Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Weird and The Wonderful
  4. Professional conditions with IF

Professional conditions with IF

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Weird and The Wonderful
csharphelpquestion
26 Posts 13 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S SalarSoft

    One of our former staff wrote this professional IF clause in VB.NET(Hell language) IF TextBox1.Text=1 or 2 or 3 THEN ' Go to hell END IF :wtf: I tried to write codes like this, but couldn't. Can you help to write? :omg:

    J Offline
    J Offline
    jhwurmbach
    wrote on last edited by
    #8

    SalarSoft wrote:

    IF TextBox1.Text=1 or 2 or 3 THEN

    Being VB illiterate... This does work as I fear it does? It sets the TextBox1.text to be "1" and then branches into the THEN, because 2 is equal to TRUE?

    Let's think the unthinkable, let's do the undoable, let's prepare to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may not eff it after all.
    Douglas Adams, "Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency"

    C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • J jhwurmbach

      SalarSoft wrote:

      IF TextBox1.Text=1 or 2 or 3 THEN

      Being VB illiterate... This does work as I fear it does? It sets the TextBox1.text to be "1" and then branches into the THEN, because 2 is equal to TRUE?

      Let's think the unthinkable, let's do the undoable, let's prepare to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may not eff it after all.
      Douglas Adams, "Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency"

      C Offline
      C Offline
      CPallini
      wrote on last edited by
      #9

      jhwurmbach wrote:

      It sets the TextBox1.text to be "1"

      Nope. Since it follows the IF statement, VB evaluates TextBox1.Text=1 as a conditional expression (I don't know if it results in a run-time error).

      jhwurmbach wrote:

      and then branches into the THEN, because 2 is equal to TRUE?

      Yes. :)

      If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
      [my articles]

      R 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • C CPallini

        jhwurmbach wrote:

        It sets the TextBox1.text to be "1"

        Nope. Since it follows the IF statement, VB evaluates TextBox1.Text=1 as a conditional expression (I don't know if it results in a run-time error).

        jhwurmbach wrote:

        and then branches into the THEN, because 2 is equal to TRUE?

        Yes. :)

        If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
        [my articles]

        R Offline
        R Offline
        Robert Royall
        wrote on last edited by
        #10

        CPallini wrote:

        (I don't know if it results in a run-time error)

        It shouldn't; nearly all flavors of VB automatically coerce numerics into strings.

        Please don't bother me... I'm hacking right now. Don't look at me like that - doesn't anybody remember what "hacking" really means? :sigh:

        C 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • R Robert Royall

          CPallini wrote:

          (I don't know if it results in a run-time error)

          It shouldn't; nearly all flavors of VB automatically coerce numerics into strings.

          Please don't bother me... I'm hacking right now. Don't look at me like that - doesn't anybody remember what "hacking" really means? :sigh:

          C Offline
          C Offline
          CPallini
          wrote on last edited by
          #11

          Robert Royall wrote:

          It shouldn't; nearly all flavors of VB automatically coerce numerics into strings.

          I was quite confident about too, but my VBA actually doesn't like the mix. Unfortunately I have no VB6 at hand. :)

          If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
          [my articles]

          R L S 3 Replies Last reply
          0
          • C CPallini

            Robert Royall wrote:

            It shouldn't; nearly all flavors of VB automatically coerce numerics into strings.

            I was quite confident about too, but my VBA actually doesn't like the mix. Unfortunately I have no VB6 at hand. :)

            If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
            [my articles]

            R Offline
            R Offline
            Robert Royall
            wrote on last edited by
            #12

            Really? Works fine for me in Access 2003. It will throw an error if Textbox1 is empty, since you can't coerce a comparison with an empty string (or a null).

            Please don't bother me... I'm hacking right now. Don't look at me like that - doesn't anybody remember what "hacking" really means? :sigh:

            C 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • C CPallini

              Robert Royall wrote:

              It shouldn't; nearly all flavors of VB automatically coerce numerics into strings.

              I was quite confident about too, but my VBA actually doesn't like the mix. Unfortunately I have no VB6 at hand. :)

              If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
              [my articles]

              L Offline
              L Offline
              Luc Pattyn
              wrote on last edited by
              #13

              CPallini wrote:

              Unfortunately I have no VB6 at hand

              Unfortunately X|

              Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]


              This month's tips: - before you ask a question here, search CodeProject, then Google; - the quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get; - use PRE tags to preserve formatting when showing multi-line code snippets.


              C 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • C CPallini

                Did you sack her for?

                If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
                [my articles]

                S Offline
                S Offline
                SalarSoft
                wrote on last edited by
                #14

                No, we deported her and her friend cause they didn't skilled and they did lots of such mistakes ( I remember their nightmare creatures ). For example she named a function to something like this "girgo". X| Because of this naming, my friends named her "girgo". :laugh: Now the corporation focused on C#

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • R Robert Royall

                  Really? Works fine for me in Access 2003. It will throw an error if Textbox1 is empty, since you can't coerce a comparison with an empty string (or a null).

                  Please don't bother me... I'm hacking right now. Don't look at me like that - doesn't anybody remember what "hacking" really means? :sigh:

                  C Offline
                  C Offline
                  CPallini
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #15

                  Robert Royall wrote:

                  Really?

                  Yes.

                  Robert Royall wrote:

                  Works fine for me in Access 2003.

                  I'm using Excel 2002. But I think that VBA version difference doesn't really matter in this case.

                  Robert Royall wrote:

                  It will throw an error if Textbox1 is empty, since you can't coerce a comparison with an empty string (or a null).

                  IMHO it will NOT throw only if the Textbox1.Text value can be coerced to a number (i.e. Runtime Error if Textbox1.Text is equal to "foo"). :)

                  If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
                  [my articles]

                  R 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L Luc Pattyn

                    CPallini wrote:

                    Unfortunately I have no VB6 at hand

                    Unfortunately X|

                    Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]


                    This month's tips: - before you ask a question here, search CodeProject, then Google; - the quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get; - use PRE tags to preserve formatting when showing multi-line code snippets.


                    C Offline
                    C Offline
                    CPallini
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #16

                    In fact I like a lot of weird things... ;)

                    If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
                    [my articles]

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • C CPallini

                      Robert Royall wrote:

                      Really?

                      Yes.

                      Robert Royall wrote:

                      Works fine for me in Access 2003.

                      I'm using Excel 2002. But I think that VBA version difference doesn't really matter in this case.

                      Robert Royall wrote:

                      It will throw an error if Textbox1 is empty, since you can't coerce a comparison with an empty string (or a null).

                      IMHO it will NOT throw only if the Textbox1.Text value can be coerced to a number (i.e. Runtime Error if Textbox1.Text is equal to "foo"). :)

                      If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
                      [my articles]

                      R Offline
                      R Offline
                      Robert Royall
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #17

                      CPallini wrote:

                      Runtime Error if Textbox1.Text is equal to "foo"

                      But... why on earth would that throw a Runtime Error? F00 is 3840... :wtf:

                      Please don't bother me... I'm hacking right now. Don't look at me like that - doesn't anybody remember what "hacking" really means? :sigh:

                      C 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • R Robert Royall

                        CPallini wrote:

                        Runtime Error if Textbox1.Text is equal to "foo"

                        But... why on earth would that throw a Runtime Error? F00 is 3840... :wtf:

                        Please don't bother me... I'm hacking right now. Don't look at me like that - doesn't anybody remember what "hacking" really means? :sigh:

                        C Offline
                        C Offline
                        CPallini
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #18

                        Because VB isn't such smart on number representations :-D

                        If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
                        [my articles]

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • C CPallini

                          Robert Royall wrote:

                          It shouldn't; nearly all flavors of VB automatically coerce numerics into strings.

                          I was quite confident about too, but my VBA actually doesn't like the mix. Unfortunately I have no VB6 at hand. :)

                          If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
                          [my articles]

                          S Offline
                          S Offline
                          SalarSoft
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #19

                          CPallini wrote:

                          Unfortunately I have no VB6 at hand.

                          You're lucky! ;P

                          C 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • S SalarSoft

                            CPallini wrote:

                            Unfortunately I have no VB6 at hand.

                            You're lucky! ;P

                            C Offline
                            C Offline
                            CPallini
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #20

                            Nope. http://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/View.aspx?fid=392254&msg=2393634[^] :-D

                            If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
                            [my articles]

                            U 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • S SalarSoft

                              One of our former staff wrote this professional IF clause in VB.NET(Hell language) IF TextBox1.Text=1 or 2 or 3 THEN ' Go to hell END IF :wtf: I tried to write codes like this, but couldn't. Can you help to write? :omg:

                              V Offline
                              V Offline
                              Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #21

                              SalarSoft wrote:

                              VB.NET

                              That is why it is Very Bad.

                              Vasudevan Deepak Kumar Personal Homepage
                              Tech Gossips
                              A pessimist sees only the dark side of the clouds, and mopes; a philosopher sees both sides, and shrugs; an optimist doesn't see the clouds at all - he's walking on them. --Leonard Louis Levinson

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • R Rich Insley

                                It's not uncommon at all to see coders express their frustrations in the code they write. For an entertaining afternoon of reading, go to http://www.google.com/codesearch[^] and enter the profanity of your choice. You'd be amazed what people say.

                                J Offline
                                J Offline
                                John R Shaw
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #22

                                :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: Thanks for the link, I needed a good laugh. ;)

                                INTP "Program testing can be used to show the presence of bugs, but never to show their absence."Edsger Dijkstra

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • R Rich Insley

                                  It's not uncommon at all to see coders express their frustrations in the code they write. For an entertaining afternoon of reading, go to http://www.google.com/codesearch[^] and enter the profanity of your choice. You'd be amazed what people say.

                                  P Offline
                                  P Offline
                                  Paul Conrad
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #23

                                  JohnnyLocust wrote:

                                  http://www.google.com/codesearch

                                  Very interesting. Put in my name and found an old Java program I wrote back in college.

                                  "I guess it's what separates the professionals from the drag and drop, girly wirly, namby pamby, wishy washy, can't code for crap types." - Pete O'Hanlon

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • C CPallini

                                    Nope. http://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/View.aspx?fid=392254&msg=2393634[^] :-D

                                    If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
                                    [my articles]

                                    U Offline
                                    U Offline
                                    User 2558377
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #24

                                    This kind of thing is standard shortcut syntax in COBOL (or was when I last used COBOL many years ago): IF X = 1 OR 2 THEN... is the same as IF X = 1 OR X = 2 THEN... The big gotcha comes when you add a NOT into the mix. All new COBOL programmers would at some point write a statement like: IF X NOT = 1 OR 2 THEN.. which unfortunately expands to IF X NOT = 1 OR X NOT = 2 THEN.. so the condition is always satisfied. Some of those beginners learn from the experience and don't make the mistake again. Others, however....

                                    C 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • U User 2558377

                                      This kind of thing is standard shortcut syntax in COBOL (or was when I last used COBOL many years ago): IF X = 1 OR 2 THEN... is the same as IF X = 1 OR X = 2 THEN... The big gotcha comes when you add a NOT into the mix. All new COBOL programmers would at some point write a statement like: IF X NOT = 1 OR 2 THEN.. which unfortunately expands to IF X NOT = 1 OR X NOT = 2 THEN.. so the condition is always satisfied. Some of those beginners learn from the experience and don't make the mistake again. Others, however....

                                      C Offline
                                      C Offline
                                      CPallini
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #25

                                      Member 2560472 wrote:

                                      Some of those beginners learn from the experience

                                      ...and quicky abandon COBOL. :laugh:

                                      If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
                                      [my articles]

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • R Rich Insley

                                        It's not uncommon at all to see coders express their frustrations in the code they write. For an entertaining afternoon of reading, go to http://www.google.com/codesearch[^] and enter the profanity of your choice. You'd be amazed what people say.

                                        T Offline
                                        T Offline
                                        TheGreatAndPowerfulOz
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #26

                                        Buttmunch

                                        Silence is the voice of complicity. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. -- monty python Might I suggest that the universe was always the size of the cosmos. It is just that at one point the cosmos was the size of a marble. -- Colin Angus Mackay

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        Reply
                                        • Reply as topic
                                        Log in to reply
                                        • Oldest to Newest
                                        • Newest to Oldest
                                        • Most Votes


                                        • Login

                                        • Don't have an account? Register

                                        • Login or register to search.
                                        • First post
                                          Last post
                                        0
                                        • Categories
                                        • Recent
                                        • Tags
                                        • Popular
                                        • World
                                        • Users
                                        • Groups