy Rules - I suppose...

                                      D Offline
                                      D Offline
                                      Dalek Dave
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #32

                                      May I enquire as to whether Pedants Association requires an apostrophe? I mean is it a society of Pedants, or a Society belonging to a pedant? Of Course if it was a society belonging to several pedants, it would have the apostophe after the "S". Please advise.

                                      ------------------------------------ Happy Primes Lead to Happy Memories. Don't Google FGI

                                      S 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • P Paul Watson

                                        No, that isn't true. The languages that came before English and which contributed to English weren't wandering around with the intent that they would "construct" English. Frisian didn't have a goal to become English one day, it was just Frisian. At some point branches of Frisian and other languages diverged significantly enough that someone classed it as English. There was a grey period during which it wasn't called English but in which it was but before that it wasn't English and nobody was "constructing" it. You can't apply hindsight to history and carpet bomb other threads of history. They are threads in of themselves, not some building block to our almighty English language. As for creationism, English wasn't the language of the Christians anyway. Jesus certainly didn't speak it.

                                        regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa

                                        Andy Brummer wrote:

                                        Watson's law: As an online discussion of cars grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving the Bugatti Veyron approaches one.

                                        S Offline
                                        S Offline
                                        stevepqr
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #33

                                        Paul Watson wrote:

                                        No, that isn't true. The languages that came before English and which contributed to English weren't wandering around with the intent that they would "construct" English. Frisian didn't have a goal to become English one day, it was just Frisian.

                                        Never said it was true - English evolved from many other languages thats a fact, and that process has been continuing for 'a long time'. There was no point in history in which someone suddenly woke and said 'bloody hell - we're speaking english!'

                                        Paul Watson wrote:

                                        You can't apply hindsight to history

                                        The classification, the actual point in history where english was deemed by someone to exist was I'm certain applied with hindsight, and I'm sure anyone listening to it today would find it difficult to believe it was english!

                                        Paul Watson wrote:

                                        carpet bomb other threads of history. They are threads in of themselves, not some building block to our almighty English language.

                                        Carpet bombing history? How did I manage that?

                                        Paul Watson wrote:

                                        As for creationism, English wasn't the language of the Christians anyway. Jesus certainly didn't speak it.

                                        What has religion got to do with it? :confused:

                                        Apathy Rules - I suppose...

                                        P 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • D Dalek Dave

                                          May I enquire as to whether Pedants Association requires an apostrophe? I mean is it a society of Pedants, or a Society belonging to a pedant? Of Course if it was a society belonging to several pedants, it would have the apostophe after the "S". Please advise.

                                          ------------------------------------ Happy Primes Lead to Happy Memories. Don't Google FGI

                                          S Offline
                                          S Offline
                                          stevepqr
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #34

                                          There's always one! Pedants, Pedants', Pedants's, Pedantses - you choose ;P

                                          Apathy Rules - I suppose...

                                          P 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups