Professional conditions with IF

Lost User

:-D well it could be worse.. i mean he could have written IF TextBox1=1 or 2 or 3 THEN TextBox2 = TextBox1 * 10 ' more ugly code here... END IF i don't know if this works with vb.net as well but in vb6 it definitly did :)

Rich Insley

It's not uncommon at all to see coders express their frustrations in the code they write. For an entertaining afternoon of reading, go to http://www.google.com/codesearch[^] and enter the profanity of your choice. You'd be amazed what people say.

Lost User

You have just supplied me with an infinitely amusing resource. thank you. (the sad part is that I probably find it so amusing because I do the same thing in all of my code)

www.socoder.net

unrealweapon

is your former staff in hell now ? LOL

SalarSoft

I saw her with her husband. I think she is in hell now. YES! She is a woman!

CPallini

Did you sack her for?

If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
[my articles]

jhwurmbach

SalarSoft wrote:

IF TextBox1.Text=1 or 2 or 3 THEN

Being VB illiterate... This does work as I fear it does? It sets the TextBox1.text to be "1" and then branches into the THEN, because 2 is equal to TRUE?

Let's think the unthinkable, let's do the undoable, let's prepare to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may not eff it after all.
Douglas Adams, "Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency"

CPallini

jhwurmbach wrote:

It sets the TextBox1.text to be "1"

Nope. Since it follows the IF statement, VB evaluates TextBox1.Text=1 as a conditional expression (I don't know if it results in a run-time error).

jhwurmbach wrote:

and then branches into the THEN, because 2 is equal to TRUE?

Yes. :)

If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
[my articles]

Robert Royall

CPallini wrote:

(I don't know if it results in a run-time error)

It shouldn't; nearly all flavors of VB automatically coerce numerics into strings.

Please don't bother me... I'm hacking right now. Don't look at me like that - doesn't anybody remember what "hacking" really means? :sigh:

CPallini

Robert Royall wrote:

It shouldn't; nearly all flavors of VB automatically coerce numerics into strings.

I was quite confident about too, but my VBA actually doesn't like the mix. Unfortunately I have no VB6 at hand. :)

If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
[my articles]

Robert Royall

Really? Works fine for me in Access 2003. It will throw an error if Textbox1 is empty, since you can't coerce a comparison with an empty string (or a null).

Please don't bother me... I'm hacking right now. Don't look at me like that - doesn't anybody remember what "hacking" really means? :sigh:

Luc Pattyn

CPallini wrote:

Unfortunately I have no VB6 at hand

Unfortunately X|

Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]

This month's tips: - before you ask a question here, search CodeProject, then Google; - the quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get; - use PRE tags to preserve formatting when showing multi-line code snippets.

SalarSoft

No, we deported her and her friend cause they didn't skilled and they did lots of such mistakes ( I remember their nightmare creatures ). For example she named a function to something like this "girgo". X| Because of this naming, my friends named her "girgo". :laugh: Now the corporation focused on C#

CPallini

Robert Royall wrote:

Really?

Yes.

Robert Royall wrote:

Works fine for me in Access 2003.

I'm using Excel 2002. But I think that VBA version difference doesn't really matter in this case.

Robert Royall wrote:

It will throw an error if Textbox1 is empty, since you can't coerce a comparison with an empty string (or a null).

IMHO it will NOT throw only if the Textbox1.Text value can be coerced to a number (i.e. Runtime Error if Textbox1.Text is equal to "foo"). :)

If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
[my articles]

CPallini

In fact I like a lot of weird things... ;)

If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
[my articles]

Robert Royall

CPallini wrote:

Runtime Error if Textbox1.Text is equal to "foo"

But... why on earth would that throw a Runtime Error? F00 is 3840... :wtf:

Please don't bother me... I'm hacking right now. Don't look at me like that - doesn't anybody remember what "hacking" really means? :sigh:

CPallini

Because VB isn't such smart on number representations :-D

If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
[my articles]

SalarSoft

CPallini wrote:

Unfortunately I have no VB6 at hand.

You're lucky! ;P

CPallini

Nope. http://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/View.aspx?fid=392254&msg=2393634[^] :-D

If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
[my articles]

Vasudevan Deepak Kumar

SalarSoft wrote:

VB.NET

That is why it is Very Bad.

Vasudevan Deepak Kumar Personal Homepage
Tech Gossips
A pessimist sees only the dark side of the clouds, and mopes; a philosopher sees both sides, and shrugs; an optimist doesn't see the clouds at all - he's walking on them. --Leonard Louis Levinson