Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Another JOTD

Another JOTD

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
comquestionhtmlsysadmintools
17 Posts 13 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • H Hans Dietrich

    After having dug to a depth of 10 meters last year, Scottish scientists found traces of copper wire dating back 100 years and came to the conclusion that their ancestors already had a telephone network more than 100 years ago. Not to be outdone by the Scots, in the weeks that followed, British scientists dug to a depth of 20 meters, and shortly after, headlines in the UK newspapers read: "British archaeologists have found traces of 200 year old copper wire and have concluded that their ancestors already had an advanced high-tech communications network a hundred years earlier than the Scots". One week later, a redneck hillbilly in a Kentucky newsletter reported the following, “After digging as deep as 30 meters in a tobacco field near Possum Creek, Ole Zeke, a self-taught archaeologist, reported that he found absolutely nothing. Ole Zeke has therefore concluded that 300 years ago, Kentucky had already gone wireless.”

    Best wishes, Hans


    [CodeProject Forum Guidelines] [How To Ask A Question] [My Articles]

    M Offline
    M Offline
    mmikey7
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    Hans Dietrich wrote:

    Ole Zeke has therefore concluded that 300 years ago, Kentucky had already gone wireless.”

    I didn't see that coming :laugh: :laugh:

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • H Hans Dietrich

      After having dug to a depth of 10 meters last year, Scottish scientists found traces of copper wire dating back 100 years and came to the conclusion that their ancestors already had a telephone network more than 100 years ago. Not to be outdone by the Scots, in the weeks that followed, British scientists dug to a depth of 20 meters, and shortly after, headlines in the UK newspapers read: "British archaeologists have found traces of 200 year old copper wire and have concluded that their ancestors already had an advanced high-tech communications network a hundred years earlier than the Scots". One week later, a redneck hillbilly in a Kentucky newsletter reported the following, “After digging as deep as 30 meters in a tobacco field near Possum Creek, Ole Zeke, a self-taught archaeologist, reported that he found absolutely nothing. Ole Zeke has therefore concluded that 300 years ago, Kentucky had already gone wireless.”

      Best wishes, Hans


      [CodeProject Forum Guidelines] [How To Ask A Question] [My Articles]

      V Offline
      V Offline
      Vikram A Punathambekar
      wrote on last edited by
      #4

      I heard this about the Soviets finding copper wire; the Americans, optical fibres; and us Indians, nothing.

      Cheers, Vikram.


      Zeppelin's law: In any Soapbox discussion involving Stan Shannon, the probability of the term "leftist" or "Marxist" appearing approaches 1 monotonically. Harris' addendum: I think you meant "monotonously". Martin's second addendum: Jeffersonian... I think that should at least get a mention.

      C 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • V Vikram A Punathambekar

        I heard this about the Soviets finding copper wire; the Americans, optical fibres; and us Indians, nothing.

        Cheers, Vikram.


        Zeppelin's law: In any Soapbox discussion involving Stan Shannon, the probability of the term "leftist" or "Marxist" appearing approaches 1 monotonically. Harris' addendum: I think you meant "monotonously". Martin's second addendum: Jeffersonian... I think that should at least get a mention.

        C Offline
        C Offline
        Colin Angus Mackay
        wrote on last edited by
        #5

        :-D ;P

        Upcoming FREE developer events: * Developer Day Scotland Recent blog posts: * Mixins in C#3.0 My website | Blog

        E B 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • C Colin Angus Mackay

          :-D ;P

          Upcoming FREE developer events: * Developer Day Scotland Recent blog posts: * Mixins in C#3.0 My website | Blog

          E Offline
          E Offline
          Ed Poore
          wrote on last edited by
          #6

          Ach noo, I think you wouldn't mind being British, it's when they insult us by calling us English, that's the problem. On a side note, apparently the shooting internationals are interesting, no-one cares who wins as long as it's not the English.  After all they are the invaders, everyone else is Celtic.

          G Z 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • C Colin Angus Mackay

            :-D ;P

            Upcoming FREE developer events: * Developer Day Scotland Recent blog posts: * Mixins in C#3.0 My website | Blog

            B Offline
            B Offline
            Baconbutty
            wrote on last edited by
            #7

            If I remember correctly, being a resident of York (UK for non-Brits), I am allowed to shoot Scotsmen if they are carrying a bow and arrow within the city walls. However, when checking on the worldwideinterweb thing the exact conditions appear confusing so I probably won't put it to the test.

            I still remember having to write your own code in FORTRAN rather than be a cut and paste merchant being pampered by colour coded Intellisense - ahh proper programming - those were the days :)

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • E Ed Poore

              Ach noo, I think you wouldn't mind being British, it's when they insult us by calling us English, that's the problem. On a side note, apparently the shooting internationals are interesting, no-one cares who wins as long as it's not the English.  After all they are the invaders, everyone else is Celtic.

              G Offline
              G Offline
              GuyThiebaut
              wrote on last edited by
              #8

              Ed.Poore wrote:

              no-one cares who wins as long as it's not the English

              This reminded me of the following: Open google and type the following string into the search field "french military victories" then press the "I'm feeling lucky" button.

              You always pass failure on the way to success.
              B E T R R 5 Replies Last reply
              0
              • G GuyThiebaut

                Ed.Poore wrote:

                no-one cares who wins as long as it's not the English

                This reminded me of the following: Open google and type the following string into the search field "french military victories" then press the "I'm feeling lucky" button.

                You always pass failure on the way to success.
                B Offline
                B Offline
                Baconbutty
                wrote on last edited by
                #9

                hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

                I still remember having to write your own code in FORTRAN rather than be a cut and paste merchant being pampered by colour coded Intellisense - ahh proper programming - those were the days :)

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • G GuyThiebaut

                  Ed.Poore wrote:

                  no-one cares who wins as long as it's not the English

                  This reminded me of the following: Open google and type the following string into the search field "french military victories" then press the "I'm feeling lucky" button.

                  You always pass failure on the way to success.
                  E Offline
                  E Offline
                  Ed Poore
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #10

                  There used to be another one that took you to Bush or Blair's home page.


                  My Blog[^]

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • G GuyThiebaut

                    Ed.Poore wrote:

                    no-one cares who wins as long as it's not the English

                    This reminded me of the following: Open google and type the following string into the search field "french military victories" then press the "I'm feeling lucky" button.

                    You always pass failure on the way to success.
                    T Offline
                    T Offline
                    TheGreatAndPowerfulOz
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #11

                    GuyThiebaut wrote:

                    "french military victories"

                    hilarious! :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • G GuyThiebaut

                      Ed.Poore wrote:

                      no-one cares who wins as long as it's not the English

                      This reminded me of the following: Open google and type the following string into the search field "french military victories" then press the "I'm feeling lucky" button.

                      You always pass failure on the way to success.
                      R Offline
                      R Offline
                      Rajesh R Subramanian
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      GuyThiebaut wrote:

                      Open google and type the following string into the search field "french military victories" then press the "I'm feeling lucky" button.

                      Have you tried typing "Find Chuck Norris" in Google and pressing the I'm feeling lucky button? :suss:

                      Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero .·´¯`·->Rajesh<-·´¯`·. Codeproject.com: Visual C++ MVP

                      G 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • R Rajesh R Subramanian

                        GuyThiebaut wrote:

                        Open google and type the following string into the search field "french military victories" then press the "I'm feeling lucky" button.

                        Have you tried typing "Find Chuck Norris" in Google and pressing the I'm feeling lucky button? :suss:

                        Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero .·´¯`·->Rajesh<-·´¯`·. Codeproject.com: Visual C++ MVP

                        G Offline
                        G Offline
                        GuyThiebaut
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #13

                        :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: nice one.

                        You always pass failure on the way to success.
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • E Ed Poore

                          Ach noo, I think you wouldn't mind being British, it's when they insult us by calling us English, that's the problem. On a side note, apparently the shooting internationals are interesting, no-one cares who wins as long as it's not the English.  After all they are the invaders, everyone else is Celtic.

                          Z Offline
                          Z Offline
                          Zhat
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #14

                          Would you rather be called french??? :wtf:

                          C 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Z Zhat

                            Would you rather be called french??? :wtf:

                            C Offline
                            C Offline
                            Colin Angus Mackay
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #15

                            Member 4085226 wrote:

                            Would you rather be called french???

                            For many years, prior to the union with England, all Scots were automatically dual nationals Scots and French.

                            Upcoming FREE developer events: * Developer Day Scotland Recent blog posts: * Mixins in C#3.0 My website | Blog

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • G GuyThiebaut

                              Ed.Poore wrote:

                              no-one cares who wins as long as it's not the English

                              This reminded me of the following: Open google and type the following string into the search field "french military victories" then press the "I'm feeling lucky" button.

                              You always pass failure on the way to success.
                              R Offline
                              R Offline
                              Rage
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #16

                              mmmhh .. No comment. :rolleyes:

                              ~RaGE();

                              I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus
                              Do not feed the troll ! - Common proverb

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • H Hans Dietrich

                                After having dug to a depth of 10 meters last year, Scottish scientists found traces of copper wire dating back 100 years and came to the conclusion that their ancestors already had a telephone network more than 100 years ago. Not to be outdone by the Scots, in the weeks that followed, British scientists dug to a depth of 20 meters, and shortly after, headlines in the UK newspapers read: "British archaeologists have found traces of 200 year old copper wire and have concluded that their ancestors already had an advanced high-tech communications network a hundred years earlier than the Scots". One week later, a redneck hillbilly in a Kentucky newsletter reported the following, “After digging as deep as 30 meters in a tobacco field near Possum Creek, Ole Zeke, a self-taught archaeologist, reported that he found absolutely nothing. Ole Zeke has therefore concluded that 300 years ago, Kentucky had already gone wireless.”

                                Best wishes, Hans


                                [CodeProject Forum Guidelines] [How To Ask A Question] [My Articles]

                                H Offline
                                H Offline
                                hairy_hats
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #17

                                Hans Dietrich wrote:

                                Scottish scientists found traces of copper wire dating back 100 years

                                I was expecting the "two Scotsmen fighting over a penny" joke. :sigh:

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Don't have an account? Register

                                • Login or register to search.
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • World
                                • Users
                                • Groups