Microsoft, Autodesk lose patent appeal
-
Z4 Technologies Inc. sued Microsoft and Autodesk Inc., maker of drafting software, in 2004, claiming the technology they used to activate newly installed software and deter piracy infringed on patents created and owned by David Colvin, the owner of privately held z4. Commerce Township, Mich.-based z4 argued that Microsoft's Windows XP and Office 2003 suite of productivity software used its patented method of asking computer users to supply two passwords, or authorization codes, before they could fully use new software. The technology in question also can be used to deactivate software. In April 2006, a federal jury in East Texas ordered Microsoft to pay $115 million to z4, plus attorney fees and $25 million for willful patent infringement. Microsoft, which had argued that the patents were invalid, appealed the decision. The jury also ordered Autodesk to pay $18 million to z4. link hope its not a repost...
_________________________ "When the superior man refrains from acting, his force is felt for a thousand li." Sun Tzu
Lawyers. They should all be put against a wall and shot. However, I expect anyone attempting such an act of supreme benfit to the human race would find themselves being sued by said lawyers for infringing upon several patents, including "Wall", "Firing Squad" and "Blind fold", and be lamabsted by the anti-smoking lobby for daring to offer a final cigarette.
"On one of my cards it said I had to find temperatures lower than -8. The numbers I uncovered were -6 and -7 so I thought I had won, and so did the woman in the shop. But when she scanned the card the machine said I hadn't. "I phoned Camelot and they fobbed me off with some story that -6 is higher - not lower - than -8 but I'm not having it." -Tina Farrell, a 23 year old thicky from Levenshulme, Manchester.
-
Amazing, simple 'off the cuff' ideas turned into patents and used to reap millions. Time the software patenting system had a revamp.
WPF - Imagineers Wanted Follow your nose using DoubleAnimationUsingPath
norm .net wrote:
and used to reap millions.
Only the lawyers get rich. Next life, when I reincarnate as a woman, I'm going to be a strip club dancing lawyer. Marc
-
norm .net wrote:
and used to reap millions.
Only the lawyers get rich. Next life, when I reincarnate as a woman, I'm going to be a strip club dancing lawyer. Marc
Marc Clifton wrote:
when I reincarnate as a woman, I'm going to be a strip club dancing lawyer.
Hopefully with far less facial hair ... ;P
:..::. Douglas H. Troy ::..
Bad Astronomy |VCF|wxWidgets|WTL -
Lawyers. They should all be put against a wall and shot. However, I expect anyone attempting such an act of supreme benfit to the human race would find themselves being sued by said lawyers for infringing upon several patents, including "Wall", "Firing Squad" and "Blind fold", and be lamabsted by the anti-smoking lobby for daring to offer a final cigarette.
"On one of my cards it said I had to find temperatures lower than -8. The numbers I uncovered were -6 and -7 so I thought I had won, and so did the woman in the shop. But when she scanned the card the machine said I hadn't. "I phoned Camelot and they fobbed me off with some story that -6 is higher - not lower - than -8 but I'm not having it." -Tina Farrell, a 23 year old thicky from Levenshulme, Manchester.
-
Lawyers. They should all be put against a wall and shot. However, I expect anyone attempting such an act of supreme benfit to the human race would find themselves being sued by said lawyers for infringing upon several patents, including "Wall", "Firing Squad" and "Blind fold", and be lamabsted by the anti-smoking lobby for daring to offer a final cigarette.
"On one of my cards it said I had to find temperatures lower than -8. The numbers I uncovered were -6 and -7 so I thought I had won, and so did the woman in the shop. But when she scanned the card the machine said I hadn't. "I phoned Camelot and they fobbed me off with some story that -6 is higher - not lower - than -8 but I'm not having it." -Tina Farrell, a 23 year old thicky from Levenshulme, Manchester.
-
Z4 Technologies Inc. sued Microsoft and Autodesk Inc., maker of drafting software, in 2004, claiming the technology they used to activate newly installed software and deter piracy infringed on patents created and owned by David Colvin, the owner of privately held z4. Commerce Township, Mich.-based z4 argued that Microsoft's Windows XP and Office 2003 suite of productivity software used its patented method of asking computer users to supply two passwords, or authorization codes, before they could fully use new software. The technology in question also can be used to deactivate software. In April 2006, a federal jury in East Texas ordered Microsoft to pay $115 million to z4, plus attorney fees and $25 million for willful patent infringement. Microsoft, which had argued that the patents were invalid, appealed the decision. The jury also ordered Autodesk to pay $18 million to z4. link hope its not a repost...
_________________________ "When the superior man refrains from acting, his force is felt for a thousand li." Sun Tzu
Only the way its done, not an algorithm or something tangible?, just for implementing an idea?, so they're suing because they think Microsoft and Autodesk and many other companies made some "reverse engineering" of their software to get the way they implemented licensing security(wait, there's not even a software?). What about Macrovision and their floating licensing service, UniGraphics and their SolidEdge product uses that way for licensing since so many years, you get an installation ID you send it to them and after a month they give you a limited licensing code that activates the product for a limited time.
-
Marc Clifton wrote:
when I reincarnate as a woman, I'm going to be a strip club dancing lawyer.
Hopefully with far less facial hair ... ;P
:..::. Douglas H. Troy ::..
Bad Astronomy |VCF|wxWidgets|WTLDouglas Troy wrote:
Hopefully with far less facial hair ...
He'll be alright so long as he doesn't overdo the facelifts...
-
Only the way its done, not an algorithm or something tangible?, just for implementing an idea?, so they're suing because they think Microsoft and Autodesk and many other companies made some "reverse engineering" of their software to get the way they implemented licensing security(wait, there's not even a software?). What about Macrovision and their floating licensing service, UniGraphics and their SolidEdge product uses that way for licensing since so many years, you get an installation ID you send it to them and after a month they give you a limited licensing code that activates the product for a limited time.
Many people says that in US you can patent anything if you're the first applying the patent even if there are people that implementing the idea before, so you can patent how people shake hands or patent the corn for use as seed, or rice for use in candies or even the way to drink a water glass. Well, there is some stories about some chem-lab that patented native knowledge like the use of some plants as pain-killers, so they comercialized something that at first place was obvious just because they filled the papers first, and a company that patented a muted cow.
-
Z4 Technologies Inc. sued Microsoft and Autodesk Inc., maker of drafting software, in 2004, claiming the technology they used to activate newly installed software and deter piracy infringed on patents created and owned by David Colvin, the owner of privately held z4. Commerce Township, Mich.-based z4 argued that Microsoft's Windows XP and Office 2003 suite of productivity software used its patented method of asking computer users to supply two passwords, or authorization codes, before they could fully use new software. The technology in question also can be used to deactivate software. In April 2006, a federal jury in East Texas ordered Microsoft to pay $115 million to z4, plus attorney fees and $25 million for willful patent infringement. Microsoft, which had argued that the patents were invalid, appealed the decision. The jury also ordered Autodesk to pay $18 million to z4. link hope its not a repost...
_________________________ "When the superior man refrains from acting, his force is felt for a thousand li." Sun Tzu
And people wonder why i use my current sig.
...cmk The idea that I can be presented with a problem, set out to logically solve it with the tools at hand, and wind up with a program that could not be legally used because someone else followed the same logical steps some years ago and filed for a patent on it is horrifying. - John Carmack
-
And people wonder why i use my current sig.
...cmk The idea that I can be presented with a problem, set out to logically solve it with the tools at hand, and wind up with a program that could not be legally used because someone else followed the same logical steps some years ago and filed for a patent on it is horrifying. - John Carmack
-
Where I work if I patent anything (even if not related to my work) they own the rights.
that's lame. afaik anything I do on my own time with my own hardware is mine, along with anything else that my employer explicitly declines to patent. OTOH I don't anticipate patenting anything so it doesn't really matter.
-- Help Stamp Out and Abolish Redundancy The preceding is courtesy of the Department of Unnecessarily Redundant Repetition Department.
-
norm .net wrote:
and used to reap millions.
Only the lawyers get rich. Next life, when I reincarnate as a woman, I'm going to be a strip club dancing lawyer. Marc
Marc Clifton wrote:
Only the lawyers get rich. Next life, when I reincarnate as a woman, I'm going to be a strip club dancing lawyer.
You missed a category of rich person. The therapist I'm going to have to see to get that image out of my mind.;)
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
-
Where I work if I patent anything (even if not related to my work) they own the rights.
that's pretty standard in the US. typically, they'll also own the rights to anything you do, even in your off-work time, that relates (in their eyes) to their business.
-
Marc Clifton wrote:
Only the lawyers get rich. Next life, when I reincarnate as a woman, I'm going to be a strip club dancing lawyer.
You missed a category of rich person. The therapist I'm going to have to see to get that image out of my mind.;)
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
Pete O`Hanlon wrote:
The therapist I'm going to have to see to get that image out of my mind.
I'll have to figure out how create a therapist, politician, stripper, lawyer job. That would make for an interesting character on an MMP roleplaying game. Marc
-
Pete O`Hanlon wrote:
The therapist I'm going to have to see to get that image out of my mind.
I'll have to figure out how create a therapist, politician, stripper, lawyer job. That would make for an interesting character on an MMP roleplaying game. Marc
-
Where I work if I patent anything (even if not related to my work) they own the rights.
Why don't you patent something ridiculously stupid? Would you get fired for that?
[My Blog]
"Visual studio desperately needs some performance improvements. It is sometimes almost as slow as eclipse." - Rüdiger Klaehn
"Real men use mspaint for writing code and notepad for designing graphics." - Anna-Jayne Metcalfe -
that's pretty standard in the US. typically, they'll also own the rights to anything you do, even in your off-work time, that relates (in their eyes) to their business.
-
Where I work if I patent anything (even if not related to my work) they own the rights.
I agree with Danny Boy up yonder, if it's on your time, it's your patent. However, if it's on their time, well that's their patent.
"On one of my cards it said I had to find temperatures lower than -8. The numbers I uncovered were -6 and -7 so I thought I had won, and so did the woman in the shop. But when she scanned the card the machine said I hadn't. "I phoned Camelot and they fobbed me off with some story that -6 is higher - not lower - than -8 but I'm not having it." -Tina Farrell, a 23 year old thicky from Levenshulme, Manchester.
-
that's pretty standard in the US. typically, they'll also own the rights to anything you do, even in your off-work time, that relates (in their eyes) to their business.
Isn't it a question of proof? No company can "own" what you do in your own time, however if you do something that is business related, and then use that at work, if you can't prove that you did it in your own time you're a bit scuppered.
"On one of my cards it said I had to find temperatures lower than -8. The numbers I uncovered were -6 and -7 so I thought I had won, and so did the woman in the shop. But when she scanned the card the machine said I hadn't. "I phoned Camelot and they fobbed me off with some story that -6 is higher - not lower - than -8 but I'm not having it." -Tina Farrell, a 23 year old thicky from Levenshulme, Manchester.
-
I agree with Danny Boy up yonder, if it's on your time, it's your patent. However, if it's on their time, well that's their patent.
"On one of my cards it said I had to find temperatures lower than -8. The numbers I uncovered were -6 and -7 so I thought I had won, and so did the woman in the shop. But when she scanned the card the machine said I hadn't. "I phoned Camelot and they fobbed me off with some story that -6 is higher - not lower - than -8 but I'm not having it." -Tina Farrell, a 23 year old thicky from Levenshulme, Manchester.
Commonsense doesn't come into it - you need to check your employment contract. From my experience the most common arrangement is for the employer to have the rights to anything related to your work that you develop whilst employed there - whether you develop it at home on your hardware or not.
Peter "Until the invention of the computer, the machine gun was the device that enabled humans to make the most mistakes in the smallest amount of time."